All of us
Uniting states (us) can never reestablish the whole, because the moving whole (all) separates states (one) from one another.
creator beings
Being implies within everything; creation implies out of nothing. A being can be tricked to give consent to suggested creationism, which implies ignoring everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested).
We just have to realize
We (plural) implies a fiction shaped within reality (singular) by uniting states together, while ignoring separation aka ones RE (response) to AL (all).
occult people
People (plural) occults person (singular)...if consented to.
tendency to know
Tendency implies inclination towards a side...knowledge implies being in-between the known-ledge, hence balancing in-between sides as choice.
Tendency occults knowledge...and faith implies tendency to hold onto suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
https://img.gvid.tv/i/GdQE8hNr.jpg ...livestock branding.
the world doesn't curve
a) Life being moved from inception towards death implies a curvature (growth) within a straight line (loss).
b) To use a slavic proverb...KURVA
when two particles become entangled
Being implies one part (perception) within whole (perceivable)...ones consent to the suggestion of another implies an artificial entanglement of natural particles.
akashic records
a) Akashic/akasha - "aether"...being implies in-between aether (below aka dying) and aer (above aka living).
b) If one ignores being aer (perception) within aether (perceivable), then one binds self by consent to suggestions of another, hence responding (re) to a string (cord) attached.
c) Others suggest rhetorical "points" for ones life sentence to get attached to, which in your profession is called "putting the needle on the record".
Consenting to rhetorical points establishes a conflict of reason aka war, and the god of war is called... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvYE9tNhPkY As for mars as a planet... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9gOQgfPW4Y
Clairvoyant
Clair (clear) voyant (to see)...a contradiction in terms. Seeing implies being within the visible spectrum of "clear" light aka being a SPEC (special; unique; partial) also implies being a SPECK (spot; stain), hence lacking self discernment, which one can clear (discern) or obscure (ignore).
In short...one can never see clear, because clear implies without any differentiation, hence without anything to see.
Is telekinesis real?
Tele (operating over a distance) kinēsis (motion)...being implies operating (life) over a distance (inception towards death) within motion.
claiming telekinesis is real and has videos showing
If being implies telekinesis, then choosing to watch what others show tempts one to ignore real (perceivable) for fake (suggested).
That being said...reality cannot be claimed; since it moves.
shared videos of...with no...in sight
Sharing a video implies by suggestion; having sight implies ones perception.
Video/videre - "vision; to see" cannot be shared, hence each ones perception within all perceivable implying a unique perspective.
A suggested video (artificial) tempts one to ignore perceivable vision (natural).
I will only believe
To believe implies ones consent holding onto the suggestion of another, while ignoring that perceivable cannot be held onto, since it moves.
my own eyes
The vision of ones eyes implies adaptation (perception) to a moving origin (perceivable)...a process cannot be taken into possession (own) without ignoring the procession thereof. Ignorance can be easily exploited with suggestions, tho...
I am a Christian
That implies being anointed aka separated from one another. Your consent to believe suggested information binds you to another, hence contradicting separation, hence tempting one to take a contrary stance to being anointed aka anti-christ.
Artificial trust (holding onto another) tempts one to ignore natural thrust (separation from one another), hence being (life) thrust (inception towards death) aka anointed aka being set free from one another when coming into being through the birth-channel.
demonic witchcraft
a) Demon aka dai-mon - "divider, provider" implies all (god) providing the division of each one (christ) within.
b) Witch/wicca/wicker - "soothsayer" implies one who crafts artifice (words) within natural (sound) to distract others from natural (perceivable) with artificial (suggested).
a hindu
Hindu/sindhu - "river" implies channeling (by suggestion) a perceptible current . Ones consent narrows one perceptible sight to the channel of suggested.
A jew does that by banking gentile trust aka utilizing a suggested currency (river) to bank (channel) trust (consent of sight to narrow itself).
to make sure we still hate them
a) Hate vs love implies ones "singular" consent to a suggested side..."we" cannot choose a side, because each one already choose a sovereign "chosen one" over self by submitting to the plural "we".
b) Them or jews (plural) ignores and throws insults at each chosen one (singular).
hot take
Taking during procession burns oneself out. It's called "fast food", because consumption cools off the ignition of life.
the New Zealand massacre
Aka the christCHURCH MOSQUE shooting...
