AI generated images
a) an image represents a captured moment, hence an artificial suggestion of naturally perceivable momentum.
b) only whole (process of dying) generates, while each partial within (living) re-generates aka ones response to being generated by.
c) the few are utilizing AI to tempt the many to reason within an artificial environment about which artificial suggestion is real or fake.
fact-check
A sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...FACT (action) + CHECK (restrain; stop)...one represents reaction (life) within action (inception towards death), hence not being able to restrain or stop it.
So does Uziel aka Luzie...
Lil Uzi
"The Uzi is a family of Israeli open-bolt, blowback-operated submachine guns and machine pistols first designed by Major Uziel "Uzi" Gal in the late 1940s..."
summon DEMONS into themselves
a) DAI (divider) MON (provider)...inception towards death represents the motion which divides into and provides for each life within.
b) SUMMON (arouse; excite; animate)...life being moved from inception towards death implies being aroused; excited; animated.
In short...DEMON (motion) SUMMONS (animates). Ask yourself how much suggested information others have to use to distract one from comprehending this?
Thought Terminating Cliches
Suggested information represents cliche (stereotype) aka STEREO (solid) TYPE (form). Solid because one is tempted to hold onto suggested information, while ignoring the liquid nature of perceivable inspiration, which goes "through" the thinking mind.
Information tempts one to think within the confines of ones mind/memory; while inspiration allows on the fly adaptation to whatever inspires one within ones surrounding.
to recognize marxism as the religion it is
a) RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...ones consent (want or not want) to another's suggestion (-ism) represents being bound anew to the choice of another, while ignoring the natural bond between perceivable balance and perceiving choice aka the bond between the enacting whole and each reacting partial.
b) RECOGNIZE, verb (Latin recognosco; re and cognosco, to know) implies perceivable inspiration (knowledge)...consenting to suggested information tempts one to ignore that. Consent to suggested -ism corrupts recognition of perceivable.
a) if whatever grows around oneself represents resistance within loss, then could one teach/learn self how to resist loss, hence how to sustain self as growth (life) within loss (inception towards death) by adapting to it?
b) what if one represents temporary sickness within ongoing health? What if others inverted the definitions to distract one from utilizing the ongoing natural order as the required health-injection for those living within the process of dying?
c) what if the few suggest complex to tempt one to ignore IN'DUSTRY, noun [Latin industria.] - "habitual diligence in any employment, either bodily or mental; steady attention to business" within the simplicity of nature?
consumption of human flesh
- CONSUME, verb - "to destroy, by separating the parts of a thing, by decomposition, as by fire, or eating, devouring, and annihilating the form of a substance"
What if whole (process of dying) separates itself into each partial (living)? What if the process of dying "consumes" the living? What if living represents decomposition, hence being dissolved back into origin?
exists in the same form until it becomes extinct. He dubbed this lack of change “equilibrium” or “stasis”...
If form (life) implies difference within extincting sameness of flow (inception towards death), then the implied momentum of motion represents the balance (equilibrium) for ones free will of choice, which isn't at standstill (stasis); but at center of surrounding motion.
Ones lack of self discernment about being within the momentum of motion doesn't imply "lack of change"...
a) to conceal (suggested information) that which is revealed (perceivable inspiration) implies ones free will of choice to ignore perceivable for suggested.
Concealment implies concealed within ones mind/memory through willing ignorance...
b) JULIUS (to shine) EVOLVE (to develop by natural processes to a higher state) implies the need to resist darkness (ignorance) for light (comprehension).
Taken word by word from...
...suggested information (words) while ignoring perceivable inspiration (sound).
imponderable (unthinkable)
If one thinks within an ongoing stream of inspiration, then consenting to fill ones mind/memory with suggested information prevents one from thinking about anything beyond suggested.
Consenting to suggested information puts weight (Latin pondero, from pondo, pondus, a pound; pendeo, pendo, to weigh) onto ones mind/memory, while adapting to perceivable inspiration sets ones mind/memory free from self imposed burdens, hence exhilarating oneself.
What can you tell be about the revisionism done to the definition of "concern" in-between https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/concern and 2023 Thesaurus? While I'm at it...what about the etymology of CON (with, together) + CERNERE (to perceive; comprehend)?
