The jews stole the Hebrew identity and inserted themselves in history.
a) Identical implies "same"; being implies different from one another. What if a jew tricks gentiles to hold onto identity, thereby behave alike, while ignoring to be differentiated from one another?
Wouldn't that permit a jew to change likeness at will aka switching in-between identities aka shape-shifting?
b) Where is his-story stored? What if a jew suggests a story to tempt consenting gentiles to store it within mind/memory, while ignoring that nature moves and cannot be recollected?
c) If he-brew the same (identity), then what different ingredients does he use?
d) If HE BREW HIS STORY within a gentiles mind, then that implies cook/coquere - "turn over in the mind"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cook
What if steering the pot (circular vessel) implies the use of suggested information to misguide the course of circular logic?
e) What if a chosen one cannot insert self into others without ones choice inviting in? Consenting to a suggestion sounds like an invite...
Color implies light separating into spectrum...analysis.
Jesus implies name attached to being...synthesis.
Only within natural analysis can there be artificial synthesis. Asking me if I agree implies an artificial synthesis, which I naturally analyzed by taking it apart into the (a)GREED it implies aka you putting things together aka to seek agreement from others aka wanting more (artificial) than needed (natural).
Spanish
Greed in Spanish...codicia
Agreed in Spanish...acordado
A-CODICIA/CORDADO...same phonetic origin.
should I speak
a) Sound implies natural; word implies artificial; language implies artificial layers.
b) Should/sceal/skel - "to be under an obligation"...a being is not under the obligation to speak; but set free from one another within sound.
a) Identical implies "same"; being implies different from one another. What if a jew tricks gentiles to hold onto identity, thereby behave alike, while ignoring to be differentiated from one another?
Wouldn't that permit a jew to change likeness at will aka switching in-between identities aka shape-shifting?
b) Where is his-story stored? What if a jew suggests a story to tempt consenting gentiles to store it within mind/memory, while ignoring that nature moves and cannot be recollected?
c) If he-brew the same (identity), then what different ingredients does he use?
d) If HE BREW HIS STORY within a gentiles mind, then that implies cook/coquere - "turn over in the mind"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cook
What if steering the pot (circular vessel) implies the use of suggested information to misguide the course of circular logic?
e) What if a chosen one cannot insert self into others without ones choice inviting in? Consenting to a suggestion sounds like an invite...
So you agree?
aGREED or disaGREED implies ones desire to possess, which corrupts ones potential to express.
Should I speak in Spanish so you don't over analyze my words?
Only within natural analysis can there be artificial synthesis. Asking me if I agree implies an artificial synthesis, which I naturally analyzed by taking it apart into the (a)GREED it implies aka you putting things together aka to seek agreement from others aka wanting more (artificial) than needed (natural).
A-CODICIA/CORDADO...same phonetic origin.
a) Sound implies natural; word implies artificial; language implies artificial layers.
b) Should/sceal/skel - "to be under an obligation"...a being is not under the obligation to speak; but set free from one another within sound.
Haha that you thought you could stop him by switching languages, ahaha, this is funny to me and I hope you laugh too!