perhaps those distinct Ones who are most alike (Family) share a common umbrella for common protection
a) suggested "perhaps" (by chance aka effect of an unknown cause) tempts one to ignore being effect (life) within known cause (inception towards death) with knowledge representing perceivable input.
b) alike represents choice for different (life) within same (inception toward death). Being different (partial) within same (wholeness) implies ones struggle for apartheid, while resisting togetherness...hence intercourse with another one leading to "OFF-spring".
c) share implies "portion; partial"...being implies share (partials) within save (whole). Save implies "to deliver".
d) family (Latin famulus - "servant")...aka serving that which delivers as a channel for birth.
e) suggested common aka common-ism (communism) tempts one believe in "equal belonging", while ignoring BE (being within) LONG (length of direction) aka being short (life) within long (inception towards death) and also different (partials) within equal (whole).
It's on oneself to differentiate between suggested definition and discerning perceivable when hearing "belong". In this example "be" implies being, hence oneself...can others define oneself or does one need to discern self? Having grown that discernment allows one then to put self within "long/length/duration/path/motion etc.
f) fall of men (inception towards death) generates umbrella (life)...resistance represents shelter within velocity unless ignored.
Resisting grows resistance; temptation tempts ignorance of resistance. Temptations tempt one to "fall" for...
perhaps “gather” is more fitting than “fall”
a) fall segregates (inception to life); gather aggregates (life to death)...
b) each partial fits into whole, hence FIT, adjective - "becoming" aka coming to be...reasoning (more vs less) tempts one to ignore that.
Do you believe one can consider an idea without consenting to it?
a) to believe represents ones consent to the suggestion of another, hence religion (Latin religio; to bind) aka binding oneself willingly to the will of another.
b) IDEA - "that which is seen" implies perceivable, even when ignored for suggested idealism aka oneself viewing perceivable through the lens of suggested, hence "those with eyes to see and those watching through the looking glass".
c) suggested "without" tempts one to ignore being (life) within (inception towards death).
In short...need (letting go) or want (holding onto) aka adaptation (choice) to motion (balance) or consent vs denial conflict (imbalance)...free will of choice.
Suggested water and wine tempt ones consent; perceivable thirst forces ones adaptation.
Or does the act of the ideas admittance to our mind imply a consent?
a) consent here was given to suggested idealism and activism, hence tempting one to ignore seeing perceivable (idea) and re-acting to it.
b) ADMIT', verb (Latin admitto, to send) - "to suffer to enter"...entering (inception) implies ones (life) suffering (towards death). Motion implies admission for those within.
Being implies RE (response to) JECT (ejected by; cast forth) within admission (motion).
In short...letting perceivable inspiration go through ones mind/memory, while resisting to hold onto suggested information represents resistance within temptation.
you see that line there moving through the station?
Line (inception towards death) moving through station (life)...
the common language
a) if language represents the articulation of sound; then that implies sound to represent the natural. Could others utilize artifice (suggestion) to distract from natural (perception)?
b) what if suggested "common" (belonging to more than one) tempts one to ignore that ONE cannot be more than ONE? What if counting represents suggested collectivism tempting one to ignore that nature sets itself apart from whole into each partial unit (Latin unus; one)?
c) what if suggested THE-ism implies ones consent to submit to the authority of another one?
artificial separation
Try to explain natural separation? If one, then separated from other ones. Where does separation originate? SEPARO (to part) -TION (through action) implies into partial reactions...
fall under the umbrella
a) an umbrella is designed to shelter those under it from what's falling from above...why does the suggested rhetoric "fall under the umbrella" invert that?
b) UMBREL'LA, noun ( Latin umbra, shade)...shade shelters from light. What if ones consent to suggested (shade) shelters one from perceivable (light)? What if others suggest umbrellas (-isms) to tempt one to shade (ignore) from enlightenment (comprehension)?
the umbrella of “semite”.
- SEM'I - "in composition, signifies half"
- H'ALF - "one equal part of a thing which is divided into two parts"
Could ONEs consent to the suggestion of another DIVIDE one into reasoning over suggested from two sides? Could that represent an internal division of ONE into half a units potential?
draw towards phoenicia
What does sound (phonics) draw towards? Consider a description from Dune: "Spannungsbogen; which is the self-imposed delay between desire for a thing and the act of reaching out to grasp that thing"...
