politician; policies
All perceivable separating into each ones perception implies "body private"...ones consent to any suggestion by another establishes "body politic".
Few suggest politics towards consenting many to remain private...many reasoning against each other about any suggested politics are willingly invading each others privacy.
Ones SIGHT implies privacy; choosing a SIDE permits politics to invade privacy by invitation aka by ones choice choosing a representative among others for self.
cult-like
Differentiation cultivates growth...likeness neglects exclusive growth for mutual loss.
A crook can only pretend to be straight for so long...
I have found that...there is a tendency to seek
Foundation doesn't have to be sought out...it permits one to discern self within it.
cling to information
Clinging (consent) to information (suggested) tempts ones perception to ignore that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto...since it moves through one.
to seek out heroes
Aka "from zero to hero"...tempting one to seek an outcome out of nothing by following another as leader.
That's an inversion of nature generating each thing (one) within everything (all)...not a seeking of outcome, but adaptation to origin, while resisting being (life) led towards outcomes (inception towards death).
no matter how illogical, that aligns with preconceived notions.
a) Logic implies an artificial circle around suggested information; which prevent ones perception to think straight within perceivable nature.
b) Being moved from inception towards death implies each ones "lifeline"...
c) Notion implies "negation of motion" aka ones denial of being moved.
d) Pre (before) con (together) ceive (perceived)...tempts one to ignore that before one can perceive, that there was all perceivable separating into each ones perception.
Without being CON-ned together...pre-ceive implies per-ceive, and before implies each forwarded (inception towards death) being (life).
even among
Among implies at odds with one another...not even.
the default for the vast, vast majority of people
a) Vast; majority and people implies a "faulty division" aka an artificial collectivization of what nature sets apart from one another.
b) Vast implies waste; major vs minor can only be fought among partials within whole aka one has to be separated from one another before one can choose to take sides against one another, and people implies an amassing of each person...a trick; a suggestion....
- Imagine there's no countries...It isn't hard to do
- Nothin' to kill or die for...And no religion, too
- Imagine all the people livin' life in peace (piece)
Maybe karma didn't let him off the hook...
tartarus means crust
Crust/kreus - "to begin to freeze" aka from beginning (inception) towards (life) freezing (death).
cataclysm
Cata (down) klan (to break) aka rising up (life) while breaking down (inception towards death).
aryan
Aryan/arya - "noble"; from gnobilis/gnoscere/gno - "to know" aka ones perception within all perceivable.
Few utilize suggestion to tempt many to ignore perception...hence the war (reasoning about suggested) against each aryan (ones perception within all perceivable).
just a handful of people. Frankly, it may be zero
From a handful to zero skips what? One aka each one being.
No need to know, you know?
Need (all perceivable) towards know (ones perception)...tempted by want (one another's suggestions).
how in the dark these people are kept
One cannot be kept in darkness...ones free will of choice keeping suggested information within mind/memory; casts darkness (ignorance) over light (discernment).
Light moves through one as perceivable inspiration and cannot be kept.
the highest levels
Level implies balance aka the moving foundation for adaptive choice rising within. Choosing to reach higher levels draws one away from foundation into imbalance.
They tell us everything
Everything was perceivable...they suggest tales to mimic the perceivable origin of everything perceivable, as to distract ones perception, when giving consent to the suggested.
You just have to research around
All perceivable moves "straight" through each ones perception as flow of inspiration. Ones consent holding onto suggested information establishes circular thinking (logic), which confines ones mind, and prevents one from thinking straight.
try to avoid those bad
Good vs bad represents the suggested circle, which tempts one to ignore straight CHANGE. Nature isn't good; bad or versus/verto - "to turn"...nature nurtures natives through change.
have to work within something called "rules"
Rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule
Hence being (life) moved in a straight line (inception towards death).
a body of spiritual principle
Aka a body (matter) of spiritual (momentum) principle (motion)...
must follow in order to be allowed to exist
a) There's a deception...-ist (existentialist) implies ones consent following a suggested -ism (existentialism).
b) Allow implies all lowering one, hence giving each onethe opportunity to rise (life) during loss (inception towards death) by resisting temptation.
c) The natural order (inception towards death) inspires resistance (life), while tempting one with the path of least resistance to ignore resisting by following along aka going with the flow.
