predict the next act
Foretelling (to predict) aka suggestion is used to distract reaction (perceiving) from action (perceivable).
the process of making...unelectable
a) being processed implies being reacting choice (elect) within action (-tion)...others suggest elections and representative choices to distract one from self.
b) MAKE, verb - "to compel; to constrain; to drive or urge with force"...inception towards death represents the driving force, which urges; compels and constrains each life within.
will be installed
STALL, noun - "a fixed spot" (also a stable; a place for cattle)...being free "will" of choice implies within momentum (balance) of ongoing motion.
Being implies within a separate; fragmented; partial state...not fixed. Others suggest "fix" as the inversion, hence "There's not a problem that I can't fix... 'Cause I can do it in the mix" aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together). And if this is hard to comprehend, well..."And you don't let it trouble your brain...Cause away goes trouble down the drain"
abstract ones
ABSTRACT', verb (Latin abstraho, to draw from or separate)...every one implies separation within everything and hence being able to draw as partial (perceiving) from whole (perceivable).
Actual (inception towards death) generates abstract (life)...
The psychological operation to distract from this...suggesting togetherness over perceivable apartheid, while calling anything outside the mass consented norm an "abstract".
terms...they're stupid
- TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.]
- STUPID, adjective [to be stupefied, properly to stop]
a) what if a boundary can only exist within motion? How could those within motion (life being moved from inception towards death) stop it?
b) notice that "terminology" used for expression represents repression (boundary) if one consents to use it...
I hate... trends
TREND, verb - "to have a particular direction"...ones choice to love or hate the suggestions (bots) by others shapes the particular direction of the suggested.
Trends feed off consent...
They're often generated by idiots influencing
The reactions of those who "love" suggested are influenced by those who "hate" suggested...others generate suggestions to shape reactors and influencers.
Recent example...jewtube influencers and their reacting audiences.
Another word created
Shaping a suggestible word out of perceivable sound...does that represent creation (out of nothing) or transmutation (out of everything)?
Explaining something was already subjective
Notice that explaining to one another by suggestion implies...subjective to subjective, while ignoring objective (perceivable).
What if nature impresses (loss) so that those within nature can express (growth) or choose to ignore that by subjecting themselves to one another?
explained something factual
FACT, noun [Latin factum, facio] - "any thing done, or that comes to pass; an act; a deed; an effect produced"...
a) how can a subjective reaction produce a factual action?
b) what about...action (inception towards death) producing reaction (life), hence being subject (living) within object (process of dying)?
c) why are the few suggesting the consenting many rhetoric like "just do it" or "facism" or "factories" or "fact-check" etc.?
Why was this a topic?
TOP'IC, noun (Latin topicus, topica) - "any subject of discourse or argument"; because if everyone represents a subject; then everything suggested to one another represents a topic within an argument (conflict of reason).
most children would learn best in small community settings, rather than a large "melting pot"
a) the foundation for scaling down represents being "one"...you can't scale down further than one. Others suggest numbers to distract one from one-self.
b) the issue isn't about size of school or students; but the foundation of education through others...mass conformity to be educated by a few. This represents why one is tricked to view a few as the solution to the problematic many.
c) the suggested school system allows the few to vet those who stand out from the many, hence both non-conformists or exceptional conformists. The former gets isolated; while the latter gets elevated over the rest of the many, while helping to melt them.
d) a child needs to discern that learning for self represents teaching self and vice versa. Nature supplies the foundation for each ones growth of self discernment as perceivable inspiration, hence giving each one the free will of choice to adapt to perceivable (need) or ignore it for each others suggestions (want).
e) a child represents an OFF-spring, while the student/teacher dynamics tempts the child to stand under (understand) suggested information, hence binding oneself to those suggesting it. How could the child spring off if the child is bound to?
f) homeschooling tempts the parents to emulate school at home, which ignores that home exists before school. Sleight of hand: "home is where the heart is".
a natural learning environment
The surrounding (environ) of mind/memory (ment) represents perceivable inspiration aka moving differences aka the flow of input for the formed response within. The suggested curriculum (running course) by others tempts one to ignore the only running course for life...from inception towards death; hence within motion, and being moved from inception towards death implies the need for life to resist origin by adaptation to moving differences aka perceivable inspiration.
All of this can be discerned if one chooses to resist the temptation of suggested information by others. Self discernment cannot be gained through others, only by oneself.
