There are a lot of posts and pictures that grab attentions, but what do you think would be the definitive way to express most information in a single meme/post/documentary?
Conspiracies are many different topics, what would be the best one to share right now? What is the best way to do it?
Many of you have a lot of input to share, what would be the perfect way to do it in a single action?
What would the masses benefit from the most right now? What is the perfect message to send them?
It's not a message, per se, but in the proper environment I try to talk about my understanding of the world as if it were a matter of fact (which, of course, I fully believe it to be).
Manipulation is too strong a word, but there's an important dynamic at play. You see, normies are trained to recognize "authorities" as those speaking as authorities. Think of all your teachers in school, or the fancy people on TV, or politicians and government officials. Do they ever start with, "I'm not real sure, but..." or "You know, my opinion is..." or "You're a faggot if you don't think that..."? Nope, never. They just speak as if everything that came out of their mouths was undisputed, bedrock fact. The fact that the vast majority of it isn't just highlights the point.
Maybe the aim here is to tickle that little spot--in people who have it--that creates the thought, "Hang on a sec. Fuck, wait. Does this jackass actually know something I don't know about this, but should? Dammit, maybe I should pay attention for a second."
Seems like a molehill, but what a mountain to climb!
That's a person, who understands the assignment.
Alright. Let's try with WEF - they obviously popularize nonsense with their "you will own nothing and you will be happy", or "people are hackable animals"...
We can use these examples. Perhaps Schwab with the text "you will eat ze bugs" or "privacy is over"... Or Yuval with his "there's no such thing as a soul" or "people are hackable animals"...
How about a picture of Schwab with the text - "This one wants you to eat ze bugs, while he lives like a King from your ignorance" (Including details about Klaus Schwab in tiny text, so they can research... or even a QR code?)
Ones consent authorizes the suggested speech of another. Without authorizing suggested speech, one perceives sound.
What is the meaning of sound without authorized speech?
Because unless disputing...the listener gives consent to everything spoken.
Furthermore; the dispute about suggested speech is called "reasoning". All perceivable doesn't reason with ones perception...it implicates (if/then). Knowledge derives implication...standing-under (understanding) suggested tempts reason.