I know there is no right answer, and secret societies can't all be publically known.
Just wondering who/what people think is the top of the bad guy stairs.
Example: Deep State, when I think of the ultimate highest group, it's the one in control of the US.
What empowers evil/live?
a) PRIN'CIPLE, noun (Latin principium, beginning; origin; source)
b) Can there be more than one source? How do ingredients came to be within source/sauce?
c) Beginning of energy implies what? Begin aka BE (being) GENERO (generated) aka being (life) generated (inception towards death).
d) Could utilizing suggestion within perception distract one from perceivable origin?
e) what's the origin of world/vault?
Precipitating itself from the origin breaks into many parts, mini 'sources' within low perceivable view.
a) "itself" implies oneself applying "self" to origin, hence ignoring to be partial within whole. Why? Self implies among other, while whole implies entire (sound).
Self can only exist within entire aka in-sanus (within sound) hence per-sonos (by sound). Applying "self" to origin implies personification of origin aka idolatry aka "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" aka labeling perceivable (sound) with suggested (word) etc.
b) others suggest pluralism (many) to distract one from discerning self as partial (one) within whole (oneness). Ones singular consent to suggested pluralism establishes collectivism aka permitting few to collectivize consenting many underneath suggested -isms.
c) instead of using suffix (-ing) try utilizing origin (-tion aka action)...precipita-tion implies action precipitating reactions. Doing that allows one to discern self as reaction (life) precipitates within action (inception towards death).
Choosing suffix tempts one to Latin suffixus; suffigere "to fasten", which for resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) implies increase of "suffering".
a) Perceivable (whole) implies only source for each ones perception (partial)...ignoring this by consenting to suggestions by others tempts one to view another as source (suggested information) for source (perceivable inspiration), hence establishing a mediator; media (Latin medius; middle) aka merchants in the middle, selling fiction as reality to anyone willingly buying into it.
b) Consenting to suggested tempts one to seek understanding aka to want to stand under others, which in return prevents one from growing self discernment within perceivable.
Perceivable moving through ones perception implies impression towards expression. Consenting to suggested implies self imposed repression of expression, while ignoring impression.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself, don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature". https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/madonna/humannature.html
Notice the next lines:
That implies others denying perceivable for suggested, while trying to repress one who is longing to express self.
c) ones view is low if one chooses to stand under what others are showing, and ones view is high if one looks down upon others. Both implies suggested sides tempting one into a conflict of reason (low vs high), while ignoring ones sight as center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable).
Resisting the temptation to view what others show (suggest) from a low or high position, allows one to draw from everything nature offers through each one. Information tempts one to view it from high or low position; inspiration inspires one to resist temptation. Ones position within inspiration implies center, hence reacting by breathing (Latin spiro; spirit) within surrounding action aka within-spirit-action (inspiration).
This is very good advice