The reason none of this makes sense
Sense/sentire - "to perceive" implies linear progression aka from all perceivable through each ones perception. Reason implies circular logic within self; turning into conflicts against others.
One senses that which shapes; not the shape. One cannot sense a circle; only an ongoing line shaped into a temporary circle.
Even Israel
Isreal/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies being at odds...not even.
isn't at the top there's something even higher
Odds (life) can only exist within even (inception towards death)...not above or below one another, but in-between aka as above/so below.
Top vs bottom aka high vs low implies a conflict of reason among gentiles, who instead of thinking straight are thinking circular aka logical, based one the suggested logos (words) by a jew.
not the devil or God
Devil aka dia (across) ballein (to throw)...motion throws matter (life) across (inception towards death). The word "god" distracts gentiles from motion; and the word "de-vil" from being matter within the momentum of motion.
Not aka nothing aka nihilo implies ones de-nial of everything moving each thing apart from one another. The words a jew suggests to label motion, are held by gentiles who ignore perceivable motion for suggested label held onto.
literally not even one straight answer anywhere about anything.
Cause there's only one solution (inception towards death) for any problem (life) within. Problems questioning and answering each other distracts from solution.
Notice literal (by the letter)... nature generates liberal (liber; free) hence giving each being free will of choice. A letter tempts ones free will of choice to LET another shape words into questions and answers.
it's so irritating
To irritate implies "stimulate to action"...one cannot act; only react aka respond to all of nature acting upon each one within.
Few utilize suggestion as a stimulus to tempt many to react in the name of taking action. In nature...reaction (perception) cannot take action (perceivable)...because it fucking moves.
Letting go of what one chose to hold onto...calms irritation.
Its almost like "science" is just the bounds of the lies.
a) Science/scio - "to know" implies each ones perception of all perceivable...anything suggested implies scientism, which tempts ones consent to hold onto the suggested, hence becoming a scientist. -ist implies follower of -ism.
b) Your consent to suggested information by choosing either true or false; binds your choice within a conflict of reason (true vs false).
c) Truth is bound to lie and vice versa, because in nature two different sides (inception and death) imply the same motion for each temporary matter (life) within.
Sides imply balance within motion for the choice of matter to adapt by balancing...choosing to hold onto any side implies imbalance for ones choice.
this is about everything
Everything implies about/abutan (on the outside)...each thing implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death).
THIS IS implies the suggestion of another tempting ones perception inside to ignore everything perceivable outside for what another suggests THIS IS.
Perceivable WAS before ones perception can be distracted with the suggestion of what IS.
WAS implies reality moving; IS implies affixed fiction...if one consents to the suggestion thereof.
I have no idea if this meme or whatever is true.
a) Instead of thinking straight; you think circular (logic); hence turning against others within a conflict of reason (true vs false).
b) Your de-nial of straight (reality) for circular (fiction) represents NO aka nothing/nihilo/nial.
c) Others tempted you with suggested information aka idealism (idolatry) to choose a side (true or false), hence tricking you to TURN from your position at center of everything towards a side, hence off-center; hence off the straight and narrow path of righteousness...
Letting go of either true or false allows one to perceive CHANGE, which implicates (if/then), while inspiring adaptation by choice.
Reason (true vs false) tempts ones choice to choose the same VS aka VERSUS aka VERTO aka "to turn" from either side, hence encircling ones line of thinking.
Being able to perceive implies an ongoing differentiation of all perceivable and each ones perception...suggesting others if earth or heaven doesn't move, tempts one to ignore perception for suggestion.
Being implies differentiation (life) during equation (inception towards death)...few suggest mathematical formula for the equation of two expressions, as to distract the one consenting to it, from discerning self as a singular part within whole.
Nature implies impression (action); being implies expression (reaction)...counting expressions together tempts one to ignore that each expression was set apart from one another, before one could count them together.
Math was designed by few to equalize differences among many.
I don't feel above.
In a balance based system...deriding anything under (satanic larp) implies from an above position.
I'm pointing out
Being alive implies sentenced at inception towards point of death..."pointing out" represents a rhetorical trick to tempt life towards death.
One may view what is shown by another as a satanic larp, but the handiwork of the great deceiver (satan) can be traced back to ones behavior.
