There's something on r/conspiracy that I've found even more worrisome than shills and corrupted mods: regular people--legitimate users as far as I can tell--that have been driven to different levels of mental illness by all the toxicity and empowerment of such that exist both on Reddit and in general society.
You ever hear the term, "crazier than a shithouse rat"? These rats have been in the shithouse far too long.
I think this is the correct stance. In my research, I have found that the Deep State, and the pyramid in which it is embedded, demand complete and unconditional subjugation. All else must be annihilated. I have yet to find a single counter-example.
If you're thinking, "Hey, that kinda sounds like the Borg!", well, that's why They told us about the Borg.
Although Western culture is steeped in competition, I have always been allergic to it and never cared for it. I favored cooperation far more. I felt that if what you wished for was to compete with others, then you were not choosing pursuits that were sufficiently challenging.
I'm not too familiar with Clif High's work, but I thought I was a fan based on the headlines I would see pass by. After reading this article concerning material with which I am quite familiar, I now wonder if he's another high-level disinformation agent along the lines of Graham Hancock (and I'm sorry if this comes as news to any of his fans).
If anyone thinks I'm bagging on the subject matter, I'm not. Quite the opposite, in fact. It's some of the most important material you can study to understand the true framework of human history and even what drives current events to this very day. Thus you should be able see why "They" consider it so vital to obfuscate it.
As to the article itself, you should first notice what is there: it's simply a narrative. Does it bear some relationship to the truth? Yes, certainly. It's closer to the truth than thinking some cavemen were running away from lions while trying to invent the wheel. And indeed, aliens were involved.
We should also notice what is not there. No citing of specific evidence, no links to other research or researchers, no argumentation or other demonstration of reasoning. In short, no scholarship or discipline. Does that really sound like someone trying to help push back the frontiers of human knowledge?
Let me interject here a note on scholarship. Almost by definition, scholars should be working at the edges of knowledge, and so they're going to make a lot of mistakes. Therefore, it's not that scholarship is marked by everything they say being correct because they're so expert, it's that a scholar lets you know explicitly where they got their information and how they came to their conclusions. Is Clif doing any of that?
So what's really going on with this article? The events of 6000 years ago were only one of the most recent incidents in the history of the Anunnaki on the Earth. Clif wants you cut off from all that. How far back does it go? The Sumerian King List tells us that they arrived on Earth about 434,000 years ago. The biggest (for us) event since that time was the creation of humans 270,000 years ago. I could amplify, but now I'm wondering if anyone actually made it through this rant.
I just want to put out a quick PSA. This guy is an experienced scientist, was VP of a giant pharma company, has a doctoral degree, is intelligent and engaged, etc, and it took him two and half years to get it.
So if you're having trouble talking to your family member or friend or co-worker or whoever about germ theory and it's problems, try to have a little patience and mercy. It shouldn't be surprising that it's taking them longer than it did Yeadon.
For those interested in following up, this article brings up a potential link between Heche and the recent "death by car" of US Congresswoman Jackie Walorski:
(Before anyone says it, yes, I get that this is the trifecta of sources many consider unreliable: beforeitsnews, realrawnews, and Sorcha Faal. But the possibility of a link is still a possibility, no matter who suggests it.)
One of the deeper truths I came to learn, through research entirely outside of occultism or theology, was that Satan exists and precisely who he is. Even for those that believe in Satan, he's not who they think.
Not actively, but just as it happens to come by me, I listen very carefully to what Satanists and occultists and various Elites have to say about the subject, to see if they know the same truth I do. They don't. Satanists say they don't even believe Satan exists and Mark Passio, a former Satanist, confirms this.
The very closest I have ever come across is from Saul Alinsky, who wrote "Rules for Radicals". On the epigraph page, he wrote:
Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.
Everyone misses the significance of this, and so never tries to figure out just what the hell he's talking about. But I feel I know exactly what he means, and reading it came as a sort of confirmation of the research I had done. How much of the truth of the surrounding issue did Alinsky know beyond that? Well, maybe none, but who knows?
