1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's about money. Not religion.

Re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...it's ones consent to suggested money which binds many to few.

If nature moves; then value cannot be held onto. A jew suggests artificial value (currency) to distract gentiles from natures motion (current).

The jews you like to complain about give no fucks about religion, only money.

Without religion...no money. Suggested money by a jew requires gentile consent to hold value, which makes money a belief system for gentiles.

As for "fucks given"...the word "fuck" from the German "fuge" implies a masonic joint aka artificially joining together what nature divides apart. A jew uses "fuck" to distract gentiles from the all giving nature by artificially joining them together into systems aka sys (together) stem (to stand).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do we have free will of choice?

Have; verb - "to own, possess"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/have

That's the issue within you...questioning another if ones FREE will of choice can be taken into possession. It's wanting to possess which binds ones free will of choice.

Furthermore...WE (plural) prevents ONE (singular) from freely expressing self. Only by free will of choice can one join we aka the majestic plural aka jewish nosism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we

I'm governed by one of two political parties that both hate me.

a) I AM represents you taking possession over self, which binds your free will of choice.

b) ONE OF TWO implies you ignoring singularity (oneself) for suggested dualism (two).

c) PARTIES implies the suggested pluralism tempting you to ignore being one part (effect) within the singularity of all (cause).

d) HATE implies your bondage to mental (love or hate) and physical (love vs hate) conflict...a conflict you started by picking a side through free will of choice.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Scored Isn't Really Scored. It's All Just A Conspiracy.

Score/skur/sker - "to cut"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/score

All dividing each one within apart from one another implies the natural score...a jew tempting gentiles together into a forum; consensus; religion; civilization; society etc. represents settling the score.

don't even get counted

If you count; then you permit another to hold you accountable, which isn't even, but putting you at odds.

The conspiracy is that you up vote or down vote and think any of it matters.

Motion generates momentum...within which matter comes into being in-between up/down. The conspiracy is about few tempting many to choose a side, which turns up versus down against each other.

jews destroy everything

A jew tempts gentiles to ignore that everything (inception towards death) moves each thing (life) apart from one another. Ignoring that destroys gentiles faster.

I suspect that jews did this

Only God does...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore that which makes gentiles suspect of wrongdoing.

I can't prove it

Proof is in (life) the pudding/putting (inception towards death)...gentiles ignore that, because a jew tempts them to "share" proof, which by holding onto, contradicts the motion of nature.

Only God proofs. God cannot be given to one another aka shared as proof through suggestible information...only perceived by each as perceivable inspiration.

The jews did this...Every.Single.Time

Trying to prove plurality (jews) contradicts singularity (single)... this fundamental contradiction exists only within the mind of gentiles, who are obliviously blind to it.

they have to cheat the system

Nature isn't a sys (together) stem (to stand), but a singular process dividing each single unit of potential within apart from one another.

A jew suggesting gentiles to stand together represents the system, while a gentiles consent to join any system represents the attempt to cheat nature, which nature always punishes.

Cheat; verb - "to seize as an escheat" aka that which falls (inception towards death) to one (life)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cheat

it's difficult for jews to infiltrate forums

Forum implies "place of assembly aka marketplace, open space, public place"...a jew represents the merchant who set up the marketplace for gentiles to enter; thereby assembling gentiles together.

What's difficult is for gentiles to resist the temptation of wanting to buy what nature gives for free by selling self out to a jew.

who else is complicit in what we sometimes describe as a "globalist cabal"

Gentiles. A jew suggests globalism + cabbalism to tempt gentiles into a consensus. Once a gentile enters any consensus (-ism); a gentile becomes complicit in giving each jew the power over it.

In reality...GLOB (circular globe) + CABB (square cube) can only be shaped within AL (all).

how many nations all complied and enacted the same exactly bullshit

Only within all can each NAT (native) of ION (action) react to being enacted upon.

all nations are under the realm

A jew tempts gentiles to believe in being part of a nation, which is called nationalism. Doing so tempts each gentile to ignore being a native (nat) within all action (ion) and foreign to one another.

The natural realm (kingdom, domain under a sovereign, royal jurisdiction) implies NAT (native) within ION (action). The artificial realm is shaped by gentile consent to the jewish suggestion of nationalism, which puts jew above/gentiles below.

is North Korea an Independent...

