turning into human and achieving a singularity
Singularity implies delineation...turning implies putting the beginning and end of a line together to shape a circle. Nature delineates; few shape artificial circles to confine many mentally (logic) and physically (reason).
Dont get mad with the lil joke
All good.
black people cannot be racist
Race/radix - "to radiate" implies each ray of light. Black implies the absence of light. Thanks to that contradiction...black people cannot be racist.
anyone referring to
To refer implies "tracing back to first cause/origin" which contradicts the procession of each off-spring being brought forth from cause into effect.
abortion is murder
Murder (taking a life) contradicts abortion (miscarrying a life) because birth implies carrying being from taking (intercourse) towards giving (offspring).
debating
Aka reasoning.
a retarded waste of time
One cannot retard (delay) time...it's holding onto suggested measurements of time which delays ones perception while laying one to waste.
an argument they can't win
a) Win vs lose implies ones mind confined to a circle (logic); which turns into arguments against another (reason).
b) Argue; verb - "to make reasoned statements to prove or refute a proposition"...only nature proposes being; which cannot be proven or refuted without ignoring nature. Few propose artifice to tempt many into argumentation against each other while ignoring nature.
at least avoid losing
Only during loss (inception towards death) can there be growth (life)...few suggest argumentation to trick many into avoidance of natural for artificial.
Both sides of argumentation represents loss. A boxing match represents loser vs loser while permitting a 3rd party outside the ring to declare the winner.
declaring your entire position
Only within entire (cause) can each particular (effect) have a position...argumentation about position is designed to distract effect from cause.
flipping the table
Flipping logic (circular thinking) and reason (circular argumentation) doesn't get one out of circular confinement.
losing a board game.
Game implies gambling aka ignoring given choice by taking a chance.
Cant serve two masters.
If choice holds onto either side it becomes a servant to two masters. Only motion > balance > choice represents master setting one free from servitude to one another.
An unstable mind is chaotic
Chaos/khaos/ghieh - "to be wide open"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*ghieh-
Only within the natural order (inception towards death) can chaos (life) come into being, hence balance (stable) generating choice (unstable). Few tempt many into imbalance by suggesting the inversion...order out of chaos instead of chaos within order.
Know your worth and purpose
Pur (forth) pose (to put) hence value (all perceivable) putting forth evaluation (each ones perception). Few tempt many with suggested value (currency) to ignore perceivable value (current)...which when held onto becomes worthless "debt/dead".
Look up not down
Nature sets up/down (balance) apart for each being in-between (choice)...choosing to look/lock onto either side imbalances a beings choice.
This is what happens if one looks up and not down... https://rainydaypoems.com/poems-for-kids/classic-poems-for-kids/the-story-of-johnny-head-in-the-air-by-heinrich-hoffman/
Little dog inverts big God if ones stumbles, and the river refers to the current of the natural order moving life from inception towards death. Falling into it only disturbs the fish temporarily... notice also who and what Heinrich Hoffmann was?
jews Are Pushing Both Immigration Sides...
...because gentiles ignore that nature simultaneously pushes (inception) and pulls (death) migration of being (life). Ignorance of the natural process represents a revolutionary mindset within gentiles, which a jew disguises as immigration vs remigration.
Free will is...
...missing OF CHOICE
You are free to go to hell
Choosing heaven or hell binds free will of choice. God sets choice free in-between...if one chooses either SIDE; then one loses SIGHT of God given while binding self.
in the beginning was the verb
a) BE (being) GIN/GEN (generation)...the word "begin" tempts one to put the effect before the cause. It's an inversion.
b) IN (within) THE (theos)...only within God can there be a beginning (inception) and end (death) for each being (life).
c) Notice that the quote "in the beginning" is from GEN-esis...not BE-GENesis.
Words have power
Aka the consent by the LETTER who LETS another shape words. This transfer of power aka authoritative sanction is called fiat aka "LET it be done".
Sound represents the natural current; words represents fiat currency...if consented to.
hope you are in good intent
Hope vs fear + good vs bad distract from natural intent ...nature delineates; conflict encircles, hence versus/verto - "to turn".
