Frankly, it's surreal. It's like this was AI-generated, created from prompts given by an awake and aware person for what they would like to see happen.
Personal confession: a video similar to this one was posted on r//conspiracy_commons, and several of the Redditors "debunked" it as from years ago or some such claim, and I believed it.
On a serious note, I think Trump did not have a very good idea of what he was up against in 2015. He severely underestimated Them and ultimately he--and all the rest of us--came out on the losing end. This time around, any sort of "middle-grounding" or negotiation or artful wording or saying without saying is out the window.
Fat lot of fucking good it did any of us last time.
I've had my suspicions about RFKjr in the past and--quite frankly--those may still apply. But what we seem to be seeing, or at least what I see, is a man who may have compromised himself in the past in this or that way for this or that reason, but now feels empowered to pretty much say what he thinks, and has been thinking for a long time.
This may be the whiskey sours talking, but it strikes me as a revival of the true American spirit of the First Amendment. You speak your mind and if other people don't like it, you are under no obligation to give a fuck.
I haven't written it up yet, but I stumbled into the time just before the turn of the 20th Century where the same old Spook Families invented and thus took control of both psychology and (surprisingly or maybe not) parapsychology. I think of them as the "Boston Psy Crew":
Morton Henry Prince
G. Stanley Hall
Society for Psychical Research
William James
Charles Sanders Peirce
Benjamin Peirce
Frederick O. Prince
Frederick H. Prince
Rev. Dr. Walter Franklin Prince
Joseph Banks Rhine
Dr. James Jackson Putnam
That's just what I have in my notes. So if anyone is wondering why both psychology and parapsychology are dumb and wrong and never went anywhere, now you have your answer as to why. "They" saw the advantage long, long ago and took appropriate action.
Trump was fighting into January of 2021, then something very very very strange happened on the 12th of which no one seems to have taken note. What that was precisely I do not know, but just wildly speculating I believe it could have been the credible threat of something along the lines of a mass casualty attack--nuclear or a "natural" disaster--on the United States. After that day, he never conceded nor said the election was not rigged, but he stopped resisting.
Just a few days ago, I think when he finally believed victory was assured, he made an offhand comment along the lines of, "I should have never left." I consider that consistent with the idea that he underestimated the damage that would be done to the world during Biden's term, and that perhaps he should have just let America take the hit, or gambled that the extortionists would not follow through.
You have to evaluate people on their actions, and in this case there's a particular action (or lack thereof) to notice. Whenever talk of secession comes up, leftists never say anything like, "Good! I hope the good people can get the hell away from those (blanks)!" Never. Why is that?
They realize subconsciously--which is where all the meaningful action happens--that they require what they perceive as an underclass of dumb MAGA-hatted asshats to do all the work they consider beneath them, which increasingly means all work. It's not hard for their subconscious to work out that a practical slave class will be required to pay the taxes that fund the UBI for the "good" people.
Their subconscious also knows you can't say these thing out loud. If pressed, their conscious will reverse-engineer the kookiest of reasons to justify their position. I had one guy assure me that the Republic of Texas would repatriate gays just to execute them. We "good" people certainly can't let that happen, can we?
For anyone interested in the technical aspects and evidence concerning the sabotage using mini-nukes of what was then sold as an "accident", this is an extremely detailed analysis:
VT Nuclear Education: Khalezov, Chernobyl and Manhattan (VT 9/7/2020)
Spoiler: 9/11 was also nukes, if anyone did not already know.
A few months ago, I saw a comment come through on Nextdoor titled something like, "What are we going to do about the fluoride in the water?" I thought, "Thank God, normies are finally getting hip to this.
I open it up to find out that the water company was temporarily switching to another reservoir, and that for about six months they were NOT going to be fluoridating the water. That's what this guy was flipping out about.
I really thought I'd seen some brainwashing before that.
It's only been a little over a year, but already many questions about this incident have been forgotten. That's how it works and They know it. To refresh, here's an article from just afterwards, and a quote to entice reading:
An Exercise in Conspiracy Factualism: The Curious Downing of the Aborted F-35B Stealth Fighter-Bomber Jet (VT Foreign Policy 9/26/2023)
Armed with this information, what can we speculatively adduce? Simple: the downed F-35B Stealth fighter-bomber was likely carrying at least a tactical nuclear weapon and its mission was to drop that weapon somewhere along its flight path (hence, the military is not providing the public with the flight path that would enable skeptics to surmise what the actual nuclear target in fact was).
The possible motive behind this mission was to orchestrate a False Flag attack on the U.S. itself (and for anyone who doesn’t believe that an American administration would be so Machiavellian and unspeakably evil as to actually do this, I refer you to Operation Northwoods; please look this up).
