what the deal was with this "swoosh" area
A picture implies a captured moment, that swoosh implies ongoing momentum covering any captured moment in dust. As in...looking at the artificial bar-scene represents the dust covering ones perceiving eyes.
mob
Another contradiction in terms for those with eyes to see...mob; noun - "common mass, the multitude; assemblage" contradicts mob/mobile - "to move" aka motion (inception towards death) dissembling matter (life).
Those who join the mob; freemasonry or any other fraternity haven't learned to discern self as being apart from one another yet.
Nature represents the DON of each being's FREE will of choice aka the don/dom-inating force. Kissing the ring implies paying freely homage to the ring (logic/reason) which binds others.
burn a photo of a saint
Saint/sancire - "consecrate" aka con (together) + sec (apart)...a contradiction in terms, hence feeding it to the flames.
turned civilization
To civilize someone implies to domesticate ones free will of choice into circular thinking (logic); which turns into conflict (reason).
Nature progresses linear...few utilize civilization (domestication) to trick mindless consumers and polluters to turn away from nature and against one another.
a fallen family member.
One can only rise (life) during fall (inception towards death)...few suggest familiarity and membership to join many together, which prevents each ones rise during fall.
Families can only be broken apart by others because oneself tries to hold together what nature separates from one another. It's ones stranglehold upon others which others break effortlessly with the help of nature.
Same trick with revoking membership of those who ignore the implication of member; noun - "an integral part of an animal body having a distinct function" by joining a membership aka collectivism.
COVID Shots Are "Essentially Murder"
Essence implies each being taking the shots, hence essentially suicide.
Notice that the shots "given" utilized bribes to advertise "taking"...small bribes like donuts; ice-cream; burgers; prostitutes, and big bribes like return to normalcy; alleviation of fear, and access to society's comforts.
This isn't about murder, but about weaponizing temptation by tempting free will of choice into self harm.
Now let's look at murder; noun - "unlawful killing of another human being by a person of sound mind with premeditated malice"...a sound mind would resist the temptation of self harm; not taking shots from one another.
The only think unlawful for free will of choice implies choosing to ignore natural law aka that which frees one for that which binds one.
Sleight of hand...Futurama's Bender in the suicide booth aka bending the rules by shirking response-ability for suicide onto a "murder" machine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRWKHrdts84 (notice the bender of rules is so cheap that he schemes the payment process for suicide).
Hell VS Humanity
a) Only within hu-man can a heaven vs hell conflict be shaped.
b) Before hu-man (hue of man) was anim-al (animation of all).
c) Heaven vs hell implies turning against one another, while animation implies directing apart from one another.
- Inflation aka "cause to swell"
- Depression aka "put down by force"
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies flow causing form to swell, while putting down form by the force of flow aka living (inflation) within process of dying (depression).
A jew tempts gentiles to ignore flow for a conflict (inflation vs depression) among form. If form turns against each other, then it doesn't swell...it diminishes by grinding against each other.
As for your example...instead of comparing artificial products; try comparing what nature does to the consumers thereof. Compare yourself to your ancestors, while asking about inflation and depression. Like the inflation of your father brought you into this world, while your inflation brought how many children into this world? That's the real inflation leading to real depression when thinking about it...
this AI chatbot
Which AI chatbot can adapt to perceivable inspiration?
mods don't exist in here
What if being given free will of choice implies self-moderation or excess...depending on what one chooses?
I disagree with his final conclusion
a) Only within a solution can a conclusion be shaped.
b) Final implies end (fin) of all (al) for each one within.
c) Disagree divides (dis) one against those who agree, hence establishing a conflict of reason aka a synthesis of beings turned against one another aka an inversion of each ones analytical position within nature.
official vs non-official
a) Office implies of/ob (to work; produce) fice/facere (to make; do)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/office
b) Official implies all working and producing for each one within making and doing.
c) Ones consent to any suggestion administers another into an "office" above one, which permits another to manage what one makes and does, while one ignores how nature works and produces.
Consent tricks one to work for another, while becoming the product for another.
GPS (global positioning system)
Position implies potential (life) within action (inception towards death) aka pos-it-ion. A jew suggests globalism to form a system out of gentile consensus to it. Within that global system...each gentiles position can be tracked by a jew.
financial markets; power grids; telecommunications networks and data centres...all need...