Pointing out is the inversion of being sentenced within, and these inversions by few turn many against each other, like for example in a ball/ba'al game.
is not to be confused with actual demon summoning
a) Actual implies nature ACTING upon each RE-ACTING being within. There's nothing within nature that isn't actual; but reactions can be confused through summation aka with establishing a sum of all things by artificially putting together what nature sets apart from one another.
b) Demon aka dai (divider) mon (provider)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/demon implies nature providing (inception towards death) division (life) among being.
Nature providing action divides into reactions...that's demonic. Being a reaction within action aka a difference in direction between intersecting lines (angle) implies angelic.
That doesn't mean it's innocuous and doesn't render the symbols meaningless though
Meaning is symbolic; not actual. Nature throws (inception towards death) apart (life) each one within, not sym (together) bol (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/symbol
Throwing apart implies linear progression (action towards reactions), while throwing together implies a circular conflict (meaning vs meaningless) called reason...a deception.
Do you really think nothing is happening
Everything perceivable moving through each things perception implies linear progression...circular thinking (logic) implies ones de-nial of everything linear aka nial/nihilo/nothing.
A jew comes to Egypt.
Egypt (a gypsy) implies each wandering jew...so does Rome (to roam; wander).
The trick...Egypt and Rome represent theoretical fiction; while "a gypsy + to roam" imply empirical reality. That's how a jew can take down empires within the minds of gentiles, while simultaneously surviving those theoretical falls of empires.
greed
A jew utilizes all given (perceivable) by tempting each one gentile given to (perception) to take (consent) nothing (suggested)...for the price of selling self out.
Gentiles are taking nothing (fiat currency) from a jew, while denying natural current offering everything...wanting more than nature offers implies ones excessively eager desire to possess from another aka greed.
The opposite of greed? Generosity aka all (nature) generating each one (being).
jacob
Aka Ya'aqobh - "a supplanter; one who dispossess aka acquires (a position from someone) by strategy or scheming"...
Suggestion represents the strategic scheme by a jew to tempt gentile consent to willingly dispossess itself from perception, hence ignoring it.
A jew acquires everything a gentile ignores automatically. Why? Because everything (perceivable) is given to each thing (perception) for free will of choice, which is what one ignores when consenting to a chosen ones suggestion.
Consent inverts choice into chance...a gamble aka taking a chance by giving up choice. That's the origin of greed.
odd way
Oddities (life) within even (inception towards death)...that's what sound generates.
you couldn't resist breaking down
Breaking apart resists the temptation of holding together. Why is "sounds alike" such an easy rhetoric to use when drawing comparisons? Could it be a temptation?
GOTTA have more
One (perception) got all (perceivable)...there cannot be more than all, nor can one have all aka take possession of it, while being divided by it (per sonos; by sound) and in it (in-sanus; within sound).
more important
a) IN (inception) PORT/PART (life) EX (death) aka partial within whole coming in and out.
b) Import and export implies linear progression...more vs less implies circular stagnation during linear progression.
As a partial within whole, what could be more important than breaking apart aka sustaining self? Off-spring implies breaking apart...coming into being sounds important.
wtf
Meet the fuckers... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family (The last name was originally spelled "Fucker")
That's the origin of "fuck" aka fuge (masonic joint)...which is what a mason does to ones free will of choice by tempting consent with suggestion.
It's obviously satanic larp but come on, they didn't summon shit.
Summon aka sub (under) monere (to admonish, warn)...does one feel "above" a warning when deriding it? Do you think yourself in an above position in this under-world? If so...what if you're being tricked to think like that?
at the top
One can't be at the top without being under. Where is that which one climbed to the top of situated under?
at the top on the rite
A rite implies a passage from/to...how could one be at the top of a bottom, while being moved from origin towards outcome? Which one came first...from/to or top vs bottom?
Why the "vs" in-between top and bottom? Because climbing to the top turns (versus/verto) one away from bottom. While being (life) moved from origin (inception) towards outcome (death)...can one turn away from the only way one is in?
sounds like
Sound/sanus - "entire; whole"...whole cannot be alike, only partials within whole can be alike one another, when ignoring to be differentiated from one another.
Comparing different...
...equalizing differences makes them alike. What set those differences apart from one another, before one can make comparisons in-between them?