NORTH Korea implies in-dependence to SOUTH Korea.

power without appearing to be directly involved

Direction implies linear procession of power; involvement implies circular confinement draining power. Nature directs...a jew misdirects gentiles by shaping artificial involvement. Why? Because gentiles willingly following misdirection permits each jew to utilize the drained power of any gentile collective.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

short tempers

If temporal (life) ignores ongoing (inception towards death) for one another aka materialism; then temporal shortens itself.

stupid

Stupid/stupe/steu - "to push". If a being (life) ignores the push (inception) and pull (death) of nature; then many get pushed by few instead.

slavish

Consenting to any suggestion of another implies ones choice enslaving self by electing a chosen one as master over ones choice.

ass kissing the rich/boss

Consent establishes hierarchy aka master above; slave below. Being implies sovereignty in-between, so joining a common hierarchy on either side tempts one towards the opposite side.

making ugliness

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder aka the being who chooses to hold onto either fictitious side (beauty or ugly)...natural quality is based on purification of self by needing to resist the wanted temptation to hold onto either side.

A jew doesn't make the world of gentiles ugly...a jew suggests both ugliness and beauty to distract gentiles from raising the quality of self by resisting the suggestions of another.

weak men

If one (singular) consents to suggested men (plural); then one weakens self for others.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

how exactly you do it

All does (act); each one within re-does (ex)...reaction implies the expression within action. Trying to "do" implies ones lack of self discernment and ones ignorance of origin.

From the Christian perspective...only God does, which allows each one within to respond to all done by God.

to clear your mind

Clarity isn't emptiness; but ones adaptation to all light aka purification.

usual state of mind

Usual implies the customary (usus) use of each exceptional mind. USURY by few is based upon USUAL response by many aka consensus farming.

Not all benefits are obvious right away

Right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right That's the only way (inception towards death) for being (life) aka how each bene (well-being) fit (to set) is being generated.

The corruption within what you wrote...NOT (nihilism) + BENEFITS (pluralism). Neither of which are beneficial to anyone but a chosen one.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not all meditation is the same.

Only within sameness can each difference mediate...suggested "not" aka nothing/nihilo/nihilism tempts one to deny that. Denial represents the emptiness of mind, which few are advertising many to seek by meditation.

If many meditate; then few can mediate...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The whole “empty your mind”...

Only within whole can each partial mind come into being...ignoring this implies the emptiness of ones mind.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Medi (middle) ation (action) implies all action (perceivable) and each ones reaction (perception) at the middle....the jewish scam refers to mediation through another (suggestion).

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Contraception implies the inversion of inception. If many use con (together) dom (dominance); then few can remain apart freely. In German...a condom was called "Präservativ" aka the preservation of each jew by gentile use of condoms.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

they show exactly 0 people through these lenses

a) Because the screen it's shown to you on represents yet another lens in-between yourself and the aura.

b) $200 for the goggles or $115 for a smartphone lens or you can buy "spirituality glasses" for $60 at amazon... https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61Jsl4Jd+vL.AC_SL1500.jpg (notice the sign in the middle).

If that's too much...simple coal tar dye (dicyanin) can be bought for less than $10.

Instead, they have a brief clip of a graveyard.

Because that's where such products usually end up...in a landfill graveyard.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

severing the connection to heaven

Nature severs each being in-between heaven (above) and hell (below)...it's con (together) nect (to bind) ion (action) which artificially contradicts nature.

break Jesus' heart

Jesus aka je suis (I am) implies a category of the mind...it's Christ (to anoint) which implies the core/cor (heart).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seven Deadly Sins

Seven implies S(plit)EVEN, hence the process of dying (inception towards death) splitting into potential (life). Sin aka SYN implies synchronization with one another while ignoring the split from one another.

7 Core Inherently

a) If all S(plits)EVEN; then into each ones core/cor (heart)...that's why home is where the heart is.

b) Inherent aka in (within) haerere (to adhere; stick) implies ones ignorance of being split apart from one another aka an INFERENCE.

Immoral Traits

a) Immoral aka im (within) mor (one's disposition) al (all) implies each ones divided position within all...not what another suggests one should (moral) or shouldn't (immoral) do.

b) Trait/trahere - "to pull; draw" implies all pushing (inception) and pulling (death) each one drawn (life) within.

true meaning

True implies versus false aka a conflict of reason. Meaning/mean/meino - "opinion" implies ones choice considering a suggested option (true or false) aka logic. As soon as an option is chosen; both sides are at conflict against each other.