Only within all can one form markets; grids; networks or centers...neither of which are needed, but wanted.
when you think of GPS, you think of your location...
...within a Global System aka a synthetic sphere contradicting natures analytic (life) line (inception towards death) of progression.
dave mitlyng
Aka David Mitl-ofski...
xairos
Aka Kairos (the right or critical moment)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos
- Right/reg - "to move in a straight line"
- Critic/krei - "to separate"
- Moment - "momentum"
Aka the momentum of motion; separating matter (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).
The GPS/GNSS system is really a collection...
Aka tikkun olam - "repairing the world by bringing together" aka the synthetic inversion of analysis.
America first vs israel first
What happened to God first? First commandment and stuff...
America with Fuentes
Aka Ameri-chicano.
a) Number implies the designation of a unit, from Latin unitas; unus - "one". Within nature there can be only one.
b) Number/nem - "to take" implies ones choice of taking what all is giving. Taking tempts one to ignore given, which is why ones choice counting makes one accountable to a chosen ones suggested numbers.
c) Number; noun - "sum, aggregate of a collection"...that's why gentiles are named and numbered, while a jew cannot be held accountable to name or number.
d) China/sino - "sin"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Sino-
Aka gentiles being blinded by a Venetian merchant named Marco Polo aka Marco Milione (mark/make a million), and what does Polo imply? Ball aka Ba'al...
way more likely
There's only one way (inception towards death) within nature, and it differentiates (life). Few suggest likeness to shape many alike, like with for example... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Society_of_Blood_Transfusion
"If a blood transfusion is deemed medically necessary, then it is not only permissible but obligatory"... https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/625443/jewish/Is-blood-transfusion-permissible-in-Jewish-belief.htm
Look into her father...a Boston Brahmin.
a) Amelia/ama "to trouble"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Amelia hence troubling (amelia) those hard (hart) of hearing (ear).
b) Circumnavigation implies driving in a circle aka logical thinking.
c) Besides being an agent for the jewish suffrage movement, and setting up the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1920...his/her daddy; Samuel Otis, was a Brahmin/bαΉαΉhati/berΗ΅ - "to become high, rise, elevate" aka a (((berg)))
d) Amelia Earhart was an Aerosmith, cause "shes got it; she's got it...that, that dude looks like a lady". Look also at the Aerosmith logo...from Boston, like the BOSTON BRAHMINS.
roll the dice
Ones perception within all perceivable implies from in-between left/right + front/back + up/down...that's the dice aka cube of allah (kaballah).
Using suggestion to tempt others into circular logic...that's rolling the dice.
some guys have all the luck
Using suggestion to tempt consensus establishes a SOME (sum of all things) based on LUCK (locked together)
some guys have all the fun
Fun implies a diversion aka using suggested to change the course of perceivable direction. Suggestion misdirects perception.
take me in your arms; let your luck begin to run.
Taking ignores given...locking onto (life) within given (inception towards death) runs one out.
So long as gentiles believe in ownership; so long does a jew remain owner of anything a gentile presumes. This trick from the talmud is called "chazakah" (to take possession)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chazakah
Consenting to any suggestion puts the burden of proof on ones presumption about having the suggested in ones possession...which one never has.
Take for example a penny...you may presume it worth a penny; yet $37.5 trillion in debt implies your presumption has a massive leak.
Whoever controls it owns it.
A potential (life) during a process (inception towards death) cannot take into possession without harming potential. Others suggest "ownership" to distract one from that.
One came into life naked; one leaves life naked...the temporary clothes on ones temporary body cannot be owned; yet others can tempt one to mentally ignore that, as to for example...sell clothes.
Those who take possession (own) become possessed (shared) by what others suggest, which represents the trick to invert private into public.
ALL...is ours
All was before each one came into being within, which implies a process of internal separation of potential from one another.
Others suggest the "sum of all things" to trick one to summarize artificially (synthesis) what nature particularizes (analysis).
property
Property/proprius aka pro privo...set forth (inception towards death) particular (life). That's why property cannot be owned, since it implies a process of separation.
We have to change the whole system to this.
