get injected or be fired
Injection (inception) implies a burned offering (life) before ejection (death). The older one gets; the colder one feels.
Sleight of hand: "Deep inside...The pressure's high...Just to stay alive...'Cause the heat is on" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZD8HKVKneI
exempt from mandatory
Free will of choice implies exemption (free) from mandates (suggested commands)...unless consented to.
executive order
Natural order (inception towards death) implies executive (enacting) for each subordinate (reacting) living within...others suggest "executive orders" to tempt ones reactions.
lucifer hierarchy
Each one has to choose lucid (comprehension) over clouded (ignorance), hence HI'ERARCH, noun - "sacred, particularly" aka segregated; partial. It's the rest of the world that is being stacked; collectivized; fermented; civilized; socialized; communized etc.
service to self
Each partial is in service to whole; even when submitting to one another. Perpetuation of self implies from one through another one; hence intercourse for off-spring.
AI will be summoning
a) those consenting by free "will" of choice to use suggested artificial intelligence represent SUM, noun (Latin simul, together). In other words...the few suggest collectivism to summon the consenting many.
b) being implies apart within whole...togetherness represents the suggested inversion thereof.
demon
DAI (divider) MON (provider)...MON (whole) generates DAI (partials).
they made it mandatory...to get
a) MAN'DATE, noun - "a command; an order". Inception towards death represents the natural order; while those alive within represent resistance (need) within temptation (want).
b) One does not need to get (suggested); one needs to adapt to what one already got (perceivable). Ignoring the latter (need) for the former (want or not want) gets one got.
get the shot...to keep your housing, your health insurance, keep food on your table etc
"Simon Phoenix; lay down on the ground"..."or else"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQIRD57lls8
I intend to start talking to my clients...
- CLIENT, noun - "a dependent; a citizen who put himself under the protection of a man of distinction and influence, who, in respect to that relation, was called his patron"
Your intent implies wanting to get something out of those who consent to be dependent on what you suggest them. Your intent binds yourself to your clients; while ignoring that a patron sets free.
That being said...patron (inception towards death) generates independence (life).
long before cymatics
CYMA (a little wave)...long (inception towards death) forwards being short (life). Ones temporary growth within ongoing loss represents a little wave aka a vessel of resistance raised and driven within a wind of velocity.
The question is...
...what others are suggesting to tempt one to ignore perceivable solution aka sound dissolving into instruments.
In short...quest tempts towards outcome; being implies within origin. Wanted outcomes tempt ones ignorance of needed origin.
what is the relevant size and geometry of the universe?
a) UNI; UNITAS; UNUS - "one"...no matter how many verses the ones within are shaping.
b) REL'EVANCY, noun - "sufficiency to infer the conclusion"...loss (inception towards death) implies sufficiency to infer (inception) and conclude (death) growth (life).
c) -METRY - "to measure; to exercise moderation"...balance (surrounding) moderates; choice (center) exercises. Try applying this within GEO (land) SPIRO (air) AQUA (water) aka natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...
it is not static , uniform nor fully known
a) ones choice to ignore perceivable (fluid) for suggested (static) tempts one to hold onto within that which one needs to let go.
Sleight of hand: "rest assured" aka cessation of motion (rest) through binding self by a pledge to another (assure).
b) uni-forms (formed ones) within uni-flow (flowing oneness) aka energy (internal/inherent power).
c) knowledge implies "fully" perceivable whole for each perceiving partial within. Discernment through comprehension (compression of impressing) is where each one has to choose for self to adapt (express) or ignore (repress).
Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
sound can create shapes
Others suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to distract one from being shape (fractional) within sound (entire).
Shapes that are still very prominent in some places
a) sound places shape within its momentum, hence only within perceivable moment (balance) can one shape (choice) sound.
b) suggested prominence (distinguished above others) tempts one to ignore being distinguished (resonance) within that which tempts one to be oblivious (dissonance).
