The incident came when the damage due to rioting was really ramping up, and people were taking up arms to protect property, both their own and others. They had to put a stop to the "rooftop Koreans" phenomenon which had been so effective.
There were two important reasons. First, They needed to make an example of a 2nd Amendment type. He gets his ass killed and then They can play it many ways: it was his own fault, he incited, assailants were justified, looking for trouble, etc. Suddenly no one wants to follow that example. Second, They had to have a "safe space" for the rioters They Themselves incited. Cities won't burn themselves down, and you can't get rioters if a bunch of them get shot.
As you can see, it worked out just dandy for Them even though Kyle didn't actually get murdered. Was there even a single instance of armed self-defense by a citizen through all the rioting? I'm not sure the cops ever even pulled a gun on anyone.
I wrote up couple of analyses of the incident showing that it was, without doubt, a murder plot involving several people. They were probably not targeting Kyle specifically, just anyone bearing arms to defend property and Kyle just looked like an easy mark. Gaige should have got a very special kind of injection, the kind offered for free by the state in very special circumstances, and in front of a set of witnesses.
The analyses were (of course!) severely de-boosted, but here's the shorter one about a less well-known aspect (and you'll find out why it's less well-known)L There was a conspiracy to murder Kyle Rittenhouse that night, and Joshua Ziminski was involved. If you don’t agree, at least tell me which Joshua Ziminski was not involved.
As I've studied it, when you take a close look at all the warmongering throughout Europe, all the NATO countries are actually dragging their feet. Anyone with sense knew it was over Day 1. They send old, cruddy, non-functioning weapons, etc. The Poles knew they were never going to see those MiGs again, so they had to be offered free planes from the US to even go along with it.
Even in the worst warmongering states like the UK, Poland, and Germany, it's just a handful of people. It's especially apparent in Germany, where they're not going to come out and challenge the party line, but they'll say, "Uh, our whole deal is going to implode if Russia shuts off the gas, dummies. It's bad now and will get real super bad."
I see it all as some reason for optimism in these troubled times. Couldn't we all use some?
He certainly seems determined to take control of Twitter, and "They" certainly seem determined not to let him have it. Elon was obviously one of "Them" at one time, but no one seems to want to examine the thesis that he was "turned" some time ago. But I will admit that loudly expressing opinion as fact is much more convenient than research, analysis, and discussion.
Thanks for posting!
I believe the U.S. and its allies should rapidly field their own hypersonic weapons....
Here, the writer flatly admits the U.S. and its allies have no hypersonic weapons (however implicitly defined) comparable to those of the Russians, which have now been used in combat several times. The Chinese.systems are already being tested.
IIRC, after several US failures, the Russians offered to share their operational hypersonic technology, recognizing its destabilizing character. The US turned them down, I suppose because huge defense contracts aren't awarded when someone just hands you somthing.
I would say so, yes. In fact, the Russians went farther than I thought they would. When they said "demilitarization", I guess they really meant it. This was three weeks ago:
Ukraine says its defense industry has been almost destroyed (3/31/2022)
Kiev's official accused Moscow of trying to reduce Ukraine to a “destroyed territory” in which “no one would be interested”
Yes, I believe you've pretty much nailed the basic idea on the interbreeding. And once you accept that as a working hypothesis, you finally start looking through the correct end of the telescope.
There are numerous things, quite diverse and scattered throughout history and even current affairs, that are puzzling and even bizarre on their own but find a succinct explanation with the Anunnaki bloodlines idea. Why were so many ancient kings and notables said to be giants? Why do kings say they have the "divine right" and emperors say they have the "mandate of Heaven"? Why do so many claim to have descended from the gods? Why are the Elite so obsessed with bloodlines? Why did pharoahs wear the uraeus? Why is there all this serpent worship everywhere? Why are Jupiter and Moses and others often portrayed with horns? Well, it goes on and on.
You might like to give some reconsideration to the Bible. As I have been able to understand and "decode" it, it mainly concerns certain human interactions with the Anunnaki. There are many aspects of it which Biblical scholars simply wave away like that bad smell that can be explained quite precisely with an understanding of the Anunnaki and their relationship to humans.
