- CRUSADE (Latin cruciare) - "to mark with a cross"
Being choice within balance (need/want), while being moved from inception towards death implies being center of cross. Drawing a line through another (crossing) marks oneself.
- M'ARK, noun (Latin mercor) - "to pass"
The passage of life implies being moved from inception towards death...a spotless passage, unless marked by those living within, who brand each other with idolatry aka with suggested symbolism, which distracts from perceivable symmetry.
Symmetry moves; symbolism tempts one to hold onto. Life cannot hold onto anything, while being moved from inception towards death without ignoring to sustain self by needing to resist the temptation of wanting to hold onto aka HER'ESY, noun (Gr. to take, to hold; Latin haeresis).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."eternal sunshine of the spotless mind".
Each -ism is suggested by another and consented to by ones "free" will of choice...consent (slave) fuels suggestion (master).
free energy
Energy (Greek; work) implies internal/inherent power aka exerting force aka whole generator (balance) for each partial reactor (free will of choice) within.
Free implies center of surrounding energy.
wrong
...implies a conflict of reason (right vs wrong) shaped by ones consent to the suggestion of another. If ones "free" will of choice ignores perceivable balance of "energy"; then one imbalances self.
This self imposed imbalance is being suggested by a few towards a many as "reason/logic" and consenting to it tricks one to view balance through the lens of imbalance.
reverse action
Action (inception towards death) generates reactions (life). Reverse implies ones REsponse to suggested VERSEs by another, hence establishing VERSE, noun (Latin versus; verto, to turn) aka a turning against one another within conflicts of reason.
Newtons laws of motion
a) suggested newtonianism tempts one to ignore perceivable...now (not new) and momentum (not ton aka gravitational weight).
Choice (life) can only exist within momentum (inception towards death) of motion...not before or after. While alive; one cannot perceive ones inception or death only the perceivable momentum aka moment aka "now".
b) suggested laws tempt one to ignore perceivable natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka the land for choice to balance on; the air for one to breathe and the solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) for ones momentary existence.
c) suggested "First, Second and Third" tempts one to ignore that all is one in energy, hence whole (oneness) generating internal/inherent partials (ones).
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone" aka ALL(in)ONE.
Also suggested names and numbers tempt one to ignore NUM'BER, noun (nombre; name) - "the designation of a unit" aka UNIT; noun (Latin unitas; unus) - "one".
d) Newton's First Law of Motion states that an object in motion tends to stay in motion unless an external force acts upon it
Motion implies external for internal momentum...being alive implies within momentum (inception towards death) of motion aka temporary growth within ongoing loss aka force of velocity generating force of resistance.
In short...being implies "subjected" to being within objectification.
e) Newton's Second Law of Motion states that when a force acts on an object, it will cause the object to accelerate
Will cannot cause, since free "will" of choice is caused within balance (momentum of motion). Will implies effect within cause. Velocity (loss) generates resistance (growth); resistance (need) struggles for self sustenance within velocity (want) aka ones "free" will of choice within the dom-inance of balance (need/want) aka free-dom.
Free (life) within dominance (inception towards death).
Motion doesn't accelerate matter; matter (resistance) rises (inception) and falls (death) within motion (velocity)...it's ones free will of choice how slow one rises or how quick one falls.
Newton's Third Law of Motion states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
a) there can be only one action (whole) for each ones reaction (partial) within.
b) being implies different (reaction) within same (action)...others suggest equality (same) through diversity (different) as the inversion thereof.
c) reaction implies RE (response to) TION (acted upon)...re (reaction) implies center of surrounding tion (action).
d) suggested oppositionism (counterbalance) tempts one to ignore being choice within balance. Others suggest one to choose sides (want or not want); which when consented to, tempts one to imbalance (want vs not want) ones position as choice in-between balance (need/want).
Once you understand...
...one consented to "stand under" the suggestions of another, hence willingly repressing ones expression, while permitting others to oppress self through the suggested.
I am VERY curious how this is done.
By tempting others to get curious about suggested, while ignoring perceivable...
Cryptocurrencies are supposed to be decentralized
Being implies center (life) within current (inception towards death)...ignoring perceivable for suggested "decentralizes" self.
a) https://img.gvid.tv/i/2iQpP22d.jpg
b) TETH'ER, noun - "rope or chain by which a beast is confined for feeding within certain limits"...as if "STABLE" wasn't obvious enough.
He just had to adhere to victim hierarchy by putting (((Daniel Davis))) first...
a) bear/born aka bearing (inception towards death) witness (life) aka even (loss) bearing odds (growth) aka whole (perceivable) bearing partials (perception).
b) against aka again aka frequent repetition of witnessing choice within bearing balance.