I believe that a smaller environment enhances difference.
a) to believe represents ones consent to the suggestions of others, hence establishing a consenting many under a suggesting few, which in return tricks one to seek a smaller surrounding (environ) for ones mind (ment).
b) to be implies partial difference (perceiving) within whole sameness (perceivable)...others suggest the inversion aka equality (same) through diversity (difference).
c) ones choice to adapt to perceivable, while resisting suggested, enhances oneself. Ignoring the need to grow self by wanting to grow through others, curtails ones enhancement.
In a massive pool, there's always a bigger fish. There's always someone a million times better than you...
Both "bigger fish to fry" and "bigger equals better" represents suggested rhetoric to tempt one to reason (bigger vs smaller or better vs worse) over suggested; while ignoring perceivable.
Is there such a conflict of reason between a butterfly and a whale? What if one can choose to draw infinite inspiration through each, no matter the size or judgement made upon?
The mental state of reason/logic represents the distortion of ones perspective through the lens of conflict...others exploit this by suggesting competition over suggested outcomes.
In a smaller/tribal environment, you can truly be the best at something. You can be "special", for lack of a more adequate term.
a) what's more SPECIAL, noun "a particular" than ONE-self aka partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)?
b) TRIBE, noun [Latin tribus.] - "descending from the same progenitor and kept distinct" refers to living (distinct) within the process of dying (same)...that represents ones perceivable tribe aka a division of whole into partial...not the suggested tribe tempting one into togetherness (socialism) with others.
To be implies apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death); hence ones struggle to sustain self among others.
c) AD'EQUATE, adjective - "equal; proportionate"...see; there's the contradiction within your mind...you're trying to find an adequate (same) term for being different, which tempts you to ignore your proportion as ONE (unit) within all. Guess who suggested you the term "adequate"....
not to say that there's nothing to be gained from...
How could one gain anything from "nothing"? Consider if the few suggest nothing as the inversion of everything perceivable?
outside influence
To be implies within (life) fluid (inception towards death)...seeking outside influence from others tempts one to ignore being center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable).
a moderately sized environment
MOD'ERATE, adjective [Latin moderatus, moderor, modus, a limit.]...what if ones mind/memory is limited to oneself?
a) the suggested system represents the distraction from the perceivable "controlled demolition"...
b) living implies being moved from construction (inception) towards demolition (death), hence requiring ones struggle to sustain self by resisting a controlled burn...
c) all the suggested systems by others represent progressivism (towards outcome); hence tempting one to ignore the need to resist perceivable origin for wanting vs not wanting suggested outcomes.
seems like theatrics.
a) a theater requires an audience...ones consent to what others are suggesting, shapes the suggested into a theatrical production.
b) THE'ATER; from THE'ATINS, noun - "an order of regular priests in Naples, who have no property, nor do they beg, but wait for what providence sends them"...
Now consider if the many give the few all property rights; while constantly begging to get something; to get more; to get"new"? Providence send the theatin few the many as a willing audience...and so the show must go on.
The "service" provided is insufficient at best
a) what could others provide (suggested) that nature (perceivable) not already offers? Ignoring this shapes ones self sustenance into insufficiency...others tempt ones ignorance of perceivable into servitude to their suggestions.
b) reasoning (best vs worse) over suggested service represents the self inflicted; mental prison for those who ignore perceivable offer for suggestions provided by others.
c) growing oneself...as the center...grows ones surrounding, hence no servitude to others required. Others benefit from the fruits of ones labors; while laboring for others spoils ones fruits.
how oligarchical families shaped events
a) OL'IGRACHY, noun [Gr. few, and rule.]...if many ignore perceivable, then the suggestions of the few become the rule for the many.
b) flow (inception towards death) shapes form (life)...resistance allows life to shape; ignorance allows others to shape ones life.
c) event (inception) towards eclipse (death) represents horizon (inception towards death) for center (life)
to better shape the future minds of their slaves
a) ones consent to the suggestions of others; willing enslaves ones mind to the suggested, while allowing those suggesting mastery over suggested.
b) suggested progressivism tempts one to ignore that which is perceivable for suggestions about that which isn't (the future). One needs to resist (life) progress (inception towards death); while suggested progressivism tempts one to ignore resisting and instead follow along, hence establishing the leader/follower dynamic.
had ideas that would ruin their control
IDE'A, noun [Gr. to see]...perceivable (reality) ruins control over suggested (fiction)...unless ignored.
was put on a pedestal because of the ... jewish Talmud!
TALMUD (instruction) represents MISHNAH (perceivable) and GEMARA (suggested), hence helping those who choose perceivable to control those who choose suggested. The oral torah represents perceivable sound; while the written part represents suggested words...the difference has to be discerned by oneself.