are aware
Perception adapting to perceivable implies awareness....consenting to suggested distorts it.
giving permission
Aka consenting to suggested, while ignoring per (forwards) mittere (to send) aka all perceivable sending forward each ones perception.
to enslave us
a) To aka towards (inception towards death) sets free (life) aka motion generating momentum to free matter from one another.
b) EN-slave implies being a slave within aka binding self to another by consenting to any suggestion, while ignoring to be perception (free) within perceivable (dom).
c) Suggested pluralism (us) tempts perceiving singular (one) to enslave self to others by artificially joining together what nature sets apart.
the universe is intelligent; alive and conscious
Universe implies turning (verse/verto) one; intelligence implies understanding (intelligo) aka standing-under another, and conscious implies perceiving (scious) together (con) aka collective consciousness....each of these suggestions tempts one to ignore living (live) within all (al).
consciousness does not allow
Because perceiving (scious) together (con) tempts one to deny (nihilo; nothing) being lowered by all.
Nature does so that each being can re-do self..."does not" implies a beings denial of what nature does.
the negative
Positive implies ones position within all; negative implies ones denial of being positioned within all...for wherever others are suggesting one to be.
the cabal has made a science
Cabal/cabbala/qabala - "he received, accepted" implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, hence ignoring science/scio - "to know" (ones perception of all perceivable) for suggested scientism (the suggestions of others about all perceivable and ones perception).
elborate
Elaboration aka each ones reaction...originating of (abora) all (el) action (tion).
One goes down, the rest fall.
An inversion of one fall (inception towards death) rising each one (life). Technology aka tekhnē (artifice) + logy (circular logic) encircles each internally (inter-net) while drawing many together externally (world wide web).
the same framework
Work implies same energy flowing...frame implies different form (life) being separated from one another within same flow (inception towards death).
websites
Any differences within a web are situated on the same line (online)...
jews are arrogant and ignorant liars.
a) Believers of truth ignore change...liars exploit ignorance.
b) Believing a lie grows the arrogance of those telling a lie.
c) Belief represents the foundation of ignorance and the fuel of arrogance.
Meaning separate
Separation implies from all (perceivable) into each one (perception); meaning implies from one (suggestion) to one another (consent).
how the cleric is separate from the general public
a) General implies "generated by all" aka into each private one.
b) Nature doesn't make public (suggestion)...it generates private (perception) access (perceivable).
c) Cleric/klan - "to break"...joining a clergy contradicts that.
literal separation
Consenting to a suggested letters tempts the one letting to ignore separation, by permitting another to join letters together into words.
Few suggest literal (according to letter) to distract many from nature generating each being liberal aka all liberating each one from one another by giving free will of choice.
The spiritual one is the difference in the understanding itself
Spirit/spiro - "to breathe" implies adaptation to force aka resistance during temptation...not submission to another by standing-under.
Seeking understanding (consent) towards outcome (suggested) tempts one to ignore adapting (perception) to origin (perceivable), which moves through one, while breathing life into one, hence being within (in) spirit (spir) of action (ation).
Self isn't an IT, but he moving through she aka a perpetuation of one-self through another one, hence a S(plit)HE aka a transformation (matter) of he (motion) through she (momentum).
What is this difference?
Differential aka each different one within all.
Understanding of meaning behind will
Nature gives being will...others suggest meaning to tempt ones will to consent to stand-under.
Seeing the light, so to speak
a) One (matter) cannot see the light (motion) from within the visible spectrum (momentum) thereof. Few suggest white (pure light) and black (absence of light) to tempt many to mix together, which distorts the visible spectrum for each spec within.
b) Speaking implies the articulation of natural sound, which tempts one another to hold onto artifice, while ignoring that sound moves, and just like light...one cannot hear sound from within the audible spectrum thereof.
Sleight of hand: https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/simongarfunkel/thesoundofsilence.html
- "People talking without speaking"
- "People hearing without listening"
- "No one dared...Disturb the sound of silence"
that has no sum
The sum of all things aka mosaic law...the inversion of all balancing each different ones free will of choice.
