Left/right + up/down + front/back aka ones "cubic" perception within all "straight" perceivable...the suggestions of another tempts ones mind into circular logic, hence "circling the square root".
A jew tempts gentiles to view reality as a "circle of life; wheel of fortune; leap of faith on the path unwinding", which when consented to permits each jew to "square the circle"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratur_des_Kreises + https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratur_des_Kreises
If/then implies given (need) moving towards taking (want) medium ...suggested "media" tempts ones consent to ignore given, while taking a seat in Plato's allegory of the cave.
Only during given (perceivable) can one (perception) take (consent) from another (suggestion)...hence others suggesting media to invert medium.
manipulation
- ATION implies action aka all moving through each one.
- MANI implies ones manual reaction within all action.
- PUL implies manually filling self, while ignoring that action moves
Action forces reactions to let go (push), while tempting to hold onto (pull). Ones free will of choice can only operate in-between push (need) and pull (want).
Do you manually push (life) action (inception towards death)...or do you allow yourself to be pulled into it?
media
Choice at the center of balance (push/pull) implies the media/medium/medius - "middle" of all streaming motion.
Others suggest media to pull the medium (ones perception) out of stream (all perceivable).
black sun
Aka one (sun) ignoring (black) all (hole)... https://genius.com/Soundgarden-black-hole-sun-lyrics
- In my eyes (ones sight), indisposed (watching what others show)
- In disguises (suggested) no one knows (perceivable)
Maybe the...logo isn't a black hole
Ones consent to any suggested LOGO establishes LOGIC within self aka circular thinking of partial while ignoring (black) whole (hole).
grok
a) https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=grok
b) A partial (perception) within a whole (perceivable) cannot "drink" aka swallow up and engulf it. From thirst to piss implies a transfer process aka a passover...
c) Strange implies separated from one another, hence a native (perception) among foreigners (suggestion). Consenting to a suggestion makes one a "stranger within a strange land"...
heavenly sphere
Heaven/heave - "to raise"...a sphere forces anything within to remain level, hence prevent raising. Only within a lowering line (inception towards death) can one raise above (life).
non-human dynamic
a) Non isn't active, but reactive aka a beings choice of ignoring activity.
b) Dynamic implies fluid; static implies solid within fluid...not as suggested "having no motion; being at rest; quiescent; fixed; stationary".
It's ones consent to any suggested information, which "affixes" it within ones mind/memory, hence tempting ones ignorance to pretend to be static. This in return permits those suggesting to define/redefine and contradict what dynamic means or not.
c) Human aka hue (color) of man implies the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) for each ray (matter) within.
Few suggest a conflict...human vs animal to distract many from discerning self to be animated within the hue of man.
This conflict among many is called "reason", and within each is called "logic" aka circular thinking aka static ignoring dynamic.
dark occult
Ones ignorance (dark) occults/conceals ones discernment (light).
homo sapiens
a) Suggested homo (same) tempts one to ignore being differentiated (life) during sameness (inception towards death).
b) Sapience (discernment) implies the division (dis) of each ones perceiving (cern) mind (ment) from one another.
Homo (same) inverts sapience (different).
decentralized
Natural decentralization implies center (life) divided from one another, within same current (inception towards death).
Artificial decentralization tempts many to consent to different currencies...banked by the same few.
Natural current sets free; artificial currency binds together.
stablecoins
Aka cattle flipping coins for a place within the same stable.
Bitcoin Magazine
why would they make...code to plunge...industry
Because code/codex (systematic compilation of) can only be applied after industrial production. Codes harvest production...if consented to.
Any suggested law tempts a gentile to give consent to a jewish sovereign. Tempting consent by suggestion implies the systematic compilation of gentiles (commonwealth) under a jew (sovereign).
A jew tricks codified gentiles to produce their own harvesting. Using the products to distract from this implies magic/sorcery/witchcraft/spellcraft etc.
pure censorship
A contradiction in terms (terminology aka terminal logic) to distract from ones free will of choice to ignore purification (discernment) for self imposed censorship (ignorance).