As for pit and pedestal...those ignoring perceivable for suggested are willingly submitting to stand under (understanding) those suggesting, this establishes the pit of the many for the pedestal of the few. Those who comprehend this utilize others on the temporary pedestal (hence hidden hand), which for those who consent to take that position upon the pedestal; represents the catch-22; the deal with the devil; the Faustian bargain etc.
Pedestal (want) vs Pit (not want) represents talmudic reasoning within gemara (suggested), hence controllable from outside by those who discern self within mishnah (perceivable).
Furthermore; reading talmud as a book; either mishnah or gemara or both together, does not represent self discernment of partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable), because a book (letters and words aka symbolism and spell-craft) represents a suggestion and reading it represents ones consent to suggested (information), while ignoring perceivable (inspiration).
Bonus: the gemara part represents the foundation for gematria aka numerology aka tempting the individual unit (one) to count collective numbers (two; three; four etc.)...hence ignoring one-self.
do not talk to machines
a) MACHINE, noun [Latin machina.] - "an artificial work".
b) suggested information (artificial) tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (natural).
c) perceivable nature neither "talks" nor does it communicate "not"...others tempt one to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words, and perceivable everything for suggested nothing.
d) suggestion represents the inversion of perception.
...the service actually provided
a) what service? Where do teachers fit into "replacement migration" and "unsustainable birthrates"? What do teachers provide a child in this environment? What are students being educated for if self sustenance is already out of the curriculum?
b) SERV'ICE, noun [From Latin servitium.] - "labor of body and mind, performed at the command of a superior". What if consenting to superiority of others implies implies inferiority of self...wouldn't that be a prime breeding ground for "unsustainable birthrates and replacement migration"?
it should be based on the individualism
a) consenting (individual-ist) towards suggested (individual-ism) tempts one to ignore self for others.
b) IN (being within) DIVID (divided as partial within whole)
c) the trick...suggested DUAL-ism; hidden within perceivable IN DIVID. Therefore...ones consent to the suggestion of another one represents DUAL (two) -ism.
d) to be (choice) implies within base (balance)...
we are individuals
We (plural) are individual (singular)? The added "s" implies suggested collectivism aka putting the singulars together under the suggested umbrella "we". A rhetorical deception...we contradicts individual ones IF individual ones consent to suggested we.
FINN-I-SH..ANS (phoneticians)...will they let hell sink?
It's been a while... https://img.gvid.tv/i/7Z8f8oJA.png
were they also called "Nazis" and the whole Israel/Hoho/Nazi thing is complete fabrication
The few suggest brands (idolatry); the many consent and reason against each other over them (idolator)...perceivable nature doesn't brand anything.
pharmaceuticals to kill with prejudice
Hence notices of liability (detailed ingredient and side-effect lists) + contract law aka choice (suggested pharmaceuticals) to choice (consent to want; pay for; being prescribed, and taking suggested pharmaceuticals).
Without ones consent pharmakeia represents a temptation, yet through ones free will of choice it transforms into suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion.
The issue with snake-oil salesmen is that the many keep wanting to buy from them...
a) salt (male seed) + oil (female soil) = ...
b) smearing and rubbing represents ones reaction to the inherent/internal values of everything else.
merriam webster
MERRIAM (Aramaic Maryam; Hebrew Miryam) - "rebellion" + WEBSTER - "weaver of webs"...let that sink in while browsing the world wide web woven by others.
anoint
Each one represents salt of the earth (male) anointed through the birth-channel (female) aka ones rite (consecration) of passage.
bot; spammer; psycho; mentally ill; schizo; nonsensical; pseudo; shit...
If the mind gets challenged; then the heart takes over...
you're clearly mentally ill...I've gotten really sick
A sick mind suggesting clear judgments about the illness of others?
deep philosophy
a) deep implies vs high, hence tempting ones mind into a state of conflict (reason).
b) philosophy is defined as "love of wisdom"; which implies vs hate of wisdom...once again a mind tempted into a state of conflict (reason).