What one ignores when choosing OPTIONAL (suggested) is PRIMARY (perceivable) generating SECONDARY (perception).

Lead to Error

Error/err - "losing ones way" implies being mislead mentally (logic) and physically (reason) into a circle, while ignoring ones (life) way (inception towards death) of linear progression.

Following the lead of another tempts one to ignore to RISE (life) within FALL (inception towards death) which demands one to resist the temptation to follow.

Demand aka de (to divide) mand (to order) implies all ordering each one within to divided from one another, which represents correction aka cor (heart) re (to respond) ction (action).

in judgement

Aka each ones mind (ment) being within (in) all justice (judge), hence "JUDGE NOT; LEST YE BE JUDGED".

The Passions

THE (theos; god) PASS (passage; transference) ION (action) implies singularity...adding an S shapes a plurality. Few shape artificial plurality to distract many from natural singularity.

Sins have been sold to Christianity

It's buying into a SIN which SYN-chronizes many under few. Nature sets each being FREE (will of choice)...so buying and selling are optional aka an opinion of the mind.

essential in right context

A jew shapes con (together) text/teks (to weave) to weave gentiles together, while distracting from right/reg (to move in a straight line) aka right (inception towards death) generating essence (life).

To think so in all context

Thinking in con (together) text (to weave) implies a hive-mind. All doesn't contextualize...all differentiates each one from one another.

I think of them as 7 character vital points Js strike at

Vitality (life) implies being sentenced from inception towards point of death...a singular line of progression; not a plurality of points to attack.

A jew tempts gentiles with rhetoric (making a point) to mentally (logic) and physically (reason) hold onto points of artificial possession, while ignoring natural procession. It's natures procession (dying) which attacks ignorant potential (life).

Even (inception towards death) generates odd (life) through internal division from one another hence S(plit)EVEN...a deadly process for each lively potential.

doesn't mean the traits bad in all context

Bad vs good implies the con (together) text (to weave). Versus/vers - "to turn" implies one turning against one another, while ignoring all delineating each one from one another.

To free oneself from context...choose to let go of possession (meaning), and use implication (if/then) instead of reason (versus). The former allows one to think straight; while the latter represents circular confinement.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

actual end game

Actual implies ongoing nature; each native within implies a temporal in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death)...few suggest games to tempt many to take chance, while ignoring what gives choice.

If one ignores given (actual) by taking (fictional); then one gambles on the end of ones life.

their goals

Few suggest goals to distract many from origin towards outcome, which makes distraction the fertile ground among many for few to plant within.

Sleigh of hand for those with eyes to see...GO-AL implies "all going", so not the end of anything; but the motion that animates each thing within.

Everyone lives in a digitally controlled pen

Digital and pen are devices shaped by few to tempt many together. Joining together implies con (together) trol (to roll) so many represent the control that few are controlling.

The word "everyone" implies a contradiction in terms aka EVERY (many together) + ONE (each one apart)...so using the word "everyone" implies that ones mind is already controlled by another.

No one owns anything and everyone is supposedly happy

a) Being implies potential (life) within process (inception towards death)...few suggest possession (own) to tempt potential to ignore process, while mentally (ideals) and physically (idols) taking possessions.

A being cannot own anything within nature without ignoring that all of nature divides each one within from one another. Analysis implies all giving; synthesis implies one taking....it's ones free will of choice to discern that.

b) Happy aka happenstance (come by chance) represents the inversion of coming (inception towards death) into choice (life). If owning implies taking into possession, then choice took a chance and thereby establishes a happenstance.

Happy implies gambling aka using choice for taking chance.

the system as a whole

System aka sys (together) stem (to stand) implies the synthesis of partials within an analyzing whole aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka mosaic (puzzle) law.

Few tempt many TOGETHER to distract from nature setting each being APART from one another.

Sleight of hand for system... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbW-xjpPzw0

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Clark Kent

Ones consent to any suggestion by another a) ordains another to become ones minister, and b) tempts one to seek knowl-EDGE by inclining towards another.

Kryptonite

Aka krypto/crypto (to conceal) + nite/night (absence of spiritual illumination, moral darkness, ignorance)...a jew shapes suggestions to tempt gentiles to ignore perceivable while concealing perception.

