Glad you found it useful!
Actually, I had just been wondering if anyone even read it. Since it was a bit off-topic, I thought everyone might have just read the post title, dug that Helios took one, hit upvote and moved on... lol
Always look at the depth of the quake. Anything under 10 km should draw attention as artificial, either HAARP-induced or underground nuclear detonation.
The linked article lists it as 9.7 km, but they're lying and trying to push it deeper to avoid suspicion. The wiki page for the quake admits it to be a very shallow 4.7 km, and This database entry lists it as at an even more shallow 4 km. Wiki also states it's the biggest quake to hit the area in two and a half centuries, so it should draw our due attention.
The USGS themselves, in a very roundabout way, admit to the anomalous nature of sub-10km quakes in this article:
Why do so many earthquakes occur at a depth of 10km?
Ten kilometers is a "fixed depth". Sometimes data are too poor to compute a reliable depth for an earthquake. In such cases, the depth is assigned to be 10 km. Why that number? In many areas around the world, reliable depths tend to average 10 km or close to it.
Shallow quakes are "masked" in this way, making their detection even more rare. That paragraph ends with this:
So if we don't know the depth, 10 km is a reasonable guess. The USGS used to use 33 km, but increased understanding indicates that 10 km is more likely.
Meaningful? Who knows, but funny to see!
If I had to bet, I'd say one or more DUMBs just got nuked. We'd have to look at the seismographs for the hallmark sharp onset to be sure, but I'm way too lazy to do that.
Additional info casting a lot of shade on this shady organization:
Why Palestinians don’t trust World Central Kitchen, with Ali Abunimah and Asa Winstanley (YT 4/4/2024)
I actually skipped past that video on my YT homepage, dismissing it as some kind of bizarre and desperate Zio black propaganda. Turns out nothing is too devious and diabolical for this crowd.
Yes, I basically would have given the same answer, that it stems from some sort of semi-conscious instinct.
We see the fabric of society, even civilization itself, fraying and unraveling before our eyes, and the reaction is to resist it and move in the opposite direction, cleaning up our acts in even the smallest ways.
Frankly, these dark times have caused me to become friendlier and cheerier than I ever have in my life. I've got a smile for everyone I see, and a kind word and a humorous comment for everyone I chance to talk to. I feel this deep, inner drive to do that, like it's the least I can do for humanity.
Sun Tzu pointed out that all warfare is based on deception, and what is the ultimate deception, even beyond anything discussed in his book? To keep the enemy unaware that he is under attack.
Even just a few decades ago, only a handful were aware that there were active, organized, covert campaigns against various groups. Now, everywhere you look, hundreds of millions are aware of such things. Nothing seems to stand in the way of there soon being billions.
If there's a point to the wildfire of that awareness, I completely fail to see what it is.
Over just the last few years, I've really slowed down on sch things and I'm conscious of it every time I do it. I'll even substitute by actually saying "OMG" or "herr merr gerd" out loud, and--while such expressions are humorous in themselves--I'm quite aware of what I'm avoiding.
Some years ago, I stumbled across the theory that Jackie did it, and the main source was on this site: http://jackiekilledjfk.webs.com/. That site died fairly recently, but you can still get to the content on archives.
As shocking as that sounds, the thesis is surprisingly simple and the evidence for it fairly straightforward. After that, I started paying very close attention to researchers discussing the assassination, to see how they addressed that same evidence. Plot twist: they did not.
What I came to realize was this: in order to cover up the truth, the CIA themselves (presumably) became the overwhelming contributors to conspiracy research on JFK. At a guess, they're responsible for maybe 80% of the primary research, then perhaps a further 15% of "honest" is based on that. The point is, though, that with all the voluminous publication, it is crafted so that none of it will lead back to the ultimate truth about Jackie. Here we are 60 years later and we see that it has been incredibly effective.
I view what goes on with Fetzer and so many others that fall into this trap as a "cycles within cycles" phenomenon. That is, suppose you think that the planets go around in perfect circles just as God intended. Inevitably, you'll begin to see anomalies. The fix? Well, as they go around in big perfect circles, they also go around in little perfect circles on that track, just as God intended. And then maybe also in smaller perfect circles than that. See how it goes? The thought never occurs, "Maybe it's not perfect circles?"
So we end up with racks and shelves of JFK research, and all of it could be true but it will never get you to where you should go.
If you're interested, I somehow stumbled across someone summarizing the Jackie story on some kind of rando sports podcast a year ago:
Conspiracy Theories with Cousin Brother Matt: The Assassination of JFK
Chris Knowles, for all his knowledge of symbology, appears to have skipped over an important interpretation in the numerology of this event.
