censorship
a) Perceivable reveals; suggested conceals. Consenting to suggested implies giving in to censure.
b) Censor directs ship if ship follows directions instead of steering.
content
Solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) isn't content...it's upset aka ongoing loss setting up temporary growth.
completely different
Complete implies same (inception towards death); partial implies different (life).
showing two people different images and then asking them to discuss the similarities
The trick...different suggestions to tempt "alike" consent from different persons. This way those who suggest control differences; while those who consent respond similar without noticing it.
Two sides fighting each other within a conflict of reason (true vs false) over suggested symbolism, while looking for similarities aka common ground, are blind to the similar consent given to the suggested symbolism.
To predict implies "foretelling"...perceivable exists beFORE one can TELL suggested.
homelessness
a) HOME; noun - "fixed residence" aka RESIDENCE, noun - "one's dwelling place" aka DWELL; verb - "to lead into error, deceive, mislead"
- https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=home
- https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=residence
- https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=dwell
b) Being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) implies ROAM; verb "to wander" aka aræman "arise, lift up".
Sleight of hand: "All roads lead to rome/roam" or "When in rome/roam..."
Edit: "Home is where the heart is" aka HEART (German Herz) aka Hertz (Hz) aka frequency of resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
consistent for thousands of years
CONSISTENT, adjective - "fixed; firm; not fluid". How could thousands of years be consistent? How could consistency exist within time?
I hate CERN
Reasoning (love vs hate) corrupts Cern (to perceive, comprehend). Why? Growing self diCERNment within perceivable is ignored when reasoning about suggested.
a) Rocko and a copy of the basilisk (reptile)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4ChpApvy.jpg
b) Others suggest accelerationism to tempt one to ignore resisting (life) velocity (inception towards death).
- Share implies partial within whole...a single charge
- Club implies collection of partials...a joint charge
Being implies single charge (life) within joined charge (inception towards death)...ones consent to suggested joined charges (clubs) permits others to become share-holders.
the solution is simple...
...inception towards death. Only life within can experience complicated problems.
relativity is
a) Reality "was" perceivable before one can suggest what it "is"...otherwise it couldn't exist on itself.
b) Those within reality aka partials within whole imply REL'ATIVE, adjective (Latin relativus) - "not absolute or existing by itself; considered as belonging to or respecting something else".
Absolute (inception towards death) generates relatives (life) within itself.
delusion
Solid (perception) within fluid (perceivable) can be tempted to delude itself, when consenting to suggested. Perceivable (inspiration) goes through ones perception; while suggested (information) tempts one to hold onto it; hence deluding self with residue.
Nature reveals everything (perceivable) to everyone (perception)...holding onto anything from one another (suggested) conceals ones perception from what nature reveals.
gravity is not a force
a) Gravity (weight) implies burdening self; Force (strength) implies resisting burdens.
b) Consenting to suggested determinism (is) and nihilism (not) burdens self, hence reducing ones resistance.
school...church
a) Suggested church (assembly; collection) tempts one to ignore being dissembled; set apart from one another. Perception and perceivable have to be differentiated from one another for senses to work.
b) Students consenting to suggested teacher or parishioner consenting to suggested preacher...same submission to collectivism, just in a different name.
In nomine educationem et curriculum vitae et ductu.
to be in the presence of
Presence aka PROE (before) ESSE (to be) aka before (inception towards death) being (life) aka being able to sense (perceive) that which came before (perceivable).
christ is satanic
a) Christ (anointed one) + Satan (adverse; turned opposite)...both imply oneself adapting to that which anoints (perceivable) or that which turns opposite (suggested).
Being Christ (need) or Satan (want) implies ones free will of choice.
b) Suggested determinism (is) tempts one (being) to ignore cause (was). One can only come to be within that which was before one came to be within.
religious discrimination
a) Discrimination (to set apart) contradicts Religion (to bind anew).
b) Natural law divides (di) partial reactions (crime) within whole action (ation). Being implies crime (life) divided within natural law (inception towards death).
Others suggest one to follow laws and solve crime, which implies inversion of being, hence a world where all suggested laws are being broken, while crime runs rampant. All the followers of laws suffer the consequences of crime; while only those who suggest laws are outside the law, while directing both criminals and law enforcement.
