DNA aka Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid. Notice what's positioned at the center of the description...nucleic aka nucleus aka "kernel; core of atom". Next; let's look at atom as well...Greek atomos aka "uncut; indivisible".
How can a core exist without a periphery; a center without surrounding; a seed without soil; a nucleus without exterior? How could anything be evident without a division between ones perception and all perceivable?
The trick here is that perception implies nucleus within perceivable exterior, and it's perceivable (whole) which divides itself into each ones perception (partials). The suggestions by others tempt one to hold onto them, which in return tempts one to ignore self as partial divided within whole.
In short...evident implies perceivable by self; evidence implies attestation; testimony by another's suggestion. The former implies reality; the latter implies fiction...if consented to.
The obvious control...
a) ...can be hidden under ones own obliviousness to suggested THE-ism aka ones submission to the authority of another when consenting to suggested.
b) Ones consent to any suggestion permits another control over definition (idolatry); redefinition (revisionism) and contradiction (talmudic reasoning) of suggested.
c) control aka contra (against) rota (wheel) implies circular reasoning, which tempts one to ignore linear implication (if/then) aka if alive; then within process of dying, hence being moved from inception towards death aka linear progression of perception (partial) within perceivable (whole).
Reasoning about the suggestions by others tempts one into conflicts of reason...want vs not want; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief; agree vs disagree; confirm vs denial; truth vs lie; true vs false; good vs evil; have vs have not; rich vs poor; yes vs no; us vs them; me vs you; nationalism vs internationalism, capitalism vs communism; liberalism vs conservatism; black vs white; red vs blue; republican vs democrat; buy vs sell; mcdonalds vs burger king; israel vs palestine; ukraine vs russia; vaxxed vs unvaxxed; soccer vs football; christians vs moslems; faithful vs faithless; vanilla vs chocolate; coke vs pepsi; iphone vs android; pop vs rock; theater vs cinema; 0 vs 1; everything vs nothing; up vs down; left vs right; front vs back; past vs future; love vs hate and so on...
Ones consent (want or not want) to anything suggested; establishes the conflict of reason (want versus not want)...a conflict among all those who consent from either side to a suggestion by another. This in return gives suggesting few control over both sides within every conflict of reason, the consenting many fight each other over. All the above example imply revisionism of the same choice of consent aka endless different rebranding to hide the same choice made underneath all conflicts.
master pulling the strings
a) Consenting (slave) to suggested (master) establishes the roles.
b) Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies the string one attaches to self when consenting to others.
c) Religion implies refinement of mercantilism aka selling (suggested) towards buying (consent), because it permits the seller to hide underneath the authority of products from buyer.
Example: buying into the following products "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" tempts one to ignore seller (in nomine) aka those who speak in the name of the suggested products.
That's why gentiles are reasoning against one another about GOOGLE (don't be evil), instead of Sergey Brin and Larry Page (both jewish).
Mossad and the CIA
a) Mossad (Hebrew מוֹסָד ;mosád; institute) aka in (within) statuere (establish). Let's add "by way (perceivable) of deception (suggested) thou shall make war (reason)"...
Ones consent to suggested establishes suggested within self, hence permitting others entrance for deception, while placing self into conflicts (wars) of reason. That's where mossad operates.
b) CIA aka central intelligence agency
Being implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)
Being implies reaction (perception affected) within action (perceivable cause).
Intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies to stand-under (consent) another (suggestion), hence submission of self to others.
The suggestions by others tempt one from center (central); underneath others (intelligence) and to react to them (agency)...that's where the CIA operates.
While I'm at it...a mason of free (will of choice) uses bricks (suggestion) and mortar (consent) to build walls of ignorance within others.
one way or another
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each wanderer within (life).
History shows this.
a) He-brew His-story to make jew fall for it...
b) Natural order (inception towards death) doesn't store...it transfers (life).
c) Consenting to suggested stories tempts one to "store" them within ones mind/memory. Consider the difference between hard-drive (accumulation until capacity) and ram (temporal accumulation under capacity).
Memory processes perceivable (inspiration) like a ram; while being tempted by suggested (information) like a hard-drive. Holding onto latter; tempts one to ignore motion of former, hence corrupting self.
