your first assumption. That there was such thing as a brown skinned Jew in year 0. There wasn't. You had black Hebrews. Like all the Egyptian slaves, you think they are tan brown, right? All historians agree, right. Wrong. The Jews stole the Hebrew identity and inserted themselves in history. The entire middle east race of light brown people was created by white slaves and black power, then by black slaves and white power. Just because the majority of historians agree with something doesn't mean it's true or even more likely. It's a belief system that has more followers, that's all. Do you know what a logical fallacy is? There are many different ones, believing the experts is call "appealing to authority.". It unscientific human nature. Try and see that and you can grow into your next mind. Looks like it's coming for you anyway, you're on to it.
How can this be true? Well, first read "from Hebrews to negroes" if you want to argue what I've regurgitated from when I read that book. The book will not make you question your faith in Jesus, so don't worry about that
.
The jews stole the Hebrew identity and inserted themselves in history.
a) Identical implies "same"; being implies different from one another. What if a jew tricks gentiles to hold onto identity, thereby behave alike, while ignoring to be differentiated from one another?
Wouldn't that permit a jew to change likeness at will aka switching in-between identities aka shape-shifting?
b) Where is his-story stored? What if a jew suggests a story to tempt consenting gentiles to store it within mind/memory, while ignoring that nature moves and cannot be recollected?
c) If he-brew the same (identity), then what different ingredients does he use?
d) If HE BREW HIS STORY within a gentiles mind, then that implies cook/coquere - "turn over in the mind"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cook
What if steering the pot (circular vessel) implies the use of suggested information to misguide the course of circular logic?
e) What if a chosen one cannot insert self into others without ones choice inviting in? Consenting to a suggestion sounds like an invite...
Color implies light separating into spectrum...analysis.
Jesus implies name attached to being...synthesis.
Only within natural analysis can there be artificial synthesis. Asking me if I agree implies an artificial synthesis, which I naturally analyzed by taking it apart into the (a)GREED it implies aka you putting things together aka to seek agreement from others aka wanting more (artificial) than needed (natural).
Spanish
Greed in Spanish...codicia
Agreed in Spanish...acordado
A-CODICIA/CORDADO...same phonetic origin.
should I speak
a) Sound implies natural; word implies artificial; language implies artificial layers.
b) Should/sceal/skel - "to be under an obligation"...a being is not under the obligation to speak; but set free from one another within sound.
a) Color/colos/kel - "to cover"...if nature reveals; then what does color conceal?
b) Jesus aka je suis - "I am"...if one takes possession over self (I am) during the process of natural revelation, then...?
c) The visible spectrum of light implies a separation of hue (color) during motion, for each ray of matter, bend apart from one another.
d) What about the difference between color and chroma - "intensity of distinctive hue, degree of departure of a color-sensation from that of white or gray" ?
"jews" are turkomongoloid hybrid trash who have absolutely no connection to Judea or Jerusalem. The genetic evidence could not be more clear. Not one of your ancestors set foot in the holy land you dysgenic yid.
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/society/exactly-why-jesus-christ-not-jew
your first assumption. That there was such thing as a brown skinned Jew in year 0. There wasn't. You had black Hebrews. Like all the Egyptian slaves, you think they are tan brown, right? All historians agree, right. Wrong. The Jews stole the Hebrew identity and inserted themselves in history. The entire middle east race of light brown people was created by white slaves and black power, then by black slaves and white power. Just because the majority of historians agree with something doesn't mean it's true or even more likely. It's a belief system that has more followers, that's all. Do you know what a logical fallacy is? There are many different ones, believing the experts is call "appealing to authority.". It unscientific human nature. Try and see that and you can grow into your next mind. Looks like it's coming for you anyway, you're on to it.
How can this be true? Well, first read "from Hebrews to negroes" if you want to argue what I've regurgitated from when I read that book. The book will not make you question your faith in Jesus, so don't worry about that .
a) Identical implies "same"; being implies different from one another. What if a jew tricks gentiles to hold onto identity, thereby behave alike, while ignoring to be differentiated from one another?
Wouldn't that permit a jew to change likeness at will aka switching in-between identities aka shape-shifting?
b) Where is his-story stored? What if a jew suggests a story to tempt consenting gentiles to store it within mind/memory, while ignoring that nature moves and cannot be recollected?
c) If he-brew the same (identity), then what different ingredients does he use?
d) If HE BREW HIS STORY within a gentiles mind, then that implies cook/coquere - "turn over in the mind"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cook
What if steering the pot (circular vessel) implies the use of suggested information to misguide the course of circular logic?
e) What if a chosen one cannot insert self into others without ones choice inviting in? Consenting to a suggestion sounds like an invite...
So you agree?
aGREED or disaGREED implies ones desire to possess, which corrupts ones potential to express.
Should I speak in Spanish so you don't over analyze my words?
Only within natural analysis can there be artificial synthesis. Asking me if I agree implies an artificial synthesis, which I naturally analyzed by taking it apart into the (a)GREED it implies aka you putting things together aka to seek agreement from others aka wanting more (artificial) than needed (natural).
A-CODICIA/CORDADO...same phonetic origin.
a) Sound implies natural; word implies artificial; language implies artificial layers.
b) Should/sceal/skel - "to be under an obligation"...a being is not under the obligation to speak; but set free from one another within sound.
Haha that you thought you could stop him by switching languages, ahaha, this is funny to me and I hope you laugh too!
Just having fun 😊
a) Color/colos/kel - "to cover"...if nature reveals; then what does color conceal?
b) Jesus aka je suis - "I am"...if one takes possession over self (I am) during the process of natural revelation, then...?
c) The visible spectrum of light implies a separation of hue (color) during motion, for each ray of matter, bend apart from one another.
d) What about the difference between color and chroma - "intensity of distinctive hue, degree of departure of a color-sensation from that of white or gray" ?
e) If chroma/ghreu - "to rub, grind" is applied to christ (each anointed one), then it would grind off the anointment...
"jews" are turkomongoloid hybrid trash who have absolutely no connection to Judea or Jerusalem. The genetic evidence could not be more clear. Not one of your ancestors set foot in the holy land you dysgenic yid.