One temporary needs to resist (resonance) wanted temptations (dissonance) within the ongoing velocity of sound.
like a flag
Others suggest temporary symbolism to distract one from ongoing symmetry...ones consent to suggested represents holding onto (dissonance) while ignoring need to let go of (resonance).
Being implies as instrument aka INSTRUERE (arrange, prepare, set in order) MENT (mind/memory) within sound. Others suggest "alike" to tempt one to ignore being "apart" aka ARRANGE, verb - "to put in proper order; to dispose parts of a whole" aka disposition (inception towards death) of partials (life) within whole (sound).
a pact with an evil entity
- PACT, noun (Latin pactus, pango) - "contract; agreement or covenant".
- EN'TITY, noun (Latin entitas) - "being"
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) represents the pact; while ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) represents the inversion of LIVE (to be animated), hence LIVE to EVIL.
Also...being implies apart from others; while contracts bind one to others.
magic
- MAG'IC, noun (Latin magia) - "secret operations of natural causes"
Aka secret operations (life) of natural cause (inception towards death)...why secret? Because Latin seco - "to divide", hence partial operations divided by whole process.
The few suggest the city system to tempt the many to surround a market at the center. This represents the inversion of being center (life) of surrounding (inception towards death), which is why the consenting many keep getting systematically destroyed by a few happy merchants and their suggestions.
Perceivable TRADE (path, track, course of action) implies from inception towards death...life within needs to resist wanted temptations, while others tempt one with suggestions to ignore resisting.
Based on everything I've seen, I think the landings were staged.
Where have you seen the landings? On television; in cinemas; within books and magazines; on the internet? Those represent raised platforms used for public display aka stages.
four scientific ways
There's only one perceivable way for those within...forwards. Counting (four) tempts one to burden self with other units; while suggested scientism tempts one to ignore perceivable aka scientia; scio (to know).
be certain
Others suggest CERTAIN (determined; restricted; fixed) as the inversion of being temporary "free" will of choice within ongoing motion. Being implies as form within flow; hence a fluid state...not an fixed one.
Holding onto suggested information (to ascertain meaning) affixes it within ones mind/memory, while tempting one to ignore fluidity of perceivable inspiration.
surface
SUPERFICIAL; adjective - "of or relating to a surface, as in not deep, without thorough understanding, cursory, comprehending only what is apparent or obvious of perceptions, thoughts etc."
ambiguous
AMBIG'UOUS, adjective - "open to various interpretations"...perceivable is open to ones perception (as inspiration), while one wields the free will of choice for various suggestible interpretations (as information).
From the talmudic perspective...gemara is open to various interpretations of mishnah.
old proves new
OLD (beyond the middle period) + PERIOD (state at which any thing terminates)...what if one can only temporary exist in the middle (life) of ongoing termination (inception towards death)?
What if suggested old vs new tempts one to ignore perceivable moment of "now" aka moment-um of motion?
What if holding onto anything within motion as "proof" tempts one to ignore that motion generates VALID (to be strong), hence loss (inception towards death) affirming strength of growth (life)?
Try holding onto your breath for proof; while reasoning old vs new...motion forces one to adapt to "now".
Old and New Testaments are not separate works. It is one continuous work...
a) others suggest old vs new to tempt one to TEST'AMENT, noun (Latin testor, to make a will) aka to choose between suggested sides; instead of being free will of choice at center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable).
b) WORK (Greek energy; internal/inherent power) + CONTINUOUS (motion) generates momentum (balance) for ones free will of choice.
c) work (energy) separates whole (inception towards death) into partials (life) aka ongoing velocity (loss) into temporary resistance (growth).
d) "are not" represents suggested nihilism (out of nothing)...the inversion of being (partial) within everything (whole).
interconnect
Outside implies wholeness; inside implies apartheid...others tempt one with suggested INTER (internal) CONNECT (fasten together) to ignore being ONEself aka a UNIT (Latin unus; one) designated through internal/inherent separation of whole into each partial.