Free will of choice cannot incline towards either side (hope or fear; good or bad) without binding itself.
Sound implies cause; instrument implies effect...words imply affect. The articulation of words within natural sound represents witchcraft aka spellcraft.
meaning dictionary symbolic
Affect
pattern recognition
Cause > effect
There can be only one pattern/patron/pater - "father".
a) Your mind represents the story/store (memory) for anything suggested by another.
b) Michelin/michael aka mikha-el - "who is like God?"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Michael
God implies sameness; being within God implies differential..."likeness" represents witchcraft used by few to equalize differences among many.
Cause (god) > effect (being) > affect (witchcraft)
Witchcraft brews affection to distract from cause > effect. Affect implies synthesis; effect implies analysis...Primate98 used former; Ndvdmm asked for latter.
properties of the pentagram
Each being represents a property of all nature...a penta (five) gram (that which is written or marked) distracts each being from ONEs self discernment.
Plurality (penta-gram) confines the mind of singularity (being) if consented to.
the other regular "-grams."
Regular/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/regular implies all of nature moving each being (life) within a straight line (inception towards death) aka delineation of essence from one another.
Gram - "that which is written or marked"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/-gram confuses ones delineation by alignment with one another, while permitting another to regulate one.
some collection of...mathematics
Few suggest math-a-magic to collectivize many together, which distracts each from being set apart from ONE another. Nature implies singularity adding (inception); subtracting (death); dividing (life) each being for multiplication (intercourse) with one another.
Counting another one as two makes one accountable to another one.
The most common item (honestly the only one I see)
Item/idem - "the same"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/item Nature implies the same process differentiating each being from one another. Few distract many from that with likeness into common-sense aka a hivemind of collective consciousness.
To see implies each ones sight...which cannot be the same (perceivable); only different from one another (perception) or alike one another (suggestion).
non integer
Only a fraction (perception) within whole (perceivable) can be IN (within) TEGER (to touch) hence being able to touch one another. Few utilize suggestion to tempt each fractions consent into a consensus held together with one another.
This touching one another without letting go, while being (life) within a moving nature (inception towards death) establishes friction, which grinds each integer into a non-integer.
square root
Ones perception in-between left/right + up/down + front/back implies the square rooted within all perceivable...consenting to any suggestion by another establishes circular thinking (logic); which turns into conflict (reason) against one another.
That's how few confine square within a circle drawn by a com (together) pass (to move forward).
Pythagoras
Ignoring ones SIGHT in-between perceivable by holding onto either SIDE suggested permits another to triangulate.
One (life) cannot perceive sides (inception/death) while being transferred in-between...
proof...
...is within (life) the putting (inception towards death).
the collapse was engineered
Nature moves; anything a being builds collapses. Engine implies being within (en) generation (gine). Few suggest materialism to tempt many to hold onto that which is being build, while collapsing together within the ignored process of generation.
we couldve had...
- WE implies one holding onto others.
- COULD'VE HAD implies ignoring given potential for wanting possession.
the layers of civilization get stripped away...not dwell on higher thoughts
Layers lure thought into lowering itself.
more primitive...less ability to connect
Because primitive/pre - "forwards" generates secondary/seco - "to divide"...few suggest connections to disable many.
not tied in with his own instinct
Instigation implies action (cause) instigating reaction (effect) aka motion prompting matter into responding. Action can neither be owned; nor tied...it's ignoring effect for affect, which ties effect into ownership to another.
own instinct, culture, language, lineage
Neither of which can be owned, hence few effortlessly shaping the instincts; cultures; languages and lineages of many at will.
groups... turn against each other
Joining a group artificially turns together, what nature delineates apart from one another. Whatever group one joins requires ones free will of choice to join, which by joining becomes bound to another.
God's word.
a) God implies sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all"...only within which a word can be shaped. Articulating words tempts one to ignore natural sound.
b) The word "God's" (with the little "s" attached) suggests that there's something that isn't God's. Words tempt ones mind to attach onto, while ignoring that all detaches each one within from one another.
discovering religion
Dis (to divide) cover (to conceal) + re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...bondage prevents discovery.
christians of all
All implies singularity for each singular unit within..."christians" implies a plurality shaped by joining one another while ignoring singularity.
all denominations
All delineates each one within from one another...others tempt one to denominate few above many.
for christ to return
Christ (to anoint) implies a division from one another...return aka re (to respond) turn (to rotate) implies turning against one another.