And guess what? Both cops and robbers are binding themselves to the suggested system, hence following religion.
nature does not have the luxury
What if nature is LUX (light)? What if seeing within implies ocular spectrum?
once everything is together
What if everything was together (sound) before setting itself apart (instruments)?
a) Periphery (inception towards death) unravels core (life).
b) HEART, noun [Latin cor, cordis, and allied to Eng.core, or named from motion, pulsation.] https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/heart
to keep us in the dark
Ignorance (dark) or discernment (light)...both imply ones free will of choice within perceivable. Choosing to ignore this for suggestions by others keeps oneself in the dark.
Example: alcohol. Drinking it keeps oneself in the dark; no matter how much or little others suggest it. Others can only tempt; only oneself can fall for temptations willingly.
a) MULTI (multus; many) VERSE (verto; turn)...there are many turns for ones choice within balance.
b) THE aka suggested the-ism implies ones choice turned down in submission to another.
c) suggested mysticism (secret; conceal) tempts one to ignore perceivable SECO (to divide; reveal)...the former clouds ones mind in mist; while the latter opens perceivable up to ones perception.
Sleight of hand...revelation (life) of method (inception towards death); hence METH'OD, noun (Latin methodus; Gr. with, and way)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/method
we should probably boycott
a) Why boycott (to combine in refusing), when already combined in agreement to suggested pluralism (we)?
b) Which side sounds more combined? Few or many?
c) What if separate (one) is the opposite of combined (we)?
d) Who has the upper hand...the ones choosing to combine or the "chosen ones" remaining separate?
e) How many cattle can a few farmers combine by herding them together?
find a way to get the fuck out and survive, full stop
a) What if one (life) cannot get out of way (inception towards death)?
b) What if growth within loss cannot survive...only grow?
c) What if whole implies constant change for each partial within?
d) What if there's no rest (cessation of motion) for the wicked (departed)? https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/wicked
nothing you can do about it but die.
What about living?
Someone could ask a jew at the anti-defamation league of the binah brith if the expression on that emoji looks like Mary Phagan, while a jew raped this child to death...
a) Consenting to want (thesis) or not want (antithesis) suggested establishes a want vs not want conflict (synthesis) of reason.
b) Being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) implies ANAL'YSIS, noun - "a loosing, resolving aka separation of a compound body into its constituent parts".
In short...synthesis (suggestion) distracts from analysis (perception); coming together distracts from being apart.
Ordo ab chao
A suggested inversion of perceivable...being temporary chaos (life) within ongoing natural order (inception towards death) aka problem (growth) within solution (loss).
Considering all the DNA evidence
DNA aka Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid. Notice what's positioned at the center of the description...nucleic aka nucleus aka "kernel; core of atom". Next; let's look at atom as well...Greek atomos aka "uncut; indivisible".
How can a core exist without a periphery; a center without surrounding; a seed without soil; a nucleus without exterior? How could anything be evident without a division between ones perception and all perceivable?
The trick here is that perception implies nucleus within perceivable exterior, and it's perceivable (whole) which divides itself into each ones perception (partials). The suggestions by others tempt one to hold onto them, which in return tempts one to ignore self as partial divided within whole.
In short...evident implies perceivable by self; evidence implies attestation; testimony by another's suggestion. The former implies reality; the latter implies fiction...if consented to.
The obvious control...
a) ...can be hidden under ones own obliviousness to suggested THE-ism aka ones submission to the authority of another when consenting to suggested.
b) Ones consent to any suggestion permits another control over definition (idolatry); redefinition (revisionism) and contradiction (talmudic reasoning) of suggested.
c) control aka contra (against) rota (wheel) implies circular reasoning, which tempts one to ignore linear implication (if/then) aka if alive; then within process of dying, hence being moved from inception towards death aka linear progression of perception (partial) within perceivable (whole).
Reasoning about the suggestions by others tempts one into conflicts of reason...want vs not want; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief; agree vs disagree; confirm vs denial; truth vs lie; true vs false; good vs evil; have vs have not; rich vs poor; yes vs no; us vs them; me vs you; nationalism vs internationalism, capitalism vs communism; liberalism vs conservatism; black vs white; red vs blue; republican vs democrat; buy vs sell; mcdonalds vs burger king; israel vs palestine; ukraine vs russia; vaxxed vs unvaxxed; soccer vs football; christians vs moslems; faithful vs faithless; vanilla vs chocolate; coke vs pepsi; iphone vs android; pop vs rock; theater vs cinema; 0 vs 1; everything vs nothing; up vs down; left vs right; front vs back; past vs future; love vs hate and so on...
