new currency
a) suggested creationism (new) tempts one to ignore perceivable...new, néwos, now.
b) differences (life) can only exist within same current (inception towards death).
brics
Those who lay bricks utilize those who launch bricks as a distraction from that which binds and seals (mortar).
'Adieu, A Heart-Warm, Fond Adieu' ~ Robert Burns (robbing & burning)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/ffEvFcap.png
...is BS.
BS fertilizes growth.
a) many reasoning (god vs satan) over suggestions by few implies mass consent to suggesting few.
b) if each of many ignore being "one with choice" within perceivable; then few become "chosen ones" over suggested....ignoring perceivable (reality) implies for suggested (fiction).
genome
GEN (generation) NO ME ("I don't know," a plea of noncomprehension)... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=nome
transfer of gene
Being alive implies transferred from inception towards death aka transmutation of whole (generation aka loss) into partials (regeneration aka growth).
extent
Only within continuation of loss (inception towards death) can there be increase of growth (life).
lifespan
Aka unit (life) of length (inception towards death).
breakthrough paves the way for...
a) suggested progressivism (the way for) tempting one to ignore that resisting velocity (inception towards death) is fertile for resistance (life)...unless ignored.
b) suggested breakthrough tempts one to ignore being break (life) through motion (inception towards death), hence internal division aka SEX (Latin seco; to divide).
In other words...temporary growth represents the break within ongoing loss aka being partial implies interruption within whole.
the talmud
a) THE (the-ism) TALMUD (instruction)...if one consents to suggested; then one submits self to instructions by authority of others.
b) reasoning about suggested instructions represents GEMARA (completion); hence finishing each other off within conflicts of reason.
c) adapting to perceivable; while resisting suggested represents MISHNAH (oral instruction of law)
d) being implies STRUC (structure) IN (within) TION (action) aka particular arrangement of reactions (life) within action (inception towards death)...that's what "talmud" implies.
Ones consent to suggested "talmud" gives others the power of ones consent to "instruct" one to react as suggested.
different genders
a) a suggested inversion of differentiation (life) within generation (inception towards death)...an inversion tempting one to remain ignorant about ones lack of self discernment.
b) GEN'DER, noun (Latin geno; to beget, to be born) aka SEX, noun (Latin seco; to divide)...others suggest genderism and sexism to distract one from that.
To be born aka towards being born implies life being born through momentum (inception towards death) of motion, hence a division of whole (velocity aka flow) into each partial (resistance aka growth).
disgusting jewess...
Being offended (disgusted) implies ones consent to a suggested offer by another, while ignoring that nature only offers perceivable towards ones perception.
I wonder if...but most people shoot me down.
If implies then, and the foundation for implication (if/then) implies motion. Being (life) implies within motion (inception towards death)...others tempt one to ignore motion (perceivable) for affixed (suggested) which shoots one down if consented to.
biggest lie
Truth...within a moving system.
lying about damn near everything
Consenting to suggested (fiction aka nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality aka everything).
the
Aka suggested the-ism representing ones consent to submit to another.
persistent
Being implies temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) hence ones struggle/subsistence/sustenance.
we
Suggested pluralism (we) tempts singular (one) to ignore self for suggestions by others.
know
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...anything suggested tempts one to ignore that.
So in other words, we have to convert to it before we see what's in it?
a) TALMUD (instruction) represents suggested (gemara) within perceivable (mishnah). Ones consent to the suggested information by others puts one into talmud aka IN (being within) STRUCT (edifice) TION (action).
b) suggested words represent the artificial edifice; tempting one to ignore being within natural sound.
Ask yourself if you view your surrounding (reality) based upon the words (fiction) used to describe what you look at? Nature doesn't label anything; those within tempt each other with labels to ignore that, which gives them power over the labels and those who adhere to them. That represent the foundation for idolatry.
c) within perceivable one represents resistance; while suggested tempts one to follow. If one consents to follow the suggestions by others; then one was converted (turned).
from the original artifact
Suggested artifice (artifact) tempts one to ignore perceivable nature (original).
Freedom for everyone, not just the rich.
a) being implies "free" will of choice within "dom"inance of balance; since only within balance (inception/death) can there be choice (life).
b) rich implies versus poor aka a conflict of reason about suggested aka imbalance.
I was instilled with these ideals, things like personal sovereignty
a) ones consent to suggested idealism sets others as ones master, and oneself as their slave. Ones free will of choice represents the sovereign over all other choices...unless ignored willingly.
b) person aka per (by) sonos (sound) implies perceivable sound to represent sovereignty, and each ones perception within the subordinate.
equalitarianism
To be implies different (life) within equal (inception towards death) aka odds (choice) within even (balance)...others suggest equalitarianism to tempt one to consent to the inversion thereof.
freedom for all
Being implies one (free) within momentum (dom) of motion (all)...others suggest progressivism (for) to distract one from sustaining self by resisting (life) temptation (inception towards death).