If all is one in energy, then what does one within all compare energy to?
It's ones free will of choice to be in-BE-tween (as above/so below) or under a hierarchy...
nostradamus
Aka nostra (our) damus/dido/deh (to give) which implies singular giving self up to plural. Our implies a possessive, hence only taking in...not giving out.
fiction
Aka fict (to shape) ion (action). Before one can shape action...action (inception towards death) shapes re-actions (life), hence "be-fore" aka forwarding being.
Ones RE-sponse to ALL action implies re-al.
book of revelation
Re (response) vela (velare; veil; cover) tion (action). Action generates reactions by setting each one free from one another, hence enabling each being to react to one another, while acted upon.
A suggested book binds ones free will of choice in-between covers...if consented to.
You so know that King James was a freemason, right?
a) You vs me + was (perceivable) vs is (suggested) + right vs wrong imply conflicts of reason aka a cover a mason tempts ones free will of choice into.
b) King implies rule/reg - "to move in a straight line", hence each one within the king-dom of god being (life) moved within a straight line (inception towards death) aka king (motion) generating DOM (momentum) to set FREE (matter).
c) James/jacob/ya'aqobh - "to supplant; dispossess, acquire (a position from someone) by strategy or scheming" implies a jew speaking (suggestion) in the name of god (perceivable) to disposes gentiles (perception).
d) A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggestion as bricks and consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within others.
AT BEST occult
All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies linear thinking...turning against others within conflicts of reason (best vs worse) implies circular logic.
Circular logic occults thinking straight...
Christlike ways
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. The separation of all into each one implies christ (to anoint), while ignoring self (singular) for others (plural) equalizes natural differences by artificially making them alike one another.
The foundation for ignoring self for others is based on JESUS (je suis; i am), hence one claiming for self by taking from another, which establishes the YOU (phonetic jew)...the merchant of temptation giving what one wants to take for the price of ones soul/sole (one and only).
1 + 1 = 2
a) All implies equal; each one within implies differentiated from one another.
b) Only within all can one be added (inception), subtracted (death); multiplied (intercourse) and divided (status quo of being one).
c) 1 (a chosen ones suggestion) + 1 (ones consent) = 2 (dualism)...the resulting conflict of reason among consenting ones implies a DUAL/DUEL.
Sounds to me like
a) Sound towards me implies a differentiation of all into one.
b) Me implies one holding onto self, while ignoring that sound differentiates each one from one another.
c) Ignoring all (perceivable) implies for one another (suggested), which makes anyone consenting to a suggestion "alike" one another.
trust
Trust binds; thrust frees... from push (inception towards death) to shove (life), hence being (choice) tempted by pull (want), while being shoved (need).
T(h)RUST...what if the "h" is silent? What if H (phonetic age/aiw - "vital force") implies the sound of silence? If an off-spring screams after birth, then was one still-born before choosing to make noise?
- EL... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_(deity)
- VIS... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vis-a-vis
- PRES... from pre (before), hence impression before expression.
- LEY... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ley
God (el) implies impressing flow; each being within implies expressed form/face/visage (vis). Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life) within a-line (align), hence the alignment of natural features.
Did you make these definitions up or what? Source?
a) Few make up definitions (suggested artifice) to trick many to ignore source (perceivable nature).
b) Words are shaped within sound...ignoring sound for any def-inition makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
A jew suggests words like "insane person" to distract gentiles from discerning self as IN SANUS (within sound) + PER SONOS (by sound). This practice of mass deception is called spell-craft.
from dividends
Dividend/dividere - "to force (inception towards death) apart (life)"...nature forces apart the artificial values gentiles hold onto, which where suggested to them by a jew.
onlyfans
A fan implies a devotee aka one who appropriates by or as if by vow aka ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Devote (holding onto) inverts divide (set apart)...
As for only...there can be only one. Whatever one does; affects each other one, hence if one devotes (gentile); another one divides (jew).
home owners association
A home cannot be owned within a moving nature...unless an association (joined company) is established first. To join the artificial company of others implies ones ignorance of nature disjointing each one from one another.
fight back against an association
Fighting implies versus/verto - "to turn" aka turning against one another aka both sides aiming at each other...that's an association.
