Adding it to NASA gets one SA T AN. I wonder where NASA lost the T...minus 9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1...
Perhaps you misunderstand?
Understanding implies ones consent to "stand under" the suggested information by others; which in return tempts one to "miss" perceivable inspiration by ignoring it.
To pledge is to promise
- PROM'ISE, noun [Latin promissum, from promitto, to send before or forward; pro and mitto, to send.]
To be implies being (life) send forwards (inception towards death) hence in need to resist the temptation thereof. Others suggest progressivism to tempt one to consent to move towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.
- PLEDGE, noun [Latin plico.] - "something put in pawn; that which is deposited with another"
That represents the foundation for Bank & Trust aka positing ones free will of choice, while depositing it to the will of others aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, which the few industrialized as RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew).
Nature gives (inception) and takes (death) everything from everyone (life)...others exploit ones ignorance of that.
the free will to choose
"of choice" implies out of perceivable balance; "to choose" implies towards suggests outcomes.
Hold your breath and ongoing (inception towards death) teaches temporary (life) that balance overrules choice. One can only respond as choice to balance (momentum of motion)...choosing outcomes tempts one to ignore origin.
FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance).
it would be hollow without
a) others suggest "without" to tempt one to ignore being (life) within (inception towards death).
b) HOL'LOW, adjective - "containing an empty space"...aka suggested nihilism (nothing) as inversion of perceivable WHOLE (everything). Consider energy (inherent/internal power) as whole and each partial within reacting to it...
reasoning
wanting vs not wanting suggested, while ignoring need to adapt to perceivable...that represents reasoning. Always a conflict; no matter which side one chooses and it can never be won; because both sides within any conflict of reason are reasoning against each other about a suggestion from a 3rd party outside.
Example...pro-life vs pro-choice represents reasoning about suggested "abortion". Those who suggest abortion, don't reason against others about it, they divide others through reasoning (talmudic reasoning) against each other, while utilizing consent to ignore perceivable for suggested by both sides to fuel the suggested.
Pro-life vs pro-choice reasoning tempts one to ignore that LIFE equals CHOICE. One cannot be pro-life without choosing to be and one cannot be pro-choice without being alive. A deliberate contradiction.
if we want to
Choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) results in a conflict of reason (want vs not want).
Example: wanting (cola) vs not wanting (pepsi) suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable need...thirst.
found only one perfect
One cannot find perfect (complete) while being ONE aka partial within whole. Finding implies "to meet", which tempts one to ignore that nature sets itself apart, hence from whole (perceivable) into partials (perceiving).
As for only...if all represents one in energy; then "there can be only one" aka "all for one and one for all" aka "alone" (all in one).
I much prefer God's will
Free will of choice can only exist at the center of surrounding balance. Each one represents center (partial) of surrounding (whole) aka EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Ones consent to want (will) suggestions by others (deity) tempts one to submit willingly to the will of others, hence viewing reality through the lens of submission to a will higher than self.
From a christian perspective: choice at the center of balance implies "as above; so below"...
Those who consent to "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" are tempted to ignore "in nomine" aka those who suggest "in the name of". Consenting to RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) tempts one to bind self by consent to suggestion of another. This bond is being distracted from by the suggested religion.
Both believers and disbelievers (while reasoning against each other) view perceivable (reality) through the lens of suggested (fiction), while ignoring the bond among choice aka the contract law with the merchants of temptation.
Is this an AI that generates...
Only natural generates...artificial implies ones ignorance of natural, hence others utilizing artificial (suggestion) to tempt one to ignore natural (perceivable).
Furthermore; suggesting "AI" represents a dehumanization attempt to denounce human expressions outside the consented to "norm" of behavior.
this dreck
How very yiddish of you...
Dissecting every word or phrase
Nature implies whole sound for each partial (dissected) resonant or dissonant reaction within...few suggest words to tempt many to ignore sound. This represents spell-craft.