Now that you know the backstory, it's disturbing, right? This spooky effect of hiding in plain sight. Discussing Crowley jerking off in Loch Ness seems ridiculous compared to personally seeing things all around that you somehow never really saw before.
I have a weird feeling I can't get rid of every time I think about applesauce. (Yes, it's Them.)
I feel confident I know basically what took place, but I have no idea how much of that is in "the files". My point, though, is that if I'm correct and the key points are therein contained, the vast majority of people simply could not believe it.
It would be a case of mass cognitive dissonance. Many would claim the documents themselves were fake, and most would simply subconsciously deflect it all away as if it did exist.
The point is, it's difficult to see what would be productive out of the whole exercise. If I were Trump (and I'm not), I would just release what part of them I thought the populace could actually handle and say it was everything.
I mean, in the real world, parents withhold information from their children all the time for various reasons. No one describes them as Zionist puppets or the anti-Christ or whatever. People need to grow the fuck up.
Haha, trust me, I've got an extremely different idea about who Cain married:
Interbreeding between archaic and modern humans
In fact, I flip the issue around and find it amazing that the story has been preserved anywhere in any form.
You hate to think that this kind of thing exists and literally makes people crazy, but here you have it:
INBREEDING: Ashkenazi Jews descended from just 350 people, study finds: “everyone is a 30th cousin” (NewsTarget 10/24/2024)
You bring up an important point, along the lines of "the dog that didn't bark". So this was supposed to be a civilian geostationary satellite operating at up to (admitted) 60Gbps. That's a gold-star prime piece of equipment.
The plug gets pulled and what do we hear along the lines of disruption? Nothing at all, not a blip, at least as far as I've heard. Jim must be correct that this rig was 100% military. "They" could have pulled a few Ethernet cables and faked some outages, but they know that no one is paying attention.
And I agree that this has gone next-level. What I had thought what we would see from the RF would be use of a combat laser to blind a surveillance sat, something like this:
Nuclear-Powered Anti-Missile System? What Russia’s Combat Laser May Be Used For (Veterans Today 3/19/2018)
I think the message here was, "You're not going to have all your high-tech shit, and if we're going to dance we're gonna do it with rifles and artillery and toy drones just like Ukraine."
The RF could have done this any time, but we have to ask, "Why now?" There's no way of proving it, but I think this was the response to the nuking of Toropets a month ago.
I thought about this possibility, but there's just no way they can let Trump retake the presidency. He's got a much better idea what he's up against and he's going to go to work right away with a chainsaw and a sledgehammer. He's had four years to make plans and shape the battlespace.
You can see that this is understood implicitly by many, underlying certain statements they make, as if he will take power on Election Day instead of in January. That's when the Rubicon will be either be crossed or it will not, with this exception....
So Kamala is going to lose bigly even though there's going to be rigging in her favor bigly. Given all the foregoing, the only way to play that is to expose the rigging but leave out who it was in favor of. Then they just wave their hands around about having to redo the whole thing next year because "the American people deserve a fair and honest election and will settle for no less".
That will buy them time for something to break their way, like a nuclear war or some such. You can't lose as long as the game continues, can you?
I think They must look back and realize this is the gambit They should have run back in 2016. Given the controversy, a lot of people would have went along with it. It's way more obviously lopsided now than it was then. Few will be inclined towards accepting it or even putting up with anyone else that does.
EDIT: I came across this variant gambit right after posting:
Martin Armstrong: Can Biden Declare Martial Law To Suspend the Election? (10/23/2024)
Lots of detailed legal history with the conclusion:
Therefore, reviewing these decisions, I would have to say that while it would be controversial, the government could call this a necessity if they can get Russia, China, North Korea, or Iran to declare war or attack before the election or certainly before January 20th, and they could declare Martial Law. Hence, the Democrats, in the hands of the Neocons, could carry out their coup, suspend the election, and seize the country as Zelensky has done in Ukraine under the same theory. They would need to close all courts, including the Supreme Court, out of NECESSITY, real or manufactured.
Yes, absolutely, 100%. What rounds up to everything They do to us "ordinary" people is through us "ordinary" people, and if we stopped going along with them--directly or indirectly--it would all be over very quickly.
I mean, crypto's not inherently bad or good, it's just another invention, but even without direct evidence I feel certain they've got a backdoor into the math for the day they need to "pull the plug".
Then, well, it's way way way too f-ing late.
I think the giveaway for this is "the dog that didn't bark". That is, if crypto was any kind of real threat to The System, every puppet and spokeshole and their brother would be flipping the fuck out about it continually.