The amount (sum) of all implies one for all is one in energy.
to raise it up another level
Another inversion...level implies balance for each ones choice rising within the loss of motion. Only within motion can there be balance, and only within balance can there be choice.
spiritual source
Aka essence (matter) within spirit (momentum) of source (motion)...
What is Phi?
a) Vieh aka cattle aka chattel slaves aka goyim/golem.
b) Logic tempts phi (love) and mis (hate) against each other.
c) Phi/pH aka potential form (life) generated within hydro flow (inception towards death)
d) Phi as the golden ratio implies the malleability (golden) of reason (ratio) by suggested information.
How about Rho?
https://www.etymonline.com/word/rhotacism
Do all roads lead to...
All implies one, so there can be only one road (inception towards death) for each traveler (life).
Isn't there something you need to know
Each thing within everything implies ledge within known....something aka the sum of things tempts one to ignore self discernment by mixing with others.
Wanting something (suggested) tempts one (perception) to ignore needing everything (perceivable).
Without the key to discernment, words become division.
Free will of choice implies key (letting go) and lock (holding onto) for ones self discernment...words suggested by others confine ones choice to the suggested, while distracting one with endless keys and locks to solve the riddle of confinement.
Reason tempts choice to hold onto a side (lock vs key)...neither of which can unlock the other. Letting go of both sides frees choice, hence reestablishing the key to unlock self discernment.
jews vs non-jews dichotomy
a) Consenting to suggested turns one from perceivable, hence establishing versus/verto - "to turn".
b) Others suggest one to claim self as "me; myself or I", which shapes every other one into a "you" (phonetic jew).
c) Non implies suggested nihilism (nihilo; nothing) tempting one to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
d) If one lets go of I (i am aka je suis aka jesus), then the you (jew) disappears into another one. It was ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion, which establishes the YOU vs I dichotomy.
it will never stop
Stop implies the cessation of motion, which others suggest to tempt ones free will of choice to ignore being moved.
when you equate
Only nature equates (inception towards death) differentials (life)...few invert it into equalizing differences among many by temping alike behavior.
Same (all perceivable) > difference (each ones perception) > likeness (ones consent to suggestion of another).
Each word shares
Share/sker - "to cut". Words are shaped by joining letters together, which tempts one to ignore sound cutting instruments apart from one another.
Being implies mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound. Letter also implies ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape letters into words to craft spells.
Word implies articulation of natural sound.
sephira
As in sefirot? Aka the attributes (perception) of God (perceivable) relating to each other (consent) in a scripted way (suggested)?
The issue with sephira/sefira - "to count"...enumeration tempts one to ignore self by counting others as more or less than one.
To be implies unit (one) within singularity (oneness)...apart from one another. To count makes one accountable to one another.
The vowels are added
a) Promise (vow) to God (el)...
b) Only nature adds (inception); subtracts (death); multiplies (intercourse for off-spring), and divides (from all into each one).
A being cannot add anything to everything nature offers.
de-construct to show difference
a) Nature gives sight to being...others make shows to tempt being to behold aka being holding onto shown, which distorts sight.
b) De (to divide) con (together) struct (to fit). Nature implies the process (inception towards death) of dividing beings (life) apart from one another. Few suggest structuralism to fit many together into an arrangement aka a turning of mind... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arrange
The sephira show connection.
The show must go...because ongoing nature (inception towards death) separates temporary beings (life) from one another; no matter what connections they show towards each other.
Your use of guesswork
Implication (if/then) over reason (vs) allows one to draw from inspiration perceived instead of letting others paint suggested information for one to hold onto.
A guess tempts one to take, while ignoring that all (perceivable) was given to each one (perception) for free will of choice.
Guessing inverts begotten with begetting.
numerology
Numero implies one; Logy implies one vs another within a conflict of reason.
There can be only one aka one for all and all for each one within.
lacks this understanding and so falls short
It's ones choice to stand-under which makes one fall short to another. Knowledge implies living on the edge of known, hence a balance act for ones reacting choice. Understanding tempts the submission of choice to another aka student under teacher; many under few; follower under leader; slave under master; gentile under jew...