I don't know, it's a mystery!
Seriously, I can only describe a few things about it from a "meta" perspective. The Anunnaki were greatly advanced technologically, as we can see in all the ancient monuments and "antiquitech" laying around all over the world, which I assume originally came from them. Certain of the Anunnaki gave advanced tech to certain humans to secure their loyalty. And note here that, as we are told by Arthur C. Clarke, we could call it either high tech or magic, so we should keep in mind that these are not distinct.
So what tech was this exactly? Well, I believe only some handful actually know. But the Bible warns strongly against practicing "sorcery", and I believe this tech is what is being referred to. (And yes, the "elohim" of the Bible are the Anunnaki.)
Why warn us off? One reason is that it's probably powerful and therefore inherently dangerous if not used properly. A second is that it may be inherently negative or evil (like it's hard to imagine constructive uses for chemical weapons.) A third is hard to describe, but I have the suspicion that use of it may somehow make one vulnerable to negative influences. An example here is the "tech" of the ouija board, of which you will find many warnings against "opening a door you don't know how to close".
I wish I knew more but as a final note, always remember that "mystery" does not mean what most people think it does, which is "something that no one knows". It actually means "secret", or "something that few know".
I might suggest flipping around the thesis of your title: the mystery schools were set up to preserve and--more importantly--to control the knowledge that was given to the Sumerians by the Anunnaki.
And let me add a note on Michael Heiser, the chief "debunker" of Sitchin: I once watched a few minutes of one of his main presentations, where he sought to show that you could completely dismiss the Anunnaki. He said something like, "Go to the Oxford Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature and search on the term 'anunnaki'. You won't find it anywhere because the Sumerians never mentioned the Anunnaki."
Strictly speaking, this is true. Sitchin came up with the term himself. HOWEVER, the Sumerians used the term "Anuna gods" instead of "Anunnaki", and they refer to the same group. There is no way Heiser was unaware of this. It's a deliberate lie.
I've only ever read a couple of paragraphs of Sitchin's work, but from what I understand of it I've come to many of the same conclusions independently.
This whole Neo-Colonialist venture in Ukraine seems destined to come to an end, and fairly soon at that. And when it does, I predict their Atlanticists masters will turn on the Ukrainian satrapy and blame the looting of the nation and all the destruction and suffering on them of the conflict, leaving out their own role of course.
It's sad not sad.
I've long given consideration to the same idea, but there is something many might consider a type of fundamental problem.
The bulk of conspiracy eventually involves people somewhere who are being ripped off, oppressed, injured, killed, etc. It's really a primary reason anyone would consider it important to study conspiracy, which is with some idea of preventing such occurrence. To invest, you're essentially "going long" on human suffering. That seems uncomfortably close to what the Elites do.
Quite a conundrum, eh?
Anti-bonus: It turns out truth is deeply unpopular, and thus difficult to monetize. Comforting lies are consistent best sellers, though.
I wonder if there's a correlation between the type of person that happily pays for Netflix's social engineering service and people that are fully vaxxed and boosted?
IOW, is binging on Netflix a leading cause of myocarditis, or maybe the silent killer "short illness"?
Mariupol is down to a couple thousand Azov rats hiding in the depths of Azovstal. A full-scale assault for the final liberation of Donbas just kicked off. There are so few active military assets in the other parts of Ukraine, Russia is now systematically destroying it's entire defense industry, like factories and repair facilities.
I haven;t come across it anywhere in the news, but from a source I trust Russia just shot down a cargo plane full of "humanitarian aid", which was made up of small arms ammunition and anti-personnel mines. This is a big escalation no one wants to talk about, but Russia has no more patience for such "aid" shipments.
As I see it, on one side Russia is going to just keep hammering away systematically until all their objectives are achieved. On the other side, the West will just keep propping up the regime and pushing out PR and false flags and war crimes. It's all extremely costly and dreadful and will continue on course.
The only thing I can see altering that is if the populace of Ukraine wakes up and starts pushing back against the regime themselves. There's certainly a flood of Ukrainian nationalist resistance propaganda being pushed on them, but I have yet to see any information on whether any truth is getting through to them.
