manipulated Him into dogmatic
Aka dog/god + ma/matter. What if what you call "god" isn't matter (solid) but immaterial (fluid), and what if your consent to suggested (word) tempts you to ignore perceivable (sound); while holding onto suggested solid within perceivable fluid?
What if words tempt one to want to hold onto meaning (information); while sound needs to be let go of (inspiration)?
war monger
a) MONGER aka merchant aka "to trade"...what if ones consent to the suggestion by another implies mercantile contract law between buyer (consent) and seller (suggestion)?
b) What if offer (perceivable) generates offered (perception) with "free" will of choice? What if others suggest currency to distract ones perception from perceivable "current", hence tempting ones "free" will of choice to bind itself to suggestions by chosen ones. Suggestions like RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)?
c) What if choice can only exist within perceivable balance (need/want)? What if choice can be tempted through suggestion into self inflicted imbalance (want vs not want)?
What if this conflict of imbalance is suggested to ones consenting choice as "reason/logic" aka reasoning about suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration and logic aka logos aka suggested word over perceivable sound aka spell-craft?
What if others get permission by ones consent to rebrand conflicts of reason (want vs not want) into for example...truth vs lie; good vs bad; belief vs disbelief; us vs them; rich vs poor; soccer vs football; left vs right; black vs white; cola vs pepsi; capitalism vs communism; trump vs biden; israel vs hamas; ukraine vs russia; vaxxed vs unvaxxed; love vs hate; big mac vs whopper; mario vs sonic etc.?
they could be demons
Demon aka DAI (divider) MON (provider)...what if being implies division (life) within provision (inception towards death)? Angels aka angles imply perpendicular to base-line...could ingredients (life) within base-line (inception towards death) shape perpendicular angles suggested by kike aka kikel aka circle?
What if holding onto suggested implies a perpendicular angle for temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death), and what if the resulting conflict of reason implies circular logic, hence reasoning against one another about suggested information, while never finding conclusion to conflict, yet spending ones resistance within endless conflicts of reason...much like a snake eating its own tail (ouroboros allegory).
evil powers
What empowers evil/live?
principalities of this world
a) PRIN'CIPLE, noun (Latin principium, beginning; origin; source)
b) Can there be more than one source? How do ingredients came to be within source/sauce?
c) Beginning of energy implies what? Begin aka BE (being) GENERO (generated) aka being (life) generated (inception towards death).
d) Could utilizing suggestion within perception distract one from perceivable origin?
e) what's the origin of world/vault?
Deep State, when I think of the ultimate highest group, it's the one in control of the US.
a) "deep" state contradicts "highest" group. Others tempt one to "think" within the controlled environment of reason (deep vs high). Suggestion contradicts perception.
b) others suggest pluralism (US aka united states) to tempt singular (one) to ignore self for others.
c) suggested the-ism tempts one to authorize another over self through ones consent to the suggested -ism.
d) as for ones state within reality...center (life) within surrounding (inception towards death).
I know there is no...
To know implies to perceive everything perceivable...others suggest nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt one to ignore perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing), hence tempting one to "deny" reality for fiction.
If "there is no", then where is nothing?
who/what
Who implies one. What implies energy. Why? Because all implies one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Only oneself can discern to be one (partial) within all (whole), hence one within oneness. Sleight of hand..."all for one, and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone...ALL(in)ONE".
Cows gonna moo'n if one lets the barn door open. Why? Cause it takes a long way to get milky...
It is what you do with it, indeed.
Hence the issue with others suggesting before one does in response. Being implies within (life) deed (inception towards death)...consenting to others tempts one "in debt".
bean
Aka BE (being) + AN, adjective (Latin unus, una, unum) - "one"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/an
to flow in the manner you decide
Only within predefined flow (inception towards death) can form (life) decide how to respond.
more coffee...
...implies less resistance within flow; hence drying out. A glass of water in-between cups of coffee helps retaining moisture aka "flushing the toilet".
The beans ain't the primary issue; it's ones consent to a suggested stimulant, which incites aka IN (being within) CITE (rapid motion) aka suggested progressivism tempting one to go with the flow, while spending ones resistance on others instead of for sustenance of self.
In short...stimulants tempt one to follow instead of resisting temptations.
Bonus: Germans call coffee PLÖRRE (regional, northern and central Germany) - "an unappetizing or disgusting liquid, often said pejoratively of a drink". Piss-Plörre to be specific...
a) phonetic (sound) underneath written (word).
b) understanding the suggestions of others implies "standing-under" those suggesting.
c) coffee aka CUFF (blow with the open hand) FEOH (livestock; cattle)
credit unions offline
a) ones (uni) creed (cred) taken offline by another...banking trust.
b) being implies within (life) line (inception towards death).
c) OFF (denotes separation), hence line (inception towards death) offering separation (life) aka ON (denotes addition aka inception of life).
- Electric aka to elect (consent) trick (suggested).
- ELEC (to elect) TR (trick) ON (positioned above).
- NEU (new) TR (trick) ON (positioned above).
Consenting to suggested puts oneself below and others above.
a) esteem vs abominate aka like vs dislike aka best vs worse aka want vs not want...different sides consenting to same suggestion.
A controlled environment where many reason against each other (love vs hate) over the suggestion by a few. In this case...NASA (Heb; nasha; to deceive). https://www.biblehub.com/hebrew/5378.htm
b) human history aka HU (hue; color) STOR (store; preservation). The preservation of color implies motion; while suggested human history tempts those who consent to it to believe in an affixed narrative.