Each letter has sig-nificance that acts as a formula when mixed.
a) "There's not a problem that I can't fix...'Cause I can do it in the mix"... https://genius.com/Indeep-last-night-a-dj-saved-my-life-lyrics
In reality...solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life) by separation; a jew fixes and mixes suggested information within each consenting gentiles mind to "flush trouble down the drain".
b) Letters are not just symbolism aka fictitious signs (signi-fic), but also imply ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape words by mixing LETTERS together.
c) What's the opposite of formula? Deviation aka form (life) deviated within flow (inception towards death). Letting others shape formula tempts one to ignore flow.
No you do not get that
Coming into being implies "begotten", hence each one already GOT all has to offer when coming into being...it's wanting to GET from one another, which tempts one to ignore that.
To get implies "towards getting" aka forwards getting aka "for-getting"...
your 'lessons'
Being implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...few suggest lessons to lessen growth within loss by burdening one with suggested information held within mind/memory. Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, since it moves through each one, while allowing one to draw from it.
About free-will-of-choice...Post Score (0) Comment Score (13473) aka no lessons given, only adapting to what's already there.
You're doing this wrong by working backwards from the word
a) Work implies energy (internal/inherent power) aka action (inception towards death) generating reactions (life)...em (within) ploy (fold) ment (mind) implies ones adaptation to origin, hence "working backwards".
b) Suggestible words can only be shaped within perceivable sound...consenting to hold onto a word tempts one to ignore being moved within sound.
Holding onto a definition shapes one into a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound) aka sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all; everything".
Suggested words like "insane person" tempt one to ignore the implication of being in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound).
Free-will-of-choice simply breaks apart words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality) as to remain free by resisting the temptation of bind self to another.
how the word was actually
A word cannot act...it reacts to letter. Only nature acts, which allows each being within to react by free will of choice...hence also having the choice to LET others shape LETTERS into words. What's another word for letting? Consenting!
Fictional words distract from actual sound...if one chooses to ignore actual (perceivable) for fictional (suggested).
you really think you decoded
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) perceivable, not the encoding or decoding of suggested. Few suggest codes/codex to establish a conflict between statutory vs illegitimate. If many consent to such codes, then few are being permitted to use statutory delegitimisation of ones FREE will of choice.
Codes are used to artificially prohibit the use of free will of choice within nature...yet only upon those who willingly consent.
I did because all inspires one to re-do by free will of choice.
fibonacci as a 'fib from a nazi"
Instead of reason (true vs false); try implication (if/then) and continue until you'll run into any contradictions...the more one resists reason by using implication, the less CONTRA-dictions one will find within oneself. It's reason which tempts one against (contra) one another....
false numerology
False vs true implies circular thinking (logy) based on ones consent to suggested names/numbers (numero) by another one.
Free will of choice cannot choose a side without binding self to another within conflict...yet resisting the temptation to choose a suggested side prevents bondage.
matter that do matter
Only within the momentum (inception towards death) of motion, can matter (life) come into being.
"It doesn't matter...cause if you ain't sharin, people ain't carin"... https://genius.com/Wyclef-jean-it-doesnt-matter-lyrics
Aka sharing (suggestion) and carrying (consent)...it doesn't matter; cause matter (perception) moves (perceivable).
creates logical snares
Like suggested creationism aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka creation out of nothing as the inversion of transformation (perception) within everything (perceivable)?
It's consent given to suggested by ones free will of choice which binds one to another. Suggestion ensnares perception...if consented to.
"It doesn't matter, you're going to die."
TO die implies living matter within motion being sentenced at inception towards point of death.
circles back
It ain't a circle of life; wheel of fortune; leap of faith; band of hope" as suggested, but each temporal bend (life) during an ongoing line (inception towards death), hence bending in (inception) and out (death) of shape (life).
A circle can only be shaped within a line. Holding onto a circle (logic) tempts one (perception) to ignore the line (perceivable).
a darkbot
- Light (ones discernment)
- Dark (ones ignorance)
- Robot/robur/strength (ones free will of choice resisting the temptation of ignorance).
Ad (toward) vert (to turn)...hence using advertisements to turn minds from perceivable origin towards suggested outcomes.
A mind turned thinks circular (logic), while turning against others (reason).
