if you were following a trajectory that dips 837 feet per second, there is no way you could perceive it as a straight and level path

Depending on your frame of reference. If you continuously preserve "down" to mean towards the center of the earth, then there is no 837' drop, because you're frame of reference compensates.

If your frame of reference is far from earth looking onward, then gravity doesn't pull the plane your perspective's "down" the entire time, but instead the angle of incidence of the force of gravity shifts continually, maintaining a direction inward toward the center of the earth.

You oversimplify and then say "impossible" instead of thinking it through.

I guess draw a diagram of the plane's initial and final locations, and draw the vectors where you think gravity and lift are directed at each location. Should be apparent, but I guess for some it isn't.

Gives off ruby ridge chives.

Vibes, but the autocorrect was hilarious so I left it.

So I don't see how that applies at all.

I was demonstrating that if you take only a portion of the mathematics and ignore the rest, you get strange results. It's exactly the same principle as what you are doing.

There was a less active spawning season this year because the crabs were social distancing.

VA is owned by Dominion Vote-Altering Machine Company, LLC and is only 'red' because that was the party which was up for sale at the time.

There are no winners when serving those warrants.

Do you talk with them about antivax stigma?

"Just be a ho until you hit the wall." -POTUS

Simply ask yourself what is the speed of gravity?

9.8 meters per second per second. 9.8m the first second, 19.6m the second, 29.4 the third... After an hour-long trek riding in a hot air balloon, the wicker basket should be falling towards the earth at 35km/s.

But it doesn't.

Air is a fluid, and gravity is always oriented to the strongest source.

George Floyd did porn also. It's where you go for cheap, disposable actors.

They never used to broadcast court until just recently. They gave you a few cases for you to decide what is "normal" then made Alex's case very abnormal. It was meant to be obvious.

Remember that the character Alex Jones was introduced to the public pushing against Waco.

1993: government, you killed kids

2013: government, you pretended to kill kids

The Great AI.

How much did we just pay to watch the wrestlers in blue spandex pretend to beat up the wrestlers in red spandex?

Bastard son of Joseph being betrayed by Judahs

It's a retelling of the same 12 tribes idea.

and the news never talked about it again.

1. Inject the useless eaters with poison.

2. Pretend you didn't just do that.

We're on step 2, that's why.

This can't be true. I never see anything pro-US online, only mudslinging.

The idea is to use their programming, their language and their kind of tactic against them.

If you're willing to stoop to their level, then you might as well just join them.

Ghislaine Maxwell-Hill, as in reddit powermod /r/u/maxwellhill.

But also Hill as in McGraw-Hill, the publisher and textbook company.

If covid caused the aids, then the world is gonna hate US WMD labs.

If they pretend the vaccine is what's causing the aids, then the world is gonna hate Pfizer.

It's easier to scapegoat, remove, rebuild, and rebrand a Pharmaceutical Business than it is a Military Industrial Complex.

Something to ponder, at least.

The only thing they taught me is that justice isn't blind, so never let them arrest you.

That Engelbrecht book is the most vapid piece of literature I've seen in years. It reminds me of climate change rhetoric in its hollowness. I wasted as much time as I'm willing to invest reading onward hoping that one paragraph, any paragraph, would reach a point about germ theory or terrain theory, but was met only with tangent after tangent and unrelated anecdote after unrelated anecdote.

I mean, I got 20 paragraphs in, and it's nothing but leftist-colored drivel.

C1¶1: People like simple solutions and don't like to change their habits. ¶2 Canadians club seals and Japanese fish for dolphin. ¶3 Nature magazine says humans reduced fish population by 90%. ¶4 "it is risky to tamper with the natural balance of forces in nature" -Dubos ¶5 'if the solution is concise, it is wrong' -Golub ¶6 No one knows everything, including experts. ¶7 Most doctors can't define retrovirus or explain PCR. ¶8 Wittgenstein says humans are looking for simplicity in their solutions as a sign of truth. ¶9 The biological world is more complicated than the media says. Instruments are made of wood and brass, and everything is made of molecules. ¶10 We don't have a scientific definition for life, and research is primarily done on dead tissue.

C1 Part B, Fungus. ¶1 Is impossible to know everything that microbes do. ¶2 If you do cocaine and heroin your health declines. Watch the movie Super Size Me. ¶3 Fast food companies advertise in order to get you addicted to bad foods. ¶4 Sugar is a gateway drug. ¶5 Cigarettes have a warning label but Happy Meals don't. ¶6 McDonalds uses celebrities for their children's health charity. ¶7 The EU almost changed its TV advertisement regulations. ¶8 A German consumer protection organization says that intestinal flora regulate itself on its own. ¶9 They cannot prove this and is not well founded. A large portion of people are constipated, so the German group is wrong. ¶10 It is impossible to say what "normal" intestinal flora looks like.

Nah, fam. Virii are real and you're buying snake oil.

Gravity doesn't make much sense on a flat earth.

"Viruses aren't real"

I don't know how to interpret this, because I've had first-hand experience with laboratory processes that couldn't exist if a) plasmids didn't exist, or b) they couldn't be packaged in a lipid membrane.

So, what is this nonsense?

Miscegenation with the mudbloods means extinction for the Purebloods.