He identifies that the destruction was just after the bridge's 47th birthday, and then loosely attributes that to some association with Freemasons and Euclid's 47th Proposition.
This strikes me as needlessly esoteric, given a much more recent and frequently used "signature". That is, the National Security Act was passed in 1947, giving the US and the rest of the world the global Gitmo Nation in which we live today. It was Year One of the modern CIA, responsible for so many of these "events". They love to sign their work and, once alerted to this, you will find "47" occurring with astonishing frequency.
The question arises: can Chris Knowles, with all his recognition of symbolism and apparent depth of knowledge, really be unaware of this notation of "47", or consider it unimportant to mention in this context? I leave it to everyone to decide for themselves whether that reasonably may be the case.
FWIW to anyone, I'm a big fan of Jim Fetzer and have followed his work for many years--since Duff and the VT days--but I'm certain he's way, way, way off on this. When I hear him talk about the JFK assassination, it's so erroneous I feel personally, well, unsettled is perhaps the word.
He's so far off that I've tried fitting the thesis that he was an extremely deep cover disinfo agent, but would They go so far as to have him write an authoritative expose on Sandy Hoax, then try to erase it from existence and preclude anyone from ever knowing it was written? No, that's way too far.
Jim Fetzer is highly intelligent, knowledgeable, and experienced--among the very best out there, IMHO--but he can still get things dead wrong--again, IMHO. I suppose the point here is that it would be instructive to examine exactly how that state of affairs came to be, but the much bigger point is that all of us should step carefully in our research, most particularly when we're sure we have it right.
This story is floating around out there, from a site most discount as fictional, and even the article itself admits the rumor has not been confirmed:
White Hats Suggest Dali Unmanned at Time of Collision (RRN 3/27/2024)
The remote piloting of a "ghost ship" to a fairly small target is probably not that easy, so that would explain the steering corrections. The power loss would then just be someone flicking the switch on and off to create the cover story. Then they had to erase part of the black box to destroy record of all the things the crew would never do and lack of actions they would certainly take.
And supposedly a harbor pilot was in control, so shouldn't we have heard all about him? You know, the standard rumors about how he was secretly gay and suicidal an a religious zealot? Nope, no discussion of him.
Maybe that's because there was no pilot on board, or anyone else.
Very good video. Always interesting to hear someone competent talk about their area of expertise and experience.
To back up another step before we even get to the issue of steering, we should ask why any steering was necessary, even if the power went out? That is, the ship was running straight ahead directly between the pylons with the rudder presumably amidships when the power went out. I further suspect the rudder is basically "locked" into place when the hydraulic pumps are not actually running.
Given their incredible momentum, turning, slowing, and stopping huge ships like that are big tasks. I wouldn't be surprised if the stopping distance for such a ship would be half a mile or more and several minutes before you'd ever have to think about it drifting around in the current, which--given that it was in a river--would just be further towards the sea.
You're right, they're definitely all over the world, and just as a preview of a future post....
I knew these people came originally from England, but I have so little familiarity with that history. Then recently, someone mentioned the current Queen and I suddenly realized her name is Camilla Parker Bowles. "Oh FFS", I thought, "that's gotta just be a coincidence, right?"
So I did the research and you can guess the result.
What we're seeing are Christian Zionists, and it's becoming clear that the existence and influence of this group was one of the Big Secrets all along. It's not that you get censored for mentioning them, it's just that somehow, some way, no one ever does. That's how the Big Secrets are actually handled.
You know who apparently has turned out to be one, of all people? The American Badass himself, Kid Rock:
Joe Rogan and Kid Rock clash over how Israel should win war against Gaza: ‘That’s actually a war crime’ (NY Post 2/26/2024)
Kid Rock and Joe Rogan clashed over the Israel-Hamas war, with the rock star declaring on Rogan’s podcast that Israel should begin killing civilians in Gaza up to “40,000 a f–king time” if it wants to win the war. “Only wars we won were f–king ones where we were the most brutal motherf–kers on the planet,” Kid Rock said on Thursday’s episode of “The Joe Rogan Experience.”
I mean, where in the hell else would someone you presume to be an America Firster get such outrageous ideas about a foreign war between Heebs and Muzzies? Plus, who the fuck is "we" exactly, Mr. Rock?
Christian Zionists is your answer.
On a "meta" level, keeping the popularity of conspiracy theory out of the general consciousness is actually an important--even vital--part of the conspiracies themselves.
The idea concerns something called "common knowledge of the fraud". That is, when confronted by some fraud (or here, conspiracy theory), your thoughts and actions will differ greatly based simply on whether you estimate that understanding to be common knowledge, or that you stand alone or with few others.