Suggested "together" aka towards getting tempts one to ignore that being alive implies being moved from inception towards dying, hence being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...together represents the inversion of apart.
if you understand...
...then you willingly consent to "stand-under" the suggestions of others, instead of growing self within perceivable.
everything you need to know to be
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...being implies within (choice) the known ledge (balance). Others suggest INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligo, to understand) to tempt ones choice to stand-under the choices of others.
sanctuary
Others suggest SANCTUS; SACRED (to make whole) as the inversion of being partial (temporary) within whole (ongoing). Being implies partial; otherwise being couldn't perceive moving differences (inspiration) within whole.
Suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (within everything) aka
- flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death)
- whole to partial; partial within whole and partial to whole
- ongoing to temporary; temporary within ongoing; temporary to ongoing
- all to one; one within all; one to all
- base to ingredient; ingredient within base; ingredient to base
- loss to growth; growth within loss; growth to loss
- velocity to resistance; resistance within velocity; resistance to velocity
- motion (male) to momentum (female) to trans-form (off-spring).
In short...alchemy.
...isn't the center.
What generates a center? How is a center generated? Where is a center generated?
I don't even know if I trust my own eyes
Knowledge implies perceivable; trust represents ones consent to suggested. The former needs to be let go; while the latter tempts one to hold onto.
Grab a tennis-ball and go to bed...you think you can hold onto it throughout your sleep? If you can't even hold onto a tennis-ball; then why all the mental gymnastics to hold onto trusted beliefs?
What one perceives inspires one to adapt, yet one cannot hold onto inspiration. Choosing to resist the want to hold onto that which one needs to let go...that's adaptation.
not everything is a PsyOp.
a) PSYCHE (animating spirit aka perceivable) + LOGIC (reasoning about suggested words)...everything is perceivable; every suggestion within tempts one to ignore it.
b) OPERATE (to be in effect; at work; perform) -TION (action)...action (inception towards death) operates reactions (life) aka effect within cause aka form within flow aka "work will set you free" (Arbeit macht frei).
illogical distraction tactic from the elites
a) logos distracts from pathos
b) logic/reason (imbalance, hence conflict) distracts from balance (hence having choice).
c) selecting (elite) others distracts one from being choice, while electing others as the chosen ones.
drawing out losses
a) loss (inception towards death) pushes (inception towards life) and draws (life towards death) growth (life). Being pushed implies inspiration; while being drawn implies temptation.
b) growth (life) can only exist "within" loss (inception towards death)...others suggest "without" as the inversion thereof.
try to convince me of any other attrition?
ATTRI'TION, noun - "abrasion; wearing by friction"...ones consent to suggested applies attrition to ones resistance (life) within perceivable velocity (inception towards death).
News like this, shows what?
a) to present to the view of others (to show) tempts one to ignore seen (perceivable) for shown (suggested).
b) suggested news represent COMPASS (moderate bounds; moderation; due limits; instrument for directing), while perceivable N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh) implies oneself as the "free" will of choice navigating life, while being directed from inception towards death.
losing control of the narrative
Suggestion represents the narrative; ones consent represents the control of others over it. If one resists consenting; then others lose control over suggested narratives.
a time traveler
Being alive implies passed in-between inception towards death...others suggest traveling from/to as to distract one from ones position within the moment-um of motion.
Suggested past; present and future tempt one to ignore perceivable moment aka "now".
writing on the wall
The wall represents human ignorance of perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information), and writing represents suggested spell-craft (words) over perceivable sound.
One cannot write a symbol without shaping it within symmetry aka by adaptation of partials (perception) to whole (perceivable).
Jesus Christ...I'm sorry, the first three writers are jewish.
- SOR'RY, adjective - "grieved for loss; melancholy; dismal; poor; mean; vile; worthless; as a sorry slave".