What if sound impresses into itself for expression (resonance) or repression (dissonance) by instruments within?
central importance of Phoenicia
a) the suggested word "Phoenicia" was brought into (import) and from (export) where?
b) if sound is imported from outside, then how does it represent center, when it implies surrounding (hence surround sound)?
how many people ever mention this? Few to none.
MEN'TION, noun (Latin mentio, ment; mind) - "to put in mind; to suggest"...can one suggest (words) without doing it within perceivable (sound)?
Does perceivable sound require the suggested word "sound" for one to discern; to be aware of; to sense; to be conscious about it?
bio-data
BIO (Latin bios; ones life) DATA (Latin datum; given)...how could others benefit from branding suggested information as "bio-data"?
upload
UP (inception) LOAD (life) DOWN (death)...
why would they use "the rib" as part of a way to clone something
Way (velocity) rips itself (momentum) into partials (resistance). How to distract from that? By suggesting rib (to inclose) instead of rip (to separate).
clone
CLONE; noun - "transplanted part of one original" aka transmutation of partials (life) out of/within whole (inception towards death).
What's hidden inside clone for all with eyes to see? cl-ONE.
one and the same
a) one implies apart from one another, hence different.
b) ones consent to suggested THE-ism (submission to authority of another one) tempts one to ignore being partial (different) within whole (same).
socialism and freemasonry
a) social implies aggregated body of persons, hence togetherness aka collectivism.
b) suggesting social-ism tempts all the ones consenting to be collectivized under the authority of a few, who call this "society".
c) suggestion towards consent represents masonry towards "free" will of choice, hence utilizing ones consent as the mortar for the suggested bricks with which others build a wall of ignorance within ones mind.
This also represents the wailing wall, where others fill crevices with suggested wishes, while wailing about the state of mass ignorance.
I believe art can change our perceptions of...
a) ones consent to art-ificial (suggested) tempts one to ignore natural (perceivable).
b) to believe represents ones consent to the suggestion by another
c) being implies within (life) change (inception towards death).
original artwork
A sleight of hand for ORIGINAL (perceivable) ARTIFICIAL (suggested) WORK (energy aka inherent/internal power).
pushing the opposite worldview
Talmudic reasoning.
like, "this 'grand conspiracy' idea is so stupid of an idea that it can't be real and has no equivalent in real life"
Suggested suspension of disbelief towards self as denial of liability for others.
handing out the glasses
Suggestion represents the glasses; perception represents ones eyes...those with eyes to see don't require glasses. The fight over the looking glass represents forcing others to consent to ones suggestion.
Everything the few are suggesting is being willingly consented to by the many, who choose to want or not want the suggested; when ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
begging them to wake the f up and do something different
- WAKE, verb -"to stir, to rouse, to excite"
a) inception towards death stirs; rouses; excites life to resist...the suggested begging of others tempts one to submit. The deception beforehand...others suggest SLEEP, verb - "to take a rest" aka to take a cessation of motion, while being moved. That's a contradiction.
b) motion differentiates (resistance) sameness (velocity) through momentum...others suggest likeness to distract resistance (life) from velocity (inception towards death).
c) suggesting to "do something" tempts one to ignore being done within everything. DO, verb - "to carry into effect"...being implies effect (life) carried within cause (inception towards death).
Those who consent to do (want) are tempted to believe in do not (not want)...nature doesn't offer the opportunity to do nothing, yet those within wield the free will of choice to believe they can do nothing.
culture is not your friend...
...since oneself represents CULTIVATE, verb (to till, to dwell) aka the reacting dweller within -TION (action). Suggested "friend" represents attachment to another, which tempts one to ignore that being implies apart from one another.
Sleight of hand: "hello darkness (ignorance) my old friend; I've come to talk with you again (remembrance aka contemplation of suggested information held within ones mind/memory)", hence "the vision that was planted in my brain...still remains".
Indeed, actions within and without
a) "indeed" represents a suggested confirmation aka ones "reaction" to another...one cannot act to one another; only react aka RE (respond to) ACT (being enacted upon), hence wielding free will of choice.
b) without out implies WITHin/OUTside aka being within (life) outside (inception towards death) aka center of surrounding...others suggest within and without to tempt a conflict of reason (within vs without), hence tempting isolationism and escapism aka hiding within or wanting out.
small and great, rich and poor, free and slave
All of these tempt one to reason against others...small vs great; rich vs poor; free vs slave. Being implies "free" will of choice, yet choosing to ignore this for the suggested choices of others, tempts one to bind self to others; hence consenting to willing slavery to a master.
