One of the deeper truths I came to learn, through research entirely outside of occultism or theology, was that Satan exists and precisely who he is. Even for those that believe in Satan, he's not who they think.

Not actively, but just as it happens to come by me, I listen very carefully to what Satanists and occultists and various Elites have to say about the subject, to see if they know the same truth I do. They don't. Satanists say they don't even believe Satan exists and Mark Passio, a former Satanist, confirms this.

The very closest I have ever come across is from Saul Alinsky, who wrote "Rules for Radicals". On the epigraph page, he wrote:

Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.

Everyone misses the significance of this, and so never tries to figure out just what the hell he's talking about. But I feel I know exactly what he means, and reading it came as a sort of confirmation of the research I had done. How much of the truth of the surrounding issue did Alinsky know beyond that? Well, maybe none, but who knows?

But the whole thing tied together for me why there was all this "Satanic" stuff floating around the Elite and Freemasonry and occultism, etc, etc. It's because there is something very real at the center, or should I say the top of the pyramid.