I see "conspiracy theorists" constantly congratulating themselves on their knowledge of conspiracies, which always indicates to me they completely fail to understand this aspect. Personal knowledge is necessary, but hardly sufficient.
I think the big secret surrounding Israel's nuclear arsenal is that it pretty much doesn't exist.
There used to be a trope in old 70's TV shows where a guy would threaten a dude with a bulge in his jacket pocket that concealed a revolver. Of course, you don't actually need a revolver if the other guy assumes you have one.
I believe that's what we have here. If you look around, there are a handful of analysts that suspect the same thing. When you carefully search for the specific concrete evidence of the arsenal, you find it's a mirage.
That being said, it's a long and untold story but they stole about 50 devices of 5kT each (from the US, of course) at the beginning of 2019. One of them was used on Port Said. They also appear to have discreetly used a few of them in the current war.
But the thing is, why would you need to steal a few very small nukes if you supposedly had a bunch of big ones at your disposal, and the capability of manufacturing any more that you need? It strongly implies the opposite.
Right, I think that's an excellent point.
Also, I think when the NSDAP founded the Ahnenerbe and that group started looking all around the world asking questions like, "Wait--who were the Aryans exactly? And where did they come from? And what what do we find in history when we start tracing back along their path?", and then they started finding answers to those questions, well, somebody somewhere said, "Okay, we gotta shut that shit down!"
Now the whole narrative boils down to "racial supremacists eugenically breeding a race of occult supermen". And people now "know" that for a fact.
Wow, I'm going to have to study your Einstein post.
Actually, my first "love" was science, but a few years ago I realized that I was lucky never to have ended up with a career in mainstream science. I see how polluted and suppressed and inverted it has all become, and I'm sure I would have gotten deranged right along with it.
As to the muzzling of Einstein, you're not going to believe it (but maybe at this point it's somehow not surprising) but it connects to the Parkers one more time. I'm dead serious.
The Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation paid for an assistant (i.e. handler) for Einstein. That Macy family was connected to Nantucket and tied up with the Parker family all the way back in the late 1700's. Details and links are in a post I wrote just two days ago (freaky, right?):
I already linked that post, but the occurrence of Einstein was (I thought) pretty trivial and purely incidental. If you noticed it there and that's.what put you in mind of Einstein, then it's not so freaky. Really, I kind of hope that's the case... lol. Hard to keep track of who said what to who and when.
Such strange and enigmatic doings are revealed when you start kicking over rocks, eh? It makes you think that all the blank spots of history that we all assumed were only boring people doing nothing of note is totally wrong.
I think the Hunter S. Thompson lead is a red herring. He's my favorite author and I have read a ton of his work. "They" have very subtly tried to blackwash him since his extremely suspicious "suicide". IMHO, he was smart, observant, and a gifted writer with a huge, dedicated audience.
I have come to understand that he moved to Woody Creek to be a sort of renunciate from the dark world he found he could do little to repair. Eventually, I believe he began waking up to the fact that the world was far darker than he had ever suspected. He began his career as a reporter, and I believe he felt himself to be a reporter all his life. His "gonzo journalism" was the best way he knew to convey the truth he found. The last stories he was working on were 911 and the White House Call Boy scandal.
Well, you can see how things are adding up here. Thompson eviscerated people he didn't care for, like Nixon, but we come to find Nixon was an errant clerk. What would Thompson have done with his talents against the real monsters? He had to go, and be left with a little stink around him so people looked no further.
As to good old Hunter, I would point you in another direction regarding his name, and it involves (you're not going to believe this) the Parkers yet again. I'm still trying to get around to writing up a post on the Parkers, but I'll hip you to this one connecting node.
The Parkers have been tied up since at least the late 1600's with a family called the Motts. For example, one of the nexus points is in the theft of the Kingdom of Hawaii. Study the page for the Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom all you like and you won't see them mentioned, but you can separately study the pages for Samuel Parker (Hawaii politician) and John Mott-Smith and you see two key players in the event floating around. They erase history by breaking the easy connections. (BTW, Mott's page mentions guy named Elisha Hunt Allen. Can't make this up!)
Anyway, the Mott family are the same Mott's of applesauce fame. If you look in the sidebar of that page, you'll see one of the founders was "Jamotia Hunter". This Hunter is mentioned nowhere else on the page, and the sidebar mention is not a hotlink. Strange, right? Another broken connection.
Mott's was founded in Bouckville, NY. About an hour due west lies Skaneateles, NY. Turns out that's the birthplace of (drum roll)... Neilia Biden, Joe's first wife, born as (drum roll)... Neilia Hunter.