The mountain of information...
...tempting one to ignore the flow of inspiration.
current examples
Being implies example (life) within current (inception towards death).
faith as the public knows it
Faith implies ones consent (belief or disbelief) to the suggestions of another aka ones intelligence (understanding aka standing-under). Doing so tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Example: suggested scientism tempts one to ignore SCIENCE (Latin scio; to know aka to perceive). That's how perceivable is being hidden underneath suggested, by exploiting ones consent to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
You can't study the talmud without being jewish, and reading hebrew, so the reality is hardly anyone understands it
a) TALMUD (instruction) implies oneself aka IN (being within) STRUC (structured by) TION (action) aka being structured reaction (life) within foundation of action (inception towards death).
b) Brewing implies transmutation of ingredients (life) within base (inception towards death).
As solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)...transmutation implies fluid to solid (inception); solid within fluid (life) and solid to fluid (death)...perceivable alchemy; distracted from with suggested chemistry.
c) One needs to grow (life) within reality (inception towards death)...others tempt one stand-under (understand) fiction (suggestion).
d) Consider mishnah (perceivable inspiration) and gemara (suggested information)...teaching one to accept former as is, while going nuts over latter, makes them very efficient for controlling those who ignore former (perceivable inspiration) for latter (suggested information).
In short...each one exists inside talmud; jew adheres to mishnah; gentile ignores this for gemara.
In the end, what information, who can you trust?
a) Being implies in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death) aka "durante vita".
b) Suggested (information) tempts one to ignore perceivable (inspiration)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter cannot be held onto, only adapted to.
c) Reality (inspiration) or fiction (information) aka need to resist wanted temptation.
d) Trusting suggested (holding onto) tempts one to ignore being (life) thrusted (inception towards death) within perceivable. No matter what life holds onto; it's going to die. Living is about building resistance while being tempted to ignore that through the process of dying.
e) Consider...bank & trust. Others suggest currency (information) to distract from perceivable current (inspiration), which when consented to (trust); permits others control (bank).
Ones creed (trust) transformed into another's credit (bank)...
f) Consider breathing (Latin spiro; spirit)...does it require ones trust or does it force ones adaptation no matter what? Hold your breath while considering this and wait a little while...
TRUST, noun - "equal in strength"...process of dying and those living within aren't equal to one another, it's equality (inception towards death) which generates diversity (life).
g) As for who? Oneself before one another. It's one (whole) for all (partials) and all (partials) for one (self) before one another.
would getting rid of them and the "jews" really change anything?
a) Everything (inception towards death) changes each thing within (life)...oneself needs to adapt to change; while resisting the temptation of wanting constancy by holding onto things.
Others tempt one to ignore change (perceivable inspiration) for constancy (suggested information)...holding onto the latter will collapse within former aka fluid (inception towards death) destroying solid (life).
Reality (sound) changes; fiction (words) tempts one to mentally affix it...hence suggested information being labeled definition (definite; affixed).
The trick...adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIAN (from phonic; sound), while consenting to suggested definition implies DEAF PHONETICIAN.
Another example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore being "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound). All suggested words are spell-craft aka affixed labels upon a moving system, and ones consent to ignore movable (inspiration) for affixed (information) affixes it within ones mind/memory as definitions aka meaning aka settled aim aka purpose aka truth or lie aka intention aka signification etc.
b) Few (jew) are a response to many (gentile)...generation (inception towards death) generates you (life). YOU aka phonetic JEW. Chosen one implies one's choice. Elite (French élite "selection, choice") implies selected by one's choice.
If one claims self as "me; myself or I"; then all other ones are branded "you/jew". What better place for others to hide; than underneath the label you/jew aka underneath ones ignorance of self? That's the last place one who suspects others would look at...self reflection. What do the so called jews do to exploit that? Mirroring; inverting; reflecting...
The monitor in front of you represents a black-mirror; reflecting your own ignorance of perceivable (need) with suggestions by others...no matter if you want or not want them. Ones consent to watch permits others to MON'ITOR, noun - "one who warns of faults or informs of duty; one who gives advice and instruction by way of reproof or caution", which others utilize to invert.