For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound), hence being within and by perceivable sound.
following it
Following (towards outcome) implies ones choice to ignore resisting (life) being moved within origin (inception towards death).
a made up definition...
Those adapting to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonic; sound); while those who ignore it for suggested word based definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS...
All suggested words are "made up" within perceivable sound...ones consent to the former tempts ones ignorance of the latter.
no continuity of thought?
How could life, while being moved from inception towards death, experience no continuation of thought? What if suggested "no" (nothing) tempts one to ignore that everything perceivable is constantly moving?
How do you pledge something sincerely without doing so freely?
Ones consent to pledge to the suggestion of others...tempts one to ignore ones free will of choice for the suggested choices of others.
Ignorance allows one to do freely, while lacking to comprehend doing it. Without self discernment; ones free will of choice will be tempted to follow the suggested choices by others.
antithesis of free will
a) "free will of choice" represents proposition (thesis) of a balance based system (need/want).
b) consenting to suggested "free will" (without "of choice") tempts one into imbalance (want vs not want), hence into opposition (antithesis).
c) consent (by choice of oneself) to suggestions (by choice of others) tempts one to ignore being free will "of choice"...
As long as others choose to "reddit" so long will chosen ones suggest it.
- PROTEST', verb [Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it.] - "to affirm with solemnity"
Protesting represents ones consent to the protested. In other words...not wanting what others choose to do gives others the power of ones consent to do it more efficiently; hence consent by self validates choice of others, while devaluating ones own choice.
If one "reddit", then one consented to the suggestion of it...protesting what one already consented to affirms the suggested.
A burden? I don't think so...there is nothing THEY can do.
a) "nothing" represents a suggestion by others; which ones consent upholds as a burden within "everything" perceivable.
b) suggested pluralism (they) tempts perceiving singularity (one) to burden self with the suggestions by others.
c) being able to perceive implies being at the center of an impressing surrounding (perceivable)...suggested "I don't think" tempts one to ignore that.
Reacting (perceiving) to impressing (perceivable) implies expressing (comprehension)...while burdening self with suggestions by others represents self repression, while giving others ones consent to depress with suggested.
Even in Tragedy, there is Hope
Hope (want) vs Tragedy (not want) implies ones consent to suggested outcomes (fiction), while ignoring ones need to adapt to perceivable origin (reality).
Consider instead if Comedy (life) can only temporary exist within ongoing Drama (inception towards death)...
be the change
Being (life) implies within change (inception towards death)...as temporary resistance (growth) within ongoing temptation (loss).
you wish to see
Wish implies ones want to see, which tempts one to ignore ones need to adapt to what is presented to the all (perceivable whole) seeing eye (perceiving partial).
I suggest...
...which tempts others to ignore being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) if consenting to the suggested.
...isn't a blessing; it's a burden.
BLESS, verb -"to express a wish or desire of"...that implies ones choice to want to hold onto, hence burdening self with it.
being awake
a) being implies in-between (life) awake (inception) and asleep (death); hence being able to WAKE; WAKA; WACHE - "to watch" aka "to stand guard".
b) ignoring this for the suggestions by others lures one to sleep, hence EXIT LIGHT (perceivable inspiration) ENTER NIGHT (ignoring it for suggested information).
- "Hush, little baby, don't say a word"..."And never mind that noise you heard"
- "It's just the beasts under your bed"..."In your closet, in your head"
https://genius.com/Metallica-enter-sandman-lyrics
seeing the whole sleeping around them...
Being able to see implies being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable). Being one partial implies a division of whole into each one partial, hence each one being surrounded by different partials within the same whole.
Only self discernment allows one to discern in-between perceivable (whole) and suggested (partials). Whatever other partials are suggesting; tempts one to ignore perceivable whole. It's on oneself to choose in-between perceivable inspiration (need) or suggested information (want)...former sustains life; latter lures towards death.