NO QUALITY
Third times the charm....NOTHING (no) EVERYTHING (quality). QUAL'ITY, noun [Latin qualitas, from qualis, such.] - "Nature, relatively considered; as the quality of an action". Self discernment is required to comprehend being reaction (choice) within action (balance), hence reacting to being within the natural order.
Nature represents perceivable value (enacting); each one within represents perceiving evaluation (reaction)...reacting to the suggested values by others, tempts one to devalue self by ignoring to evaluate perceivable.
shills like you
Shilling for what? For others to grow self discernment, for dragging contradictions into the light while threatening the darkness of ignorance, for taking apart deceptions; for using perceivable inspiration over suggested information, for not participating in suggested conflicts of reason, for expressing reality instead of repressing self with fiction?
you are activated
Free will of choice can only react...
you were a program written as a joke
Comedy (living) can only exist at the center of surrounding drama (process of dying). If you are into jokes; then consider looking into the "Royal Order of Jesters"...
a language that you understand
Why would I consent to stand under any suggested languages, when I can express myself within every perceivable sound?
decided to work to make this place raise
a) EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"...everything represents work; everyone within represents an employed ment (mind/memory) working.
b) a seed doesn't raise its surrounding; it expresses self from within, which in return raises surrounding until met by resistance...
Thanks for the inspiration.
this is like saying "breathing represents a human being"
a) nature impresses (inception towards death) for expression (life), hence breathing.
b) does nature utter suggested words (saying) or does it communicate perceivable sound? Could those within nature deceive each other with suggested words to ignore perceivable sound?
Could suggested "insane person" tempt one to ignore perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound), hence being within and by sound?
c) RE (response to) PRESENT (presented by), hence response of perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole).
d) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] implies AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.] aka flow (inception towards death) animating form (life).
e) what if breathing represents material form adapting spiritually to immaterial flow?
Nope, it's a very tiny insignificant part of it.
a) part implies each "one" partial within the "oneness" of whole. No matter how tiny or big, it still represents the UNIT (Latin unitas; unus) of "one".
b) temporary form (life) represents the SIGN, noun - "something by which another thing is shown or represented" within ongoing flow (inception towards death).
c) the few suggest signs (plural) to tempt each one (singular) of the many into a conflict of reason (significant vs insignificant), hence tempting one to ignore expressing perceivable origin.
Sleight of hand from Ace of Base: "I saw the sign, and it opened up my eyes...No one's gonna drag you up to get into the light where you belong...But where do you belong?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqu132vTl5Y
d) yep (agreement) vs nope (disagreement) implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, hence tempting one into a conflict of reason. Consider applying this to breathing...does it matter if one agrees (want) or disagrees (not want) or is one forced (need) to breathe nonetheless, hence to adapt to perceivable origin?
e) does your suggested "nope" prevent ones free will of choice from making choices or does it tempt one to ignore ones own choice within perceivable for the suggested choices of others?
Your point?
A point implies suggested outcome tempting those within motion to ignore resisting perceivable origin. Inception towards death aka ongoing motion generates each "life-sentence". Death represents the predefined point to each life sentence...living implies ones need to resist that, hence to prolong the sentence (self sustenance)...not to make points.
In short...others suggest points to tempt one to ignore perceivable line.
everything you've listed
How could one-thing (partial) within everything (whole) list everything? If there's more than what I've listed, then why do you brand it "everything"? All suggested words are tempting one to repress self from drawing out of perceivable sound, hence to express self as perceiving resonance within perceivable sound. Self repression represents dissonance, hence the ignorance of perceivable sound for consent to suggested words.
Those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics, sound), while those who consent to suggested word-based "definitions" represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
It is also "current world order"
If natural order represents current, then there's only perceivable "now" (momentum of motion)...suggested old (past) vs new (future) tempt one to ignore that. Furthermore..."new, néwos, now", hence revisionism at play.
Each one represents the consequence of all that was, the expression within all that is, and the free will of choice to shape the consequences for all that will be...holding onto what was, while considering what will be, tempts one to ignore what is. The few suggest what was (his-story; nostalgia etc.) and what will be (science-fiction; progressivism; hope/fear; religion; politics etc.) to tempt the many to ignore what is (everyone within the momentum of everything).