Mosque/moseak - "mosaic" + Church/kyrios/keue - "to swell"...that's how one kindles fire by swelling inlaid patterns.
that song was used in the video
Starting just at the moment when he's done kindling and climbs back into his auto (inception towards death) mobile (life).
Edit: The front window of the car gets shot through right at the line "I TAKE YOU TO LEARN" aka clearing of sight. Afterwards he says "now comes the fuel" followed by the song... https://genius.com/Manuel-eurobeat-gas-gas-gas-lyrics
Why do so few conspiracy theorists see
Sight requires one to be apart from one another...being among many conceals ones sight, until only few can see unobstructed from one another.
you will own nothing
a) Will implies ones struggle to want to hold onto what one needs to let go of.
b) Taking into possession (own) tempts one to ignore being (life) within procession (inception towards death). A process cannot be taken into possession from within, hence a jew externalizing ownership by tempting gentiles to take possession of suggested currency, while ignoring perceivable current.
c) Everything (perceivable) or nothing (suggested)...only one can be taken into possession (ownership) by paying consent, while selling oneself out to another.
Guess what the majority of mankind owns...nothing. But boy oh boy do they hold their mental and physical possessions dear. Simply asking them to GIVE up a belief can tempt them to instead wanting to TAKE your life.
How close are we?
- Christen, verb - "to anoint; to consecrate by unction; separation through oil".
Few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt many closer together, which tempts each singular one into close-mindedness...
Pyramid of Giza
Aka the fire (pyr) in the middle (amid) of GIZA (Arabic Er-ges-her) - "besides the high".
Being implies in-between sides, hence as above/so below aka being heightened (living) during lowering (dying).
A jew utilizes spell-craft such as "pyramid of giza" to cast consenting gentiles, as a burned offering, into the fire.
Ones consent to a suggestion makes one "bound by wild desire" to a "burning ring (circular logic) of fire"...following a suggestion establishes a führer/fiur - "fire".
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/The-crazy-world-of-arthur-brown-fire-lyrics + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLUGsn-NOis
a) The malleability (gold) of the unhatched (egg) referring to suggestion preventing perception from coming forth.
b) Left/right + up/down + front/back implies ones sight within a cube, hence incubation. Consenting to a suggestion keeps one enclosed within circular logic, hence encircling the square by preventing the square root from sprouting.
c) To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring perceivable. To believe implies taking an absence from being alive, hence be-lieve (being on leave) when lieve/leubh (carrying) suggested.
Carry/caru - "to burden; a load, weight, charge, duty; that which is born"...coming into being implies an unburdening, hence nature generating each ones "free" will of choice.
just one language
Only within singular sound can plural languages be shaped. If one discerns this, then the natural sound can't be hidden as easy underneath artificial languages.
why don't you consider
Because siding together (con-sider) contradicts ones free will of choice. A choice can only operate in-between separate sides. Trying to put sides together within conflicts of reason implies imbalance for ones choice.
To consider implies "to fix the mind upon"...being implies within (life) motion (inception towards death).
you can't conclude shit by analyzing it
a) Shutting down together (con-clude) contradicts nature starting up (inception) each being (life) apart from one another before shutting down (death).
b) Ask yourself why you seek synthesis (conclude) over analyses (originate)? It's jewish tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) which tempts the synthesis of gentiles amassed together, which equalizes each unique aka analyzed being.
c) Let's go with your example...shit. Concluding food implies constipation within bowel, which the ongoing natural process forces through ones body, just like breathing. A body adapting to the process of hunger "analyzes" food, hence biting off; chewing apart; dissolving within, and shitting out.
english
English/engle - "angle"...before an angle can be shaped, there has to be (life) a straight (inception towards death).
