1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

creatures on other planets would have a completely different evolutionary process.

probably flat:

  • absorb (or protect from) radiation from above
  • feed or use the ground
  • simplest form, making it more likely
  • in an environment with line-of-radiation remote sensing, lower would be safer.
  • a flat form would have other advantages (maximal edges, potential floating on gas or liquid)
2
PeneDeMichelleObama 2 points ago +2 / -0

The footage at the other mosque, Linwood Mosque, is just bizzare. Bored actors scrolling on their phones with a few bloodstains here and there.

2
PeneDeMichelleObama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Objectively Russia haven't been decisive.

Yeah, terrible Russian decision making in both Syria and at the beginning of this war. It seems like they have wised up now, but probably more obviously terrible decisions to come.

BTW, neither Russia nor China are currently formally communicating with the USA.

1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure: that all seems spot on.

Oh, I forgot to add: Russia now has the world's fifth biggest economy, passing Germany, and only just behind Japan. Russia is exporting oil like a biiiitch, yo!.

1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes.

Weirdly humanoid aliens:

  • Standing, balancing, on two feet,
  • two arms,
  • shoulder, elbow, wrist, thumb, fingers
  • two legs
  • hips, knees, ankle, feet and toes
  • head on a neck
  • rib cage
  • head (on top of neck)
  • get this: two eyes, a mouth, a nose in the middle of the face, and ears on the side of the head.

And this is based on many (not all, but many) of the reported sightings. Many, most of the sighted aliens (quite rare) are ~weirdly~ absolutely impossibly humanoid.

1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK. All I want to say is that the war, as either a NATO ground -vs- Russia or Ukraine -vs- Russia, is over. It's been over for a long time.

NATO could, maybe, try a non-nuclear air war, but we know that would turn out. Then the NATO air war -vs- Russia would be over too. How many - 50? - advanced NATO fighters and 10? bombers/AWACS shot down in a month, and then it'd be over. They'd make up some bullshit about the wrong pronouns being used, and then they'd stop. And we have seen how Russia responds to attacks: it anhilliates infrastructure.

  • Attack on the Crimean Bridge 1,2 weeks ago: 4 Ukranian control centres destroyed.
  • Ukranine tried to ship grain after Russia got shafted: The port of Odessa destroyed.
  • First talk of basing Ukraine's response in neighbouring countries, EU countries (8 - 10 months ago) : Russia anhilliated the western Ukranine's Rail system's power system.

If NATO tried an air war, Russia would destroy a few military airports (from which the strikes were being launched)

Tell me what was that objective?

For the last 10 years 'Russia" has been saying that there is not to be any NATO missiles on it's border, or within 1000 km or something. Ukraine is to be neutral. That - along with the 'de-nazification' (which means "de-America-fication") of Ukraine - have always been the clearly stated objectives. Protection of the Russian population in Ukraine was the trigger for the conflict: Attacks "sky rocketed" in the weeks leading up to 22-02-2022.

Tell me, it isn't you down voting? Call that faggot out.

Not me

1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, we're on the same page. That fucking article, Jesus Christ.

According to Scott Ritter (who may or may not be compromised; some of his videos are - used to be - kinda off, and he sometimes uses "we" when talking about Russia) in Russia (which he toured a few months back) the state and local authorities have more money than they know what to do with (probably an exageration). Because . . . . get this. . . western sanctions have stopped the oligarchs from moving their money out of Russia. Now the oligarchs have to (1) keep thier money in Russia and (2) pay Russian tax - which is a flat 13% that basically everyone pays. So at the end of the last 2 Russian financial years, many cities have unspent budgets and are scrambling to sign off on a few more bridges, hospitals, a university or two . . .

Wagner in Niger is interesting. Russia recently forgave a 13 Billion USD debt, so they are probably in the Niger good books, but who knows? I don't know. Maybe it is partially the Wagner brand image: seasoned NATO thumping street fighter. I am pretty sure that Niger will be played, at least in part, as a distraction from the possibly unfavourable (to the west) "re-interpretation" of the Ukranian conflict. Fucking cynical: let's encourage war to help our PR. Jesus H Christ.

The poor fucking Ukranians. Most were just trying to get along.

1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're an idiot.

No

There were/are peace talks. Jeddah. Saudi Arabia, China, few others. Last week.

No. There were talks in Saudi Arabia that (1) excluded Russia and (2) started from Ukraine's premise that pre-USA disaster, no-longer-existing (former) Ukraine would be magically restored. . . and only then could peace discussions begin. Zelensky is a [edit] Servant of The Synagogue of Satan , a [/edit] traitor, an enemy of the former Ukraine. Only a complete fool would ever call these "peace talks". They were for show. China participated. I think it, China, wants to see who is singing which tune.

Tanks aren't for show if they're properly used. Ukraine hasn't used them effectively.

Ukraine is not in a position to use tanks effectively, and it never (again) will be. It is not in a position to have an army; it is not in a position to exist. Ukraine is a corpse in a bath of US taxpayers' money, arbitrary billions of US money. The fate of NATO is - probably - at stake.

I mean (you don't know, but) look at what I showed you before https://liveuamap.com/en/2023/13-august-ukrainian-defence-forces-continue-offensive-operations Ukraine is hardly even fighting. The Billions aren't going to Ukraine, they're being drained from the dying USA.

1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're speculating. Russia doesn't want Ukraine. It has integrated parts of the Ukraine already. They are Russian.

