I suspect the guy just dropped his weapon, took off or put on a different colored shirt, put on/took off a hat, and blended into the crowd walking towards the venue to see that happened.
Takes some balls to do that, but--like with stage magic tricks--what's amazing is how much people do not notice about the world around them. Some guy dressed in all black sprinting away from the site of a shooting... well, that is the kind of thing that would be noticed.
I would point to that user as a perfect example of the level of consciousness of the vast majority of "conspiracy theorists".
At that level, you keep finding out how "right" you are and feel a compulsion to demonstrate that to others. Of course, there's no end to "evidence" that can be interpreted to prove that correctness, and it is impervious to all counterargument.
While this may strike many as the obvious endpoint of any conspiracy theory or science or reasoning itself, it isn't. As Richard Feynman put it:
In science, we are never right, just not proven wrong.
The search for the truth is finding out what you're wrong about and correcting yourself, hopefully with an idea that is--in some sense--less wrong.
Oh, there were no days off, any more than there are days off for the robots in "Westworld". Wouldn't even make sense as a concept in that context. Not just a useful comparison, either, since (long story) They were using that show to allegorically tell us how it used to be.
There is no clear and universal consensus on when the idea of a "sabbath" day came into human culture, but I found this passage quite intriguing:
The earliest extrabiblical attestation of Sabbath might occur in a 7th-century BCE ostracon discovered at the ancient fortress of Mesad Hashavyahu, which could refer to a servant doing certain kinds of work "before Sabbath" (lpny šbt).
In another incredibly long story, it turns out the whole world changed drastically around 600 BC, the same dating as this origin of the sabbath. It goes back once again to the Anunnaki, and the settlement of what is loosely known and widely misunderstood as the "war in heaven". The "peace treaty" went into effect at that time.
So in that scenario, the sabbath just came into being along with a couple of hundred other things that humans started thinking up, such as the very idea of writing down history. Big changes all around.
Related: When I first began researching the Anunnaki, I came across an item buried incredibly deeply in etymology that did a lot towards convincing me of their reality.
Ingrained so far down in culture that it has become subconscious is the separation between work and worship. There was a time in living memory when Christians called Sunday, "God's day". Chick-fil-A is still closed on that day, and that's an assload of chicken money to give up just to respect something no human is holding you to. Orthodox Jews live in buildings where the elevators run automatically during the Sabbath. The concept is in there deep.
Nor is it only a modern way of getting out of work. Two followers of Jesus were gathering wood on the Sabbath and the Jews wanted to f-ing kill them for it. Sure, we're largely fallen from the purer faith, but people take this concept really seriously.
So how surprised was I to find that the ancient Hebrew word "avodah" means both "work or service" and "worship or prayer". These two diametrically opposed concepts had been one and the same in the mists of the past. How could that be?
Well, to be brief, the Anunnaki created us as a slave species. These powerful aliens were as gods to these new humans. We can't really get in their heads as to how they thought about it, but their writing seems to indicate so. Does your dog think of you as a god? You sure have god-like powers and do things in mysterious ways.
There's the explanation of how work and worship were originally one and the same. They were literally doings gods' work.
Interesting tidbit about the Ukraine anti-corruption office: it was run by Americans.
I guess the justification was, "We're giving you all this free money so we need to see it's properly used." Under the Big Guy, though, I'm sure it was, "We're just making sure we're getting our piece of the action, capisce?"
Then Trump gets in and Zelensky shuts it down. I think they were worried a new set of Americans would come in and, you know, start looking for corruption... lol
"They" figured out long ago that if you control women, you control men. As Adam Weishaupt put it:
There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so, for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration.
Long after, George Orwell operationalized the same principle in 1984:
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.
Thank so much! You don't know how much I appreciate the support. I hope you find these posts both interesting and useful.
You have no idea how much of this material there is. A year ago, I might have said I had written up 20% of what I had notes on. Now, a year later and after much work, I would estimate it at 10%, maybe 5%... lol
I feel my poor browser may just implode one day, but real, not like the Titan.