Nature cannot be fought back...each being struggles to grow life during the natural process of dying.
home
- Home/ham - "dwelling place"; from tkei - "to settle, dwell"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/home
- Settle/setlen - "become set or fixed, stable or permanent; come down"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/settle
- Dwell/dwellan (to lead into error) + dwelana (go astray) + twellen (to hinder; delay) + gedweola (error; heresy; madness) + dwale (deception; trickery)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/dwell
Few suggest "home" to establish settlements (settled minds) among many, which natures motion destroys on behalf of few who depart from settled minds.
Peter; verb - "to diminish gradually and then cease"...few establish hierarchies to grade many, as to distract from nature diminishing (inception towards death) beings (life) when joining hierarchical structures aka when arranging by degrees.
As for level...inception towards death implies the horizontal level (balance) for each irregular life (choice) within.
stringless puppets
A puppet is attached to the theater, hence dolled up to play a part for an audience.
No strings attached implies each ones free will of choice resisting the temptations of one another...a life long struggle.
Edit: Notice them wearing ties, hence being bound...
Elvis aka el (god) vis (visage; face; form) + pres (pressure) ley (alignment of natural and artificial features)
Luciferian cabal doesn't like the whole Jesus thing
a) Jesus aka je suis (I am) implies a partial within whole taking possession of self.
b) Lucifer aka lucis (light) bher (to carry) implies one partial carrying another partial within whole light.
c) Cabal aka cabbala/qibbel - "to receive, admit, accept" implies one partial consenting to the suggestion of another partial, while being carried away within whole.
Why do they do this "borrow" thing?
Because nature moves and cannot be held onto...any attempt to hold onto anything implies borrowing aka "the lending of debt". In nature...any lender pays back the whole of debt accumulated.
Cause who else is the powers in space
Cause empowers effects by separating each one from one another, which allows each one to extent into space/spatior (to wander).
Powers that be implies each empowered (inception towards death) being (life).
will be driven from their course
Being (life) driven (inception towards death), hence course (forward motion)...tempting ones free will of choice to ignore this establishes circular logic, hence tempting each being off-course.
son of man
Aka son (sonos; sound) offering man (person; per sonos; by sound)...
sun and moon
Aka sun/son (sound) + moon/mono (single)...
be driven from their course
Course implies "motion forward", hence being (life) driven forwards (inception towards death)...circular logic tempts one to ignore that.
four corners
Being implies in-between left/right; front/back; up/down, hence within a cube. Ones perspective within a cube implies four corners...circular logic draws an artificial circle within the natural cube, while permitting others to intersect at angles, which is being done by compass and square.
God hates AI
God implies nature moving; holding onto either love or hate shapes an artificial conflict of reason among beings moved apart from one another by nature.
God hates
To hate implies "towards another"...God implies one. Towards implies God moving each one within apart from one another. Choosing to turn against one another (love vs hate) ignores God.
Biden/bide - "to stay, continue, live, remain"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/bide
So why use a puppet to depict death in the name of life? Because living implies within the continuous process of dying.
miscegenation and integration
Aka artificially mixing together what nature sets apart.
deceitful deals
Aka ones consent (to buy) to a suggestion (to sell) deceiving ones perception into selling self out.
control over the ruler
Rule/reg aka to move in (life) a straight line (inception towards death)...it's circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others which rolls together (con-trol) many under few.
secret attack
Secret/seco - "to divide"...mixing consent and suggested together implies an attack on all perceivable setting each ones perception apart from one another.
killing many innocents for the actions of one
a) One cannot act...only react.
b) Innocence aka within (in) harm (nocere) aka being (life) within harms way (inception towards death). Ignoring this by consenting to the suggestion of another implies guilt/gieldan - "to pay for, debt".
rationalizing violence
Violence (inception towards death) sets each peace/piece (life) apart from one another...rationalizing aka reasoning implies peaces/pieces at war with one another.
Fundamentally...FREE implies each beings free will of choice, while MASONRY implies manipulating choice to freely bind itself to another ones suggestion.
Death implies the ongoing natural order aka the process of dying for those living within aka perceivable inspiration for each ones perception to draw from. The manipulation of choice with suggestion tempts one to ignore perception.
That's how freemasonry works underneath the plethora of distractions upon it.