- PLAN'ET, noun [Latin planeta; Gr. wandering)
a) being able to evaluate implies being center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable) value...suggestions by others (planet) tempt one to wander from center towards surrounding, hence being tempted off-center.
b) consider ones plane (inception towards death) of existence (life); hence as odds (choice) within even (balance)?
- LU'CID, adjective [Latin lucidus, to shine; transparent.]
TRANS (transmutation of ingredient out of base) PAREO (to appear) aka life appearing (growth) in-between inception towards death motion (loss). Growth at the center of surrounding loss implies radiance (shine).
Sleight of hand: https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/victoriajustice/makeitshine.html (written by Lukasz Gottwald, Michael Thomas Corcoran, Daniel J. Schneider)
able to discredit...ideas
IDEA (that which is seen)...ones consent to give CREDIT (creed; faith; belief; consent) to the suggestions by others, shapes those others into creditors, enabled to discredit the suggested information at will.
That which is seen implies perceivable...not the suggestions of others about it. Only oneself can discern the difference...not the suggestions of others about it.
subversive to the system
a) if perceivable sound represents system; then perceiving ones within represent VERSE (short division of any composition), hence composition (inception towards death) generating division (life).
Consenting to the suggested POETRY (language of excited imagination) gives others ones power of consent to divide suggested compositions, hence dividing those who consent to reason against each other over the suggested.
b) suggested information represents SUB (substitute; put in place of another); which tempts one to ignore MAIN aka perceivable inspiration. Ones consent to suggestions by another...sub-merges together.
was he a psyop?
a) if one read about the story; then that implies ignoring perceivable (psycho) for suggested (logical); hence being operated (effect upon mind) upon.
b) "psy-op" aka psycho-operation aka PSYCHO (mind, mental; spirit; animating principle" + OPERATE (effect upon mind) implies perceivable inspiration.
The hidden trick...using the word "psy-op" represents LOGIC (logos; word; reason) aka suggested information, which tempts one to ignore perceivable (psy-) inspiration (op).
Suggested information as an effect upon mind implies ones consent to want to hold onto it; which tempts one to ignore that one needs to let go of perceivable inspiration. On the other hand...effect of inspiration upon mind implies growth of comprehension, hence growth of expression (perceiving) within comprehended (perceivable).
c) was vs wasn't implies reasoning (logic) about suggested information (logos), while ignoring that which perceptible is (pathos).
SHAM'AN, noun- "conjurer, who by enchantment..."
Conjured suggestions enchants ones mind to ignore perceivable.
Amorites...through crafty infiltration...
Suggested amore (love) tempts one to consent to want it, hence giving those who suggest consent to infiltrate ones mind/memory.
art of infiltration
Ignoring natural (perceivable inspiration) for artificial (suggested information) gives those suggesting consent to infiltrate ones mind/memory.
infiltration never ended
As long as oneself chooses willingly to uphold suggested information within ones mind/memory; so long will the infiltration by those suggesting it continue.
secret society
a) ones creed (faith; consent) to suggested information; gives those suggesting it the power of ones consent to keep it secret (from seg; segregated). Hence...giving others control over information (while ignoring freely available inspiration) allows them to keep it away.
b) the few suggest SOCIAL (aggregate body) to tempt each ONE (partial within whole) to ignore self for others, hence desperately failing at getting "together" to overthrow the chosen "ones".
freemasonry
A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes ones consent to suggested as mortar and ones ignorance of perceivable as bricks for building the wall between the suggesting few and the consenting many...a wailing wall.
agree...evil
Agreement vs disagreement aka good vs evil...conflicts of reason aka many fighting each other about suggestions by few. While the many fight each other reasoning over suggested; the few gain the opportunity to prey upon everything perceivable the many ignore.