In short...gentile (host) establishes jew (parasite); jew exploits gentile with temptations unless resisted.
Resistance (life) cannot overcome temptation (inception towards death)....only grow resistance by resisting. Resistance is fertile; following the suggested orders by others makes ones resistance infertile.
Would not someone else just step in and continue their work?
Others cannot step in unless oneself invites (consent) them (suggestion). Why? Because being implies center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable). Suggestion represents poison; consent the vector that permits others to inject it. Once injected with suggested (fiction) ones perspective within perceivable (reality) becomes clouded.
They Live shows the struggle to put the glasses on to see the fiction; in reality (perceivable) one needs to resist putting the glasses on (suggested).
Look outside..do you see land; air; water; animals; humans; grass etc? What do you see without watching the labels others suggested you? Does any other life-form utilizes symbols to navigate perceivable symmetry? Does any other life-form utilize the 7,151 recognized languages in use?
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "The world is a vampire sent (life) to drain (inception towards death)"
nazi germany
ALDI aka ALbrecht DIskont or VOKUHILA aka VOrne KUrz HInten LAng...that's how the German language abbreviates by the first two letters.
Let's apply this to NAtional SOzialist...NASO (was aber auch)...not nazi, which stems from ashke-nazi. Head of ashkenazi? Rothschild. Family name? Bauer (German; farmer).
Wanna go deeper? Deutsch aka Dutch aka Dish...like Yid-Dish. Deutschland or Yid-dish/deutsch-land?
a massive immagration policy of jewish people to get rid of ethnically homongeous societies other than thier own
a) tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka equality (same) through diversity (differences) aka united states; united nations; european union aka uniformity; university; unicode; unicef; universal basic income; universal pictures aka miscegenation; mass migration; melting pot; collectivism; multiculturalism; pluralism; dualism aka society-ism (socialism); community-ism (communism) aka democray (demos; common people + kratos; strength) aka "there comes a time, when we need to heed a certain call...when the world must come together as one" etc.
The foundation for all of this...nature sets itself apart; from whole (perceivable) into partials (perception); while those within tempt each other back together, which allows a few to remain apart.
Erecting at center (jew) while cutting off circumference (gentiles) aka circumcision. Why does it work? Because one can be tricked to ignore being center (life) within circumference (inception towards death), hence being cut off (ongoing loss) unless erecting self (temporary growth).
Example...jew erects high-rise city centers to draw gentiles in, then cut them off from downtown through suburbs towards country, where a small town boy gets drawn back by big city lights. From a farmers (Bauer) perspective...that's crop rotation and pasture management through rotational grazing for cattle.
The grass looks always greener on the other side...
either they're corrupted or brainwashed
a) Each brain (life) gets washed (inception towards death)...ignoring this corrupts self, while permitting others to exploit ones ignorance.
b) Suggested jew and gentile distracts from YOU (life) within GENERATION (inception towards death)...and once one comprehends this by discerning self, others cannot be blamed anymore for ones own ignorance.
c) Suggested pluralism (they) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self...that ignorance is being ruthlessly exploited by others suggesting pluralism towards ones consent.
DNA aka Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid. Notice what's positioned at the center of the description...nucleic aka nucleus aka "kernel; core of atom". Next; let's look at atom as well...Greek atomos aka "uncut; indivisible".
How can a core exist without a periphery; a center without surrounding; a seed without soil; a nucleus without exterior? How could anything be evident without a division between ones perception and all perceivable?
The trick here is that perception implies nucleus within perceivable exterior, and it's perceivable (whole) which divides itself into each ones perception (partials). The suggestions by others tempt one to hold onto them, which in return tempts one to ignore self as partial divided within whole.
In short...evident implies perceivable by self; evidence implies attestation; testimony by another's suggestion. The former implies reality; the latter implies fiction...if consented to.
a) ...can be hidden under ones own obliviousness to suggested THE-ism aka ones submission to the authority of another when consenting to suggested.
b) Ones consent to any suggestion permits another control over definition (idolatry); redefinition (revisionism) and contradiction (talmudic reasoning) of suggested.
c) control aka contra (against) rota (wheel) implies circular reasoning, which tempts one to ignore linear implication (if/then) aka if alive; then within process of dying, hence being moved from inception towards death aka linear progression of perception (partial) within perceivable (whole).