Joining any religion returns each christened being back to nature. It's the words FOR and TO which imply nature forwarding each living being from inception towards death.
A standard...holds...we are burning
Fire cannot be held onto. Burning implies liquefaction of solid. The spark of life implies solid (life) liquefaction (inception towards death)...and one cannot hold onto it.
The math doesn't add up.
Because a being cannot add anything to nature. Math is based on mentally affixing artificial parameters to measure in-between, while ignoring that nature implies a moving singularity.
Inception implies addition of being; death implies subtraction of being; intercourse implies multiplication of being, and being a solid (life) within a fluid (inception towards death) implies division of being. Singularity doesn't need to be measured, but a being can be easily manipulated with measurements.
Shock and awe
The "Shock & Awe" doctrine is described as a strategy to achieve the systematic destruction of military capability through attrition, where appropriate, and to use overwhelming force to paralyze shock, unnerve, and ultimately accomplish the moral destruction of an opponent.
The International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD): A Program of Action presented at the conference called for massive propaganda effort, utilizing the mass media, non-governmental organizations, commercial entertainment, and academic institutions in an effort to "persuade" people in developing countries to change their fertility preferences.
~John Coleman - 'The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations'
liquefying in fiercer fires than they ever kindled
If being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death); then fire kindled among solid pales in comparison to liquefaction. Grinding solids against each other to make sparks by friction is milder than the spark of life, generated at the center of liquid animation aka the hell-fire representing each beings IN (within) FERN (fire) AL (all) state.
amazon detention scanning
The screen in front detains ones mind (detainment); what's on it amazes ones mind (amazement); and the transfer in-between enters and tames ones mind (entertainment)...how many of theses screens already have a camera pointing at one?
How do you know you really have free will of choice?
HAVE implies "to own; possess"...the thought of being able to own or possess binds ones free will of choice. A jew tempts gentiles into a have vs have not conflict thereby luring free will of choice into bondage.
Aren't you usually presented with a limited number of options
That which is presented to you is optional; that which presents you is primary. Balance implies primary; choice implies secondary...the presented choices of another implies optional. Either optional side presented tempts choice into imbalance against the other side.
As for limitation: Infinite nature represents the limit within which finite being is free to respond. A being cannot ever exhaust nature...only oneself or each other.
In other words...as long as one is free to choose; one can increase ones limit.
and those options are usually already engineered?
Engine implies being within (en) generation (gine)...nature implies the primary generator; being the secondary response to it. Optional social engineering tricks a being to respond to one another aka give consent to any suggestion, while ignoring natural engineering.
Natural engineering is about discerning self as within (en) generation (gine).
What you perceive as free will might just be trained behavior
a) What's trained behavior is leaving out OF CHOICE when talking about free will, which puts one a liberty of a chosen one.
b) Being able to perceive implies a division of all perceivable into each ones perception aka in-between (choice) a division (balance). It's the suggestions by another which are optional to one.
c) Train/trahere - "to pull, draw" positions ones choice in-between a push/pull balance aka life being pushed from inception and pulled towards death simultaneously.
A jew pushes optional choices to pull gentiles towards death, while distracting from the natural push aka the animation of life aka the inspiration of life aka breathing life into being.
to some degree at least.
a) Some/sum implies putting together...doing that binds free will of choice. Each chosen one summons the free will of choice of each gentile into a consensus aka together into bondage.
b) A degree (a position in a hierarchy) implies ones choice under a chosen one aka an inversion of each beings free will of choice.
Nature divides each being from one another...a jew suggests hierarchy to first rank each divided gentile, and then rank each divided jew above unified gentiles. This is how each jew can manipulate the degree of division among unified gentiles.
vilification of knowledge
Knowledge moves through each being...willingly holding onto information establishes a villain (bondsman aka man bound) and an en-e-my (within me).
