Well, he just so happened to be Antifa. I'm pretty sure we're all allowed to shoot at fleeing cars. I think there's even a rule that says we can, isn't there?
Wait--what am I saying?! None of us are allowed to have guns.
Just by the sheer number of posts on r/conspiracy about the monkeypox, it's a pretty strong indication that it's all nonsense.
I was totally unaware of the info in this thread. It makes me wonder if some of the wide-scale depopulations of previous Resets was rewritten as the "scourge" of smallpox.
I think the article actually misses the point of the power dynamic at play: Germany is caught in a vise between the New World Order and the emerging Multi-Polar World Order.
On the one hand, if you stay with the NWO, you get cash, valuable prizes. guns and planes, awards and sashes. Scholz talks a good game and may well be totally on board and trying to drive it forward against the wishes and best interests of lots of Germans.
On the other hand, if you decide to check out of the NWO, all the goodies vanish and you're the bad guy, just like Russia. You always were the bad guy and you'll be a threat to the whole world until you're destroyed. Shit, you're obviously already a bunch of horrible Nazis, aren't you?
If they make an outright enemy of Russia now, Russia cuts off their energy and that will be extremely destructive to their industry in a way they simply cannot avoid. And for the long haul, Russia may not mention what Germany does now, but they will not forget.
So how are they playing it? Germany is dragging it's feet bigly when it comes to actually delivering for Ukraine. The military equipment is slow to arrive, very outdated, and sometimes outright non-functional. It looks to me like they hope Ukraine totally goes under sooner rather than later and the whole thing becomes moot.
Some classic documentation on the subject:
We know NASA is a nonsense BS scam if for no other reason than any normal person would want to drive the rover over there to get a closer look, or at least take more pictures at different angles and times. Who even cares about "the science"? It would generate tons of public interest.
With NASA it's like, "Nah, we got all this other dust and rocks to look at. And anyway, what you saw you did not see."
Could you imagine your friends and family shredded and incinerated and then you read in the paper years later that the murderers had some concerns over "reporting delays and information gaps"?
I feel that even the fully awake have lost track with how much humanity we've all lost.
Some know that Hillbeast wrote her thesis on Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals". Fewer know that he dedicated that book to Lucifer. I think very few have actually read that dedication, so here it is:
Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.
I interpret that phrase as Saul hinting at something he knows and thinks you don't, and I further suspect Hellary is of the same state of knowledge.
A few months ago, I got banned on the Skeptiko forum after my third post, literally no reason given. (And it was for 5 months, which seems odd.) In my first post I called the guest disinfo, but the host, Alex Tsikiris, responded himself just saying he didn't agree.
At the end of the most recent episode of the show, Alex, as usual, said, "Come over to the forum," but this time added, "It's getting lonely over there." This makes me think that the "helpful" admin is booting users without Alex's knowledge. My point is that censorious infiltration may be far deeper than is generally suspected.
As noted, Biden can sign whatever he pleases but it requires 2/3 of the Senate to ratify. HOWEVER, and this is what to watch for, they get around that by referring to it as a "deal" and then just acting as if it had the force of law.
Like, didn't you ever notice that the "Iran Deal" seemed to be pretty informal terminology from a gang that gets their hardest hardons when speaking official-ese?
Here's the narrative I'd go with:
Since the Cold War, Russian sleeper agents have been known as "mules". Dinesh D'Souza has shown conclusively that Trump colluded with Russia in his bid for reelection. Thankfully for democracy, the effort ultimately failed. In impotent frustration, Putin attacked helpless Ukraine.
Doesn't anyone remember "The Americans"? Huh, member? Nuke 'em!
The battleground is ultimately each individual consciousness, and we must always remember that.
Trump still gets criticized for not "draining the swamp". Could he have pursued and imprisoned some of the swamp creatures? Almost certainly. The lesser problem was that numerous others would gladly take their places, but there's a far bigger problem.
Had he done that, a large fraction of the population would have believed, without doubt, that a tyrant was beginning a wave of oppression leading to a murderous purge. They would have been told that night and day. Eventually, blood would have been spilled. Innocent blood, aside from being victims of an unrelenting psychological attack. Who knows what might have been unleashed.
Fast-forward a little over a year, and I daresay that far more people would go along with trials for corruption and treason for the likes of Biden and Pelosi. This would have been unthinkable a couple of years ago.
As hard evidence, look at what has happened with the hottest of hot-button issues: the overturning of Roe v. Wade. A couple of days of overheated twittering and then everyone goes back to their lives. The liberals have clearly blown their load on this. And after BLM and burned cities, no one wants riots over anyone's outrage either.
And the difference is in consciousness: a strong majority no longer believes that the leaders advocating such things are actually fighting for their rights. After COVID, they have seen that these liberals do not give a rat's ass about the rights of the people.
The vast majority of the Hell we are living in has been created people that think they're following the law, doing the right thing, being a model citizen, whatever. They are "one of the good guys", as far as they know.
Everyone is free to deal with this as they see fit, but if you ask me, it's quite problematic. And if God is watching what you do, I don't think you get to use the excuse, "I didn't know any better," especially if you haven't extended that grace to other people.
If anyone thinks that history is orchestrated by a small group of people, then you may be interested in researching the possibility that this guy is related to François Joseph Paul de Grasse. He commanded the fleet to victory at the crucial Battle of the Chesapeake, which set the stage for the final Colonial victory at Yorktown. (The fleet left from Sandy Hook, NJ.) His son was an extremely prominent Freemason in SC.
His adult children emigrated to Saint-Domingue on Hispaniola. NDT's grandmother is from the miniscule Caribbean island of Nevis. Of further note, Alexander Hamilton was also originally from Nevis. Small world, no?
As to the Saturn thing, he may have been aware of something like this: Purple Dawn Theory and The Saturn Death Cult | stolenhistory.net
As to where some of the knowledge he had came from, I suspect much knowledge was handed to us very long ago. Over time, the important stuff was sequestered, and then public record and public memory were destroyed.
Somehow I get the feeling that far behind the scenes, the Neo-Liberals are being allowed to shake themselves apart and melt down with all the world watching the display of their limitless criminality, rampant lunacy, and utter disregard for human life. The support they've lost during the short reign of Biden is many, many times that ever achieved during the time of Trump. And in the meantime, the keys to the nukes are in the pocket of a responsible adult.
Wait--"far behind the scenes"? Never mind! I'm starting to sound like a conspiracy theorist.
Here's a paper providing a larger context for all the gayishness, jewiosity, and fakariousness permeating the whole crowd around that time and place:
Hitler's Genealogy (48-page pdf)
The article in the OP is referenced on page 23.
I think you'll find this line of inquiry most fruitful. Once you accept the general hypothesis as a framework, you'll "have your antenna up" and come across more and more evidence for it in research completely unrelated to the hypothesis itself. Over the last few years I've collected what must be thousands of such links.
BTW, don't let the naysayers about Zecharia Sitchin put you off. I've only read a couple of paragraphs of his work and watched a couple of short videos, so none of what I've found is just some sort of regurgitation of his research. We just came to the same conclusions.
Is this where they normally keep that orb that Trump and the Saudi King laid hands on?