Since ignorance and concealment are based on ones free will of choice....anyone finding "kryptonite" by discerning self can nullify the power of Superman.

Lex Luthor

Lex/legis (law) + luthor/liut (people) implies common law...as opposed to natural law for each sovereign being within.

Alexander/andros (man) + joseph/yoseph (to increase) + luthor/liut (people) implies collectivism aka the use of suggestion to increase each mans consent into a consensus of many people.

superman

a) Man can only exist in-between aka as above (super); so below (inferus)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/XQXvTHyw.png

b) SU (you) PERM (permanent) AN (pertaining to) implies temporal (life) pertaining to permanent (inception towards death).

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

WHY EVERY BAG OF POTATO CHIPS ONLY HAVE 8 CHIPS IN IT AND THE REST IT AIR NOW?

Bagging implies taking possession of a potential within a process...doing that always diminishes whatever is bagged. The trick is to tempt many to take possession of brand awareness (idolatry), which in return permits few to diminish both consumer and product.

WHAT A RIP OFF

Process (inception towards death) generating potential (life) implies a RIP (cut apart)...it's the BAG (put together) which takes possession of self.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who you guys think Russia really aligned with at this point, Israhell or Iran?

There's only one line (inception towards death) implying the one and only point (death)....isreal aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies each sentence (life) struggling to sustain self within line before reaching point.

To distract many from this...few are shaping circles like "ally vs enemy" or "iran vs israel" or "russia vs ukraine" to confine many in conflict against each other.

if shit hits fan

Fan implies a "device to make an air current"...being implies device (life) within current (inception towards death) of natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater). Ignoring this tempts shit to hit each other, thereby representing artificial congestion during natural digestion.

Nature implies linear digestion; being implies each di (to divide) gested (to carry) essence within aka shit/skei - "to cut; split"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/shit

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

make everything around perverted.

Per (by) vert (to turn)...nature moves within a straight line; turning away implies artificial perversion.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the father of lies

Abraham aka ab (father) raham (multitude)...aka the lie that there can be more than one. The first falsification tempts one to ignore first (singularity) for more than (multitude).

First implies all perceivable > second implies each ones perception...any suggestion by another represents a multitude shaped by ones consent to it.

Mastering the arts of persuasion, deception

Ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion) persuades one to deceive self into slavery to another master.

The real master of ones FREE will of choice implies the DOM-inance of all balance...only within balance can there be choice. It's the one and only master who sets ones choice free from one another, which consenting to any suggestion reverts.

propaganda

The propagated (ones perception) cannot hold onto propagation (all perceivable)...choosing to hold onto propaganda (anything suggested) tempts one to ignore that.

advertisement

Input (all perceivable) delineates mind (ones perception)...consenting to any suggestion tempts one to hold onto one side while turning (vertise) the mind (ment) against (ad) the other.

Being implies WANT (life) within NEED (inception towards death), which makes it impossible for want to hold onto need. Alas...holding onto one another turns WANT against NOT WANT.

As long as one holds onto whatever one want or not wants, one confines self mentally (logic) and physically (reason) within a circle.

he’s helpless against it

Aka stuck within a circle of wanting vs not wanting whatever has been advertised to him.

Wanting or not wanting "always Coca Cola" or "that's what I like" (Pepsi) tempts ones mind to ignore need aka THIRST, which isn't a circle, but a line of progression, which generates a force multiplier if ignored.

As long as you are stuck within a mental (logic) or physical (reason) circle...the natural line of progression acts as a force multiplier upon the artificial circle.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together)...each product has to be sacrificed into the GLO (to glow) BAL (ba'al) melting pot.

As for oasis (fertile spot in the desert)...that refers to jewish centralization drawing fertility out of the circumference of gentiles aka the rite of circumcision (erect at center; cut off circumference).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is a mistake to say that a letter means something

Because if one takes a letter from another; then one misses that which allows one to measure.

There is no meaning in a letter

Meaning implies a measure held within mind, hence measurement...it's the one suggesting the LETTER; not the one LETTING another shape, who controls the meaning.

Attempting to derive meaning from the alphabet rather than how words are used is not a worthy pursuit.