Ha, hilarious coincidence! My next post is going to be about the Russells and the opium trade, and when I was researching for it today I came across this book:
The New Underworld Order (Christopher Story 749-page PDF)
On what the PDF refers to as page 74, you find:
Figure 14A: The Order of Skull and Bones, of which this is the symbol, was established at Yale in 1832-33 under the pirate (drug-running) flag of William H. Russell, used for his family firm's China operations.... The skull and crossbones is the symbol of death that is used on bottles of poison: and poisoning is classically the Illuminati's preferred method of 'liquidation'. The symbol is used on pirates' flags, and was the centrepiece of the Nazi Tofenkopf ('death's head') insignia of the Schutzstaffel, or SS. It was used in Prussia by elite soldiers as long ago as 1740....
Even that takes off in two different directions. The documentary "Ring of Power" mentioned that the mercenary Hessians of the wrong side of the American Revolution were from Hesse-Kassel, right next door to Prussia, and that it was a Rothschild who set up the enterprise.
Also just today in the course of the same research and tied up right alongside the same people, I ran across Daniel Coit Gilman who was responsible for bringing in the Prussian education system. That's the one that makes sure children become cogs in the Big Machine.
There's just no end to this heinous crap. I never even used any material from that PDF because the post is too long just with Wiki and Geni... lol
As it's shaping up, pretty much everything to do with "witchcraft" for at least a century, 1642-1735 as far as I've documented, was a gigantic psyop. You find these faker families as victims, accused, witnesses, judges, exonerated, executed, everything. I never even keep track.
That holds for both America and England, although I've written up very little about the action there. You can find a guy, Matthew Hopkins who started calling himself the "Witchfinder General" operating in Essex County, England in 1644. Salem is in Essex County, MA. These are all the same fakers. I touched on Matthew Hopkins briefly here:
A “Cabell” runs through the JFK assassination to UFOs to Thomas Jefferson to the Mueller investigation to the Mayflower and beyond (conspiracies.win 11/27/2024)
Almost all these people were embedded in the Puritan Great Migration, particularly 1635-1640. They were also involved in Quakerism, but I haven't sorted that all out yet. I kinda got the sense that they provoked these religious migrations just as cover to set up shop in a new place, kinda like what we saw with Zionism and Israel.
Are there any actual witches with actual magical powers in any of this? All I could say is that there is zero evidence I could point to. But pointing to someone and calling them a witch and wrecking them maybe was the 17th Century's version of pointing to someone and calling them a terrorist. That isn't proof it's real.
I've heard one interview a long time ago with John Lash Lamb. With Tracy, oddly enough I just listened to her last couple of interviews on The Higherside Chats. Her work with the ouija board is very interesting but problematic. She seemed to begin to get the idea that I have had firmly for a while. That is, you are really contacting discarnate entities, but you cannot and should not trust what they say.
I figured out a while ago that was the basis for the Bible's injunctions against "witchcraft". Like hand grenades and test tubes full of colorless liquid, that shit can be extremely dangerous unless you know exactly what you're doing. New rule: do not touch and stay away.
I mean, I feel bad for Tracy and, Jesus, she was a mom. I think she was under tremendous stress and was fucking with shit where she did not know exactly what she was fucking with, and that did not help her situation. RIP.
I watched the movie. Actually, I sought it out specifically after I had gotten a firm grounding in the Anunnaki. Someone mentioned that the movie had some reference to the subject.
As I was watching it, I thought, "Jiminy Christmas! Whoever wrote this sure knows a lot about the Anunnaki!" I really was shocked. Same thing looking back at the movie, "Stargate".
Since then--let's say a decade--I've been hyper alert to anyone making the connection between these two movies and the Anunnaki. Nothing.
From that I realized, "Yeah, They don't care about parading any of this in front of the public because no one has any idea what they're seeing. Probably just inflates the egos of the people that put it there."
Perhaps we simply misunderstand the nature of God and of just what the hell is going on in this Universe. Really, we should be questioning what our role in it should be.
If someone gets a D+ on their math test, it's probably not correct to conclude that mathematics is wrong and does not exist and people should stop talking about it. Maybe, but probably not.
There's a subtle and slow game going on. It's not just that Tulsi says it out loud, it's that the for real DNI says it in such a way and in the same tones as the normies are used to that get them to realize, "Yeah, that is some bullshit. They can't be doing that shit. Shut it down!"
Personally, I read it exactly the opposite way: They brought conspiracy theories into the mainstream because They are growing more desperate by the day. They are now the biggest and worst conspiracy theorists on the planet.