It is also current human behavior
a) everything "was" (perceivable) before anyone within can shape a suggestion to one another about what it "is".
b) suggested behavior aka being (be) + having (hav) tempts one to ignore that being cannot have; possess; hold onto anything unless ignoring to be temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
c) suggested BEHA'VE, verb - "to restrain; to govern; to subdue" tempts one to ignore being "free" will of choice within the "dom"-inance of balance, hence the free center (living) surrounded by dominance (process of dying).
The center (resistance) of dominance (velocity) has to be free to choose between resisting (need) and following (want), because growth within loss requires resistance, while tempting with ignorance thereof. Go on a treadmill to experience the need to resist wanting to stop running.
That's such a stretch with your comments
What if living represents ones struggle to extend (life) in a line (inception towards death), hence to stretch before being pulled back in?
I usually just downvote you and call you a bot
a) upvote (want) vs downvote (not want) represents a conflict of reason you put yourself into by consenting to suggested information, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
Ones choice exits within perceivable balance (need/want), only if one consents to the suggestions by others does one experience imbalance (want vs not want). Notice that voting is being suggested to you by others; and that free-will-of-choice responds without voting?
b) how recent have you decided to change your behavior into suggesting others to be "bots", hence dehumanizing your surrounding, and who but the parasitic few are benefiting from mass dehumanization, from denigrating others; from putting the artificial upon the natural, form labeling others; from passing judgements upon others?
c) how did the few manage to revise BOT; ROBOT (Latin robur; strength) into an insult? Should I be insulted by being called bot, by others lacking to comprehend the ongoing revisionism of words, or do I need to resist suggested labels nonetheless?
I am 99% sure you are a bot
Why then would you reason with something artificial? Why do you want assurance about what others are suggesting? Who suggested you PERCENT (by the hundred)? Does nature offer you less than everything perceivable? Why would one need to count to a hundred? Does any other life form suggest you counted numbers?
Or a person extremely high on drugs
Who runs the drug-trade...the few or the many? Who consents to take suggested drugs...the few or the many? What if your ignorance is being mocked with rhetoric like putting others "down" for being "high" on drugs? A deliberate contradiction for those with eyes to see.
What if suggesting "extreme" (outermost) implies ones lack of self discernment about being innermost (partial within whole; choice within balance; growth within loss etc.)?
just because you write things that are not easily understandable it doesn't make them intelligent.
a) INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)
b) understanding implies ones choice to want to "stand under" what others are suggesting, while ignoring the need to express growth (comprehension) within KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
In short...intelligence contradicts knowledge; understanding represents the inversion of comprehending. One can only discern this for self, not through others.
c) does living within the process of dying sounds "easy" or more like ones struggle for the sustenance of life within ongoing temptation? If you think breathing is easy; then how about changing your altitude to comprehend ones lack of putting in effort when judging something as easy?
it seem that you are delusional
What if mind/memory is being led within perceivable inspiration, while being tempted with suggested information into DELUSION, noun - "a misleading of the mind; being liable to the delusions of artifice".
Can you discern being liable within natural to resist artifice? Even if everyone else chooses artificial (suggested) over natural (perceivable)...oneself still remains liable for self discernment through free will of choice. Self discernment cannot be given by others.
No offense
Consider ongoing offense (inception towards death) generating temporary defense (life)....everything offends; everyone within needs to defend self. The suggestions of others tempt one to ignore defending...
That's stating the obvious with too much useless wording
a) suggested stating aka STATICS, noun - "branch of mechanics which treats of bodies at rest" tempts one to ignore perceivable dynamic, hence being within constant motion.
The trick...ones consent to suggested mechanic tempts one to only view the dynamic thereof, which allows others to prevent mechanic to move as to deceive the consenting ones to ignore the perceivable dynamic of existing as temporary growth within ongoing loss.
b) everyone (perceiving) is being used by everything (perceivable)...suggested "useless" tempts one to ignore that.
c) too much food vs too little food tempts one to ignore hunger...hence enough adaptation to still hunger momentarily.
divided from the masses
Nature represents the divider of whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving), those who ignore that are being tempted together by the suggestions of others.
