What's next should be...
To be implies life in-between inception and death...the suggestion of what's next temps one to ignore that. It's this ignorance which allows others to shape what one hopes for (want) or is afraid of (not want).
- SKHIZO (split) PHREN (mind) + HOMO (same, equal, like) SEX (divide)
Sex (Latin seco; to divide) implies one to be differentiated from other ones...not Homo (same; equal; like). This is why using HOMO (same) + SEX (different) together represents a contradiction, which implies a split (schizo) made within ones mind (phren).
Furthermore...LOGIC (reasoning about suggested) contradicts PSYCHE (animated spirit aka adaptation to perceivable), hence suggested "Psycho-Logy" representing a contradiction in terms set-up.
wants to be deceived
a) choosing want tempts one to ignore need.
b) ignorance deceives ones perception (need) with suggestion (want).
the world
Consenting to suggested "the" aka THE-ISM tempts one to ignore perceivable WORLD (whole). Why? Because suggestion by partials (fiction) comes after perception of whole (reality).
Everything (whole) is perceivable before anyone (partial) can shape any suggestion within.
a) FEU'DAL, adjective - "pertaining to fees" + FEE, noun (Latin pecu, pecus) - "use of cattle in transferring property, or from barter and payments in cattle".
b) the few suggest the -ism, the many consent to the suggested -ism...contract law.
c) those who ignore that nature sets everyone within as "free" will of choice...can be bought by others for a price.
this webpage looks kinda suspicious...
...maybe because all of those "worldwide connected" students are jewish?
bottlecap balloon brigade
bbb aka 666
That ain't a German accent. Sounds Slavic. She mumbles something about Polish or Portuguese.
acceptance laws in Japan...I hope this gets shot down
Guess which one in the following picture was shot down, and whose laws will be accepted...or else?
Ignoring perceivable law (land, air, water) for suggested laws (rules of behavior) thrashes everyone (living) within everything (process of dying)...
a) the center of balance represents choice.
b) balance represents the center of motion (momentum).
c) motion (inception towards death) generates momentum (life).
Consenting to suggested (currency) represents putting on a blinder (bank) within perceivable (current), hence allowing others to set river-banks to steer the fictitious flow of currency.
equally be attributed
- E'QUAL, adjective - "uniform; not variable"
- VA'RIABLE, adjective - "susceptible of change; liable to change; mutable; fickle; unsteady; inconstant"
Temporary living within the ongoing process of dying implies one to be variable (growth) within equal (loss).
- ATTRIB'UTE, verb - (Latin attribuo; ad and tribuo) - "to divide"
Whole (process of dying) divides itself into each partial (living), hence ongoing loss attributing temporary growth to internally/inherently sustain self aka EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
those who have free will
a) free will of choice implies as reaction by each ONE (singular)...suggested "those" (plural) tempts one to ignore that.
b) FREE implies within dominance; WILL (want) implies within need; OF implies out of and CHOICE implies within balance.
c) why would others suggest "free will" without "of choice"? Could it be that one can be tricked by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to bind oneself to the choices of others, while ignoring ones own free will of choice?
Phoenicians
What if those who adapt to perceivable sound (phonics) represent PHONETICIANS, while those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words, hence for the "definitions" suggested by others, represent DEAF PHOENICIANS?
Canaan
CANAAN; from KANA - "to be brought into synchronicity"... https://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Canaan.html
The few suggest synchronism aka e pluribus unum (out of many, one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being asynchronous (temporary growth) within synchronous (ongoing loss) aka living within the process of dying, as partial struggling to sustain self within whole.
The many consenting to follow the suggested orders of the few...each ignore being the resistance (life) within the natural order (inception toward death).
Synchrony (temporary chaos) within Asynchrony (ongoing order) aka living within the process of dying.
atheist
a) A THE IST aka one consenting to suggested THEISM.
b) both wanting (belief) and not wanting (disbelief) represents ones consent to suggested.
The Bible
a) THE; definitive adjective - "is used before nouns to limit their signification, to denote a species by way of distinction; a single thing representing the whole".
b) why does suggested Pig-Latin (English) exchange CONNOTATION, noun - "implication of something beside itself inference" with THEISM?
c) does "the bible" represent male or female connotation? And what about Latin "biblia" or Greek "biblion" ?
d) BIBLION - "a book as a division of a larger work"...what if whole (process of dying) divides into partial (living) and what if whole and partial together represent the inherent/internal power of ENERGY (Greek; work)?