I don't see firing Joy Reid and Rachel Maddow and Stephen Colbert as any sort of 4D chess moves, but as sensible acts They could no longer prevent because Their control is and always has been incomplete.
Others may choose to interpret this is "all part of the Big Plan".
It was Colgan Air Flight 3407 and the woman that got in his face was Beverly Eckert. That photo isn't her, nor is it from the meeting with the 911 victims' families. There is a photo of Beverly and Obama at that event included on the wiki, which I feel is Them putting it in our faces.
You can read the cock-and-bull story about the crash at the wiki. The other phony conspiracies floated around at the time were that it was due to icing and, if you didn't like that one, that the co-pilot was an overworked and underpaid young woman.
Witnesses on the ground heard two booms and saw the plane in flames as it went down, so of course it was ice and females.
Not to drag this out so feel free to stop reading any time, but there's a finer point to be made concerning morality and the "responsibility" of the masses. Also about just what Trump is up to....
It turns out as part of the Big Secret, consciousness and morality are part of the same phenomenon. The NPC consciousness essentially has no in-built morality. It never develops beyond the level of a small child or an animal. We do not generally hold small children or beasts responsible for morality. Although it has been forgotten, this was recognized and written into Catholic Church doctrine, known as the "Age of Reason".
What really happens is this: We are all trained from birth to obey authority. All mammals do that, primarily for safety. In humans, it begins with parents and continues on to teachers, clerics, elected officials, and the fancy people on TV.
NPCs begin with the assumption that they are a "good people". Of course, such an assertion should be the conclusion of a long chain of moral reasoning rather than an assumption, but with an NPC everything is reversed. This is why you can never, say, convince an NPC they have been hypocritical. What you're saying is (in their own mind) contradictory to plain truth.
"Good people" obey authority. You do what your parents say, you don't commit sin, you listen to your teachers and experts and elected officials, all of whom duly earned their positions of knowledge and trust. You will be rewarded both here and in the world to come for doing so, won't you? Those who don't do like you are stupid and ignorant and "bad" people, such as those given to ridiculous conspiracy theory. See how this is all working?
Now, it can barely surface above all the anti-Trump screeching online, but there are some baffling aspects to what Trump is doing. If he's out there fighting evil or whatever, why isn't he "locking them up"? Why didn't he track down all those involved in either assassination attempt? How about all the election cheaters, and the people running the COVID scam, and... ?
The first thing you'll notice is that these issues are rarely mentioned, although they're very real. Well, he must be "in on it", right? But for all the Trump bashing, why not bash him as a feckless traitor with these fairly straightforward ones?
Trump is playing a very, very subtle game. The NPCs listen to authority, yes? To really get anything fixed permanently--and to avoid a civil war--he has got to get the NPCs to recognize him as an authority and start listening to him and not Them.
Well, authorities cannot say anything very far outside the Overton Window. Trump can only push against it very gently, trying to slide it a little further without "breaking the spell" so to speak.
The first of these, in my book, has been Tulsi's announcement regarding treason by a former President and many high officials. That has never happened before. They hang people for that kind of stuff, don't they? Again, it took six months to get here when he could have done it Day One, but he's got to go slow even if he's criticized by people who do not understand what is happening and why.
So now the Establishment is in crisis how to respond. If they try to calmly talk Their way out of it, they may lose on the facts. If They start screaming about how this is the beginning of "The Purge", They may lose NPCs regarding them as authorities. I think They'll stay calm then throw a "Hail Satan" when it looks like they're losing.
Trump followed this plan the whole 2024 campaign. I've not yet been able to tell if it's instinct, advice and direction from others, or that he consciously figured out the same things that I just told about human consciousness.
We live in very interesting times.
You'll have to take my word for this, but I always think of it like, "What if 'Miles Mathis' was a real researcher?"
I once calculated that I read 330 of his papers before I quit. I know that my style is a lot like his, but what can I say? It's a pretty good style! And you can see how I would have been influenced even if it wasn't like his style to begin with.
I've been waiting for someone to call me out as disinfo, a cheap Miles Mathis sequel. Well, I wouldn't admit that because it's not true, but no one has done that so far. Even if it were, you're still getting a metric shit-ton of wild info... lol
There is information I've gathered to back this up, but in summary as to how the modes break down numerically I'm guessing that the "80/20" rule is in effect. That would mean 80% NPCs, 15% mid, and 5% fully awake.