Ones consent (faith) to a suggested authority (Jesus Christ) prevents one from growing self; while tempting one to grief the loss of others, while representing a "sorry slave" to those suggesting authority aka those who speak in the name of (in nomine) suggested authority (patris et filii et spiritus sancti).
- CRITIC (to discern, to judge, to separate, to distinguish)
- CRIME (to separate, to judge, to decree, to condemn)
a) being implies crime (life) within law (inception towards death) aka temporary chaos (growth) within ongoing order (loss)...a separation of whole into partials.
b) discernment can only be grown by one-self within perceivable...not by consenting to suggestions from other ones.
c) critical thinking from ones perspective implies perceiving (partial) perceivable (whole)...yet "critical thinking" as suggested by others represents ones ignorance of perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information).
d) suggested criticism (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable critic (reality)...the former tempts one to reason (conflict) with others about meaning; while the latter implies being able to discern; being mind/memory (ment) within that which just-is (justice); being partial separated within whole; being one distinguished from every other one.
...means indoctrination
- DOCTRINE (Latin; to teach) aka IN (being within) DOCTRINE (taught by) ATION (action).
a) being within action (inception towards death) implies being reaction (life).
b) being able to perceive implies being within perceivable; hence to learn for self teaches self and vice versa.
c) ones adaptation to perceivable (inspiration) represents the foundation for learn/teach; while ones consent to suggested (information) tempts one to ignore that; while giving others the power of ones consent to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information at will.
d) perceivable inspiration implies predefined meaning; suggested information represents a smoke-screen; an idol; a brand; a label; a fiction upon reality...and ones consent affixed it within ones mind/memory.
e) suggested words tempt one to ignore perceivable sound. Those who adapt to sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonic; sound); while those who ignore sound for word based definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
you think the market as something mechanical. Sure, inputs and outputs matter, but it's not a machine.
MACHINE, noun (Latin machina) - "an artificial work"...ones consent to suggested (artificial) over perceivable (natural) shapes the machine.
As for input (inception) and output (death)...life represents processed matter in-between.
The price is always what the market will allow in a free society...
a) one binds self to others when consenting to suggested society aka social-ism.
b) oneself chooses by "free" will of choice to pay suggested prices.
c) perception (wholesale) or suggestion (retail) represents the foundation for "market", while consent (buy) to suggested (sell) represents "contract".
d) allow (Latin allocare; allocate), hence whole (perceivable) allocating each partial (perception).
a) the few operate fiction (suggested) within reality (perceivable); while the many are trapped within fact (want) vs fiction (not want) reasoning; while ignoring reality (need).
b) one can only stand (erect; directed upward) within motion, while suggested facts tempt one to hold onto them.
LOY'AL, adjective (Latin lex, law) - "faithful to superior; plighted faith; subjected to others"...that implies to others; not to a place suggested by others.
Ones consent (want or not want) to a suggestion by another (he tells) tempts one to ignore perceivable (need).
Both believer and disbeliever are consenting to be cucked by those who suggest them what to belief/disbelief.
Or you are being tricked to ignore that each ONE represents a different partial within whole...
What if others suggest sentimentalism (sentiment); identitarianism (identical); collectivism (vast majority); mathematicism (100k); pastism (had) and theism (the) to distract ONE from discerning self?
a) do you comprehend that Japan and America imply a "different" position to one another?
b) do you comprehend the contradiction of suggesting that the "same" goes for "different" positions?
c) suggesting to be a Japanese-American implies being "there-here"...that contradicts perceivable.
a) he-brew his-story...jew fell for it.
b) the foundation for "his" implies motion, hence motion (male) to momentum (female) to trans-form.
c) motion (his) doesn't store (story)...it moves product.
d) others suggest stories to tempt one to willingly hold onto, while ignoring the need to adapt to moving production as the moved (inception towards death) product (life).