Meanwhile...those who suggest history are utilizing revisionism to constantly apply change to an affixed narrative, hence mimicking motion.
Few collectivizing many by suggesting "self", which in return tempts each one among many to identify self by consenting to what few suggest.
why allow this sort of dialog now?
DIA (two) LOG (logic/reason) aka a conflict of reason in-between two sides. Ones consent to reason against others over suggested information implies permission (allow) towards others and submission (deny) of self.
As for "now"...before vs after represents the dia-log for each one who willingly ignores that being can only exist now (life); not before (inception) or after (death).
philanthropy
Anthropy sounds like Entropy...
We can't say they didn't tell us, huh?
Before any tale of a soothsayer...nature took apart the one suggesting it from the one consenting to it.
One wields the free will of choice in-between fable (suggested) or that which enables (perceivable). Only oneself is able (need) to resist fable (want).
Nature apart is interesting for sure.
a) Yet many are more interested in pfi-zer, which permits few to raise interest rates.
b) being "a part" within whole nature implies as solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)...not internal (inter) resting.
Sleight of hand: no rest for the WICKED, adjective "to depart, to fall away".
c) as for sure...being implies IN (life) SURE (inception towards death). Now look up the opposite of sure and compare that to being alive... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/sure.html
teleportation
TELE (distance) PORT (portable) ATION (action) aka motion carrying resistance (life) over velocity (inception towards death) aka distance (process of dying) generating portable (living).
long-distance
Aka divided stance (life) within long (inception towards death).
enabled
Aka action (inception towards death) enabling reactions (life).
multiplexed quantum memories
- MULTI (more than one) PLEX (fold) QUANTUM (quantity) MEMORY (mind)
Being implies one (partial) within oneness (whole)...consenting to mentally uphold the suggestions by another one; folds ones mind into many memories aka a "hive-mind" generated by ones consent to suggested collectivism.
vitamins, minerals, protein
- Vitamin aka MIN (mine) VITA (vitality)
- Mineral aka AL (all) MIN (mine)
- Protein aka EIN (within) PRO (forward)
The suggestion of vitamin; mineral and protein tempts one to ignore being a partial within whole.
carbs; fat
HYDRO (water) + KAR (heat; fire) = FAT (liquid oil) aka inception towards death implies liquid heat generator for each anointed life within.
dealbook/summit
- consenting to suggested...deal
- binding self to another...book
- submitting self under apex...summit
grey area
a) GRAY aka spectrum in-between pure light (white) and absence of light (black) aka mixture of white with black.
b) white (inception) to gray (life) to black (death); hence GRAY - "to wither, dry out" aka living form drying out within flowing process of dying.
c) AREA aka arere aka arid "to become dry" aka a space cleared by burning aka a burned offering.
pfizer
PFI (physios; nature) - ZER (apart, asunder)...a sleight of hand for nature (whole) setting itself apart (partials). Ignoring this by consenting to a suggested injection (jab) tempts partials together, hence permitting another to inject into one aka a coming together of parasite and host through vector (vaccine).
synagogue
SYN (together) AG (moving)...motion sets apart (inception) before dissolving partials (life) back together (death).
satan
Adversary aka AD (to) VERSE (turn)...if resistance (life) within motion (inception towards death) turns; then it follows others, while ignoring to resist.
Demon aka DAI (divide) MON (provide)...being implies divided (life) within provided (inception towards death). Divided cannot perceive provided, only grow self discernment.
selling certification
- Sell (suggested) tempting Buy (consent)
- Certificate (suggested) tempting Permission (consent)
- Choice (suggested) tempting Choice (consent)...into submission.
Why is it they are always so connected
a) All way (inception towards death) sets each one within apart (life).
b) many are tricked together so that few can remain apart. Those apart resonate with nature; while those together shape dissonance among themselves.
c) all the vetting processes established by a chosen one towards ones choice imply a setting apart, a distancing of self from others; an erection of center while cutting off circumference.
d) ones consent to suggested pluralism (they) and collectivism (connected) prevents one from discerning self as being one apart from one another, hence not connected.
e) oligarchy aka OLIGOS (only) ARKHEIN (be first) aka ONE, hence "there can be only one".
f) only from perspective of many are other ones viewed as "few", because ones consent to be part of many (suggested collectivism) tempts one to view everything through the lens of a collectivist mindset.
Whatever one of a many sees; he tries to categorize; to brand alike; to amalgamate; to mix into conformity; to affix a label to; to seal the meaning of; to define as, to choose a side for etc. Nature doesn't do any of that...those who ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested) choose to redo reality with fiction.
In short...connections among others exist only within ones mind, hence binding oneself, while permitting others free range.
TPTB
If one resists suggested THE (theism) and THAT (substitute); then BE (being) POWER (potential) becomes harder to ignore.
bait
Bait (suggestion) tempts Hook (consent)...sea (perceivable) sets free (perception).
Centuries of propositions in response to other propositions, while ignoring PRO (before) POSITION (pose within action).
Ones pose (perception) within action (perceivable) can be distracted with propositions (suggestion) from others...if one consents.
Energy implies aether/either flow (inception towards death) or form (life) within the same momentum (perceivable moment).
Others suggest besides as the inversion of being center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable). In other words...others suggest sides to tempt ones choice off-center when consenting to either/aether side.