HOWEVER, these are ceilings, deriving from inherent limits in the individual. But each individual has to develop to that highest level. I fear that many mid-level people are stuck at NPC, and many that could be fully awake are stuck at mid. Part of the Big Program and the reason this is a Big Secret is to keep people from developing to their highest level.
For example, someone mentioned that in SRA, they considered it vital to get the victims traumatized by age 7. I recognized this was because humans that were capable would naturally develop to mid around that age, and the Satanists needed to ensure they remained at the NPC level.
Another thing I came to recognize was that others throughout time had been climbing the same mountain I was on, although from different directions and to different heights. Now, I wish I could pin down this next reference more precisely, but I think you'll find it in Mark Passio's "Natural Law" presentation. It's well worth watching in any case.
Mark describes three basic human operating modes as "service to self", "service to others", and "service to the truth". I recognized these as simply being a manifestation of the three modes of consciousness.
To go back to the previous example of Bill Maher and the mid-level consciousness, he believes he's fighting the brave crusade of progressivism, freeing all the oppressed masses or some such thing. And he reaps the rewards, too, but that's only fair for a brave crusader, is it not?
Note well, though, that were he simply serving himself, he would have never even had dinner with Trump in the first place. In fact, you can see he's truly puzzled and disappointed that he got backlash from his audience. Don't they know he's one of the "good guys?" (Are you getting a feel for this now?)
At the highest level, though, reward and punishment are irrelevant. The right thing to do is simply what must be done. There is, for example, a scene in the old show "Firefly" where the vaguely criminal captain realizes that the cargo he jacked was medication badly needed for en epidemic.
The captain badly needs the money, but he decides to return it to the sheriff of the small town it was headed for. The dialog goes like this:
Sheriff Bourne: You were truthful back in town. These are tough times. A man can get a job. He might not look too close at what that job is. But a man learns all the details of a situation like ours... well... then he has a choice.
Mal: I don't believe he does.
See how--with precision--we can deconstruct the morality here?
As to the last, about blaming others for all the various troubles, I agree this is disturbing and a psyop and--worse--incorrect. Probably the best way to say it is that if you look around, none of the problems we see are by their design. They and their consciousnesses and their beliefs and their actions were just moved around the chessboard by forces that know what's really going on here.
And as to changing that situation, they also cannot be counted on to "wake up", aside from a tiny fraction. But that fraction is crucial. I've heard it said that in the American Revolution, only about 10K out of 3M really knew what was going on politically. That's 0.3%.
Further, as I have yet to write up, the Salem Witches were all over it, making that whole thing look like a giant social engineering project. But it looks to me like that social engineering project eventually got out of control, and that would have been caused by only some part of that 0.3%. Pretty incredible when you think about it.
Finally, being fully awake may seem like some kind of curse at times. If you read the Book of Ecclesiastes, the author is a king who was granted full consciousness for his job, but is surrounded by NPCs. He sees their endless suffering at the hands of the same forces he serves and cannot control. He laments to the unknown reader that he has enjoyed every pleasure known to man, yet he wishes he had never been born.
So it is what it is, you know?
Well, probably the first thing to keep in mind is that this is all a shift in paradigm.
That is to say, you can't take the body of current scholarship and research then just select and and adjust your way to the correct view. You have to throw out the very foundations of it and set a new foundation.
But once that's done, you can actually go back and pick up the scattered masonry and start construction again. It wasn't the facts themselves that were wrong, but how they were interpreted and given sense.
So take a general form of the current question: "How does a person know what's true?" To answer it, perhaps you would study the page on epistemology. Maybe you start thinking that these damn normies better start studying some damn epistemology!
But we are already, at this very first step, trapped in the current and incorrect paradigm. That page assumes that for the important task of determining objective reality, every human being follows a rational process. That is unstated on the page and unconscious in whoever wrote it. And it's wrong on every point.
In the "normie" or "NPC" mode, people are driven by their subconscious. Their essential goal might be called "safety". That is achieved in many forms in many different situations, but you can easily see the basic ones: "go along to get along", "move with the herd", "follow instructions", "do the smart thing", "mind your own business", etc.