Worth can only be derived from motion aka from being (life) moved (inception towards death). Any meaning derived from letters by holding definitions within mind corrupts ones evaluation of moving value.

Even Hebrew alphabet is blasphemy to God

Alpha (inception) > beta (life) > omega (death)...each being represents the beta moving from alpha towards omega. A jew utilizes the alpha + beta (alphabet) within which he brews (hebrew) new omegas; thereby inverting ones perception of origin with suggested outcomes.

A beta (life) cannot perceive alpha (inception) or omega (death) while in-between, but must nonetheless adapt to being moved from/to. Suggesting an outcome like "paradise; afterlife; winning; making it; reincarnation etc." tempts others to ignore the animation by origin of being.

The blasphemy to God (sound) implies speaking (word)...artificial words shaped within natural sound represent spell-craft.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

hidden from the eyes of outward observers

To observe implies holding onto...if one holds onto any outward suggestion, then ones inner perception remains hidden.

wisdom withheld from the people

People implies a plurality one holds onto. Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies singularity dominating (dom) each perceiving (wis) unit within.

Letting go of "people" allows each person to discern self from one another. If ones preliminary state (preamble) of mind is "WE THE PEOPLE"; then there ain't no room for self discernment.

to be entirely removed

Only within entire (cause) can partial (effect) come into being. To be implies responding (re) to being moved (move)...from cause into effect.

Effect (life) within cause (inception towards death) implies removal aka all (al) moving (mov) each response (re) within.

to be transported into a hidden world

Aka towards being (life) transported (inception towards death)...a hidden world unless discerned by self.

reappears in the light of day a different, quite transformed person

Light > spectrum > ray implies delineation of appearance (matter) during transformation (momentum) of light (motion). Each ray within the visible spectrum of light responses (re) to light coming forth (appear) differently than one another.

cannot find words sublime enough to express the momentous...

Because momentum implies the spectrum of sound...not the words shaped within in, which are tempting one to hold onto definitions; thereby making oneself a DEAF PHONETICIAN.

no one can understand his words

Because understanding implies "standing-under" another...not alleviating self. Sound animates life...words exchanged among living beings are burdening life while distracting from animation.

mysteries

a) Mystery/mystēs/myein - "mute"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mute#etymonline_v_19324 aka though shall not speak within the sound of silence; otherwise though are speaking in the tongues of man.

  • People talking without speaking
  • People hearing without listening
  • People writing songs that voices never shared
  • No one dared...disturb the sound of silence

b) Suggested pluralism (mysteries) tempts ones singular perception to ignore all perceivable singularity. Ignorance represents the MYST/MIST within ones mind MISS-ing out. Any suggested words others are writing into ones mind represents MYTHO-logy.

initiation

ATION (action)...you (reaction) are IN IT.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

never heard anything good

Does entanglement within a web sound good?

people having trust issues

People (plural) represents the issue a person (singular) shapes by trusting another. The word issue implies "a way out"; which one seeks shortly after joining with others. Why? Because joining binds free will of choice.

RAM prices increasing

The suggestion of prices (A)ccesses ones (M)emory (R)andomly...if consented to. Ones perception operates in response to a plan (all perceivable)...which suggestion randomly distracts from.

all technology part

Being implies part (effect) within all (cause)...few suggest techno (artifice) logy (circular thinking) to distract many from self discernment.

brain rot

If one thinks in a circle instead of thinking straight; then the brain rots aka ones memory has to decompose whatever suggested information circulates within until ones will chooses to let go of it.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

A vortex, in a vortex, in a vortex.

Vortex/vertere/wer - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vortex

It's circular thinking which makes you think there's a vortex (turn) within a vortex (turn) within a vortex (turn)... you are counting the same circle over and over and over again, while ignoring natural delineation.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

is a star cluster

It's your mind which clusters stars together, while ignoring that each star exists apart from one another. Apartheid allows ones mind analysis...clustering distracts ones mind with synthesis.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nephilim came from Orion

Nehphilim (to fall) came from or/oar (to row) ion (action)...nephilim implies all falling for each ones rise within, while orion implies all action for each rowing reaction within.

Nehphilim implies the nature (fall) of each being (rise)...orion implies each being (or) within nature (ion).

the origin of

THEos aka God. There can be only one origin.

connection to orion

It's the suggested word "orion" which connects ones perception (or) and all perceivable (ion)...if one consents to it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›