But the whole thing tied together for me why there was all this "Satanic" stuff floating around the Elite and Freemasonry and occultism, etc, etc. It's because there is something very real at the center, or should I say the top of the pyramid.
Yes, there's a nuance there about the reaction of the "firefighter" pushing the gurney, something like, "Resistance was not unexpected. Let's move with alacrity."
As for the "covering", the only thing that threw me off was the color, as I had thought they were all black> But no, they come in every color of the rainbow. Given that paramedics don't pronounce death, I think they would only load a very, very obviously dead person (or parts thereof) in a body bag. All the reports are she died in the hospital after some time.
Also, the shills are already out attempting to derailing conspiracy discussion. One I saw said, "Pretty suspicious there was an overhead camera taping this. It's probably a hoax!" It was F-ing "Newscopter 5", dipshit. That kinda seals it for me that it was a murder.
To put a finer point on it, I would suggest that they give themselves over to deception. I would analogize to those in the military who operate in the mode that they are there to "follow orders". I know officers receive specific training that they are only bound to follow lawful orders, but when push comes to shove how many have internalized that and are actually willing to explicitly disobey? Very few.
Ever since discovering certain deeper truths about the world and its history, I've listened quite keenly indeed to exactly what those at higher levels believe (or at least say they believe) about these matters.
I've come to the conclusion that at each higher level of the pyramid, yes, they are told a few new truths but they are also given a fresh set of lies. I would guess that the dumb ones believe the lies, and the smart ones believe it's best to believe the lies.
For example, all these high occultists like Blavatsky and Pike and particularly Crowley are full of nonsense. Unless you really, really know what you're doing I would tell everyone to stay away from their work.
I suspect that there are at most only a handful at the very top that know the full truth. We shall certainly never know their names, because their non-existence makes them invulnerable.
The whole concept of a "food calorie" probably has some relation to the use of energy in the body, but it is certainly not direct and may be entirely useless. Calories in food are measured using a device called a "bomb calorimeter", which measures the total heat content of a food sample by reducing it to ashes.
Does your digestive system function like a bomb calorimeter? If it does, I suggest you go see a doctor.
Here are a couple of articles that point to a certain structure being implemented in the context of the IRS. You may or may not give credence to these articles, but I consider myself a relatively critical observer of such things and I can't find the obvious BS in them:
After reviewing the video and reading just one article, my worst suspicions are confirmed:
17,000 Baby Bodies Found in jewish Abortionist’s Back Yard in 1981
The first item to note is that Malvin Weisberg is not an abortionist, he's a pathologist, so already the cover story topples over. My speculation is that "They" hired Weisberg for the disposal for the remains left from occult ceremonies in the LA area. So let's examine that thesis.
Note the huge number of babies collected in a very short period of time: 1976-1981. That's more than 9 a day, every single day for 5 years. Where could so many come from? They mention that this was for "pathology tests". Uh, how much pathology could we possibly need from babies intentionally put to death?
Note the physical damage to the bodies as described in the video. Not all of them seem consistent even with a violent D&C abortion. Some were of an age to be viable. I wonder how many mothers were told their premature babies were "stillborn" then whisked away?
Then the ACLU swoops in. To protect someone's civil liberties? Doesn't seem so. They just want the bodies incinerated. I would suggest this is to prevent any further discoveries as to the precise nature of their demise.
So what happened? It looks like Weisberg being (((Weisberg))) thought he could pocket a few additional bucks by not arranging and paying for a permanent vanishing of the remains. Obviously even too greedy to make required payments on the container.
Then the fail-safes the Elite keep in law enforcement and the DA activate to make sure Weisberg is never charged, no investigation is done, and the whole matter disappears down the memory hole. The "abortionist" and "defrauding the government" narratives are invented and are entirely phony.
Welcome to Our Occult World.