Well, you can see that none of those involve a rational process. Rather, after the decision is made and the course set, the only process--if necessary--is rationalization.
Only on rare occasions when pressed hard will a normie say something like, "I don't care of it's true or not." Their subconscious knows they sound like a fool and that does not bring safety. So they will reverse engineer any reasoning, any facts, any moral principles to justify their beliefs and actions.
So from that we find that for them, there is no objective reality or--for that matter--objective morality either. Things are true because they need to be true at that point in time. Even the concept that reality needs to be real has no inherent importance. Try finding any of this mentioned as part of epistemology.
That's the cold calculation you mentioned, but where it becomes apparent is in the mid-level consciousnesses scattered about. A good example is Bill Maher, although I've been collecting a list of others.
The vast majority of the time, Bill goes along with the progressive line and spouts all the same dumb talking points and bullshit reasoning. But every once in a while, Maher comes across with the same things that would come out of your mouth or mine. When you focus on this phenomenon, it's stark. How is it possible?
The mid-level straddles that line, trying to move from rationalizing to rational. The problem is, there is one correct rational analysis but innumerable rationalizations. Bill is a smart guy with access to lots of info, so he can conduct the rational analysis. Bill is also firmly in the liberal milieu and gets all the rewards from it.
So it ends up being like pouring water into an upside-down funnel. Some gets through but not much. As an example, go back and study his comments after he met with Trump very, very carefully. His rational analysis--his first-hand experience, no less--is that Trump is personable even with a critic, he's well-informed and wants to do the right thing, etc, etc. But all that is at war with how Bill "knows" that Trump is "bad".
Interestingly, Bill can't bring himself to say something which is actually quite simple and reasonable like, "You know, I think it's possible I may have been wrong all this time about Trump. Maybe I was the bad guy in this." It's a related but bigger subject, but the NPC and mid-levels of consciousness also do not possess the same kind of morality it is assumed they do. They virtually always begin by assuming themselves to be the "good guys" and it is thus literally unquestionable.
As to the precise mechanism behind the three states of human consciousness (NPC, mid-level, fully awake), no one knows. It should, however, not be considered spiritual or magical or mysterious or anything like that unless it is clearly demonstrated to be so.
A very good analogy is the phenomenon of color-blindness. There are the color-blind, the normally-sighted, and for argument we add in people that can see ultraviolet. What is surprising is this: without screening, color-blind people often reach adulthood without themselves or anyone around them ever being aware of their condition.
People assume that what sight is like for them is what sight is like for everyone else. Color-blindness can be extremely difficult to notice. I would claim the same holds for the modes of consciousness.
With an awareness of color-blindness, we've come up with certain screening tests. As for the mechanism, the discovery of cone cells is not even two centuries old, and they were discovered by direct observation with a microscope.
No one has come up with screening tests for consciousness, and we don't have a microscope for internal thoughts. The question may be harder to crack. Also, as mentioned, it's a paradigm shift. Also, you're trying to get (at most, I believe) 5% of consciousnesses to recursively probe the depths of consciousnesses. Also it's a Big Secret so no one is studying it.
I have actually come to detest when people criticize normies as being stupid or guilty of some failing or such. As far as I can tell, they are how they are, they had no choice in the matter, and they are almost certainly incapable of changing the state of affairs.
It's like being angry at an engine for malfunctioning after some a-hole intentionally put the wrong kind of fuel in it. The anger is not going to help and you're angry at the wrong thing anyway.
I would conclude this is misdirection.
If you were planning on dropping your rifle, why not just drop it where you shot it so there's no chance of anyone seeing you carrying a rifle-shaped object? On the flip side, if you made it to the woods, aren't you just about home free? Why drop it there?
The rifle was planted. It was meant to be found and will lead nowhere. Crowder went through that weird humiliation ritual a few years back, so he's an asset who was chosen to promote this story.
They should have went all the way and planted a different imported bolt-action rifle: the 6.5mm Mannlicher-Carcano,
UPDATE: The FBI apparently smelled this particular rat and seems to be wasting no time trying to get to the bottom of it:
BREAKING: Steven Crowder Announces He Has Been Subpoenaed Over Explosive ATF Leak Revealing Transgender and Anti-Fascist Engravings on Charlie Kirk Assassin’s Weapon (The Gateway Pundit 9/11/2025)