- Palantir aka Palan (far) Tir (to watch over) aka a far-seer aka PHAR-I-SEE
The Pharisees were the "separated ones" in conflict with the Sadducees (ṣāḏaq; to be right; just). The issue...thanks to separation, the Pharisees gained more control over the common people (gentiles), than the Sadduccees, who used a king to control the common people, as a shield for themselves as the upper class.
Pharisee or Sadducee represents an internal jewish conflict about using a sovereign over the gentile commonwealth or make each jew the sovereign among the gentile commonwealth.
As for the gentiles...one cannot see far (pharisee) if one joins others, and one cannot be just (sadducee) while at odds with one another within conflicts of reason.
Without discerning this for self...a gentile remains a slave to a jewish master by free will of choice.
I also think there are lots of them
Taking possession over one self as I (i am aka je-suis) casts everyone else into a lot (they).
Being one within all set apart from one another implies christ (anointed one).
It's ones thinking based on I (jesus), which turns one against (anti) others, while ignoring one-self (christ).
be able to incarnate
Being alive implies within (in) the flesh (carna) of action (tion) aka flash of light. Living implies each ones mortal incarnation within the process of dying.
Coming into being implies being enabled by origin...incarnation implies re-enabling aka re-animation aka ones response to being enabled by animation.
my opinion could change
Only within change can one hold an opinion...for a while.
double agent
Action only divides into reactions...it cannot be doubled. Reactions can be tricked together with the promise of double the outcome aka gambling; sports-betting; double effect psychology etc.
Falling for a suggested double makes one a dupe (deceived person), and few are deceiving many with suggested dualism to join one another within conflicts of reason.
is DJT the fucking anti-christ
a) Ignoring what WAS perceivable for suggesting what IS ignores christ (anointed one), hence establishing a conflict of reason (is vs isn't) within ones mind, which corrupts anoint-ment.
b) Fuck/fugg - "joint" contradicts christ (separation by anointing)
c) Anti-christ implies turning against (anti) another, while ignoring the separation of all into each one (christ).
d) Donald JOHN Trump...john aka JO (jah/yah/was) HN (hanan/grace/free) implies "one freed by all that was" aka an anointed one.
middle east
Middle implies in-between north; east; south; west (news)...middle-east implies inclination towards a side, hence being off-center.
end times
Beginning implies gaining being, end/ant - "front, forehead" implies being heading forwards.
One gains being by inception, while being sentenced forwards towards point of death...others suggest "time" to tempt ones mind to measure a duration, while ignoring to adapt to being moved.
dajjal
Aka dajj (to deceive) al (all)...all implies perceivable; to deceive implies by suggested.
Being implies one (perception) within all (perceivable) deceived (suggested) by one another.
speaks English in the name of Russia; suggests power to unite together for the establishment of a new world order; views israel as a collective...
A judaizer.
power united
Power divides from all into each one aka from action into reactions aka from flow into form aka from cause into effects etc.
United implies each divided UNIT (unus; one)...
What if the solution is a loop around jew necks?
a) Solution implies flowing motion...a loop implies shaped matter within flowing motion. Seeking solution within a loop only destroys self.
b) It's a jew who tempts gentiles to put a loop (circular logic) around ones line of thinking...it's gentiles who are willingly strangling each other to death within mutual conflicts of reason.
c) Physically strangling another doesn't relieve one of mental stranglehold...only choosing to let go does.
Which criminal jews should we indict and put on trial for crimes against humanity (Whites)?
a) A jew suggests laws to tempts consenting gentiles to commit the crime of ignoring natural law. Suggested laws tempt one to follow; natural law inspires resistance.
b) Putting on trial tempts one to ignore being within trial aka within process (inception towards death) of test-a-ment (life) aka a trial (dying) of error (living).
c) Human aka hue-man implies color of man, which can only exist in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light).
A jew suggests black and white to tempt gentiles to choose a side within a VERSUS conflict, hence versus/verto - "to turn" aka turning against each other, which mixes colors together.
It's these conflicts of reason which distorts each gentiles perspective within the visible spectrum of light with mixing aka with abrahamism (father of multitude) + mosaic law (puzzling together what nature sets apart).
I can name many
A jew suggests names to manifold gentiles together "in the name of "...
indict
Aka in (within) dict (to show) ment (mind)...a mental distraction. A jew tempts gentiles to judge each other mentally, while ignoring being within justice aka diversity (life) within equity (inception towards death). Being implies justice served, hence being a servant to nature.