Frankly, they would only need make reasonable and rational claims: that untraceable currency would be ideal for dark webbists, domestic terrorists, regular terrorists, foreign influencers, etc, etc.
For comparison, a number of years ago there was a brief program to frighten the sheeple with the concept of "three-ring terrorists". These were maniacs bent on random homicide who dodged the intelligence services by writing things down on paper, where they could not be remotely snooped upon. I think they gave it up when they realized that telling everyone to be suspicious of any person carrying around a binder was probably a bridge too far.
I once heard the principle that, "Dishonorable men will do dishonorable acts." (I can't find the source of the quote so maybe I just made it up somewhere along the line.)
The point is, Twitter is a bunch of servers and code and connections to the Internet, and dishonorable men did dishonorable things with it. If the policies and practices were made fair, dishonorable men would immediately try to get them changed back. If you set up your own Switter or Fwitter, dishonorable men would immediately try to infiltrate it. You can go on in this vein.
The problem is dishonorable men and their dishonorable acts. Setting up new servers and writing new code and camping in the wilderness off the grid will never permanently alter that.
Well, let me lay this on on you, and if this doesn't get you then nothing will. Personally, I almost fell out of my chair when I stumbled across it.
A few years back, I was getting hella tired of people on social media blaming everything on Satan. He didn't exist (or so I knew at the time) and so it was a real conversation (and investigation) stopper. I was trying to find some basic contradiction or plot hole in the Satan story to point people towards, like "Just check this out, m'kay?"
It eventually occurred to me that there might be an opening along the "son of the morning star" and "son of Venus" line. I knew a little bit about both astronomy and ancient pantheons by that time.
Isaiah 14:12 is where we get that, as well as the only mention of "Lucifer". You'll find no shortage of people waving their hands around about exactly what that means and you're free to choose any of them. I, however, just wanted to check whether the verse referred to the planet, or a star, or what. The translations are all over the map so I knew I had to go to the Hebrew.
The line reads "ben shahar", so I looked up "shahar". He's actually Shahar, god of the dawn in the Ugarit pantheon. You should already be asking yourself why the Israelites thought Satan was the son of a pagan deity, and also why no one but me talks about it.
So I tried looking for more about Shahar and found his origin story: The king of the gods was walking along one day and encountered two women bathing... and each woman bore a son. They were Shahar, god of the dawn, and Shalim, god of dusk. Lucifer would then be the son of the elder half-brother.
That's when I almost fell off my chair.
I recognized that exact genealogy. In the Sumerian pantheon, Anu is the king of the gods and he had two sons who are half-brothers. Enki is the elder and Enlil is the younger. Marduk is the son of Enki.
Anyway, best of luck with your studies.
I meant the translation of "Inanna" from the Sumerian, which they give right in her wiki:
Her primary title is "the Queen of Heaven".
And for once on a crucial matter, they give a correct translation from the Hebrew you stated. I don't really study the Bible in anything like the normal sense that others do, so when I happened to stumble across it (like Jer 44:17), I thought, "Hey, does anyone realize this is referring to one of the Anunnaki?"
I also came to note the black hole surrounding that question, which may just sound like a glib expression at first. Didn't people wonder why the Israelites got so hung up on a made-up deity from a civilization that died a thousand or two years before? I guess many times you just never ask the question until after you come to know the answer.
To be brief about the importance of all this ancient history, to me it's still very much alive and in effect. For example, one of the questions you see come up from time to time in conspiracy circles is, "Why do the Elites worship Satan?" I had no idea until I put the big pieces together.
To be extremely brief, Marduk disagreed with Enlil (spoiler: Yahweh) as to the nature and fate of the human race. To settle the matter, an experiment was set up in which we are now engaged. If Satan (Marduk) could come to dominate us, then that would prove he was correct and he would be allowed to continue to rule as he saw fit, given that we had shown ourselves no better than livestock. Regulated by some methodology that remains mysterious to me, a small fraction of us were given higher consciousness as sword and shield.
The rule, though, was that he could use no advanced tech or brute force, only seduction. We had to do it to ourselves through a free will choice. As Satan and his cohorts were small in number, working through compromised humans was necessary. That's what we see now: the Elites literally work for him.
I believe this truth is known only at the highest levels, and perhaps even there they are deceived. Understanding the Anunnaki is key to all this, and so that makes it one of the Big Secrets.
Every current Anunnaki researcher is either off the track or has been compromised. You're reading it here because it has been written nowhere else publicly available (but maybe in the Vatican basement, eh?). That's how it goes when "They" really want to keep a secret.
If you like it, wayyyyy more where that came from. I feel like I'm on a streak... lol