How do you reconcile ALL "leaders" went along with...
a) leaders conduct followers...life reacts to being generated from inception towards death, by either resisting for the sustenance of self, or ignoring this by following others.
b) RECONCI'LE, verb [Latin reconcilio; re and concilio; con and calo, to call, Gr. The literal sense is to call back into union.]
Whole unity (process of dying) calls back each partial division (living)...
if you believe...how do you explain
a) to believe implies ones consent to believe the suggestions of another, hence submission to another...that implies repression (loss), while ignoring expression (growth).
b) EX (expression of life) within the impressing PLAIN of existence (inception toward death)...one doesn't need to ex-plain anything to others; one represents the EX within the PLAIN.
is independent
IS (to be) IN (within) DEPENDENT (sustained by) aka to be alive while being within and sustained by the process of dying.
masonic parliament
PARLER (to speak) MENT (mind, memory)...a mind doesn't speak; it can memorize spoken suggestions if consented to.
A mason (steinmetz; stonemason) utilizes FREE will of choice to MASON (stone; stai; thicken; stiffen) the memorial stone (ones memory/mind) with ignorance (ignoring perceivable by consenting to suggested).
They use BRICK (fragmented suggestions) and MORTAR (consent to bind together) to build WALLS (immure; confine; shut in) of ignorance within ones mind/memory.
"Your empty walls, your empty walls...Pretentious attention, dismissive apprehension"
"Don't waste your time on coffins today...When we decline from the confines of our mind"
"I want you to be left behind those empty walls...Taunt you to see from behind those empty walls"
Vice: "Conspiracy Theorists think..."
a) suggesting in the name of others (one qui vicem gerit) represents a VICE, noun [Latin vitium.] - "a habit of transgressing; duplicity; deception; intemperance"
b) ones consent allows the suggestions of others to invade ones mind and a life of vice is rarely a solitary invader; it usually brings with it a frightful train of followers...
If racism represents the hate for other races; then which -ism represents the love for ones own race?
Let's see....
- Life is suffering...
Living within the process of dying aka temporary growth within ongoing loss aka resistance within velocity implies one to SUF'FER, verb [Latin suffero; sub, under, and fero, to bear; as we say, to undergo.] - "to endure; to support; to sustain; not to sink under".
On the other hand...the temporary life one endures, supports and sustains represents the opportunity to express growth within loss, hence allowing one to consciously experience the fertility of resisting temptations.
- The cause of suffering is craving
The cause of suffering represents the ongoing process of dying; craving represents one temporary living within, while ignoring to resist (need) perceivable for chasing after (want) suggested.
If one craves anything, then one ignores that nature already offered everything before one could react by craving more.
3.The end of suffering comes with an end to craving
Suffering represents the temporary (living) within the ongoing (process of dying)...beginning (inception) and end (death) of suffering (life) can only temporary happen within an ongoing system.
Suffering doesn't stop...each one goes in and out of it. The whole (process of dying) sustains itself through each processed partial (living). The partial represents the internal/inherent power of the whole.
- There is a path which leads one away from craving and suffering
The only way (inception towards death) for everyone within (life) represents the need balancing ones want (craving). The free will of choice in-between need/want balance represents ones struggle to sustain self, hence the suffering of being alive while dying.
Furthermore, the only way impresses itself (dying) upon each expression (living) within...others suggest paths to "lead" away the mind away from comprehending to being pushed by.
Need implies the response-ability to resist origin; want implies the temptation to ignore resisting...hence being lured towards outcomes while being flushed away.
four noble truths
a) truth vs false represents wanting vs not wanting suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
b) NO'BLE, adjective -"free; generous" implies being "free" will of choice..."generated" at the center of balance (momentum of motion). Only within balance can there be choice, and only within motion can there be balance.
c) each "one" represents free will of choice...others suggest one to count other ones (four) as to distract from being oneself (perceiving partial) within oneness (perceivable whole).
There's no such thing as a perceivable "four"...everything perceivable is different from "one" another, otherwise the one perceiving couldn't discern perceivable differences.
Buddhism
Resisting suggested -ism prevents one from being labeled an -ist, and allows one to comprehend the implications (if/then) of perceivable BUD (Greek; to beget) aka BEGET', verb - "to produce, as an effect; to cause to exist; to generate", which implies NATURE, noun [Latin born, produced].
From your perspective...internal split personality aka 1. yourself as the one observing the observer (boss); 2. yourself playing the decoy as you want to be observed; 3. using the decoy as a mirror showing what the observer observes beforehand and how he will react to it.
The observer is looking for out of ordinary behavior, hence him observing. What the decoy is used for is to manipulate the observer by suggesting him ordinary, out of ordinary in your favor, and out of ordinary as bait in his favor to then steer into your favor. Like you pretending to make the mistake he anticipates, just to imbalance him by doing something he didn't anticipate and which skews his view in your favor.