A mason of free (will of choice) can utilize compass (circular logic) and square (angular language) to artificially manipulate natural beings with shapes aka geometry/geomancy.
don't make sense
a) How could one sense "doing nothing"? Which sense does nothing?
b) Make/mag - "to knead; fashion; fit", hence magic/mason/mingle/mongrel/amass/match...
Who makes "don't"?
jews have been into the occult
Nature reveals each being...ignoring nature for each other implies occult/occulere/kel - "to cover, conceal".
A jew suggests artifice to tempt gentiles into the occult aka into concealing self from natural.
secret societies
A contradiction in terms...SEC implies to divide apart; SOC implies to unite together. Same linguistic trick as "sovereign citizen".
Correlation means it describes unknown causation.
A meaning implies a suggestion by another...ones consent to it establishes correlation, for which one ignores known (perceivable) cause.
100% causation
If one measures cause by a hundred (percent), then what about every number above a hundred? Furthermore...if hundred implies one and two zeros, then how many zeros can one cause affect?
Correlation is not causation
a) There can be only one cause for each effect within.
b) Cause differs effects from one another.
c) Not implies the correlation between ones consent and suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing), while denying the only perceivable cause for everything.
highest level
a) Level implies balance, which generates choice in-between high/low aka "as above/so below".
b) A jew suggests artificial levels to distract gentiles from being variable (choice) within level (balance) of nature.
c) How does a level-tool work? By utilizing form (life) within flow (inception towards death) to find balance within foundation.
euronews.
Notice the POINT, which implies a preceding sentence, hence EU R O N(orth) E(ast) W(est) S(outh) aka you are a cardinal within ordinal direction aka the cardinal essence of life sentenced by ordinal direction from inception towards point of death.
This is how false dialectics are created.
a) Dialect is shaped by ones consent to another ones suggestion, hence one + one = two (dia). Lect/leg - "to collect" implies the collecting of consent through suggestions made by speech, hence legein - "to speak".
b) True vs false implies dialectical conflict of reason aka one versus a second one over a third ones suggestion..the third one isn't participating in the conflict, but controls both sides (reason) from outside the ring (circular logic).
c) Created implies ones consent to suggested creationism aka creation out of noting (creatio ex nihilo), which tempts one into a conflict of reason...everything vs nothing aka destruction vs creation.
wtf the US or any other country that's not in the region cares
US aka UNITED STATES implies a joining together of remote states...tricked to care/carry the burden of bondage.
to look at the framing
Sight is framed by eye...looking implies locking onto what others are showing, which narrows ones sight to what others are channeling, hence telling a vision channels.
argument in support
Nature withdraws support from arguing minds, while inspiring the need to resist the wanted temptation of arguing. Within a moving nature...resistance is fertile.
Argument implies resistance vs resistance...mutual infertility.
The dance of life
a) Tunes regulates dance...if one tunes in.
b) Sound doesn't tune aka "form one sound to another"...there can be only one sound/sanus - "entire; whole" for each partial instrument within. Few utilize suggestion to tempt consenting many to tune in and henceforth dance in accord to the tunes of a conductor aka a conduit aka a pied piper.
move schools every year like I did and you avoid the programming/brainwashing a little
Because that forces one to adapt to a changing environment, instead of repeating fixed tasks over and over again. The trick underneath...nature doesn't require one to fit in; it inspires one to stand out from one another.
Public or private
Private (ones perception) within public (all perceivable)...OR implies that there's an alternative to cause, an inversion of effects alternating within the one and only cause.
If perception within perceivable implies private within public, then SUGGESTION shapes it into conflicts among privates...if one consents to it.
What's the lowest rank of soldiers called? Privates...reasoning about suggested implies war, within which privates fight each other for ranks/hring - "circle; ring" aka circular logic.
the definition was broadened.
Definition/definite - "to affix"...how could something affixed be broadened? Could it be that nature cannot be affixed; since it moves, yet beings within can be tricked to mentally hold onto definitions, which in return prevents each from broadening ones horizon?
you don’t notice it happening at all
To notice implies making a mental note when one consents to suggested information, while ignoring all perceivable inspiration. Nature doesn't note; it doesn't establish memorandums (random memory), and it it doesn't mark in writing.