Reasoning about the suggestions by others tempts one into conflicts of reason...want vs not want; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief; agree vs disagree; confirm vs denial; truth vs lie; true vs false; good vs evil; have vs have not; rich vs poor; yes vs no; us vs them; me vs you; nationalism vs internationalism, capitalism vs communism; liberalism vs conservatism; black vs white; red vs blue; republican vs democrat; buy vs sell; mcdonalds vs burger king; israel vs palestine; ukraine vs russia; vaxxed vs unvaxxed; soccer vs football; christians vs moslems; faithful vs faithless; vanilla vs chocolate; coke vs pepsi; iphone vs android; pop vs rock; theater vs cinema; 0 vs 1; everything vs nothing; up vs down; left vs right; front vs back; past vs future; love vs hate and so on...
Ones consent (want or not want) to anything suggested; establishes the conflict of reason (want versus not want)...a conflict among all those who consent from either side to a suggestion by another. This in return gives suggesting few control over both sides within every conflict of reason, the consenting many fight each other over. All the above example imply revisionism of the same choice of consent aka endless different rebranding to hide the same choice made underneath all conflicts.
a) Consenting (slave) to suggested (master) establishes the roles.
b) Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies the string one attaches to self when consenting to others.
c) Religion implies refinement of mercantilism aka selling (suggested) towards buying (consent), because it permits the seller to hide underneath the authority of products from buyer.
Example: buying into the following products "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" tempts one to ignore seller (in nomine) aka those who speak in the name of the suggested products.
That's why gentiles are reasoning against one another about GOOGLE (don't be evil), instead of Sergey Brin and Larry Page (both jewish).
a) Mossad (Hebrew מוֹסָד ;mosád; institute) aka in (within) statuere (establish). Let's add "by way (perceivable) of deception (suggested) thou shall make war (reason)"...
Ones consent to suggested establishes suggested within self, hence permitting others entrance for deception, while placing self into conflicts (wars) of reason. That's where mossad operates.
b) CIA aka central intelligence agency
The suggestions by others tempt one from center (central); underneath others (intelligence) and to react to them (agency)...that's where the CIA operates.
While I'm at it...a mason of free (will of choice) uses bricks (suggestion) and mortar (consent) to build walls of ignorance within others.
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each wanderer within (life).
a) He-brew His-story to make jew fall for it...
b) Natural order (inception towards death) doesn't store...it transfers (life).
c) Consenting to suggested stories tempts one to "store" them within ones mind/memory. Consider the difference between hard-drive (accumulation until capacity) and ram (temporal accumulation under capacity).
Memory processes perceivable (inspiration) like a ram; while being tempted by suggested (information) like a hard-drive. Holding onto latter; tempts one to ignore motion of former, hence corrupting self.
...tempting one to ignore the flow of inspiration.
Being implies example (life) within current (inception towards death).
Faith implies ones consent (belief or disbelief) to the suggestions of another aka ones intelligence (understanding aka standing-under). Doing so tempts one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Example: suggested scientism tempts one to ignore SCIENCE (Latin scio; to know aka to perceive). That's how perceivable is being hidden underneath suggested, by exploiting ones consent to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
a) TALMUD (instruction) implies oneself aka IN (being within) STRUC (structured by) TION (action) aka being structured reaction (life) within foundation of action (inception towards death).
b) Brewing implies transmutation of ingredients (life) within base (inception towards death).
As solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)...transmutation implies fluid to solid (inception); solid within fluid (life) and solid to fluid (death)...perceivable alchemy; distracted from with suggested chemistry.
c) One needs to grow (life) within reality (inception towards death)...others tempt one stand-under (understand) fiction (suggestion).
d) Consider mishnah (perceivable inspiration) and gemara (suggested information)...teaching one to accept former as is, while going nuts over latter, makes them very efficient for controlling those who ignore former (perceivable inspiration) for latter (suggested information).