The more you do this, the more you gaslight him to question himself, which then opens him up for you to reassure him with however you want to be seen as.
From his perspective... he knows the ordinary work routine and looks for any deviation from it. Since he suspects foul play when observing, he likely uses bait to tempt the observed, since he doesn't want to waste his time observing without satisfying his suspicions.
His knowledge about the ordinary represents his weak point, which is where your decoy is set-up. He doesn't suspect the ordinary to be manipulated; instead he looks for you acting out of it aka doing something you wouldn't normally do.
In short...MEDIA (Latin medius; middle)...the middle in-between observer and observed represents the ordinary, the status quo of your work relationship (boss/employee); the shared foundation of your coexistence, the suggested habitation for intelligence operations...that's your battlefield; that's where baits and decoys are being set; while everyone wears a mask (public over private).
There's only one perceivable way (inception towards death), and only one means to subvert those perceiving it (life)...choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law, hence willingly binding oneself to the choices of others when consenting to their suggestions.
All goes back to the same
All represents same (process of dying), each one within represents difference (life). This is how the few can rebrand the same (perceivable) with different brands (suggested) ad infinitum.
leading exponents of Traditionalism
a) EXPO'NENT, noun [Latin exponens; expono) - "set forth". Only nature sets forth and those within represent the resistance (life) to being set forth (inception towards death).
b) a leader suggests progressivism to tempt consenting followers to ignore resisting the ongoing process of dying.
c) every -ism represents a suggestion to ignore perceivable, while every -ist represents ones consent to ignore perceivable for suggested.
d) tradition aka TRADO (to deliver) -TION (through action) implies reaction (living) delivered through action (process of dying). Consenting to suggested traditionalism tempts one to ignore that.
A panopticon is set up to not allow resistance, to not even allow affirmation of being observed.
The trick...ones optics (perceiving) represent the center of everything (perceivable), so others suggest a center for everything (pan-) that isn't oneself. This tempts one to ignore ones perceivable surroundings for attempting to view oneself through the lens of the suggested observer.
Imagine you knew your boss was watching you
Observing the observer.
your boss didn't know you were aware of him watching you
Observer falling for mediator decoy while being observed.
acting a certain way to project the image of yourself, as an employee, that you want your boss to see.
Mixture of suggested assurance (about observed) and gaslighting (about observing).
using secret knowledge of somebody spying on you to further your goals without them realizing.
Decoy effect aka asymmetrical dominance.
a) any effort put into artificial intelligence will be accumulated and then used against everyone putting in less effort.
b) like vs dislike (reasoning) represents the argument shaped within your mind.
c) 'ARGUE, verb [Latin arguo, to show, argue accuse or convict.] - "to reason; to invent and offer reasons to support or overthrow a proposition".
Perceivable inspiration represents the only proposition...suggested information tempts one to ignore perceivable by arguing about suggested. Suggestion cannot overthrow perceivable, but it can tempt those perceiving to submit by "standing under" (understanding) to those suggesting.
d) CHAT, verb - "to talk without form or ceremony; to talk idly; to prate; to talk much and without weight"...this is what the few tempt the many to consent to.
e) like to see implies wanted outcome, while ignoring the need to adapt to what you see. Meanwhile, wanted outcomes represents suggested progressivism aka...
"...we will still direct thought towards different fantastic theories which will appear to be progressive. For it was by the word "progressive" that we have successfully turned the brains of the stupid Goys. There are no brains among the Goys to realize that this word is but a cover for digression...progress, being a false conception, serves to conceal the truth so that nobody may know it except ourselves; God's elect; who are its guardians."
~Protocol 13
The ol' reliable cloak of persecution...
Spring...reanimation from the death of winter...how is that for crazy?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Willy#/media/File:Free_willy.jpg
"a friendship you could never imagine"...hence lack of IMAGINA'TION, noun [Latin imaginatio.] - "power or faculty of the mind by which it conceives and forms ideas of things communicated to it by the organs of sense" when ignoring free will of choice for the suggested choices by others.
premise...getting free will out of captivity (the jump out of suggested back into perceivable).
KILLER (death) WHALE (Greek, to stir, agitate or rove) aka life being stirred, agitated and roved within the process of dying.
black/white freemasonry checkerboard colors; representing the "game" between light (comprehension) and dark (ignorance), which others utilize to play CHECK, verb - "to stop; to restrain; to hinder; to curb" by suggesting one to ignore perceivable.