Why do they have an international law that extends the definition
a) Being implies within natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater). A jew suggest an internal (national) vs external (international) conflict of reason to trick each gentile to ignore being the internal (inter) native (nat) of all (al) action (ion).
b) Definite implies affixed, and a gentiles consent holding onto a suggested definition by a jew affixes it within ones mind/memory, which represents ones ignorance of nature moving.
It's the moving force of nature, which the ignorant one within, perceives as the expansion of the held onto definition. Nature implies an ongoing process...any definition held onto implies a self imposed constipation.
extends the definition of child porn to literally everything?
Buying into sells self out, which is why porn/pornē - "prostitute" drives sales.
Porn thrived under the "teen" label, which tempted many to seek fresh products from few. Afterward the "teen" category was switched with "amateur", which represents gentiles industrially producing fresh content by themselves, and for one another, which frees each jew for control over the hub of porn aka from production towards distribution.
Child porn isn't mainly about the children, but about porn watchers being "guilty", while seeking "innocence" in fresh products. And porn isn't mainly about the sins of the flesh either, but about new (suggested) over old (perceivable) aka ignoring reality for fiction.
Ignoring perceivable for suggested "prostitutes" ones choice to a chosen ones will...porn is about making fresh stale. Child-porn has to be both advertised and curtailed, to trick stale gentiles into believing there's fresh produce left.
a) Only gentile consent permits a jew to "enter tame mind".
b) A picture implies a "captured moment"; while a motion picture implies "moving a captured moment", both of which tempt matter (life) to ignore perceivable momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
Matter within momentum of motion implies "reactors within direction"...a jew suggests "actors following directors" to invert that.
c) A jew suggests creationism (creatio ex nihilo) to tempt gentiles to consent to nothing as the origin of something. Reality implies...everything (all perceivable) generating each thing (ones perception) by internal transformation of base into ingredients aka alchemy.
my credibility
One cannot own credit; only give it to others.
only separation from God
God (whole) separates into each anointed (christ) being (partial).
spiritually corrupting
Con-spire implies "breathing together". Being implies partition of aether (inception towards death) through each aer (life).
Spirit (through one) gets corrupted by -ual (dual; two together)...ones consent "breathes life" into the suggestion of another one. That's a wasted breathe aka spiritual corruption.
reddit thread here...
One of the commenters wrote: "The powers that be want us arguing about relentlessly: typically dichotomies, false dilemmas, between two and only two options for every category...but never, ever, another option"
That "another" option implies each ones free will of choice. It's choosing to give consent to the suggested choice of another, which establishes a dichotomy aka a division of two.
What do the Rosicrucians believe in?
a) Rosi (rose; rise) cruci (cross; across) aka to rise (life) across (inception towards death)...
b) To believe implies holding onto a suggested side, while ignoring to be the perceiving center of all perceivable.
Here's the center of each rosicrucian... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compass_rose
Notice...cardinal, which implies pivotal (pin on which a wheel or other object turns). Consenting to a suggestion pins ones mind into the circular wheel of logic, which turns against others within conflicts of reason.
Meanwhile...nature directs each being as life sentenced towards point of death, hence not pinned down, but set free at center. What's the opposite of pivotal? Inessential!
a) There's an issue with that...only inside can there be shapes. Trying to show outside to those inside inverts the origin (flow) of shape (form).
b) Con (together) contradicts cave/keue (to swell). Only apart from one another can one swell from the inside outwards.
c) You call everything "universe", yet uni (one) verse/verto (to turn) implies one thing turning within everything.
How could oneness turn? If God implies one, then what does turning imply? Turning implies around; coming into being implies within (life) straight (inception towards death)...
two triangles
A contradiction in terms... TWO (2) TRI (3) tempting ones angular perspective to ignore that differences can only be shaped within the same motion.
A chosen one suggests dualism (2) and trinitarianism (3) to make other ones accountable.
the name David...consists of
Consist aka con (together) sistere (to place) contradicts nature setting (all perceivable) apart (ones perception). That's why there's a difference between the suggested name "david" and the perceivable implication of "divide".
one star in the middle
Being one (perception) within all (perceivable) implies medium/medius - "middle". A jew suggests "media" to mediate for consenting gentiles, hence tempting each one off center and into circumference (circular logic).