Knowledge cannot be held onto...a jew shapes understanding to tempt gentiles a) into a hierarchy aka student standing under teacher and b) to hold onto suggested information.
entertainment
Consent permits suggested information to enter and tame ones mind. Perceivable inspiration inspires while animating resistance to the temptation of wanting to hold onto.
arts
Artificial implies the inversion of natural...and it requires a being to ignore the motion of nature by holding onto the artifice.
Without
Being implies inner (perception) within outer (perceivable). A jew suggests without to invert within...within the minds of gentiles.
urge to seek
Nature implies the urging origin inspiring being to resist the temptation of seeking outcome. A jew inverts this by suggesting for example "two more weeks" to tempt gentiles to seek alternatives for urgent outcomes. It's seeking alternatives to avoid outcome, which keeps outcome within being. If one tries to avoid that which one fears, then one carries fear within one.
A jew adapts to real origin, while shaping fake outcomes to misdirect gentiles.
desire to create
a) Desire implies the want for outcome tempting ones choice to ignore the need to adapt to origin. The issue with holding onto desire..."I can't get no satisfaction; cause I try and I try and I try".
b) Coming into being implies a natural transformation (transfer of form within action)...a jew suggests creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) to invert everything into nothing.
There cannot be creation inside of energy; motion; cause; sound; light; all; whole; God...YET...each power; matter; effect; instrument; ray; one; partial; Christ can be tricked to ignore transformation for creation.
mass...sacrifice
To amass together sacrifices each divided (divined) partial within. A jew amasses gentiles through for example tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together)...it's joining together with others which represents self sacrifice.
Amorites
Aka amos (borne by god) + rite (formal act)...God implies action; any form borne within implies reaction.
Arameans
Aka aram/rum (to be high)...action bringing reaction into being implies a lessening (inception towards death); coming into being implies a heightening (life).
Phoenicians
Aka phonics (sound)...sound acts; instrument reacts. Instrument implies mind structured within, hence being of sound mind.
Hebrew
He (male) > she (female) > off-spring implies respiration...brewing implies fermentation. Nature generating being implies a process of respiration; a jew tempting gentiles together represents fermentation.
compromised the entire
Only within entire can partial be com (together) promittere (to send forth). The entirety of nature sets each partial being within apart from one another...thereby allowing respiration aka animation generating room to breathe for being. A jew utilizes fermentation to invert the entire process by compromising gentiles into a consensus of order followers.
How many libraries have they burned
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) written into a book (suggestible information) initiates the burning by the friction of holding onto something, while ignoring that everything moves.
All perceivable inspiration is being made available to each ones perception...unless willingly ignored for suggested information. For example...holding onto words tempts one to ignore sound. The latter offers each instrument an infinity of inspiration to draw from, while the former confines the instrument with information orchestrated by another aka being played for a fool.
jews rewriting history
Nature delineates (inline); artifice is written (outline)...a jew writes outlines to tempt gentiles into ignoring being (life) within a line (inception towards death). Holding onto outlines implies storing stories.
creating fake realities
RE (to respond) AL(all) aka all action generating each reaction. A jew suggests creationism aka creatio ex nihilo (out of nothing) to tempt gentiles with created nothing from transforming (reaction) everything (action).
Ones consent to anything created by another turns real into fake.
cannibalizing other jews
Each jew (singular) suggests jews (plural) to tempt gentiles (plural) to ignore singularity. Plurality implies the cannibalization of each singular within aka mutual destruction.
Joining others (plural) sacrifices oneself (singular) hence cannibal/canis - "dog" implying a dog eat dog world.
https://genius.com/Dog-eat-dog-isms-lyrics
the past is no different from the present
Presence implies differentiation of essence from one another...a jew suggests past > present > future to tempt gentiles by choosing a side to attack their presence at center.
I will object to his use of the word "elastic" though.
a) EL (all) ASTIC (unsteady, unstable, taking no fixed position)...if all moves, then each one within remains unstable.
b) Will (choice) implies an OB (towards) JECT (to throw) aka motion > balance > choice.
c) Each beings will implies the ASTIC within EL of natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater).
It's ones consent to suggested "words" which makes ones mind rigid...
Judas goat & golden calf...