Sleight of hand: Socrates (father of philosophy) accused and sentenced to death for misleading others...
to be one implies being situated among other ones
Can one be alone, hence without being among others? Can one be more than one? What does it mean to be "one"; to be a unit among others; to be a partial within whole?
go seek a therapist
If others make one butthurt; then the-rapist already found one...
if this is a honeypot
the elites control everything
Each one of the many ignoring ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection, choice", when choosing to consent to the suggestions of the few, shapes the few into the selected/chosen elite, hence into the "chosen ones".
somehow this documentary got made
a) DOCU; from DEK (to take; accept) + MENT (mind/memory) implies ones choice to consent to the suggestions of others; hence ones submissive state of mind.
b) DOC as in doctrine (teachings; dogma; instructions)...a doc-u-ment (docks your mind), while a doc-t-or (dock-ed-oar) prevents one from steering freely.
a) suggestion (fiction) cannot prove already perceivable (reality).
b) proof (as suggested by others) represents the inversion of discernment (as perceiving self within perceivable).
c) everything suggested can effortlessly be defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted (talmudic reasoning) by those suggesting it.
d) want (suggested) tempts one to ignore need (perceivable).
e) love vs hate represents reasoning over suggested (want vs not want), while ignoring to adapt to perceivable (need).
f) the few utilize suggestion to tempt the many into conflicts of reason, hence distorting ones mind/memory with logic/reason/understanding.
g) suggested IDEN'TITY, noun -"sameness" represents the inversion of being different (perceiving partial) within same (perceivable whole).
a) what does suggesting others to "copulate self" imply about human psychology? Could it represent ones schadenfreude about tempting others to hurt themselves?
b) what about the conflict of reason (-logy)? If others harm themselves by consenting to what one suggested; then did oneself behave logical?
Psychobabble
- PSYCHO- (mind/memory; mental; spirit) aka reaction to animation.
- BAB'BLE (to utter sounds frequently as words)
Perceivable sound animates resonance/dissonance reactions from perceiving instruments...suggested words tempt one to ignore that. Words are held within mind/memory, hence distorting ones perspective within ongoing sound.
Nonsense
Sensing implies ones reaction (perceiving) to being animated by (perceivable)...suggested "nonsense" (to perceive nothing) tempts one to ignore that.
conjecture
CONJECT, verb - "to throw together"...aka the suggested inversion of nature setting itself (perceivable whole) apart (perceiving partials). Ignoring this represents ONEs lack of self discernment.
ONE implies apart from other ones...not together.
defeats its own logic
Can you list a couple of mankind's greatest victories within the conflicts of reason/logic; like...us vs them; rich vs poor, truth vs lies; belief vs disbelief; on vs off; good vs evil etc.?
What represents the biggest win logic has ever achieved?
martial law...psychological manipulation
If one ignores perceivable MORTAL (subjected to death) for suggested MARTIAL (belonging to war); then ones MIND (psycho) was manipulated by REASON (logic), hence conflicts (war) of reason.
is not control by...it is control by...
Only within a controlled environment can one suggest what is or isn't...suggesting (fiction) tempts one to ignore being controlled/regulated within perceivable (reality).
Inception towards death (ongoing) controls life (temporary)...life represents the momentary choice to express growth by resisting or repress self within loss by falling for temptations.
Perceivable (whole) controls perceiving (partials)...consenting to suggestions tempts one to believe in control by others.
AIs understanding human behavior
Standing under artificial suggestions by others represents domesticated behavior.
aim at building systems
a) SYS'TEM, noun [Latin systema; Gr. to set.] - "a whole plan or scheme consisting of many parts"...partials (life) within whole (inception towards death) don't need to build systems...they are tempted to want to, which is why others run all their systems as an effective means to destroy those within.
b) aiming implies towards outcomes, being implies within origin...consenting to the suggested former tempts one to ignore the perceivable latter.
analyze situations for why they occur
ANAL'YSIS, noun [Gr. a loosing, or resolving] - "the separation of a compound body into its constituent parts"...to be one implies being situated among other ones, hence representing formed (life) analysis within flow (inception towards death).
Synthesis (process of dying aka ongoing loss) generates analysis (living aka temporary growth)...others tempt analysis to synthesize, hence coming together instead of staying apart, which would sustain apartheid within wholeness a moment longer....hence "why" partials occur within whole.
a) what comes first...a barn or a stall (fixed spot)? I write about the foundation (perceivable), others are distracted by what's being build upon it (suggested)...
b) BARN, noun [Eng.born.] - "a child"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/barn
Ask yourself why others suggest to use barns to contain livestock; when being born implies life being set free?
'ASS, noun [Latin asinus; Gr. an ear.]...ignoring to listen represents the ass end.
The sheep are out trying to make a buck, while ignoring that ram (aries) left the field for the bull (taurus)...so much shit to shovel...
What's more questionable...what I write; how I write or that I write?