Even brave Ukie patriots would want it over with instead of everything getting ground to bits in a doomed and pointless resistance. Hopefully some of the POWs will get info back to their families and word will spread that it's over militarily and that their real enemies are right in Kiev/Kyiv/Poland.
Every time I see some normie saying something like this, I think about the titanically messed up logic behind it.
It's been estimated that in WW2, there were 100,000 small arms rounds fired per enemy casualty. That's a 0.001% "adverse event" rate. So you see, folks, bullets are both safe and INeffective. Do you have some kind of "gunfire hesitancy" problem?
What I've noticed about the upvoting (which I think is still primarily humans, while the heavy downvotes are bots and brigades) is that it just equates to people who agree with the sentiment. It's really nothing about the quality or importance or insight of the post, just "Yep, that's right!" or "I, too, hate that sumbitch!"
There is still some conspiracy, yes, but there is virtually no "theorizing" left. That is, a post will surface some conspiracy "dot" or other, but posts almost never surface multiple dots and connect them.
The same point could be made about this forum. Instead of, "Here's my theory and the evidence and analysis I used to come up with it," it's more like, "Here's my theory and also my opinion about it." It's not a good sign, assuming we'll need reasoning to fight off the Illuminati.
All that being said, I still use r/conspiracy as daily news feed to get content I can't really find elsewhere. Takes a lot of scrolling, though.
After close examination of the Rittenhouse case, I concluded that his attorneys were "in on it" while Kyle was not. There were very obvious observations and questions I had after very little research that had seemingly totally escaped them.
But then again, I don't know why any of us would think lawyers should somehow be assumed to be honest players in these events. Seems quite dumb, actually, after counting up the lawyers in DC alone.
I read all this SH/AJ saga as consistent with AJ being controlled opposition all along. You would think that, if in earnest, Jones would exhibit evidence of the hoax in the public record of a court of law, or if the courts were corrupted, use Infowars to exhibit evidence of such corruption of the courts.
But what did we get? "Oh, you're right. It happened just however they say it did and I can't talk any more about it. Sorry!"
I'm not sure what Posobiec means, but I do know that most people have never even heard the pope was once on the correct side.
Suppression of the Society of Jesus
The suppression of the Jesuits was the removal of all members of the Society of Jesus from most of the countries of Western Europe and their colonies beginning in 1759, and with the approval of the Holy See in 1773. The Jesuits were serially expelled from the Portuguese Empire (1759), France (1764), the Two Sicilies, Malta, Parma, the Spanish Empire (1767) and Austria and Hungary (1782).
"Where Did the Towers Go?" by Dr. Judy Wood. I came across it about 2013 or so, and that was when it dawned on me we were beyond the looking glass.
First, after a dozen years how could I have never realized that the towers didn't collapse, they were turned into dust. With some background in physics, I knew there was no readily apparent energy available to do such a thing, certainly not gravitational potential energy, a bit of kinetic energy, and a little kerosene.
Second, how were all the "toasted" cars created? No ordinary physical process, such as exposure to burning debris or heat, could explain the very anomalous damage. Upon close examination, it seemed like it would be quite tedious if not impossible even to create them by hand. It seemed they had been exposed to an exotic source of energy and undergone unusual physical processes.
I have since concluded that Wood is honest but her main thesis of DEWs is incorrect, therefore they use her as a type of limited hangout. As an example, she once mentioned that there was no excess heat at the site, but I think many will recall that construction workers were complaining that the soles of their boots were melting. Excess heat did not fit into her thesis, so it did not fit into her head.
You surely agree with the Pentagon, but I was going by this (from two weeks ago): Pentagon says Ukraine can 'absolutely" win the war. I'm no expert but how can you win a war if you've lost 91% of equipment?
You can join the vibrant conversation over there. Meanwhile in the US, the arch-warmonger and global hyperpower has run out of combat-ready weapons systems to ship to Ukraine and has moved on to vaporware: Calling all weapons makers: Pentagon seeks new ideas to arm Ukraine
No estimates available on when "stuff we haven't thought of yet" will turn the tide.