"The ultimate tyranny in a society is not control by martial law. It is control by the psychological manipulation of consciousness, through which reality is defined so that those who exist within it do not even realize that they are in prison."
If one ignores perceivable MORTAL (subjected to death) for suggested MARTIAL (belonging to war); then ones MIND (psycho) was manipulated by REASON (logic), hence conflicts (war) of reason.
is not control by...it is control by...
Only within a controlled environment can one suggest what is or isn't...suggesting (fiction) tempts one to ignore being controlled/regulated within perceivable (reality).
Inception towards death (ongoing) controls life (temporary)...life represents the momentary choice to express growth by resisting or repress self within loss by falling for temptations.
Perceivable (whole) controls perceiving (partials)...consenting to suggestions tempts one to believe in control by others.
This twisted logic (cosmic bullshit) suggests you're a psycho freak (reality). Inception towards go fuck yourself spammer bot represents how annoying (ongoing) your mentally ill gymnastics are. The flawed distorted logic of many of your bot statements suggests (wholly) you need to be in an institution (permanently off the streets) and not running a bot on .win.
remember the flatearth brouhaha here a few months ago? supposedly, the reason the one mod wanted us to consider banning FE posts was because they turn off new users. however, users tallestshil, iknowitsu, and free-wall-of-text are allowed free reign to go around shitting up comment sections. i would think any n00b landing here genuinely seeking new/unusual info/POV's would be more turned off by those three than FE posts.
Probably. But you know, it's easy to tell the crazies. After that one has to learn to ignore them. I haven't fully adjusted but I am improving even though once in awhile I blow off steam at the worst ones. I guess this is the price of freedom though, better to have freedom than to have a perfect happy world.
One thing with this that some people feel better - elevated - by watching others go down or even taking them down. It explains many bullies, who secretly feel poorly about themselves but perk up when they attack someone, gaining apparent power. Many immature (kids) may feel unpowerful in life so they may feel happier when they bring someone down. When this gets reinforced over time, it produces assholes who know no other way to live. I interpret many liberals as being people with weak egos and no confidence in themselves, so they are motivated by jealousy when they see someone who is successful under their own power, so they want to see them fail.
I work on AIs understanding human behavior, and aim at building systems that can analyze situations for why they occur. But it is based on human psychology.
Standing under artificial suggestions by others represents domesticated behavior.
aim at building systems
a) SYS'TEM, noun [Latin systema; Gr. to set.] - "a whole plan or scheme consisting of many parts"...partials (life) within whole (inception towards death) don't need to build systems...they are tempted to want to, which is why others run all their systems as an effective means to destroy those within.
b) aiming implies towards outcomes, being implies within origin...consenting to the suggested former tempts one to ignore the perceivable latter.
analyze situations for why they occur
ANAL'YSIS, noun [Gr. a loosing, or resolving] - "the separation of a compound body into its constituent parts"...to be one implies being situated among other ones, hence representing formed (life) analysis within flow (inception towards death).
Synthesis (process of dying aka ongoing loss) generates analysis (living aka temporary growth)...others tempt analysis to synthesize, hence coming together instead of staying apart, which would sustain apartheid within wholeness a moment longer....hence "why" partials occur within whole.
a) what does suggesting others to "copulate self" imply about human psychology? Could it represent ones schadenfreude about tempting others to hurt themselves?
b) what about the conflict of reason (-logy)? If others harm themselves by consenting to what one suggested; then did oneself behave logical?
FUCK YOU TWICE, you psycho bullshit posts spammer. You're clearly mentally ill - your posts are filled with schizo ravings and I've gotten really sick and tired of your shit nonsense.
"to be one implies being situated among other ones, hence representing formed (life) analysis within flow (inception towards death)."
This is not some deep philosophy, it's bot-generated pseudo-meaning bullshit. Now fuck off, bot-owner, and go seek a therapist.
A sick mind suggesting clear judgments about the illness of others?
deep philosophy
a) deep implies vs high, hence tempting ones mind into a state of conflict (reason).
b) philosophy is defined as "love of wisdom"; which implies vs hate of wisdom...once again a mind tempted into a state of conflict (reason).
Sleight of hand: Socrates (father of philosophy) accused and sentenced to death for misleading others...
to be one implies being situated among other ones
Can one be alone, hence without being among others? Can one be more than one? What does it mean to be "one"; to be a unit among others; to be a partial within whole?
go seek a therapist
If others make one butthurt; then the-rapist already found one...
I am going to shout out bullshit. Psychobabble. Nonsense. Conjecture.
It even defeats its own logic on high self esteemed low self esteem in psychological causes. Read its analysis.
