As for financing Hitler...take a step back and ask yourself about the foundation of money? The few suggest a price-tag for perceivable, and the many consented to it. That's it. Ever since the many are paying a few with suggested for access to perceivable.
Consenting to a suggested apple for $1 tempts one to ignore that the perceivable fruit contains seeds for exponential growth of more fruit...IF oneself chooses to put in the labor to grow it. Meanwhile; ones consent to the suggested $ tempts one into exponentially growing (growth) debt (loss) aka into a contradiction.
Why do the few suggest "growth of debt"? To distract the many from comprehending that loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life) within itself.
Suggestion (fiction) inverts perception (reality) for those who consent to it.
As for financing Hitler...take a step back and ask yourself about the foundation of money? The few suggest a price-tag for perceivable, and the many consented to it. That's it. Ever since the many are paying a few with suggested for access to perceivable.
Consenting to a suggested apple for $1 tempts one to ignore that the perceivable fruit contains seeds for exponential growth of more fruit...IF oneself chooses to put in the labor to grow it. Meanwhile; ones consent to the suggested $ tempts one into exponentially growing (growth) debt (loss) aka into a contradiction.
Why do the few suggest "growth of debt"? To distract the many from comprehending that loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life) within itself.
Suggestion (fiction) inverts perception (reality) for those who consent to it.
Exactly. The market is always correctly valued because one consents to sell and another consents to purchase at the same price.