No matter how many Jews threaten a religious discrimination lawsuit, a school which does not take its students to be in the presence of a holy building devoted to Christ is satanic.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
a) Suggested church (assembly; collection) tempts one to ignore being dissembled; set apart from one another. Perception and perceivable have to be differentiated from one another for senses to work.
b) Students consenting to suggested teacher or parishioner consenting to suggested preacher...same submission to collectivism, just in a different name.
In nomine educationem et curriculum vitae et ductu.
Presence aka PROE (before) ESSE (to be) aka before (inception towards death) being (life) aka being able to sense (perceive) that which came before (perceivable).
a) Christ (anointed one) + Satan (adverse; turned opposite)...both imply oneself adapting to that which anoints (perceivable) or that which turns opposite (suggested).
Being Christ (need) or Satan (want) implies ones free will of choice.
b) Suggested determinism (is) tempts one (being) to ignore cause (was). One can only come to be within that which was before one came to be within.
a) Discrimination (to set apart) contradicts Religion (to bind anew).
b) Natural law divides (di) partial reactions (crime) within whole action (ation). Being implies crime (life) divided within natural law (inception towards death).
Others suggest one to follow laws and solve crime, which implies inversion of being, hence a world where all suggested laws are being broken, while crime runs rampant. All the followers of laws suffer the consequences of crime; while only those who suggest laws are outside the law, while directing both criminals and law enforcement.
And guess what? Both cops and robbers are binding themselves to the suggested system, hence following religion.