Is this an AI that generates...

Only natural generates...artificial implies ones ignorance of natural, hence others utilizing artificial (suggestion) to tempt one to ignore natural (perceivable).

Furthermore; suggesting "AI" represents a dehumanization attempt to denounce human expressions outside the consented to "norm" of behavior.

this dreck

How very yiddish of you...

Dissecting every word or phrase

Nature implies whole sound for each partial (dissected) resonant or dissonant reaction within...few suggest words to tempt many to ignore sound. This represents spell-craft.

For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound), hence being within and by perceivable sound.

following it

Following (towards outcome) implies ones choice to ignore resisting (life) being moved within origin (inception towards death).

a made up definition...

Those adapting to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonic; sound); while those who ignore it for suggested word based definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS...

All suggested words are "made up" within perceivable sound...ones consent to the former tempts ones ignorance of the latter.

no continuity of thought?

How could life, while being moved from inception towards death, experience no continuation of thought? What if suggested "no" (nothing) tempts one to ignore that everything perceivable is constantly moving?