Being still implies free will of choice...ignorance doesn't change that. A modern rhetoric utilized to distract from slavery represents "understanding" aka ones consent to "stand under" the suggestions of another aka nigger under massa aka slave under master aka student under teacher. Rhetoric based on logic (logos; suggested words) represents the mark of others upon self...if consented to...and it tempts one into reason (conflict) against other ones.
buy or sell
The happy merchant of temptation tempts one to buy (consent) what he sells (suggestions), which tempts one to ignore that nature offers each one within "free" will of choice.
Whole (perceivable value) generates partials (evaluation by perception)...consenting to suggested values devalues ones evaluation.
The price for nature (inception towards death) implies ones life...others suggest amounts (plural) to distract one (singular) from self.
calculate the number
NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun (Latin unus, one)...suggested calculation tempts one to ignore perceivable addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for offspring) and division (being partial within whole) of each ONE unit.
CALCULATE, verb - "to compute; to reckon"...others suggest compute (throw together) to distract one from reckon (set apart), hence being one apart from other ones.
The one who has understanding...
...stands-under another one when consenting to suggested THE-ism (authority of other over self).
because it is the number of a man
BE (being within) CAUSE (caused by) aka being effect (life) within cause (inception towards death). aka being one (partial) within oneness (whole).
As for man...male (motion) to female (momentum) to trans-form (being), hence FE (minine) MALE + WO (mb) MAN + S (plit) HE.
Potential reactions to a suggested reality
Suggestion implies shaped within perceivable, hence always representing fiction shaped within reality to those who consent to ignore latter for former.
As for potential...only within actual (action) can there be potential (reaction). Suggested potentiality (possibilities) tempts one to ignore actual perceivable, hence spending ones diminishing potential onto others.
enzyme
EN (being within) ZYME (leaven; fluid) aka as form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
raise...levels
Motion generates level (momentum aka balance within motion)...choice within balance raises itself by balancing or diminishes self by choosing to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want)....raising level implies diminishing choice, hence others suggesting it.
- Claimant: "are you guilty of possession?"
- Defendant: "if you're in possession of what you're claiming I'm guilty of possessing; then I'm not guilty!"
Those who take from you are tricking you to plead guilty to possess that which isn't in your possession anymore. That being said...if the internal-net (internet) is externally owned, then external owns internal, hence being "guilty" of possession and distribution.
guilt
GUILT, noun - "crime; offense"...being implies defense (life) within offense (inception towards death)....others suggest crime and guilt to tempt one to ignore that natural L (land) A (air) W (water) implies an offer, and that being within implies innocence aka IN (within) NOCEO (hurt; harm) aka being within (life) harm's way (inception towards death).
Innocent until "proven" guilty is what others suggest, yet also "proof is in the pudding (putting)"...being implies put; set, laid or placed internal by external.
I think they mean the physical mark...
a) To mark something physical implies what? "to mark" aka towards marking aka within motion. PHYS'IC, noun (Gr. from nature; to produce) aka the generating motion (action) for the generated (reactions) within.
Choosing to react to being (life) generated by (inception towards death) implies RE-GENeration...unless ignored for suggested marks.
b) How can a reaction define meaning of enacting origin while being within it? How can suggestion define the meaning of perceivable if it distracts others from it? How could I slap a suggested mark (words) upon perceivable (sound) without tempting others to ignore reality for fiction?
c) try to resist "marking my words" as meaning and allow yourself to discern the sound within which words can be shaped. Start with breaking words into letters aka LET'TER, noun - "one who permits" aka LET'TER, noun (Latin litera.) - "a mark used as the representative of a sound".
Words to sound represents reverse engineering spell-craft. The more one does that; the more of the spells one holds onto are falling apart.
beast
Aka BE (being) AST (astute)...being discerning implies self discernment, not consenting to the suggestions by others.
misunderstanding of...everyone seems to treat it as if it means "unknown", or even "unknowable"
a) understanding implies ones consent to "stand under" the suggestions by others, which in return tempts one to ignore growing comprehension within perceivable knowledge.
b) as choice...perceivable balance implies the "known ledge".
c) if one consents to suggested "unknowable", then one gives others the power of ones consent to define if one is "able" to know (perceive). This tempts one to ignore that perceivable (whole) enables each ones perception (partial). Ones comprehension thereof has to be grown by self...it cannot be enabled by others.