Ones consent (want or not want) to anything suggested; establishes the conflict of reason (want versus not want)...a conflict among all those who consent from either side to a suggestion by another. This in return gives suggesting few control over both sides within every conflict of reason, the consenting many fight each other over. All the above example imply revisionism of the same choice of consent aka endless different rebranding to hide the same choice made underneath all conflicts.
master pulling the strings
a) Consenting (slave) to suggested (master) establishes the roles.
b) Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies the string one attaches to self when consenting to others.
c) Religion implies refinement of mercantilism aka selling (suggested) towards buying (consent), because it permits the seller to hide underneath the authority of products from buyer.
Example: buying into the following products "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" tempts one to ignore seller (in nomine) aka those who speak in the name of the suggested products.
That's why gentiles are reasoning against one another about GOOGLE (don't be evil), instead of Sergey Brin and Larry Page (both jewish).
Mossad and the CIA
a) Mossad (Hebrew מוֹסָד ;mosád; institute) aka in (within) statuere (establish). Let's add "by way (perceivable) of deception (suggested) thou shall make war (reason)"...
Ones consent to suggested establishes suggested within self, hence permitting others entrance for deception, while placing self into conflicts (wars) of reason. That's where mossad operates.
b) CIA aka central intelligence agency
- Being implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)
- Being implies reaction (perception affected) within action (perceivable cause).
- Intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies to stand-under (consent) another (suggestion), hence submission of self to others.
The suggestions by others tempt one from center (central); underneath others (intelligence) and to react to them (agency)...that's where the CIA operates.
While I'm at it...a mason of free (will of choice) uses bricks (suggestion) and mortar (consent) to build walls of ignorance within others.
one way or another
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each wanderer within (life).
History shows this.
a) He-brew His-story to make jew fall for it...
b) Natural order (inception towards death) doesn't store...it transfers (life).
c) Consenting to suggested stories tempts one to "store" them within ones mind/memory. Consider the difference between hard-drive (accumulation until capacity) and ram (temporal accumulation under capacity).
Memory processes perceivable (inspiration) like a ram; while being tempted by suggested (information) like a hard-drive. Holding onto latter; tempts one to ignore motion of former, hence corrupting self.
The mountain of information...
...tempting one to ignore the flow of inspiration.
current examples
Being implies example (life) within current (inception towards death).
faith as the public knows it
Faith implies ones consent (belief or disbelief) to the suggestions of another aka ones intelligence (understanding aka standing-under). Doing so tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Example: suggested scientism tempts one to ignore SCIENCE (Latin scio; to know aka to perceive). That's how perceivable is being hidden underneath suggested, by exploiting ones consent to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
You can't study the talmud without being jewish, and reading hebrew, so the reality is hardly anyone understands it
a) TALMUD (instruction) implies oneself aka IN (being within) STRUC (structured by) TION (action) aka being structured reaction (life) within foundation of action (inception towards death).
b) Brewing implies transmutation of ingredients (life) within base (inception towards death).
As solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)...transmutation implies fluid to solid (inception); solid within fluid (life) and solid to fluid (death)...perceivable alchemy; distracted from with suggested chemistry.
c) One needs to grow (life) within reality (inception towards death)...others tempt one stand-under (understand) fiction (suggestion).
d) Consider mishnah (perceivable inspiration) and gemara (suggested information)...teaching one to accept former as is, while going nuts over latter, makes them very efficient for controlling those who ignore former (perceivable inspiration) for latter (suggested information).
In short...each one exists inside talmud; jew adheres to mishnah; gentile ignores this for gemara.
In the end, what information, who can you trust?
a) Being implies in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death) aka "durante vita".
b) Suggested (information) tempts one to ignore perceivable (inspiration)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter cannot be held onto, only adapted to.
c) Reality (inspiration) or fiction (information) aka need to resist wanted temptation.
d) Trusting suggested (holding onto) tempts one to ignore being (life) thrusted (inception towards death) within perceivable. No matter what life holds onto; it's going to die. Living is about building resistance while being tempted to ignore that through the process of dying.
e) Consider...bank & trust. Others suggest currency (information) to distract from perceivable current (inspiration), which when consented to (trust); permits others control (bank).