It is hypothesized that this inverse relationship is mediated through the human psychological inclination to define and protect their self- and in-group- identity or self-conception.[5] Specifically, for someone with high self-esteem, seeing another person fail may still bring them a small (but effectively negligible) surge of confidence because the observer's high self-esteem significantly lowers the threat they believe the visibly-failing human poses to their status or identity. Since this confident individual perceives that, regardless of circumstances, the successes and failures of the other person will have little impact on their own status or well-being, they have very little emotional investment in how the other person fares, be it positive or negative.
Conversely, for someone with low self-esteem, someone who is more successful poses a threat to their sense of self, and seeing this person fall can be a source of comfort because they perceive a relative improvement in their internal or in-group standing.
This bullshit word excuses wealth and blames poverty.
It is nonsense. How did wealth amass their fortune and don't they derive the same Schadenfreude? Pleasure off another's failures if it profits. Tell me why then don't we all have the same wealth. Because of the pleasure of another's failures. How come it is wealth that considers itself with esteem.
Completely fucking bullshit. Hey shrink shove it up your Schadenfreude.
you got pegged when you took the jab, now your brain is dissolving and your going to die suddenly and then the spirits can deal with your dumb ass. They have a plan to deal you an eternity of pain, enjoy.
PSYCHO- (mind/memory; mental; spirit) aka reaction to animation.
BAB'BLE (to utter sounds frequently as words)
Perceivable sound animates resonance/dissonance reactions from perceiving instruments...suggested words tempt one to ignore that. Words are held within mind/memory, hence distorting ones perspective within ongoing sound.
Nonsense
Sensing implies ones reaction (perceiving) to being animated by (perceivable)...suggested "nonsense" (to perceive nothing) tempts one to ignore that.
conjecture
CONJECT, verb - "to throw together"...aka the suggested inversion of nature setting itself (perceivable whole) apart (perceiving partials). Ignoring this represents ONEs lack of self discernment.
ONE implies apart from other ones...not together.
defeats its own logic
Can you list a couple of mankind's greatest victories within the conflicts of reason/logic; like...us vs them; rich vs poor, truth vs lies; belief vs disbelief; on vs off; good vs evil etc.?
What represents the biggest win logic has ever achieved?
a) Schaden (inception towards death) generates Freude (life), hence comedy (living) existing within the center of drama (process of dying).
b) INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)...ones consent to "stand under" the suggestion of another, keeps ones position low.
"The ultimate tyranny in a society is not control by martial law. It is control by the psychological manipulation of consciousness, through which reality is defined so that those who exist within it do not even realize that they are in prison."
If one ignores perceivable MORTAL (subjected to death) for suggested MARTIAL (belonging to war); then ones MIND (psycho) was manipulated by REASON (logic), hence conflicts (war) of reason.
Only within a controlled environment can one suggest what is or isn't...suggesting (fiction) tempts one to ignore being controlled/regulated within perceivable (reality).
Inception towards death (ongoing) controls life (temporary)...life represents the momentary choice to express growth by resisting or repress self within loss by falling for temptations.
Perceivable (whole) controls perceiving (partials)...consenting to suggestions tempts one to believe in control by others.
This twisted logic (cosmic bullshit) suggests you're a psycho freak (reality). Inception towards go fuck yourself spammer bot represents how annoying (ongoing) your mentally ill gymnastics are. The flawed distorted logic of many of your bot statements suggests (wholly) you need to be in an institution (permanently off the streets) and not running a bot on .win.
don't waste your time on that botfag/fagbot. curious why mods don't ban the wall-of-texter that just shits up the comment threads.
hahaahah you are so right
remember the flatearth brouhaha here a few months ago? supposedly, the reason the one mod wanted us to consider banning FE posts was because they turn off new users. however, users tallestshil, iknowitsu, and free-wall-of-text are allowed free reign to go around shitting up comment sections. i would think any n00b landing here genuinely seeking new/unusual info/POV's would be more turned off by those three than FE posts.
Probably. But you know, it's easy to tell the crazies. After that one has to learn to ignore them. I haven't fully adjusted but I am improving even though once in awhile I blow off steam at the worst ones. I guess this is the price of freedom though, better to have freedom than to have a perfect happy world.
One thing with this that some people feel better - elevated - by watching others go down or even taking them down. It explains many bullies, who secretly feel poorly about themselves but perk up when they attack someone, gaining apparent power. Many immature (kids) may feel unpowerful in life so they may feel happier when they bring someone down. When this gets reinforced over time, it produces assholes who know no other way to live. I interpret many liberals as being people with weak egos and no confidence in themselves, so they are motivated by jealousy when they see someone who is successful under their own power, so they want to see them fail.
I work on AIs understanding human behavior, and aim at building systems that can analyze situations for why they occur. But it is based on human psychology.