No. It has taken the parts of Ukraine that are Russian speaking and that want to be part of Russia. Putin, as a spokesman for Russia, has said many times that he/Russia does not want parts of the former Ukraine that do not want to be part of Russia. Now, it is possible that Russia will drive across Ukraine to the Polish border. But those parts of Ukraine will either return to Poland or become part of a Rump Ukraine, but Russia will has said that it will not incorporate them.

Odessa could take years to seige. If it's still an objective. That's part of the problem. There isn't an objective.

Odessa is Russian speaking and could - and should - be part of Russia. Ukraine is over. Ukraine is the same NATO success as Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria. Whatever is left of Ukraine, a Rump or partitioned, and neutral, will not be part of NATO. Hopefully NATO will be destroyed: NATO is pure evil.

Not much has been happening along that front since the grain was diverted. It is still under bombardment

Well, off the top of my head: The bridges to Moldova have been destroyed, eliminating any chance of land support from NATO; the ports' storage facilities have been destroyed; supported, dug in, Russian troops are behind defensive lines about 40 km from Odessa.

Russia is now defensive and still making slow offensive ground in Donetsk.

Russia is engaging in a process that will be added to the textbooks of war. Behind multiple defensive lines they are actively inviting attacks that result in the deaths of 100s or 1000's of attackers. The preservation of Russian soldiers' lives, on the other hand, is paramount. This is the controlled demolition of the Ukrainian army (== population). Zelensky's (i.e. NATO's) public abandonment this week of gang-pressing probably means USA cannon fodder will be imported. I don't think that any European country's population is stupid enough to sacrifice itself. So Team USA it is.

Who knows what happens and who cares.

I kindof agree. In the future we will see, the reality. Speculation is pointless.

1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am definately a nigger faggot stalker. Also, my tone was off: why was I so negative and aggressive? You were just making conversation.

My bad.

I only browse these sites (voat, poal, *.win) one day a week . . . so 7 days later .

1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Peace talks, but there will be, no, peace. Just talks saying nothing else.

No. There are no peace talks.

I think there's fatigue. A lack of popularity and some concern.

That's got nothing to do with anything. "Fatigue" WTF? Stop watching television.

All those tanks and assault vehicles won't do much in wet ground.

It's not here yet. Russia relies very heavily on artillery. https://liveuamap.com/ <--- It is like this every single day. You are not allowed to know, but the population of Ukraine is being exterminated: Women overseas; men turned into mincemeat under NATO command.

. Funding, more arms and aid, like new tanks, missiles, jets, enemy, and positions

That is COMPLETE bullshit. Ukraine has limitless funding, more money than it knows what to do with. It's paid off its former 5 Billion loan to the IMF, that's after the-most-corrupt-country-in-Europe (Ukraine) took its various cuts. Any arms dealer will sell them anything they want. Of course, it doesn't have an airforce - destroyed in the first 48 hours after 22-02-2022 - nor an army (rather organised militants and gang-pressed civilians) . The tanks are pointless, for show only, and now that is over (all destroyed) that will stop. Tanks need to be part of an organised battalion, and there is nothing like that. Send a tank into a field and it will be destroyed.

The missiles are British and French, and will not be able to be operated by untrained, not-english-speaking Ukrainian school teachers gang-pressed into the front lines.

This is the big story:

  • Neither Ukraine nor its military exist any more, other than in the febrile and feeble minds of CNN watchers
  • The war is Russia vs NATO, and NATO can achieve nothing other than terrorism
  • So, on the current path, this is the end of NATO as we know it. About fucking time.
1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, but you really have not been paying attention:

. Tactically Ukraine haven't punched through.

This is the current situation. While cycling new recruits through the front line, not using any conscripts, and largely relying on a they-did-well but rag-tag private army, this is how things currently are. Attacks this week in * Western* Ukraine, most of the major electricity systems destroyed (Ukraine has (I mean, 'had') an electric rail system - now, moving tanks 1000km to the front lines is effectively impossible. Hence the tiny new tank deployments - 300 tanks are being lost each month), large concentrations of troops near Odessa. Open land to the east of Kiev, and see here https://liveuamap.com/ for the large Russian buildup behind the borders to the north of Kiev. Russian doesn't even want Ukraine.

Anyway, this is the current situation. Note the troops to the north of Kiev. Just waiting for the Ukrainian collapse:

https://s2.cdnstatic.space/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/12august2023_Ukraine_map.jpg

1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

How to tell everyone that you are a fucking ignorant moron, without actually saying it:

lol, you really think the vaccine is killing people

1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

It says "Fent or Vaxx" retard. At least you are boosted

Take another booster vaxxxtard .

2
PeneDeMichelleObama 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is part of the new narrative: "Ukraine is hopeless; we've tried".

You can see many examples of this, and there is discussion about this changed narrative.

by pkvi
1
PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are part of the problem believing hiding from the problem is a solution.

/u/pkvi logic: I - personally - am "part of the problem" because I [do not read the MSM]

Yup. Thought as much. You are completely fake and gay (and a MSM addict).

by pkvi
0
PeneDeMichelleObama 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are fucking addicted to the MSM. Never seen anything like it. "MSM this" MSM that: give it a fucking rest.

I have "burnt the bridge". You? You never will.

by pkvi
0
PeneDeMichelleObama 0 points ago +1 / -1

if you do want to "burn the bridge" then install and use leechblock. I do: all MSM is blocked on all my devices.

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/leechblock-ng/blaaajhemilngeeffpbfkdjjoefldkok

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›