The more the many reason (pro-life vs pro-choice) over suggested (abortion)...the more power of consent the suggesting few can wield. If it's that easy to utilize mass consent to fuel suggested child-sacrifice, then "mere" mutilations were already consented to.
we all
Suggested "we all" distracts from perceivable "each one within all". Pluralism (we) distracts from singularity (one); and collectivism (all) distracts from being partial within whole...only oneself can discern that. Reasoning (true vs false) about others suggesting this keeps one distracted.
not to do any kind of work
EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"...everything works (motion); mind (momentum aka balance) employs labor (choice) within.
fat
a) choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) tempts one to want more...
b) wanting suggested food vs not wanting suggested food tempts one to ignore perceivable need...hunger.
weight loss
a) ongoing loss (inception towards death) generates temporary weight (life)...
b) wanting to hold onto while ignoring need to let go...burdens one, hence making resistance harder.
c) choosing need to let go, while resisting want to hold onto...grows resistance.
actress...voices told her...
a) ones consent to suggested voices implies "reacting".
b) action (perceivable) generates reaction (perceiving)...others suggest actors under directors as the inversion of being reaction (life) within action (inception towards death).
c) inception towards death implies TRANSIT (passing) -TION (through action) for each reacting life.
d) action (whole) generating reactions (partials) implies TRANS-mutation of ingredient (temporary) out of base (ongoing) alchemy.
There are devout, and there are sects...
a) DEVOUT (dedicated; set apart) + SECT (seco; to divide)..."there" implies as divided partial within whole.
b) POSI (placed) -TION (through action)...reaction (life) placed within action (inception towards death) represents only position for existence.
random...synagogue
a) RANDOM (course without direction) + SYN (together with)...
b) motion implies direction (from/to) and motion sets apart (action/reaction).
synagogue
a) SYNAGOGUE (synagein; to gather, bring together) and KENESETH (assembly) are utilized to strengthen apartheid (dia-spora) by tempting together ones who lack resistance.
b) zion-ism gathers center (jews) within surrounding (gentiles)...zi-on aka si-on (phonetic see-ohn) aka "seeing one" implies all (perceivable) seeing (perceiving) I (oneself).
complete know
Knowledge (perceivable whole)...being choice within edge (balance) of known (motion) implies as perceiving partial, hence momentary opportunity to grow comprehension about; within; and in response to perceivable whole...unless ignored for the suggestions by others.
believe what you want...proclaim it...
Both wanting and not wanting represents ones claim over another ones suggestions...suggested tempts one to want to hold onto; while perceivable implies need to let go.
go into your local...
Being implies center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable)...going into a local (suggested position) tempts one to ignore center (oneself) for surrounding (others).
Different perspective...choice can only exist at the center of balance. Suggested choices by others tempt ones consenting choice to imbalance self by wanting or not wanting what others are suggesting.
mosque
MOSQUE (Arabic masjid ; temple) - "place cut off" aka CUT - "incision; division into two or more parts" aka "intersect; cross; abridge or shorten by omitting a part".
Wanting to be together omits being partial within whole.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "cut my life into pieces; I've reached my last resort...suffocation; no breathing" aka cutting into pieces (temple); sort (togetherness) suffocation (obstruction of breathing aka spirit).
a) MONO (whole) generates POLY (partials) within.
b) ABRAHAM (father of multitude).
c) -IST (ones consent) to -ISM (another ones suggestion) implies DUAL.
d) poly (perceiving) within mono (perceivable) can be tempted into dualism (suggested), hence consenting to others while ignoring self.
e) suggested ISLAM (submission) tempts one to ignore that poly (life) within mono (inception towards death) implies resistance.
bred for this moment to not resist
Resisting (living) momentum (process of dying) each one was bred within...others suggest TO (towards aka progressivism) NOT (nothing aka nihilism) as distraction; inversion; subversion; temptation etc.
Both pluralism (they/them) and creationism (out of nothing) represent suggested tools of subversion.
Aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); hence suggested pluralism (us vs them) over perceivable singularity (one).
a) ones consent to suggested THE-ism implies ones consent to believe in authority of another over self.
b) TRIBE, noun [Latin tribus.] - "descending from same progenitor (inception towards death) and kept distinct (life)".