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Moby-we-are-all-made-of-stars-lyrics
The word for “one”
A word is shaped by letters aka one who shapes the word (suggestion) and one who LETS another shape (consent).
Nature doesn't shape words; it moves all sound through each one instrumental being by force, which inspires resistance (need) to temptation (want) from each ones free will of choice.
A jew tempts ones choice to select a chosen ones suggestion, hence LETTING another make choices for one.
In short...one implies only; words are never enough to describe to one another what it's all about.
a triangle consists of 3 corners
If one looks at a triangle, then ones perspective establishes another angle. Out of the corner of ones eyes...
Put your hands down into the shape of triangle...if you look down on it; then your eye represents the top of a pyramid.
a crypto-jewish explorer and navigator named Christopher
a) Christo (to anoint; to separate) + bher (to carry) implies nature carrying each anointed being apart from one another, hence off-spring.
b) As for the jewish name...Cristóbal aka cris-to-bal (christ to ba'al) implies "turning separation" against each other.
Cristóbal Colón adds the colon; noun - "clause of a sentence", hence closing ones life sentence, when turning against one another.
David (divide) + Remphan/rephan aka re (response) bha (to speak).
Nature divides sound/sanus (entire) into each instrumental being...a jew tricks gentiles with the spoken word (logos) into ignoring sound (logic) while dividing against each other (reason).
can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes
How can one see with ones own eyes...ones inception and ones death?
If all photographs of...are a hoax
a) One cannot photograph all. A photo can only be taken by one from within all.
b) One cannot write (graph) light (photo)...only within all light can each ray write to one another.
How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
a) Body implies solid within fluid aka atmos/atmo - "spiritually arouse", hence motion generating momentum (inception towards death) to spiritually arouse matter (life).
A jew suggests shapes like "flat" and "sphere" to distract gentiles from being within the process of atmos (German atmen; breathing).
b) To maintain implies "taking into possession", hence man (hand) tenere (to hold)...being implies potential (life) set free within procession (inception towards death).
A jew suggests gentiles to maintain aka tainting self (perception) within main (perceivable) by holding onto suggested.
To learn is to know
TO (towards) implies the known ledge (inception towards death) for each enabled being (life) within to learn to teach/teach to learn self.
To experience is to understand
EX (out of) PER (forward) implies coming (inception towards death) into being (life)...to understand implies a being choosing to "stand-under" another being, while ignoring to ex-press self outwards, while being forwarded.
Understanding inverts knowledge. Understanding tempts one to hold onto suggested information; knowledge implies all perceivable inspiration moving through ones perception.
I wish I could be...knowledgable
Wishing implies towards outcome; knowledge implies origin forwarding being.
Being implies able (life) within ledge (inception towards death) of known.
If it does "work" then it would only be possible
Work implies energy (internal power)...all works so that each one within can become possible.
by trickery
Energy implies internal (effects) separation of external (cause)...others trick one to ignore that by mentally and physically joining together what nature sets apart from one another.
if it does
IF implies then within perceptible nature...IT implies an artificial suggestion tempting ones consent into a conflict of reason (does vs doesn't).
Few suggest IT (artificial) in the name of IF (natural) to trick ones perception into ignoring perceivable for suggested.
It's just some modern art piece.
Nature implies just; artifice does nature injustice...if one ignores natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).
a transatlantic tunnel that was never built but only someones pipe dream
a) Trans-a-tlantic aka "transfer (trans) without (a) bearing (tlantic/tlenai)"...
b) All perceivable transfers through each ones perception without one being able to bear/carry it...instead its perceivable which carries forth perception.
c) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a tunnel, which conceals perceivable from one; while permitting others to pipe dreams into one, since ones perception is asleep.
Piping dreams like Hollywood...the dream factory.
flood the zone
Zone/zōnē - "belt" aka a belt around one aka circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others.
A jew utilizes influencer (fluid) to inform (solid) gentiles...consenting to the fluid influence of solidified information suggested; "floods the zone" aka tempts one to restrict self with the saturnian belt of logic, which turns into the ouroboros of reasoning against others.
Suggested information tempts ones consenting choice to incline away from center and into circumference...