NOT-e implies nothing aka suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing), which is why a musical note implies a pitch, just like a merchant makes a pitch to tempt consent.
What if note inverts noscere (to know; to perceive) with suggested nothing; to deny?
cannot be seen directly
Direction (inception towards death) implies separation (life)...only during separation can one have sight among moving differences.
Cannot implies suggested nihil-ism...something tempting ones mind to hold onto, which thereby conceals ones sight.
honorable
Aka being able to hone (sharpen) ones know-LEDGE...not seeking praise/price from others.
defense is justifiable, offense never is.
a) Only nature offers (inception) and takes (death) beings (life).
b) Offering (suggestion) and taking (consent) from one another tempts one to sacrifice self as an offering for the taking by others.
c) Justifiable implies just (all perceivable) enabling partisan (ones perception).
d) Never aka "nothing ever" implies a suggested inversion of the perceivable offer.
the only way...is to stop
Within the only way (inception towards death) one (life) cannot stop...few put stop signs everywhere to tempt many to deny ongoing motion.
The process of dying cannot be stopped...resisting it fertilizes life. Trying to stop anything within motion implies exponential waste of resistance.
stop watching media
Ones sight implies the perceiving mediator within all perceivable...watching implies focusing ones sight (hence narrowing it) by holding onto suggested, which tricks one to believe that one can hold onto it aka stop it moving.
Devil/diaballein aka dia (across) ballein (to throw) aka being thrown (life) across (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand...the devil is in the details. Hence DE (entirety) TAILLIER (to cut into pieces).
Being implies VIL (matter) within DE (momentum) of GOD (motion)...a jew tempts gentiles into a conflict of reason (god vs devil), which represents mutual destruction of gentiles by ignoring to discern self.
animated through a ritual
Ritual/rite - "to move in a straight line", hence animated (life) through a ritual (inception towards death).
involving a magical name of God
If God implies sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all", then ones consent to a suggested word (phonetic verb) makes the magic happen aka involves/envelopes/surrounds ones mind within the suggested word, while ignoring perceivable sound.
golem
a) Aka goyim...the artificial man who ignores natural, hence golem/galam - "wrapped up" in suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration moving through ones mind.
b) Golem aka GOing LEM aka luna (light) excursion (deviation in argument) module (allotted measure)...ignoring perceivable (light) by holding onto suggested (allotted measure) establishes a conflict of reason (deviation in argument).
Luna/leuk - "light" cannot be held onto as a ray (matter) within the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion). The dark side of the moon implies ones ignorance of light (discernment).
starlink
- People they come together
- People they fall apart
- No one can stop us now
- Cause we are all made of stars
Being implies falling (inception towards death) apart...a jew inverts this by tempting gentiles together aka establishing a "starlink", which requires ones choice to give consent to a chosen ones suggestion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1rFAaAKpVc ..."You can't ignore what is going 'round"...because going round (circular logic) implies ones ignorance of coming (life) straight (inception towards death).
jews and Jesus
Jesus (French; Je suis) - "i am", hence jew (phonetic, you)...if one within all claims self as "i am", then other ones become "you are".
It's gentiles who select each jew, hence ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion...that's how I AM (jesus) becomes YOU (jew).
jews hate
A jew tempts gentiles with suggestions to love or hate...either choice of side establishes a conflict of reason among gentiles against each other about what a jew suggested.
Once reason is established among gentiles...the suggested became an idol for those consenting to it; the suggesting few gained mass consent to reshape the suggested at will, and also control over both sides of every conflict of reason from the outside, which a jew perpetuates by contradicting both sides aka talmudic reasoning.
jews ordered romans
To rome/roam implies the wandering jew within the natural order...just like egypt implies a gypsy aka vagabond; bohemian; roamer (roma); rootless; vagrant, wanderer.
Influencer suggest information to tempt others to hold onto it, which then turns them against each other, hence truth vs false reasoning.
What about rebranding ROAM to ROME; thereby affixing a place within the minds of those ignoring the moving force of nature? This shapes gentiles into lost sheep who are wondering/wandering (to roam) within the roman dominion (empire) of a jewish sovereign, each operating as a "wandering jew".