Within motion one "needs" to resist; while being tempted to "want" to ignore resisting....others exploit ones ignorance of need (perceivable) with want (suggested).
life and death
Being implies living (growth) within process of dying (loss)...others suggest conjunction (and) as the inversion of apartheid (temporary growth) within wholeness (ongoing loss).
Nature sets itself apart (living within dying)...those within tempt each other back together (life and death).
...was treated like trash whenever he tried to preach the truth.
Those preached to have already consented to suggested lies (sold to them as truth), and so ones suggested truth is being viewed as contradicting the already agreed upon truth, hence representing a lie in their eyes.
The trick...others suggest truth (want) vs lies (not want) to distract one from perceivable change (need).
wanting to believe
Wanting to believe in suggested (information); tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable (inspiration). The former tempts one to want to hold onto; the latter needs to be let go during ones resistance to the former. That represents one choice balancing in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested).
I know im not the only one
Being implies "alone" ALL(in)ONE aka all partials within one whole...others suggest nihilism (not; nothing) to distract one from everything perceivable.
heritages
The origin of succession (heritage) implies from flow (inception towards death) to form (life) aka from balance to choice aka from action to reaction aka from surrounding to center aka from loss to growth aka from ongoing to temporary aka from base to ingredient etc.
- NON, adverb - "not" + SENSE, noun (Latin sentio, to perceive)
Who suggested you to believe that nothing can be perceived?
I HAT YOU
A kippah doesn't offer much to hat with...
SOLERUIN
"What begins with Alchemy, shall end in Destruction" aka transmuted ingredient (life) goes back to base (inception towards death).
SURVIVE UNTIL THE VERY END
Suggested survivalism (to remain alive) represents the inversion of RE (living response within) MAIN (process of dying).
Problem, reaction, solution
Solution (inception towards death) generates Problem (life) wielding Reaction (free will of choice).
hegelian dialect
Thesis (wanting suggested) vs Antithesis (not wanting suggested) for Synthesis (conflict of reason).
if it says stuff, it'll be "liable", right.
Your consent to suggested "ai" binds you to those suggesting it, hence making you liable. The surety is liable for the debt of his principal...
Do not worship idols
...meets...
written compilation of the oral
Your bing-ai search for a written compilation of something oral represents idolatry. Nature doesn't compile (collecting parts); it separates (from whole into partials).
authority on the Talmud
TALMUD (instruction) implies being within (life) that which structures (inception towards death), hence being authorized (need) to disapprove (want).
a) consenting to suggested (vax) tempts one into a conflict of reason (good vs bad)
b) those suggesting contradict both sides to keep the conflict going; which represents talmudic reasoning.
c) one sees what one chooses to focus on...others utilize suggestion to bring periphery into ones focus.
To divide is to multiply. (as fertilization in the womb, One cell becoming two, then four, then eight, the zygote)
a) only within whole (oneness) can there be division into partials (ones).
b) multiplication of one through another one by inter-course implies off-spring aka another division. Others suggest zygomatic (joining) as the inversion of apartheid within wholeness.
c) others suggest both collectivism (joining; counting) and dualism (more than one; double the fun) to distract one from self-discernment. Ones consent to either suggested -ism establishes both the dualism between suggesting one and consenting one, as well oneself being collected by another as a unit (one) following another unit willingly.
d) the foundation of fertility (producing in abundance) implies being the product (life) within abundance (inception towards death) aka transmutation of temporary growth within ongoing loss.
The momentum (female) of motion (male) represents the womb for trans-form.
To expand is to condense
a) motion generates momentum (balance) which represents a condensed environment for each expanding ones free will of choice.
b) suggesting what "is" tempts one to ignore what "was" (condensation); which in return represses ones expansion. One trying to define reality through suggestion represents ones ignorance of perceivable reality for suggested fiction.
If one resists what others suggest "is", then one can utilize implication (if/then) upon everything that "was" before one came to be. That's how one expands comprehension.
To absorb is to radiate
To absorb loss (inception towards death) radiates growth (life). Choosing to ignore radiating within perceivable (inspiration); tempts one to hold onto suggested (information); hence concealing ones radiation.
All information warfare aims at tempting one to consent to fill up ones mind/memory with suggested information, while continue to reason (conflict) about it with others. That's how a few can conceal the radiating potential of a many by merely suggesting them to do it to themselves.
Ignorance (choice of want over need) represents concealment (ones concealed mind/memory).
To record is to forget
a) suggested information tempts one to want to hold onto; perceivable inspiration needs to be let go. If one discerns self as being within motion; then holding onto represents the ballast one drowns self with.