Instead of viewing yourself divided from others, try discerning oneself as partial within whole, hence surrounded by other different partials of the same whole?
how complex you make it sound
What if perceivable sound represents simplicity; while suggested words represent complexity, hence tempting one to fill mind/memory with unnecessary information?
How many words have those within nature spoken to each other? Unaccountable amounts! How many words has nature spoken to those within? None!
In short...sound implies simple; words represent complex".
bet you don't even know what this means. But it's a cool word to make you sound intelligent - inception. Make it "towards death" and now it's philosophical.
a) motion predefines meaning for those within.
b) ME'ANING, participle - "having in mind"...hence enacting input through reacting memory. It's on oneself to discern between perceivable input (inspiration) and suggested input (information).
c) if one discerns to be alive, then "inception towards death" implies the moving surrounding for ones life at the center. Those who lack self discernment are being tempted by the suggestions of others to view beginning (inception) and end (death) as divided states, instead of the whole motion dividing into each partial within.
d) notice that while being alive, one cannot perceive ones inception (beginning) and death (end), hence existing within the momentum (balance) of motion. Perceiving how others come in and out of existence allows one to discern self as the center by adapting to ones surrounding?
now it's philosophical
a) the few suggest SOPH-ism to tempt the consenting many into a PHILO (to love) vs MISO (to hate) conflict of reason.
b) perceivable SOPHOS (learned) implies ones growth of comprehension within perceivable...not ones understanding of suggested.
The few suggest students (follower) under teachers (leader) to tempt one to ignore that perceivable represents the only source for each perceiving one within to teach/learn self, and discerning self as being within a moving source implies ones need to resist it...not to follow others.
no, it doesn't
Implies "nothing; it does nothing"...a contradiction of being (life) done by everything (inception towards death).
It may seem poetic to write the word "life" after you've written "death" but it is not logical in your statement.
a) the state of an ignorant mind represents LOG'IC, noun - "reason", hence being within a conflict (yes vs no). If one resists reason for implication (if/then), then one can discern that living implies the need to resist the process of dying, hence life being processed within motion from inception towards death aka forwards motion (velocity) generating momentum (balance) for resistance (choice) within.
b) suggested poetic (composed aka set together) tempts one to ignore being set apart, hence representing perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole).
Not all.
Aka NOTHING (not) EVERYTHING (all)...yet another contradiction.
this place is a place of people who resist.
a) reasoning against others about the suggestions of the few represents spending resistance (hence being harvested for loosh). Resisting the temptation of suggested (fiction) while adapting to perceivable (reality) allows one to grow resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
b) this place (not suggested forum, but perceivable momentum) offers each one response-ability (free will of choice), hence the choice to resist (need) or ignore (want) resisting. Reasoning (want vs not want) implies that one already made the choice to ignore resisting, while ignorance implies lack of discernment; lack of comprehension; lack of resistance; lack of awareness etc.
You wrote so many words
13171 right now...by simply using perceivable inspiration to draw expression from, instead of reasoning with others about suggested words.
That's pathetic
Logos (suggested words) tempts Pathos (suffering)...
You only waste my time.
What if one can utilize others as perceivable inspiration, instead of "wasting time" by misusing them for suggested information? Are others responsible for ones lack of effort, for ones misplaced choices?
you always write on some posts with similar comments.
Each comment represents a different expression, since I adapt on the fly to whatever inspires me. Frequency of repetition increases resistance within velocity (from the energy perspective), but each repetition implies a different reaction within the same action.
As for always...one exists within ALL WAY, others suggest "always" to tempt one to ignore self as the temporary within the ongoing.
I decided to expose you
What did I conceal that inspired you to expose it?
if you bring low quality, expect a reaction from me.
What if it's your free will of choice to evaluate things as low (not want) or high (want) quality? What if I adapt to needed value (perceivable) while resisting whatever others evaluate (suggested) as high or low?
