misunderstanding of...everyone seems to treat it as if it means "unknown", or even "unknowable"
a) understanding implies ones consent to "stand under" the suggestions by others, which in return tempts one to ignore growing comprehension within perceivable knowledge.
b) as choice...perceivable balance implies the "known ledge".
c) if one consents to suggested "unknowable", then one gives others the power of ones consent to define if one is "able" to know (perceive). This tempts one to ignore that perceivable (whole) enables each ones perception (partial). Ones comprehension thereof has to be grown by self...it cannot be enabled by others.
The real meaning is more like "secret", or "that which few know".
a) SEC'RET, from Latin seco - "to divide". Few implies among many, hence an internal division.
b) "the real..." tempts one to ignore ones consent to suggested THE-ism (authority of others over self), which distracts one from perceivable reality.
c) if each one of a many consents to the suggestions of a chosen few, then perceivable represents "that which few know".
d) perceivable knowledge can only be hidden by oneself choosing to ignore it for suggested understanding...those one consents to stand-under can then further suggest narratives to keep that which one ignores hidden.
e) "meaning" represents suggested definitions...a phonetic play on DEAF PHONETICIANS aka those willingly deaf to PHONICS (perceivable sound) when consenting to use suggested words as definitions.
Even more obvious...definite (fixed) tempts one to ignore sound (fluid).
babylon
a) BABEL (confusion; disorder) aka BABBLE (incoherent uttering) aka BABBLE-ON (frequency of incoherent uttering).
b) ignoring perceivable order tempts one into suggested disorder, hence ignoring perceivable sound (reality) tempting one to incoherently utter suggested words (fiction)...no matter how high disorder is being built; it will always being toppled within the foundation of order.
a) understanding implies ones consent to "stand under" the suggestions by others, which in return tempts one to ignore growing comprehension within perceivable knowledge.
b) as choice...perceivable balance implies the "known ledge".
c) if one consents to suggested "unknowable", then one gives others the power of ones consent to define if one is "able" to know (perceive). This tempts one to ignore that perceivable (whole) enables each ones perception (partial). Ones comprehension thereof has to be grown by self...it cannot be enabled by others.
a) SEC'RET, from Latin seco - "to divide". Few implies among many, hence an internal division.
b) "the real..." tempts one to ignore ones consent to suggested THE-ism (authority of others over self), which distracts one from perceivable reality.
c) if each one of a many consents to the suggestions of a chosen few, then perceivable represents "that which few know".
d) perceivable knowledge can only be hidden by oneself choosing to ignore it for suggested understanding...those one consents to stand-under can then further suggest narratives to keep that which one ignores hidden.
e) "meaning" represents suggested definitions...a phonetic play on DEAF PHONETICIANS aka those willingly deaf to PHONICS (perceivable sound) when consenting to use suggested words as definitions.
Even more obvious...definite (fixed) tempts one to ignore sound (fluid).
a) BABEL (confusion; disorder) aka BABBLE (incoherent uttering) aka BABBLE-ON (frequency of incoherent uttering).
b) ignoring perceivable order tempts one into suggested disorder, hence ignoring perceivable sound (reality) tempting one to incoherently utter suggested words (fiction)...no matter how high disorder is being built; it will always being toppled within the foundation of order.