If a mother chooses to hold onto her off-spring; then she smothers; suffocates; represses the spring; vegetate; flourish of the child.
b) others suggest RE (response to) CORD (string together) and FOR (forwards) GET (to gain possession of) as the inversion of being a person (per sonos; by sound; hence set apart within whole) and being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death), hence ones struggle with the temptation of possession within dispossession.
database
The base (foundation) of data (known) implies perceivable inspiration, hence a flow-state going through each formed recipient within. Others suggest; build and control a database out of suggested information and ones consent to hold onto it.
contact...
Implies friction of resistance and resistance within velocity. Resisting velocity grows resistance; while friction with other resistance spends/drowns resistance.
There's a choice to made in-between spending (intercourse) and drowning (lust) when making contact...
They are the most offensive person on here.
PERSON aka per sonos (by sound) implies that each one is offered by SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken; whole". That's the most offensive aka the whole offer for each one recipient within.
Aren't you offended? Read it.
That implies me choosing to consent to what others offer me by suggestion; while ignoring the only perceivable offer. You chose to consent to "their" offer, hence now being offended by it, which gives them the power to continue emotionally manipulating you.
Why do you think all the masquerade is used to draw attention? They even managed to suggest the so called right to adapt to the make-up (clown-world aka joker): They suggest sodomy and how does the right react? They start sharing Hunter Biden dick-picks on social media. One sides gets the pride-parade; the other reacts by showing exposed genitals next to children.
I simply wanted the down voting to stop
If one resist suggested voting aka VOTE, noun (Latin votum, to vow) - "suffrage; the expression of a wish, desire, will, preference or choice, in regard to any measure proposed", then neither up-votes (want) or down-votes (not want) concerns ones free will of choice within balance (need).
Others suggest STOP (cessation of motion) to distract one from being (life) within motion (inception towards death). One cannot stop motion while being within it, yet one can ignore motion for what others are suggesting (voting; blocking; banning etc.).
insecure
IN (being within) SECU (Latin seco; to divide); hence as divided partial within dividing whole. Others suggest "insecurity" as not being safe, which distracts one from being (alive) within danger (process of dying).
...as clearly year 1
a) all represents one in energy...there can be only one...all for one and one for all.
b) Which year? Sidereal year; Anomalistical year; Civil or Legal year; Bissextile or leap year; Lunar year; Lunar astronomical year; Common lunar year; Embolismic or intercalary year; Julian year; Gregorian year; Sabbatic year?
How long will it take humanity to realize that nature doesn't count (collecting units)...it designates each unit (one) apart from one another.
actual translation of Apex
a) TRANS (to transmute) LATE (to impede; delay) TION (action)...reaction represents the transmuted delay within action/actual.
b) NADIR (inception); APEX (life); CLIMAX (death)...experienced by each trans-form within momentum (female) of motion (male).
The person is loose a screw. It might be a woman. Sure. But doubtful.
Suggested transgenderism tempts one to ignore that GENeration (inception towards death) TRANSmutes reactions (life). If one gets offended by suggestions; then one consented to a suggested offer (fiction), while ignoring perceivable offer (reality).
The rhetoric "trans-gender" and chicks with dicks/ guys in drag are distractions from alchemy aka from base generating ingredients through transmutation. Others don't want you to utilize alchemy; they want you as an ingredient within their alchemy.
They're a stalker.
Implies you being prey. Ones ignorance of perceivable gives others ones consent to prey upon one with suggestions.
What are those odds?
Even (balance) generates odds (choice)...choice can be tempted to ignore even (need/want) for uneven (want vs not want). You reasoning about reddit trannies represents an uneven conflict, which you chose to partake in. Being offended by reddit tempts you to ignore your consent to redd-it (read it).
Apex is male. Veritas is female.
FE (aka feminine; veritas) MALE (apex) aka a trans-mutation of feminine out of; within and in response to masculine.
Apex (male) substantiates (verifies) Veri-tas (female). That's also why using apex (tip; summit; peak) "makes a woman".
Deep conspiracy" is where you're actually trying to figure out just what the hell is going on in the world, rather than reacting...
What if consenting to suggested information buries one "deep" under it, while tempting one to ignore perceivable surface aka face value aka the exterior (value) for ones interior being (evaluation)?
to cover up
Suggested covers up ones perception if one consents to hold onto it.
Too much work, I suppose.
If all represents one in ENERGY (Greek; work); then there cannot be too much work. Ignoring this represents ones willing supposition under others, hence under-standing suggested.
a) consider if mind/memory represents momentum (inception towards death); driven by motion, for those living within?
b) if implies then...motion communicates itself as implication to those within.
Flow (inception towards death) objectifies form (life)...form (temporary growth) is subjected to flow (ongoing loss).
Suggested symbolism tempts one to ignore being driven within perceivable symmetry.
a) suggested information (words) tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (sound)
b) those adapting to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those who consent to suggested "definitions" represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
c) others suggest words like "insane person" to distract one from perceivable sound aka "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound). This represents spell-craft.