What if one doesn't need to expect reactions from others; but needs to be the reaction (choice) within enacting whole (balance)?
a) question to her 500k subscribers: "where are your eyes?"
b) question to Lola: "where is your decency?"
c) foundring be like: "but what about skills?"
a) motion represents the natural world order, hence moving all life from inception towards death.
b) the few suggested the many to consent to an "old world order" aka civilization; society; laws of men; religion; behavioral norms; law enforcement; history; progressivism; identitarianism etc.
c) the natural world order destroys the suggested old world order, hence the few requiring a "new world order" narrative to sell the ongoing destruction to the oblivious many...who're busy clamoring about the old world order being swept away.
d) perceivable natural order (inception towards death) requires resistance (life); all suggested orders tempt one to follow, hence ignoring to resist.
I think A.D's insertion is a heap of fantasy.
Allow yourself to question deeper...what can one insert into reality? If one exists within reality, then how could one insert something from the outside? Is inception up to life or does life represent the insert (inception) and extract (death) of outside into inside?
As for heap of fiction...where does such a heap accumulate? Could ones consent to suggested information (fiction) over perceivable inspiration (reality) tempt one to "heap" it upon ones mind/memory, hence holding onto it?
single biggest
What if single (partial) can only exist within biggest (whole)? What if others tempt one with suggested biggest vs smallest to ignore being partial within whole?
He has a point.
POINT, noun - "an indivisible part of time or space"...how could "one" (partial within whole) have an indivisible part, while representing a divided part?
history has been changed around it.
If you (life) are within constant change (inception towards death), then everything changes everyone within...
It assumes a fictional start
Can you discern in-between your start within reality (inception) and the ongoing reality (inception toward death) starting you? Are these discernible or do they require assumptions?
a bookmark that has been completely dishonest
a) what if ones consent to suggested honesty "bookmarks" the suggested within ones mind/memory, hence "binding" the ones consenting to the one suggesting?
b) why does a partial uses "completely" to describe the behavior of other partials?
c) how could HON'EST, adjective [Latin honestus, from honos, honor.] - "free from trickishness and fraud" exist if everyone represents the free will of choice to trick and defraud others?
Furthermore...if one chooses want over need, then does that represent dishonesty to self?
Brutally removing
a) does the ongoing process of dying brutally removes everyone temporary living within?
b) does nature represent BRU'TAL, adjective - "pertaining to a brute; as brutal nature" + BRUTE, adjective - "senseless; irrational; unconscious; bestial"? And if so...do those born into it represent gentle?
it provided a reset counter
Does ones response to perceivable setting require counting? Do you count breathing? How do you count thirst and hunger? What about counting shelter? Are the few suggesting the many to count; are the few suggesting all the numbers to the many; are the few known to "fudge the numbers"?
Could ones consent to suggested "counting" give others the power to define; redefine and contradict numbers? What about perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit (Latin unus; one)"? Can ONE perceive more than other ONEs?
There is almost 0 evidence of...
a) EV'IDENT, adjective - "plain; open to be seen; apparent; manifest"...where is 0 (zero; nothing) evident? How does perceivable nature communicate 0 to the perceiving 1's within?
b) "there is almost..." If MOST is, then what about the rest of ALL? Is it not?
we made up those dates.
How? How can one make up anything? How does the made up affect others? How could one (singular) be we (plural)...who made that up? Can anyone make up anything without using everything already in existence as the foundation? If make up, then taking down, so who has more power to take down...the living or the process of dying? If it's the latter, then who has more power to make up...the living or the process of dying generating the living within itself?
has been altered repeatedly
What if being represents repetition (adaptation by free will of choice) within alteration (balance of motion)?
a heap of bullshit
Sleight of hand from Madonna: "I'm not your bitch, don't hang your shit on me (it's human nature)" aka "I'm not consenting to you, don't hang your suggestions on me" (it's human nature)...
a) because the many are so bad at discerning that nature already made everything perceivable available.
b) reasoning (good vs bad) implies ones consent to suggested; while ignoring perceivable.
c) the few tempt the many to put themselves down, while reaching for things made up.
d) CHAT, verb - "to talk without form; to talk idly; to prate".
Fuck ALL Religions
RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) binds ones consent (want or not want) to the suggestions by others. Both being for or against a suggestion represents ones consent to it, hence fueling it, while weakening self.
to be completely...
One can only be partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...others can tempt one with suggestions (progressivism towards fulfillment) to ignore that.
better suited for a Abrahamic forum
- ABH (father) RAHAM (multitude)
- MUL'TITUDE, noun - "the state of being many"
Aka the suggested inversion (state of being many) of perceivable reality (state of being one)...