The issue with figuring this out by oneself is that ones consent to a suggestion (antarctica) by another implies forfeiture of witness testimony (test in one) aka TEST; verb (Latin testor) - "to make a will".
One cannot choose from another ones choice (aka from a chosen one) without ignoring ones own choice in the process. Ones ignorance prevents ones sight.
The words you read are designed to distract you from the behavior of partials (instructed minds aka instru-ments) moving within sound aka SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire". Being alive implies in-sanus (within sound) per-sonos (by sound)...others suggest "insane person" to distract one from discerning that. That represents spell-craft and your consent to suggested words permits others to put a spell on you.
The more one resists words, the more one opens up to sound, and the more one teaches self to learn about behavior of sound, the more one discerns self as being (life) within having (inception towards death) aka "be-have".
Others suggest one "to behave" as the inversion of "having to be"...the former tempts one to follow orders; while the latter inspires one to resist natural order.
Each suggested word represents an inversion of perceivable sound..the former is affixed by ones consent to definitions, while the latter moves and can't be held onto.
Words are shaped out of "letters"...ones consent to suggested words "lets" others shape them.
LET, verb (Latin elocare, to lease) - "to permit; to allow; to suffer; to withhold restraint; not to prevent"...one needs to resist letting others choose wants or not wants for self.
This bitch is so full of shit...
- POLLY; from molly; mary (Hebrew Miryam) - "rebellion"
- ST aka SAINT (worthy of worship)
- JAMES; from jacob (Hebrew Ya'aqobh) - "supplant; disposes; acquire by scheming".
fascist Germany, communist China, and capitalist America
The few suggest fascism; communism, capitalism AND nationalism; while the many consent by choosing a side within.
antartica
a) ANT (anti; against) ARKTOS (bear).
b) https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bear
cover stories
The suggested cover stories by others can only work with a consenting ones ignorance (cover) and within ones memory (store).
transparent
PA'RENT, noun (Latin parens, from pario, to produce or bring forth)...inception towards death produces/brings forth trans-muted life.
Being implies trans (temporary ingredient) within parent (ongoing base)...the less one stores suggested stories by others; the more previously ignored one uncovers.
From a different perspective...being hue (color) man in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light) implies TRANSPA'RENCY, noun - "state of a body by which it suffers rays of light to pass through it".
Being implies radiation (growth) within light (loss); hence radiate; raddix; ray; race, hence "human race" aka hue-man radiation.
from religion into a cult
RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies ones repression of cultivation (growth) through submission to another.
free the...
Using "free" will of choice to consent to suggested "the-ism" binds ones choice to the choices of another.
to advance agendas
Agenda (action) advances reactions (life) from inception towards death...following suggested agendas tempts one to ignore that.
a) 'ARGENT, noun (Latin argentum; Gr. silver, from white) + TINA aka CHRISTINA - "christian".
Sleight of hand: "Don't cry for me; white christian"...
b) suggested "new" (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable "now" (implies within everything).
c) rhetoric aka "art of speaking" implies artificial suggestion (word) over naturally perceivable (sound).
d) nature moves life from inception towards death, hence life being presided over, while being set into, hence PRESI'DE, verb (Latin proesideo; before setting.) aka PROE (inception towards death) SIDEO (life).
-SCIAM
Aka Scientific American aka Holtzbrinck Publishing Group, which was taken over in 2007 by Murdoch and was protested by the resignation of Dieter von Holtzbrinck.
Aka crossing (life) the line (inception towards death) aka over (growth) within under (loss) aka BE (being alive) YOND (wandering within process of dying).
As for the brewing aspect...boil (living) within freeze (process of dying) aka ingredient (temporary growth) within base (ongoing loss) aka burned (life) offering (inception towards death) etc.
Life is passed over inception towards death and thereby back into.
Another one...across (inception towards death) the rubicon (taking a decisive step) aka life wielding free will of choice within decide (to come to a conclusion).
proven by the bible, history and jewish writings.
What if both history and the bible represent jewish writings?
Consider revisionism as a tool of subversion...
