There's a better explanation that this one in 5 minutes from a person, who was in the Kabbalah. Do you want it?
I am familiar with the video you shared, it's what an "outsider" considers about Kabbalah, it's incomplete. That 5-minute video opened my eyes, honestly.
If you want it, just let me know. I assure you it's more knowledge than anything you've read/learnt so far. And if it isn't, you're correct to call out as a liar. But I watched the video you shared and I can confirm it's less than a 5-minute one that I can provide from an actual Kabbalist.
The comment about a better Christian seemed like it could be understood as an attack and I knew OP would find it an attack. I think the whole world could do with being better little Christ's.
Better Christian? I'm sorry, but do you think you're a better Christian than Jesus? Do you think I am better one than Jesus? Or third-eye-vision? It's a proper assessment, not an insult, in my opinion. How you know how he would take it is a level of mind-reading I am totally unfamiliar with.
Let me explain - Christianity is a belief that stems from a book called the Bible. In this book there are rules that should be followed, if you don't follow them - you're less of a Christian, and if you do follow them - you're more of a Christian. That's an accurate assessment of how one is a better Christian than another.
How did you manage to assess what is an attack without the Bible? How did you manage to read his mind? And let me say this - how he takes it doesn't reflect on what I've said. I can call someone "friend" and they may take it as an insult, in this case, who is correct and who is wrong?
I'm sorry but I don't agree with your moderation so far. Actually, I would like to hear it from third-eye-vision on his genuine thoughts, without the fear of his statement being deleted. Honestly, I believe that any rule that I quote from the Bible, he will agree on, so that's the backbone of our argument. Which then strengthens our communication about better Christian, when in turn leads to a useful conclusion for both of us.
I'm sorry, but if you don't believe in the Bible, your moderation is out of place. You said it already that this place is a community, while you can't let people express their opinions, if they differ... That's really strange. Would Jesus do the same?
No one is a better anything than Jesus and you suppose too much about me here, I think. I should have said I was pretty sure I knew how Op would view it and yes it is an attack technically.
This is a secular forum, tho I do aim to serve the Lord Jesus Christ in everything I do.
Nature implies order, hence ordaining each native within the sorce/source; whence sorcery/sortis/sors (to sort) representing either the natural assortment (division) or artificial assortment (union)...the latter representing chaos; as in orderless con (together) fusion (to melt).
a prophecy in the Zohar
Zohar aka splendor (life) of light (inception towards death) allows pro (forward) phecy (to speech)...consenting to forwarded speech turns light (discernment) into dark (ignorance) within oneself.
For example...consenting to the word "zohar" prevents one from discerning self as splendor of light.
Messiah's arrival
Messiah/mashiah/mashah (to anoint) implies the coming into being of each anointed one within all. Arrival tempts one to ignore origin for outcome.
The voyage itself isn't ARRIVE, but ALIVE...that's the message/mittere (to release, let go; send, throw) of each messiah (anointed one).
There's a better explanation that this one in 5 minutes from a person, who was in the Kabbalah. Do you want it?
I am familiar with the video you shared, it's what an "outsider" considers about Kabbalah, it's incomplete. That 5-minute video opened my eyes, honestly.
If you want it, just let me know. I assure you it's more knowledge than anything you've read/learnt so far. And if it isn't, you're correct to call out as a liar. But I watched the video you shared and I can confirm it's less than a 5-minute one that I can provide from an actual Kabbalist.
Your call.
You can just say no.
Removed for rule 1 violation. Be respectful, attack the argument not the person.
Just informative, could you please let me know of the "attacks on person" that you detected in my comment?
I'm not trying to go against the rules, but trying to improve based on the rules. If that's not too much trouble. If it is, I understand.
The comment about a better Christian seemed like it could be understood as an attack and I knew OP would find it an attack. I think the whole world could do with being better little Christ's.
Better Christian? I'm sorry, but do you think you're a better Christian than Jesus? Do you think I am better one than Jesus? Or third-eye-vision? It's a proper assessment, not an insult, in my opinion. How you know how he would take it is a level of mind-reading I am totally unfamiliar with.
Let me explain - Christianity is a belief that stems from a book called the Bible. In this book there are rules that should be followed, if you don't follow them - you're less of a Christian, and if you do follow them - you're more of a Christian. That's an accurate assessment of how one is a better Christian than another.
How did you manage to assess what is an attack without the Bible? How did you manage to read his mind? And let me say this - how he takes it doesn't reflect on what I've said. I can call someone "friend" and they may take it as an insult, in this case, who is correct and who is wrong?
I'm sorry but I don't agree with your moderation so far. Actually, I would like to hear it from third-eye-vision on his genuine thoughts, without the fear of his statement being deleted. Honestly, I believe that any rule that I quote from the Bible, he will agree on, so that's the backbone of our argument. Which then strengthens our communication about better Christian, when in turn leads to a useful conclusion for both of us.
I'm sorry, but if you don't believe in the Bible, your moderation is out of place. You said it already that this place is a community, while you can't let people express their opinions, if they differ... That's really strange. Would Jesus do the same?
No one is a better anything than Jesus and you suppose too much about me here, I think. I should have said I was pretty sure I knew how Op would view it and yes it is an attack technically.
This is a secular forum, tho I do aim to serve the Lord Jesus Christ in everything I do.
Opinions are fine, without personal attacks.
If you rephrase your comment I will approve it.
Removed for rule 1 violations
Nature implies order, hence ordaining each native within the sorce/source; whence sorcery/sortis/sors (to sort) representing either the natural assortment (division) or artificial assortment (union)...the latter representing chaos; as in orderless con (together) fusion (to melt).
Zohar aka splendor (life) of light (inception towards death) allows pro (forward) phecy (to speech)...consenting to forwarded speech turns light (discernment) into dark (ignorance) within oneself.
For example...consenting to the word "zohar" prevents one from discerning self as splendor of light.
Messiah/mashiah/mashah (to anoint) implies the coming into being of each anointed one within all. Arrival tempts one to ignore origin for outcome.
The voyage itself isn't ARRIVE, but ALIVE...that's the message/mittere (to release, let go; send, throw) of each messiah (anointed one).