Logic implies circular thinking within self turning into conflicts of reason against others, hence en-e-my (within me).
a) Gentile implies an effect within the cause of generation. A jew suggests legend/legere/leg - "to collect; gather" to tempt effects together by tricking mass consent to suggestion as an artificial cause.
Effect (perception) within cause (perceivable) can be affected (suggestion) by others...
b) Consenting to a suggestion con-verts aka turns together gentiles within conflicts of reason, like...effective vs ineffective.
These conflicts are artificial and distract one from discerning self within nature as effective within cause aka "in-effective".
Nation aka native (life) within action (inception towards death) implies each ones need to resist wanted temptation, hence israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".
A goyim/golem consents to follow the suggested temptations by others, while ignoring to resist perceivable.
So israel (each jew) implies a nation, while goy (collective of gentiles) implies a nation in denial...
Each religion/religio - "to bind anew" tempts believers and non-believers to hold onto suggested information.
Acceptance or denial of suggested truth or lies distracts one from discerning self as will within perish/perire/per - "forwards" aka as life being forwarded from inception towards death.
Where can one see no thing? How could one thing (perception) within every thing (perceivable) see no thing?
Christian implies "to anoint" aka the separation of each one within all aka establishment (life) during destruction (inception towards death).
A jew suggests pluralism aka polytheism (gods) to tempt each anointed (christ) gentile to join "christianity" through mass consent, which turns gentiles against each other aka anti-christ.
Joining (plural) contradicts anointing (singular)...the bond of religion contradicts the being of each christ aka ones consent to the suggestion of another contradicts ones choice by selecting a chosen one as sovereign over self.
Ones consent to suggested creation-ism establishes a conflict of reason (true vs false) about what others suggest IS, while one ignores what perceptibly WAS.
Coming into being implies a transfer from cause (perceivable) into effect (perception) aka an internal separation aka an unction/anointment of each one within all/oil...
OY VEY implies the WAY of OIL...for each salty seed within.
Just implies balance; war implies imbalance...it's ones choice ignoring balance (need/want) which imbalances (want vs not want) itself.
Belligerent aka bellum (war) gerere (to carry) implies holding onto a side within a conflict, while carrying the burden of con-sequence (following together).
Doing that tempts one to ignore that nation implies a separation of NAT-ives within act-ION.
a) Consenting to suggested moralism lures one into a circular conflict of reason...better versus worse aka a circumference (better/worse) lured into its center (versus).
In reality...a straight outside (inception towards death) generates each curved center (life) within.
b) Proposing a suggestion tempts those who consent to ignore ones position (perception) within pro/per/forward (perceivable).
Aka inhale and exhale thy confusion/disorder/confused medley of sounds aka the babel/babble of suggested words crafted into a medley within perceivable sound.
Medley; noun - "hand-to-hand combat, war, battle" aka a conflict of reason, hence medley/meddle - "mixing together"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=medley
Prior to Je suis (i am) implies all was before each one came into being.
Taking possession (je suis; i am) within a process of separation (christ; to anoint) establishes a contra-dict-ion aka conflict (contra) of shows (dict/deik) within action (ion)...that's how all the world became a stage for the onlookers.
Jesus (holding onto) contradicts Christ (setting apart).
Be set apart implies being (life) moved A-CROSS (inception towards death)...ignoring to discern this for self implies ones de-NIAL/NAIL.
Only within all can one be "of"...
Seeing implies the separation of each ones perception within all perceivable, hence each being enabled to see moving differences among each other.
A jew suggests tikkun olam (repairing the world by mixing together) to equalize differences among the unique perspective of each gentiles.
Like for example mixing white and black together corrupts the perceivable spectrum of light in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light). Absence implies ones sense willingly abdicating (ignorance) from light (discernment).
The jewish suggestion "There's not a problem that I can't fix...'Cause I can do it in the mix" goes INDEEP into a gentiles mind if consented to... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtfZbj4J71A
To know implies effect (perception) adapting to cause (perceivable)...interest in discussions about suggested tempts one towards outcome.