The real meaning is more like "secret", or "that which few know".
a) SEC'RET, from Latin seco - "to divide". Few implies among many, hence an internal division.
b) "the real..." tempts one to ignore ones consent to suggested THE-ism (authority of others over self), which distracts one from perceivable reality.
c) if each one of a many consents to the suggestions of a chosen few, then perceivable represents "that which few know".
d) perceivable knowledge can only be hidden by oneself choosing to ignore it for suggested understanding...those one consents to stand-under can then further suggest narratives to keep that which one ignores hidden.
e) "meaning" represents suggested definitions...a phonetic play on DEAF PHONETICIANS aka those willingly deaf to PHONICS (perceivable sound) when consenting to use suggested words as definitions.
Even more obvious...definite (fixed) tempts one to ignore sound (fluid).
babylon
a) BABEL (confusion; disorder) aka BABBLE (incoherent uttering) aka BABBLE-ON (frequency of incoherent uttering).
b) ignoring perceivable order tempts one into suggested disorder, hence ignoring perceivable sound (reality) tempting one to incoherently utter suggested words (fiction)...no matter how high disorder is being built; it will always being toppled within the foundation of order.
world ID is coming
a) IDEN'TITY, noun - "sameness, as distinguished from diversity"...a suggested inversion of being diverse (life) within identical (inception towards death).
b) COME, verb - "to move towards"...identical (inception towards death) moves towards diverse (life).
whether they like it or not.
Perceivable (need) moves towards one, whether one likes (want) or dislikes (not want) suggested.
around the world
Suggested surrounding (around the world) tempts one to ignore being center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable).
worldcoin
COIN, verb - "to mint; to forge; to fabricate" + WORLD (phonetic VAULT)...
a) the suggested word "devil" represents a sign of distinction (mark), hence "mark my words".
b) M'ARK, noun (Latin mercor, to pass)...life represents the mark passed from inception towards death.
a) Latin clausula "the end, a closing, termination"...others utilize suggestion to tempt one into STIPULATION, noun - "agreeing and covenanting; a contracting or bargaining" aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...a clause upon ones life sentence.
b) Hebrew satan "adversary, one who plots against another" represents the temptation for oneself to ignore perceivable for the suggestions by others.
If choice (reaction) ignores balance (action) for the choices of others, then that represents an ADVERSE reaction...ignorance represents ones adversary.
c) IN (being within) NOCEO (harm) aka being within (life) harms way (inception towards death).
Bonus...if the status quo of form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents innocence, then what does "until proven guilty" imply?
so why not...
Because aka "being within cause" implies being within everything...suggested nothing represents ones ignorance of everything perceivable if consented to.
so why not remain
Asking others for suggested answers tempts one to ignore RE (response to) MAIN (that which has most power in producing an effect) aka perceivable origin. That's why.
as long as possible
Potential (possibility) can only exist within momentum of motion aka within perceivable moment aka "now". Only one within momentum can choose to measure length by holding onto measuring points.
The want to hold onto tempts one to ignore need to let go of perceivable. Measuring motion isn't for defining length, but to sustain self as the temporary within ongoing motion.
Try this...can anyone alive measure ones life while lacking the whole extent (inception towards death) of it?
Is it possible to ignore reality indefinitely?
By ignoring that which is (infinite moment) for questioning how long or short it is.
to ignore...and not suffer any consequences?
a) ignorance represents ones choice...choice (reaction) represents the result of balance (action). Others suggest CON (together with) SEQUENCE (to follow) to distract one from being set apart; while resisting origin by balancing as choice.
b) only within suffering (inception towards death) can there be relief (life).
I mean as a species.
SPECIES (particular) + MEANING (imported significance) implies being partial (perception) within whole (perceivable)...the suggestions by others tempt one to ignore that.
how evil and corrupt the world is
Good vs evil represents ones choice to reason (want vs not want) over suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration. Others suggest moralism to tempt one into reasoning (good vs evil).
Take an apple...one can eat it so it's good; right? Now keep holding onto it until it's rotten...is the apple now evil or did one simply ignore perceivable motion for reasoning (good vs evil) about a suggested value?
I am not prepared for how fake and gay it is.
a) PREPARE; noun - "set in order for a particular end"...life is set by the natural order (inception towards death); not for outcome; but for adaptation to origin. Death represents a predefined outcome for life; so living is about what one does until then, hence now.
b) fiction (suggested) represents ones free will of choice to ignore reality (perceivable). You chose to resist that fiction and are now more aware of reality, yet still surrounded by all those willingly ignoring reality for fiction.