- Out along the edges...Always where I burn to be
- The further on the edge...The hotter the intensity
https://genius.com/Kenny-loggins-danger-zone-lyrics + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siwpn14IE7E
What Does Antisemitism Really Mean?
a) The sem in anti-sem-ite implies shem - "name" aka the fiction tricking one to derive meaning from, while ignoring reality.
b) Name/nombre/number - "designation of a unit" implies each unitas/unus - "one" within all of nature...not the name one brands other ones with.
Unit implies the body natural; name implies the body politique aka a fictitious label which permits others to operate in the name of reality.
c) If anti (against) then for (before). Without self discernment one ignores BE (being) FOR (forwarded) aka each forwarded (inception towards death) being (life).
If one is being forwarded (before) then one isn't AGAINST others, but A GAIN aka temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
A GAIN implies the body natural; AGAINST implies the body politique, hence the conflicts among beings.
been weaponized
Without self discernment one ignores BE (being) EN (within) aka one within all aka living within process of dying aka choice within balance.
Each ones weapon of choice implies the instrument for ones offense/defense, which are in balance with one another, hence each one having to defend self (life) within what nature offers (inception towards death).
Few trick many to "choose" suggested weapons to offend or defend against each other, which in return tempts many to ignore that consenting to a suggestion implies lowering ones defense by submitting to the offer by another, hence taking offense by ignoring defense.
Anointing suggests on-ointment, joining oil to flesh.
a) Perception implies natural; suggestion implies artifice. Suggestion tempts consent into a binding contract, which artificially annuls natural anointment.
b) Before something can be applied ON; something has to be separated IN everything, hence from all into each anointed one.
c) Before one can join oil onto flesh...flesh has to come into form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Once again there's a difference between natural and artificial anointment, tempting many to buy artificial oil for their flesh from few, who advertise it as "essential" oil, which it isn't, since essence implies "being".
Oil represents flow, flesh represents form.
a) Represent implies ones response to all presented...flow cannot respond to presented; only form within flow can, which implies adaptation.
b) Perceivable oil implies the momentum (inception towards death) of all motion for each matter (life) within. Coming into being through MOM-entum implies the natural anointment from father (motion) through mother (momentum) into each off-spring aka seed.
Oil implies the entire process from flow into form aka oil/all.
c) Suggested oil is shaped by form; out of form, and for form, while tempting form to ignore flow. It's being advertised as skin-care aka carried upon skin aka a burden upon that which nature set free.
Few suggest many to apply oil from outside to prevent skin from drying out; which tempts many to ignore that flow forces itself through form, hence pouring liquid outwards, which forces solid to replenish aka generation forcing re-generation aka action forcing re-action.
Jesus holds onto oil, and sets apart from non-oil.
a) Christ implies the setting apart of all into each anointed one; jesus aka je suis (i am) implies one taking possession over self, while ignoring the procession of all.
b) Non implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting one to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
c) Coming through the birth-channel sets each anointed being free from one another, hence wielding FREE will of choice. Choosing to hold onto implies rubbing against each other, thereby annulling anointment aka rubbing off, which also implies a transfer agreement between ones consent and another ones suggestion, hence few selling many something to hold onto.
join
Join; verb - "uniting into whole" inverts whole (all) separating into units (one). Only one within all can dis-cern self aka distinguish between ones perception and all perceivable.
A jew suggests gentiles to join aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states; united nation; united kingdom; soviet union; european union; uniformity; university; unisex; unicode; usb aka equality through diversity aka artificial sovereignty based upon natural equity aka multiculturalism; miscegenation; mongrelization; melting pot; mass migration and on and on and on...
If God (all), then separation into each Christ (one)...the joining of Jesus + Christ inverts that separation.
a) Fugal/fugue/fuga - "flight; flow" aka force (inception towards death) generating center (life) during flight.
b) A suggested centrifuge shows the rider held within circumference, while riding circles around the center.
Ones perception represents the center of all perceivable, while consent to suggestions from the circumference keeps ones circular logic spinning within ones memory...."right round like a record, baby"
c) Gravity/gravitas/gwere - "heavy"... aka impressing motion (inception towards death) pressuring matter (life) to heave itself up by resisting (need) temptations (want).
What's the opposite of heavy? Light! What's the weight of light? Ignorance...