Ones creed (trust) transformed into another's credit (bank)...
f) Consider breathing (Latin spiro; spirit)...does it require ones trust or does it force ones adaptation no matter what? Hold your breath while considering this and wait a little while...
TRUST, noun - "equal in strength"...process of dying and those living within aren't equal to one another, it's equality (inception towards death) which generates diversity (life).
g) As for who? Oneself before one another. It's one (whole) for all (partials) and all (partials) for one (self) before one another.
would getting rid of them and the "jews" really change anything?
a) Everything (inception towards death) changes each thing within (life)...oneself needs to adapt to change; while resisting the temptation of wanting constancy by holding onto things.
Others tempt one to ignore change (perceivable inspiration) for constancy (suggested information)...holding onto the latter will collapse within former aka fluid (inception towards death) destroying solid (life).
Reality (sound) changes; fiction (words) tempts one to mentally affix it...hence suggested information being labeled definition (definite; affixed).
The trick...adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIAN (from phonic; sound), while consenting to suggested definition implies DEAF PHONETICIAN.
Another example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore being "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound). All suggested words are spell-craft aka affixed labels upon a moving system, and ones consent to ignore movable (inspiration) for affixed (information) affixes it within ones mind/memory as definitions aka meaning aka settled aim aka purpose aka truth or lie aka intention aka signification etc.
b) Few (jew) are a response to many (gentile)...generation (inception towards death) generates you (life). YOU aka phonetic JEW. Chosen one implies one's choice. Elite (French élite "selection, choice") implies selected by one's choice.
If one claims self as "me; myself or I"; then all other ones are branded "you/jew". What better place for others to hide; than underneath the label you/jew aka underneath ones ignorance of self? That's the last place one who suspects others would look at...self reflection. What do the so called jews do to exploit that? Mirroring; inverting; reflecting...
The monitor in front of you represents a black-mirror; reflecting your own ignorance of perceivable (need) with suggestions by others...no matter if you want or not want them. Ones consent to watch permits others to MON'ITOR, noun - "one who warns of faults or informs of duty; one who gives advice and instruction by way of reproof or caution", which others utilize to invert.
In short...gentile (host) establishes jew (parasite); jew exploits gentile with temptations unless resisted.
Resistance (life) cannot overcome temptation (inception towards death)....only grow resistance by resisting. Resistance is fertile; following the suggested orders by others makes ones resistance infertile.
Would not someone else just step in and continue their work?
Others cannot step in unless oneself invites (consent) them (suggestion). Why? Because being implies center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable). Suggestion represents poison; consent the vector that permits others to inject it. Once injected with suggested (fiction) ones perspective within perceivable (reality) becomes clouded.
They Live shows the struggle to put the glasses on to see the fiction; in reality (perceivable) one needs to resist putting the glasses on (suggested).
Look outside..do you see land; air; water; animals; humans; grass etc? What do you see without watching the labels others suggested you? Does any other life-form utilizes symbols to navigate perceivable symmetry? Does any other life-form utilize the 7,151 recognized languages in use?
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "The world is a vampire sent (life) to drain (inception towards death)"
nazi germany
ALDI aka ALbrecht DIskont or VOKUHILA aka VOrne KUrz HInten LAng...that's how the German language abbreviates by the first two letters.
Let's apply this to NAtional SOzialist...NASO (was aber auch)...not nazi, which stems from ashke-nazi. Head of ashkenazi? Rothschild. Family name? Bauer (German; farmer).
Wanna go deeper? Deutsch aka Dutch aka Dish...like Yid-Dish. Deutschland or Yid-dish/deutsch-land?
a massive immagration policy of jewish people to get rid of ethnically homongeous societies other than thier own
a) tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka equality (same) through diversity (differences) aka united states; united nations; european union aka uniformity; university; unicode; unicef; universal basic income; universal pictures aka miscegenation; mass migration; melting pot; collectivism; multiculturalism; pluralism; dualism aka society-ism (socialism); community-ism (communism) aka democray (demos; common people + kratos; strength) aka "there comes a time, when we need to heed a certain call...when the world must come together as one" etc.
The foundation for all of this...nature sets itself apart; from whole (perceivable) into partials (perception); while those within tempt each other back together, which allows a few to remain apart.