A claim implies "to demand recognition of a right"...nature cannot be claimed, hence not recognizing demands from any being within.
Ones consent to suggested artifice tempts one into a contract with another as a "claimant"...
If holding onto suggested implies a claim, then claiming oneself as "me; myself or I" shapes everyone else into a "you" (phonetic jew).
As for israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God...that implies each ones struggle within all, while resisting the temptation to claim from one another.
A jew doesn't claim from gentiles...a jew tempts gentiles to make claims upon suggested by giving consent.
Lastly: ethiopia aka abyssinia/habasah/hbsh - "mixed"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Abyssinia That's what each jew tempts gentiles to do to each other...equalizing differences by mixing.
Really?
Ones RE-sponse to ALL...not a question towards another.
It doesn't mean...
Holding onto meaning contradicts sequence/sequi - "to follow".
his father?
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
two numbers in sequence added together don't produce the next number in the sequence?
a) Name/nombre/number aka "designation of unit" implies unitas/unus - "one". There can be only one...unless ignored by following (sequi) another.
b) Nature produces each being by setting each one apart from one another...others tempt one to count suggested numbers together, while ignoring ONEself counting, which in return makes one accountable to another one...a chosen one.
c) Putting together doesn't produce...it re-produces off-spring, hence ones response to all production separating self (life) further down the line (inception towards death).
d) Artificial math tempts one to ignore real addition (inception of one); division (death of one); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring of one) and division (being one within all).
e) If energy implies one, then what would two represent? Double energy? How does counting energy together double it?
What if energy cannot be increased or decreased...only divided from all into each one? What if ones within energy can be tricked to ignore the oneness (singularity) of all energy by counting each other?
f) Who told you the history of "Fibonacci" and where do you store that story? What if he-brew his-story to make jew (phonetic you) fall for it, while ignoring that a moving nature cannot be stored?
What if any story tempts one to misuse mind/memory as a storage device?
the formula is a lie
Ones consent to suggested formula/form aka in-form-ation tempts one into a conflict of reason...truth vs lie, while ignoring perceivable in-spir-ation.
Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death), hence nature inspiring being to spir/spiro - "to breathe".
One does not follow (sequi/sequence) breathing...one resists being forced to adapt or falls for the wanted temptation to follow.
by a group
Nature separates each being from one another, hence each chosen one tempting the choices of gentiles to give mutual consent to a suggestion, which groups many together under control of few.
Each jew represents apartheid... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
Hence israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" aka each ones struggle within all to separate from one another.
Suggestion tempts consent into sequence...being implies divergence.
when the principle was re-discovered
a) Principle aka primus (first) capere (to take)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/principle
Nature implies first...and cannot be taken by any being within. A jew inverts this by suggesting gentiles to follow "principle", hence to being taken in by a mis-take.
b) Nature reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentile consent under cover of ignorance. Re-discover implies ones response (re) to the division (dis) of suggested covers aka a conflict of reason among gentiles.
when...in 200 B.C.
200 B.C. implies a suggested number held within a consenting gentiles mind, while ignoring that "when" implies NOW, cause ones perception within all perceivable can only work at this moment as matter (life) within the moment-um (inception towards death) of motion.
Being implies in-between before and after, hence a divergence...not a sequence. Christ furthermore implies "anointed one", hence separation of each one within oil/all as seed within s-oil.
been secret nazis
Nazi aka nati (native) + secret aka seco (to divide) implies be'en aka being native within division of all.
Nature doesn't keep secrets...it divides (seco) each being as native within all and foreigner to one another.
before their time
a) Before implies forwarded (inception towards death) being (life) aka temporal within ongoing. Suggested "time" tempts one to measure a temporal duration, while ignoring ongoing procession.
All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies "linear"...measuring the duration of time implies "circular".
Sleight of hand: "We'll have some fun when the clock strikes one"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUgAxGaPXe4
Is that what Bonacci means and he was a prophet?
a) All perceivable WAS before ones perception came into being...others suggest what IS to distract one from discerning self.
b) Mean/men - "to think"...a jew suggest meaning to tempt consenting gentiles to hold onto it, thereby establishing circular thinking (logic), which turns into conflicts of reason among gentiles.
c) A jew suggests prophet aka pro (forward) bha (to speak)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prophet to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words, which represents spell-craft.