The more you adapt to reality; the more you can resist the temptation of surrounding fiction. Reality destroys all fiction...waiting for all fiction to be destroyed tempts one to ignore reality.
c) you want fiction to go; you need to adapt to ongoing reality...it's your free will of choice.
How long can this go on??
Being implies within the momentum of motion, hence within perceivable moment aka "now"...neither before or after. Others suggest past; present and future to distract one from "now".
For example...a suggest picture represents a captured moment, while a suggested movie represents moving pictures. A picture tempts those within momentum to hold onto captured moments; while a movie tempts one to believe that the capture moment is within momentum.
The few simply fuck with the mind/memory of the many who willingly consent to hold onto suggested information; instead of adapting and letting go of perceivable inspiration.
war against reality
a) the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) cannot be opposed by the temporary chaos (life) within.
b) ignoring reality (need/want balance) for fiction (want vs not want imbalance) shapes the war (reason/logic) within ones mind/memory.
...while no other life form does that.
a) condition (suggested information) or unconditioned (perceivable inspiration)...a choice each one has to make for self.
b) when she says "I like...", then that represents suggesting others what she likes, which tempts both herself and others to ignore being different from one another. Expressing these differences would represent the "uncondition".
c) "I like the subject of momentum" tempts one to ignore being the subject (life) within momentum (inception towards death), hence being able to perceive the ever changing "moment" (momentum of motion).
d) suggested "infinite intelligence" tempts one to ignore that INTELLIGENCE (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies standing under the suggested information by others; hence restricting self within the infinite offer...perceivable inspiration.
tl; dr...the comic guy looks stoned af.
obsession with Real Estate
- ESTA'TE, noun (Latin status) - "fixedness; a fixed condition"
a) perceivable reality implies ones moving condition, others suggest fixedness as the inversion thereof.
b) consenting to suggested represents the temptation (ones obsession) to want to hold onto it; while ignoring the need to let go of perceivable.
c) obsession implies possession, yet progression within motion prevents possession, hence living within the process of dying...a struggle of sustenance.
d) estate in regard to shelter...the few suggest DOMICIL, noun - "place of permanent residence" to distract from temporary (choice) within ongoing dominance (balance) aka from being within the momentum of motion.
In other words....motion implies permanence; everything within represents transience.
As for financing Hitler...take a step back and ask yourself about the foundation of money? The few suggest a price-tag for perceivable, and the many consented to it. That's it. Ever since the many are paying a few with suggested for access to perceivable.
Consenting to a suggested apple for $1 tempts one to ignore that the perceivable fruit contains seeds for exponential growth of more fruit...IF oneself chooses to put in the labor to grow it. Meanwhile; ones consent to the suggested $ tempts one into exponentially growing (growth) debt (loss) aka into a contradiction.
Why do the few suggest "growth of debt"? To distract the many from comprehending that loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life) within itself.
Suggestion (fiction) inverts perception (reality) for those who consent to it.
the illuminati created
Aka suggested the-ism + illuminism + creationism.
- the-ism implies ones consent to the authority of another, hence willing submission.
- illuminism tempts one to ignore that light has to exist before those within can get enlightened through it.
- creationism implies out of nothing; which tempts one to ignore being (partial) within everything (whole).
got genocide'd
Ones consent to any suggestion by others implies ones ignorance of perceivable. Those who ignore perceivable are destroying self and others, hence others tempting one to give suicidal consent to genocidal suggestions.
Example...pornography represents a temptation, yet the moment one consents to it, suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion is being established. All suggested -ism represent temptations to ignore perceivable.
innocent
Ones consent to suggested moralism tempts one into a conflict of reason (guilty vs innocence). This tempts one to ignore perceivable...IN (being within) NOCENCE; NOCERE (harm) aka being (life) within harm (inception towards death).
What about guilt? Response-ability (life) senses temptation (inception towards death) while in-nocence (within harms way).
in the name of
All languages are suggested by the few as tools of miscommunication among the consenting many aka spell-craft. Nature communicates itself as perceivable sound; those within tempt each other with suggested words to ignore that.
The "leaders" of our nations aren't in charge.
a) only within direction can one lead others to follow.
b) direction (inception towards death) charges reactions (life)...reactions wield the free will of choice to react, while being directed, as to recharge self...the other choice represents ignorance.
One needs inspiration (perceivable); others tempt one to want vs not want information (suggested).
LINK, noun - "division of a chain; a chain; any thing connecting"...hence giving consent to chain self to a post.