Erecting at center (jew) while cutting off circumference (gentiles) aka circumcision. Why does it work? Because one can be tricked to ignore being center (life) within circumference (inception towards death), hence being cut off (ongoing loss) unless erecting self (temporary growth).
Example...jew erects high-rise city centers to draw gentiles in, then cut them off from downtown through suburbs towards country, where a small town boy gets drawn back by big city lights. From a farmers (Bauer) perspective...that's crop rotation and pasture management through rotational grazing for cattle.
The grass looks always greener on the other side...
either they're corrupted or brainwashed
a) Each brain (life) gets washed (inception towards death)...ignoring this corrupts self, while permitting others to exploit ones ignorance.
b) Suggested jew and gentile distracts from YOU (life) within GENERATION (inception towards death)...and once one comprehends this by discerning self, others cannot be blamed anymore for ones own ignorance.
c) Suggested pluralism (they) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self...that ignorance is being ruthlessly exploited by others suggesting pluralism towards ones consent.
Within that line of reasoning, many Jews...
a) Are jews within gentiles line of reasoning or does a jew suggest consenting gentiles what to reason about?
b) Can you describe the difference between gentile line of reasoning and talmudic reasoning?
False dichotomies are everywhere
a) Perceivable surrounds each ones perception everywhere...reasoning (true vs false) about suggested tempts one to ignore that.
b) Consenting to suggested divides one into two (ignoring perceivable while consenting to suggested) aka a dichotomy.
c) Reasoning (true vs false) implies dichotomy aka one fighting other ones over suggested definitions.
d) Nature operates on implication (if/then)...which are not in conflict with one another, but implies same momentum (inception towards death) for each different matter (life) within.
Upmost (capital) implies half (semi) of bottommost...
a) Nature doesn't brand anything...all brands are suggested (word) to distract from perceivable (sound).
b) KHAZAR aka QUASAR aka QUASI (as if) aka suggested as if perceivable.
Motion (he) to momentum (she) to matter (trans-formation)...
- "Baby (inception towards death) I (life) don't know why you want to hurt me"
- "After all of the things I've done (growth) for you (loss)"
- "She (momentum) parties (sets matter apart through transformation) all (motion) the time (part of duration)"
secret room
a) Brad Pitt in Seven opening the box or John Travolta in Pulp Fiction opening the briefcase...those represent secret rooms. Both actors are doing sells-pitches to tempt viewers to consent to the suggested boxes. There's nothing in the box for the viewer, yet consent of the viewers puts not only everything imaginable into it, but also boxes in the viewers mind/memory, while permitting others to define; redefine and contradict the suggested imagination.
Decades later and viewers are still reasoning against one another what secrets were within those boxes.
b) A layer of perspective underneath this...Pitt and Travolta aren't actors; but play-acting, while reacting to directions. It's on the director to steer how the "actor" reacts to suggested directions...all to distract viewers from reacting (life) to direction (inception towards death); which they do by "mirroring" actors. (Look at DeNiro's "are you talking to me" scene).
c) Now for the foundation of "secret room"...motion to momentum to matter implies motion dividing (Latin seco) through momentum into matter, and for matter to exist within the extension (room) of momentum.
Modern sleight of hand through One Piece: ROOM (inception towards death) SHAMBLES (life). When the character casts room "death" is readable on his hand; yet when he casts shambles he flips the hand upside down, hence life not being able to perceive its inception or death while living.
If you want to open another rabbit-hole...the guy casting room/shambles is called Trafalgar Law aka taraf-al-garb (end of the west) L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...
copying all traffic
TRAF'FICK, noun - "trade; commerce, either by barter or by buying and selling"...suggested information represents the trafficking within all perceivable inspiration aka a carbon copy aka buying (consent) and selling (suggested) instead of bartering as perception (choice) within perceivable (balance).
Black (absence of light) + White (pure light)...both are being suggested as colors to distract one from being within the visible spectrum of light, hence in-between as hue (color) men.
Those consenting to suggested colorism are a) fighting each other (black vs white) hence mixing the spectrum and b) being played on the masonic checkerboard aka CHECK, verb - "to stop; to restrain; to hinder; to clash or interfere".
MON'ITOR, noun - "one who warns of faults or informs of duty"...you are being shown a reflection of your own ignorance within every black mirror. Ignoring this further by switching on the light within implies ones consent to a burned offering...
Take the magic away and "the fairest of them all" suggestion disappears. What remains: Mirror on the wall...showing me.