So Hunter's middle name is his mother's maiden name, which these Elites do all the time. These towns are both on the eastern side of the Finger Lakes area of New York, and we've all had the displeasure of seeing the Ugliest Tattoo in the World on Hunter's back. So whatever is going on in the Finger Lakes area, it already makes me never want to go there.
You'll have to take my word for it, but there's tons more connections with a family named the Coffins, the Finger Lakes, Nantucket, etc. So the little bit I just wrote up may strike as tenuous, but for me it all drops in like the perfect Tetris piece.
I'd actually never heard of that movie before but I'll have to watch it.
I glanced at the wiki for it and saw that Armie Hammer was in it. I asked myself, "Was that the guy that wanted to eat some lady's toes?" So I searched "armie hammer toes" and yes, he was that guy, but even before that result there was this:
Son Sucks Armie Hammer's Toes In Video And Critics Call Actor A Heel (HuffPo 7/29/2019)
FFS, every f-ing time with these freaks.
"Might get some bread"... I love it! I'm going to use it in the future.
Actually, I write it this stuff up mostly to just instantiate it into the innerwebz, with the hope that someone somewhere sometime might stumble into it at just the right moment during a search.
Funnily enough, I actually confirmed the validity of that theory a while ago. I was searching for something--don't remember what--a reference I vaguely recalled and wanted to cite in a post. After a few searches, voila!, I found someone had written it up in a post on r/conspiracy.
It was just the writeup I was looking for. I was like four paragraphs in before I glanced up at the username and saw it was me... lol
Thanks for the tip!
As I was taking a look at the link, I noticed they give the architect as R.H. Hunt. Clicking over to his page, the three sample photos they give of his work are all obviously Tartarian.
It reminded me of a video I saw a while ago about the old Crystal Palace in London (now destroyed, of course). They give credit for the magnificent design to Sir Joseph Paxton, but it turns out the guy was barely qualified to do lawn maintenance.
It turns out all the other work they credit to Paxton was also Tartarian, so he was just a sock puppet. I suspect we have the same thing with Hunt and, thus, that the Lookout Mountain Hotel was Tartarian. Whatever they tell us about the origin and history of the hotel, we can virtually guarantee it was something other than that, right?
I also happened to notice that Hunt was born in Elbert County. We all know what monument stood there until it was recently blown up by parties unknown. I always thought the location of it had no significance, but maybe that's not the case. It's a tiny place, and the population of the whole county even today is only 20k. The college I went to was almost twice the size (not the town, just the students).
But what seals the case for me is this: a "Notable person" of the county was Danial Parker. He was the son of Captain John Parker. I just yesterday mentioned that man in a post:
That post got 7 upvotes and 4 downvotes. Okay, i get the 7 because not many people are interested in such long-winded talk. Don't upvote and don't read, right? But it also looks like parties unknown don't like when this type of material is brought into the light.
Anyway, thanks again!
It looks to me now to be that the MV Dali was remotely piloted into the bridge and no one was on board at the time. It's an application of the old pirate saying, "Non-existent men tell no tales."
The explanation for the MV Dali power loss under that thesis is simply that the remote hijackers "flicked the lights on and off" specifically and deliberately to create the circumstances for conspiracy theories.
Here, They did it again to the APL Qingdao just to convince normies that "ships lose power next to bridges all the time". They also wish to convince conspiracists that hijackers have the ability to interfere with power on ships, when the truth is of course far beyond that.
The rumor of the "ghost vessel" has been around since just after the event itself:
White Hats Suggest Dali Unmanned at Time of Collision (RRN 3/27/2024)
Well, it sounds nuts and can't possibly be independently substantiated. That is, until we get this innocuous article a week later in the mainstream press:
Dali container ship crew are STILL marooned on the stricken vessel in the Baltimore harbor a week since the Frances Scott Key Bridge collapsed with no plans for them to disembark but they do now have Wi-Fi (Daily Mail 4/2/2024)
If you examine the article carefully, you'll see there's no mention of anyone actually speaking to any member of the crew: no interviews by investigators, no comments to the press, no contacts with friends or family or port workers. (Similarly, in this APL Qingdao incident, we get a report from a tracking company from a report by a tugboat captain, not a statement from a ship's officer, company spokesperson, or investigator.)
Only one person single person even claims to have been aboard the Dali, in an indirect and bizarre way. I would say her statement is weird because it was made-up and she's a bad liar:
Why would they not have electricity and food? Why would they have to "settle in"? They live aboard this ship or similar vessels for weeks or months at a time, do they not? Then she adds:
So this ship crashed and, rather than viewing the damage or speaking with the officers, she goes and sees what's cooking (literally)? That dumb detail was the one that was supposed to subconsciously convince us her dumb story was real.