- New International Version
- New Living Translation
- English Standard Version
- Berean Standard Bible
- Berean Literal Bible
- King James Bible
- New King James Version
- New American Standard Bible
- NASB 1995
- NASB 1977
- Legacy Standard Bible
- Amplified Bible
- Christian Standard Bible
- Holman Christian Standard Bible
- American Standard Version
- Aramaic Bible in Plain English
- Contemporary English Version
- Douay-Rheims Bible
- English Revised Version
- GOD'S WORD® Translation
- Good News Translation
- International Standard Version
- Literal Standard Version
- Majority Standard Bible
- New American Bible
- NET Bible
- New Revised Standard Version
- New Heart English Bible
- Webster's Bible Translation
- Weymouth New Testament
- World English Bible
- Young's Literal Translation
As for history...what if HE-BREW HIS-STORY to make JEW fall for it?
is like trying to be "friends"
Aka trying to be "alike", instead of being "apart" from one another.
tell them straight what you think
Being implies crooked (life) within straight (inception towards death), hence bending light as a refraction within.
Sleight of hand: straight vs QUEER, adjective - "odd; singular" to distract from being odd within straight.
Nice. Try going nuts... https://img.gvid.tv/i/42kmRjvh.jpg
-ist (scientist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (scientism), hence ones demand from another, while ignoring to be awake within perceivable (reality) for dreaming within suggested (fiction).
SCI'ENCE, noun (Latin scientia, from scio, to know) + KNOW, verb (Latin nosco; to perceive)...not ones consent to the suggestions by another.
- PAGAN, from PAG (to fasten) + FASTEN; from FAST (solid)
Being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)...consenting to a suggested -ism binds one to another solid, while ignoring ones position within fluid.
idol worship
Idols (suggested) are utilized to distract from worth (perceivable) of ship (perception)...yet; only work if one consents.
"Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life" ~John 6:54
a) ETER'NAL, adjective - "without beginning or end of existence" aka suggested denialism tempting one to ignore existing (life) within beginning (inception) and end (death).
b) Emptying a suggested vessel tempts one to ignore being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka a VASSAL.
c) EU (you) CHAR (to perform a business) IST (consented to suggested -ism).
a) adverse in VAERS implies "opposite", so whatever is being shown...there's an opposite.
b) ones consent to suggested implies "adverse reaction" within all perceivable.
c) access (inception) towards conclusion (death)...each one (perception) implies all access (perceivable); unless ignored for wanting access to what others are suggesting. Choosing the latter permits others to exclude one from accessing.
Example...those standing in line outside a club aren't on the guest list, hence not invited.
d) PRI'VATE, adjective - "peculiar to one's self"...others suggest "public" to tempt one to ignore self.
Ignorance of many permits chosen ones to run public relations in private.
back-end system
a) SYS'TEM, noun (Latin systema; Gr. to set) - "an assemblage of things adjusted into a regular whole"
b) being implies being set (system) in-between front (inception) and back (death) aka as an unregulated partial (wielding free will of choice) within a regulating whole (balance of motion).
Each ingredient (living) goes back to base (process of dying).
how they're straight up poisoning you...wine
WINE, noun - "intoxication"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/wine
"Burnin' deep inside my brain...Poison...I don't wanna break these chains"
Staying out of range instead of marching into a target makes fire practice much less dangerous.
Also...imagine a target so effective that it attracts game.
You can not have a river flow in one direction other wise peasants will follow it to the source.
a) One (life) within direction (inception towards death) being tempted by others to follow instead of resisting.
b) Only within one direction (inception towards death) can one (life) navigate (left/right; up/down; front/back). Why? Because one direction (motion) generates balance (momentum) for ones free will of choice to navigate within.
c) Perceivable inspires ones resistance; suggested tempts one to follow others.
d) Choosing sides implies being directed by others; being choice implies within the balance (momentum) of direction (motion).
a) letter implies one who "lets" another aka one who consents to the suggestions of another.
b) if others suggest letters and one consents to let those in, then one permits others to craft ones spelling.
c) to let implies to lease aka "to grant the temporary possession of...to another". If one leases to another, then the other holds ones leash.
U'SURY, noun (Latin usura, from utor, to use) + IN'TEREST, verb (Latin inter and esse)...being implies internal essence used by external abstract.
Others suggest usury (taking interest) to tempt ones consent to take the interesting offer. This in return tempts essence (life) to ignore abstract (inception towards death). Abstract drains essence...unless resisted.
Consenting to suggested moralism (ethic) tempts one into a conflict of reason (logic) aka moral vs immoral; good vs bad; thumps up vs thumbs down etc.
Duality (Latin duo; two) of whose mind? ONEs mind or another ONEs mind? What if others can suggest dualism to tempt one to ignore self when consenting?
a) EMO'TION, noun (Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from)
b) life implies being moved from inception towards death, hence being within motion, not being able to move from it.
Ignoring fluid (perceivable inspiration) for solid (suggested information) tempts ones emotions away from motion. Choosing to resist suggested temptations grows one resistance to emotions...entrance happy merchant of temptation.