If a gentile consents to a suggested PROPHET, then a suggesting jew makes PROFIT...hence exploiting sequence with a little fib-o-nacci...
can't wait for that decode too.
Merely an hour...
How to escape the devil’s matrix.
a) Devil aka dev-il implies division of all...into each one.
b) Matrix/mater "mother" implies the internal division of all (father) into each one (child).
c) Suggested escapism tempts one to ignore being within all for wanting a way out.
The cube represents mind control over the head. Mentally imagine the cube exploding. Replace it with a Golden circle of protective light
a) Cube implies ones perception within all perceivable aka left/right + front/back + up/down.
b) Circle implies circular thinking (logic) when one consents to suggested.
c) Light doesn't protect (cover from danger) it delivers (life) into danger (inception towards death) aka igniting the spark of life.
d) Within light...a circle represents ones ignorance of cu-be aka of cubus/kybos (a six-sided die) being.
A circle cuts off the corners of a cube...hence cutting off intersection aka intercourse.
Devil/diabolos aka dia (across) ballein (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=devil
Being (life) thrown across (inception towards death) implies by the father; through the mother, and into each off-spring.
Ones consent to suggested vatican aka papal authority (vati/papa - "father") tempts one to ignore... "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9, while giving the one suggesting "vatican" the power of a vates - "soothsayer, prophet, seer", hence permitting another by ones consent to suggest in the name of (in nomine) the father; the son and the holy ghost.
If one writes "The devil is not in the Vatican", then not/nothing/nihilo implies ones de-nial of perceivable reality for suggested fiction.
Ones response (re) to all (al) isn't an argument against, but a-gain of ment aka each being gaining access to mind.
Argue/arg - "to shine; white" aka light > spectrum > ray...not a conflict against one another, but a separation from one another to establish the visible spectrum of light.
Real aka ones response (re) to all (al) implies a diversion of all into each one...or in biblical terms...a divination from deus (god) and dyeu (to shine).
Fiction aka fictitious (fic) action (tion) implies ones ignorance of action dividing into reactions, when choosing to hold onto each others suggestions.
Example...form (life) reacting to flow (inception towards death) implies reality, while the suggested labels "form + flow" imply fiction if one chooses to hold onto them to describe reality.
Responding to all doesn't require descriptions of matter, but adaptation to motion.
Angelic-al...all isn't angular, but linear. Each one (life) within line (inception towards death) can be manipulated with angles (suggested information) into circular thinking (logic).
What's a corner? An intersection where lines meet at an angle! Intersection implies internal (inter) division (sec) of action (tion) aka action (motion) dividing internally (momentum) into reactions (matter).
The status quo of being implies intersection, hence having the opportunity to intercourse with one another, while being intersected, which generates off-spring aka the further divination of each angelic being...a division of angles.
Catholic/cathode aka kata (down) hodos (way); as oppose to anode aka ana (up) hodos (way).
Life being moved from inception towards death implies up (growth) and down (loss) the way...a current/curraunt - "running, flowing, moving along".
Suggested "catholic" tempts one down the way; while ones free will of choice resisting the temptation to give consent to suggestions allows one to grow up the way.
Church as suggested implies "body of christians collectively"...christ (to anoint) implies the separation of each ones body within all/oil.
Joining a church implies ones denial (the nail) of the body of christ being moved across (a cross)...and it's this denial of oneself by joining others, which through jesus aka je suis (I am) establishes everyone else into a jew (you).
Belief implies ones singular consent to a suggestion of another, which only then collectivizes consent into a common-ism.
a) Nature implies fail/fall (inception towards death) for the rise of each being (life)...
b) Any suggested -ism establishes a commune of consent given...if others choose to join.
c) Calling something communism implies ones consent to suggested commun-ism, which makes one a consenting commun-ist.
To call implies "summon, invoke; ask for, demand"...that's why suggested words shaped within perceivable sound imply an invocation/invocare - "to call upon, invoke, appeal to"...not by one to all, but by one to one another.