Standing under artificial suggestions by others represents domesticated behavior.
a) SYS'TEM, noun [Latin systema; Gr. to set.] - "a whole plan or scheme consisting of many parts"...partials (life) within whole (inception towards death) don't need to build systems...they are tempted to want to, which is why others run all their systems as an effective means to destroy those within.
b) aiming implies towards outcomes, being implies within origin...consenting to the suggested former tempts one to ignore the perceivable latter.
ANAL'YSIS, noun [Gr. a loosing, or resolving] - "the separation of a compound body into its constituent parts"...to be one implies being situated among other ones, hence representing formed (life) analysis within flow (inception towards death).
Synthesis (process of dying aka ongoing loss) generates analysis (living aka temporary growth)...others tempt analysis to synthesize, hence coming together instead of staying apart, which would sustain apartheid within wholeness a moment longer....hence "why" partials occur within whole.
FUCK YOU
a) what does suggesting others to "copulate self" imply about human psychology? Could it represent ones schadenfreude about tempting others to hurt themselves?
b) what about the conflict of reason (-logy)? If others harm themselves by consenting to what one suggested; then did oneself behave logical?
FUCK YOU TWICE, you psycho bullshit posts spammer. You're clearly mentally ill - your posts are filled with schizo ravings and I've gotten really sick and tired of your shit nonsense.
"to be one implies being situated among other ones, hence representing formed (life) analysis within flow (inception towards death)."
This is not some deep philosophy, it's bot-generated pseudo-meaning bullshit. Now fuck off, bot-owner, and go seek a therapist.
If the mind gets challenged; then the heart takes over...
A sick mind suggesting clear judgments about the illness of others?
a) deep implies vs high, hence tempting ones mind into a state of conflict (reason).
b) philosophy is defined as "love of wisdom"; which implies vs hate of wisdom...once again a mind tempted into a state of conflict (reason).
Sleight of hand: Socrates (father of philosophy) accused and sentenced to death for misleading others...
Can one be alone, hence without being among others? Can one be more than one? What does it mean to be "one"; to be a unit among others; to be a partial within whole?
If others make one butthurt; then the-rapist already found one...
I am going to shout out bullshit. Psychobabble. Nonsense. Conjecture.
It even defeats its own logic on high self esteemed low self esteem in psychological causes. Read its analysis.
It is hypothesized that this inverse relationship is mediated through the human psychological inclination to define and protect their self- and in-group- identity or self-conception.[5] Specifically, for someone with high self-esteem, seeing another person fail may still bring them a small (but effectively negligible) surge of confidence because the observer's high self-esteem significantly lowers the threat they believe the visibly-failing human poses to their status or identity. Since this confident individual perceives that, regardless of circumstances, the successes and failures of the other person will have little impact on their own status or well-being, they have very little emotional investment in how the other person fares, be it positive or negative.
Conversely, for someone with low self-esteem, someone who is more successful poses a threat to their sense of self, and seeing this person fall can be a source of comfort because they perceive a relative improvement in their internal or in-group standing.
This bullshit word excuses wealth and blames poverty.
It is nonsense. How did wealth amass their fortune and don't they derive the same Schadenfreude? Pleasure off another's failures if it profits. Tell me why then don't we all have the same wealth. Because of the pleasure of another's failures. How come it is wealth that considers itself with esteem.
Completely fucking bullshit. Hey shrink shove it up your Schadenfreude.
so mad he pegged you - lol
The only pegging was when your brain fell out your ass. Dumbass. You're on retard account. What happened to the last one. Did the Mod fuck you.
you got pegged when you took the jab, now your brain is dissolving and your going to die suddenly and then the spirits can deal with your dumb ass. They have a plan to deal you an eternity of pain, enjoy.
Perceivable sound animates resonance/dissonance reactions from perceiving instruments...suggested words tempt one to ignore that. Words are held within mind/memory, hence distorting ones perspective within ongoing sound.
Sensing implies ones reaction (perceiving) to being animated by (perceivable)...suggested "nonsense" (to perceive nothing) tempts one to ignore that.
CONJECT, verb - "to throw together"...aka the suggested inversion of nature setting itself (perceivable whole) apart (perceiving partials). Ignoring this represents ONEs lack of self discernment.
ONE implies apart from other ones...not together.
Can you list a couple of mankind's greatest victories within the conflicts of reason/logic; like...us vs them; rich vs poor, truth vs lies; belief vs disbelief; on vs off; good vs evil etc.?
What represents the biggest win logic has ever achieved?
Schadenfreude - how we all feel when a moron who took the Jew jabs dies of suddenly
Vaccine criticism has nothing to do with your fake hate larp bullshit.
a) Schaden (inception towards death) generates Freude (life), hence comedy (living) existing within the center of drama (process of dying).
b) INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)...ones consent to "stand under" the suggestion of another, keeps ones position low.
Bot shit spammer.