To tolerate evil is complicity
a) good vs evil represents ones consent (want or not want) to suggested moralism, hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) complicity.
b) TOL'ERATE, verb - "to suffer to be" aka to suffer (inception towards death) to be (life) aka resistance within temptation.
complicity that makes you indebted
The debt of being complicit to consent to suggestions represents carrying the suggested (information) around, hence burdening self within perceivable (inspiration).
the victims
VIC'TIM noun [Latin victima.] - "something sacrificed in the pursuit of an object"...the few tempt the many to pursuit suggested objectives; which when consented to represents self sacrifice to perceivable origin.
Living represents the burned offering within the process of dying.
Sleight of hand: "Bound by wild desire (inception towards death)...I fell into a ring of fire (life)".
the messaging is 100% off on everything
a) messaging (suggested information) is 100% off on everything (perceivable inspiration)...ones consent to anything suggested puts it over everything perceivable.
b) MES'SAGE, noun [Latin missus, mitto, to send.]...life is being send from inception towards death, hence send by origin before returning to sender.
race to the bottom
Suggested race (progressivism or racism) tempts one to ignore perceivable RACE, noun [Latin radix; radius; ray, radiate, etc.]. It's ones free will of choice to view being moved from inception towards death as a race against others to reach the end...or as ongoing surrounding (loss) for ones temporary center (growth).
Growing implies radiating growth (living) within loss (process of dying) by resisting the temptation of it...
we consume, but it actually subversion...
a) CONSUME, verb - "to destroy by separating the parts of a thing"...whole (process of dying) separates itself into each partial (living) for sustenance.
b) the few suggest the many to build something (putting together) while ignoring that nature sets apart, which then confuses the many when it falls apart despite their efforts to keep it together; to hold onto it, to possess it etc.
c) within wholeness...apartheid sustains one-self; togetherness consumes each partial one within.
created a Global
Globalism was suggested just like creationism...
walk away from the game
a) life cannot walk away from being moved from inception towards death...walking implies within the momentum of motion, hence as the reaction choice at the center of enacting balance.
b) ones consent to win (want) vs lose (not want) the suggested game, tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable "work" (energy).
Sleight of hand: "all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
their own implosion
The internal/inherent power of energy represents imploding sound (inception towards death) in balance with exploding sound (life)...motion represents impressing; being moved represents expression.
it's all by design
a) DESIGN, verb - "to form an outline or representation of any thing"...flow (inception towards death) represents the outer line, for representative form (life) within line, hence ones (inline) within all (outline).
b) suggested "all by design" tempts one to ignore that each one being designed by all, hence formed out or; within and in response to flow.
subversion
SUBVERT', verb - "to overthrow from the foundation"...perceivable balance represents the foundation for perceiving choice...the suggested choices by others tempt one to ignore foundation (perceivable) for subversion (suggested).
best ayh can do is casinos
tfw when carrying all the equipment upstairs for a $10 buck tip and now reading he disliked casinos... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4Twno6XA.jpg
Hylic (from Greek ὕλη (hylē) "matter") is the opposite of psychic (from Greek ψυχή (psychē) "soul").
Matter (life) breathes (spirit; soul)...coexistence within; not opposition to one another. Within where? Momentum of motion (immaterial)...soul represents the adaptation (by choice) of matter (form) to immaterial (flow) within momentum (balance).
Momentum puts form (life) and flow (inception towards death) in opposition to each other, hence ones struggle to resist (living) temptation (dying).
gnostic belief system
To belief (consenting to suggested) contradicts GNOS'TIC, noun nostic. (Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.) aka adaptation to perceivable. The suggested belief system is called Gnosticism, which tempts one to ignore Gnostic (perceivable). Same trick as with science (Latin scientia, from scio, to know) and suggested Scientism.
system
SYS'TEM, noun [Latin systema; Gr. to set.] - "an assemblage of things adjusted into a regular whole"...perceiving partial (living) are being set into perceivable whole (process of dying)...suggested systems tempt one to ignore that.