A system (to stand together) can only be shaped by partials within a whole. Few suggest systems to trick many into becoming one aka into a systematic consensus to the suggested.
As for change...all changes (inception towards death) into each one (life). It's holding onto any suggested system which tempts a partial (perception) to ignore whole (perceivable).
Holding onto change...ignores being changed.
...is Masonic
a) Being within nature as one within all implies MA (to knead, fashion, fit) SONIC (sound).
b) If MA (perception) SONIC (perceivable); then ones consent to any suggestion by one another implies FREE-MA-SONIC, hence by ones free will of choice.
Who killed Mr. Burns?
a) Nobody was guilty but innocence itself (Maggie).
b) Mr. Burns didn't die, so everyone answering the question became guilty of assumption...
The enemy must be named
Name implies en.e.my (within me), which is where one holds inwards the names one applies outwards to another.
jew
Aka phonetic YOU...the name given to others, which originates from ME; MYSELF or I, hence from within me (en-e-my).
Me; myself or I implies one taking possession over self when declaring to others I AM (je suis; jesus).
Notice the jewish masons are unarmed. The chain wasn't applied by arms; neither can arms break it.
The ordres de bourse (stock market orders) imply suggested orders tempting consenting lifestock to sell itself out into bondage to another.
One isn't held by chains...one's holding them by the weapon of choice.
a) Reversing stability by switching polarity...
b) Transaction implies action (inception towards death) transferring reaction (life) in one direction only. Therefore...opposite polarity can only exist within linear progression.
c) How to switch opposite polarity within linear progression? By shaping circular (currency) within linear (current) for distraction. How does currency become circular? By holding onto it, while ignoring that current continues to progress a linear way.
Whoever Does the Ops - They are in Total control of the Crime Scene
a) Suggesting a scene tempts consensus among watchers...that's the operation by few to gain control over many.
b) Being implies each fractal within total of nature...a suggested scene implies an artifice shaped to distract consenting watchers from nature aka distracting fractal (perception) from total (perceivable).
Watching anything suggested implies ones "total" denial of perceivable...
only the Effect of the Op is What Matters
Nature implies total cause, each being within an effect...a suggested operation shaping consensus implies "affection".
As effect within cause...one can affect one another. That's what one needs to resist the wanted temptation of.
occult forces movie
Movie implies "moving pictures" aka captured moments artificially moved to distract the viewer from natural momentum.
That's how a movie occults the force of nature within the mind of each watcher.
The way they're using...logos
Logos/logic/reason can only be shaped within natures way of procession. The latter moves linear; the former circular.
blindfold
Folding implies "to yield to pressure"...being implies expression (life) within impression (inception towards death). Yielding to pressure implies suicide.
It's natural impression (perceivable inspiration) which gives sight to each beings expression (perception shaping perspective)...others tempt ones consent to fold suggested information until ones sight becomes blinded.
initiation
Inception implies the initiation of life into the process of dying...an internal separation of potential within procession aka an analysis.
Few invert initiation by tempting one to join in synthesis aka using a masonic joint, and suggested information as mortar, to brick consensus among many.
one pant leg up
What's a leg up? An aid (war-time tax) and a boost (push from behind) aka "Here's your burden to carry; now march and fight".
- Probable/prove/pro-bhwo - "being in front"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prove
Being (life) fronted (inception towards death) implies ones passage of life. That's why the saying "proof is in the pudding/putting"...it's the measuring of probability, which tempts one to ignore the ongoing passage aka the pass-over.
As for doobie/doob/dub... https://biblehub.com/hebrew/1727.htm it's about carrying during passage, hence burdening self, when holding onto suggested temptations.
It's not just about smoking the drug/droge - "dry" as a solid (life) within a fluid (inception toward death), but the ritual of sharing & carrying sin, while taking a hit. It's also called a "joint", because of the sharing aka ones consent to the suggestion of another. "Don' t Bogart the joint" tempts each other into sharing the self imposed burden.
In short...tempting others to hold onto represents the "operation" which distracts one from being passed within a moving "matrix".
a) If the number of gentiles is higher than the numbers of jews, then why do jews have more power than gentiles?
b) If number implies the designation of a unit/unus (one), then is plurality based on counting singular units together? What if counting together spends power?