σώμα (sōma)...πνεύμα (pneuma)
Consider temporary σώμα (sōma) adapting through πνεύμα (pneuma) to ongoing κίνηση (gait; motion; flow etc.)
the lowest order
What if there's a natural order before those within can react as choice to low/high balance? What if suggested THE-ism tempts one judge lowest vs highest instead of adapting to the natural order?
The duty of (spiritual) man was to escape the material world by the aid of the hidden knowledge (gnosis).
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) implies ongoing input, hence revealing itself to each perceiving one within...unless willingly ignored for suggested information. Consenting to such information gives those suggesting the power of consent to conceal it, while labeling it "hidden knowledge", hence tempting those who already consent to it to want it even harder.
Ignorance of perceivable for suggested represents the self imposed prison, one cannot see while ignoring. The few suggest escapism to tempt the many with a way out; which tempts one (perceiving) to ignore being within (perceivable).
no
a) implies a viewpoint through the conflict of reason (yes vs no), shaped by consenting to suggested, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable.
b) the few use suggestion to divide the consenting many into reasoning against each other over the suggested.
Why do you disregard the message
a) MES'SAGE, noun [Latin missus, mitto, to send.]...nature sends perceivable inspiration, those within send suggested information. Consent to the latter represents ignorance of the former, which in return gives those suggesting the opportunity to exploit ignorance by shaping the suggested at will.
b) the few suggest progressivism (towards outcome); hence tempting the many to REG'ARD, verb - "to look towards", while ignoring to adapt to perceivable origin.
c) regard vs disregard represents the rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
give definitions
a) nature communicates itself as perceivable sound, those within tempt each other with suggested words (spell-craft) to ignore sound.
b) those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those who ignore sound for word-based definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
c) I take apart the idolatry; revisionism and deliberate contradictions within suggested definitions, while expressing my comprehension about perceivable sound.
d) suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound), hence being within, by, out of and in response to enacting sound as the reacting resonance (need) or dissonance (want)...depending on ones free will of choice.
just odd
Consider....motion (odd) to momentum (even). Then consider being choice within balance (momentum) of motion, hence having the choice to even the odds.
Form (life) within the momentum of flow (inception towards death) represents ones choice to even the odds of dying...
shtick
Perceiving (living) cannot stick to perceivable (process of dying)...suggested can stick to those consenting to hold onto it, which in return tempts them to ignore resisting (living) temptation (dying).
Looking underneath suggested banking and insurance at the perceivable foundation, which the many ignore for the suggestions of the few, who in return gain the consent to racketeer through banking and insurance.
a) both horizontal (left/right) and vertical (inception/death) imply ones position at the center of ones surrounding, while within motion.
b) one ignores that perceivable motion "was", before one can suggest others what time "is". Time is being suggested to tempt one to hold onto position within motion, instead of resisting being moved by balancing within its momentum.
c) TIME, noun (Latin tempus; tempora) - "a particular portion or part of duration", hence particular potion (life) within whole duration (inception towards death).
d) consider if those who try to explain what time is are lacking self discernment about their position within it, hence there perspective of it?
What if "this" has to be perceivable before one can suggest others what it means? If so; then what if perceivable represents predefined meaning and what if suggested meaning tempts one to ignore that?
Does "this" not exist if one doesn't suggest others what it means? Does everything exist if everyone within ignores its meaning?
"from...to" implies motion, while suggested sequence (that which follows) tempts one to ignore being moved by motion, hence representing resistance within temptation.
What if others suggest one to "follow" suggested orders; while ignoring to "resist" perceivable order?
a) what happens if the "tower of babel" collapses? The foundation remains! Suggested information collapses upon itself (Gemara); while perceivable inspiration continues (Mishnah).
b) "like" implies partial positions among each other, behaving alike, yet different, while within the momentum of the same duration aka difference (life) within sameness (inception towards death).
Others suggesting one to behave alike, while pretending to be the same, which in return tempts one to ignore differences (perceivable inspiration as communicated through motion).
c) "scraping the sky" represents a sleight of hand for friction between ongoing velocity (inception towards death) and temporary resistance (life).
Friction represents energy (internal power) generating partial center (growth) within surrounding whole (loss), hence utilizing friction to generated form (life) within flow (inception towards death).