In short...each one exists inside talmud; jew adheres to mishnah; gentile ignores this for gemara.
a) Being implies in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death) aka "durante vita".
b) Suggested (information) tempts one to ignore perceivable (inspiration)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter cannot be held onto, only adapted to.
c) Reality (inspiration) or fiction (information) aka need to resist wanted temptation.
d) Trusting suggested (holding onto) tempts one to ignore being (life) thrusted (inception towards death) within perceivable. No matter what life holds onto; it's going to die. Living is about building resistance while being tempted to ignore that through the process of dying.
e) Consider...bank & trust. Others suggest currency (information) to distract from perceivable current (inspiration), which when consented to (trust); permits others control (bank).
Ones creed (trust) transformed into another's credit (bank)...
f) Consider breathing (Latin spiro; spirit)...does it require ones trust or does it force ones adaptation no matter what? Hold your breath while considering this and wait a little while...
TRUST, noun - "equal in strength"...process of dying and those living within aren't equal to one another, it's equality (inception towards death) which generates diversity (life).
g) As for who? Oneself before one another. It's one (whole) for all (partials) and all (partials) for one (self) before one another.
a) Everything (inception towards death) changes each thing within (life)...oneself needs to adapt to change; while resisting the temptation of wanting constancy by holding onto things.
Others tempt one to ignore change (perceivable inspiration) for constancy (suggested information)...holding onto the latter will collapse within former aka fluid (inception towards death) destroying solid (life).
Reality (sound) changes; fiction (words) tempts one to mentally affix it...hence suggested information being labeled definition (definite; affixed).
The trick...adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIAN (from phonic; sound), while consenting to suggested definition implies DEAF PHONETICIAN.
Another example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore being "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound). All suggested words are spell-craft aka affixed labels upon a moving system, and ones consent to ignore movable (inspiration) for affixed (information) affixes it within ones mind/memory as definitions aka meaning aka settled aim aka purpose aka truth or lie aka intention aka signification etc.
b) Few (jew) are a response to many (gentile)...generation (inception towards death) generates you (life). YOU aka phonetic JEW. Chosen one implies one's choice. Elite (French élite "selection, choice") implies selected by one's choice.
If one claims self as "me; myself or I"; then all other ones are branded "you/jew". What better place for others to hide; than underneath the label you/jew aka underneath ones ignorance of self? That's the last place one who suspects others would look at...self reflection. What do the so called jews do to exploit that? Mirroring; inverting; reflecting...
The monitor in front of you represents a black-mirror; reflecting your own ignorance of perceivable (need) with suggestions by others...no matter if you want or not want them. Ones consent to watch permits others to MON'ITOR, noun - "one who warns of faults or informs of duty; one who gives advice and instruction by way of reproof or caution", which others utilize to invert.
In short...gentile (host) establishes jew (parasite); jew exploits gentile with temptations unless resisted.
Resistance (life) cannot overcome temptation (inception towards death)....only grow resistance by resisting. Resistance is fertile; following the suggested orders by others makes ones resistance infertile.
Others cannot step in unless oneself invites (consent) them (suggestion). Why? Because being implies center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable). Suggestion represents poison; consent the vector that permits others to inject it. Once injected with suggested (fiction) ones perspective within perceivable (reality) becomes clouded.
They Live shows the struggle to put the glasses on to see the fiction; in reality (perceivable) one needs to resist putting the glasses on (suggested).
Look outside..do you see land; air; water; animals; humans; grass etc? What do you see without watching the labels others suggested you? Does any other life-form utilizes symbols to navigate perceivable symmetry? Does any other life-form utilize the 7,151 recognized languages in use?
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "The world is a vampire sent (life) to drain (inception towards death)"
ALDI aka ALbrecht DIskont or VOKUHILA aka VOrne KUrz HInten LAng...that's how the German language abbreviates by the first two letters.
Let's apply this to NAtional SOzialist...NASO (was aber auch)...not nazi, which stems from ashke-nazi. Head of ashkenazi? Rothschild. Family name? Bauer (German; farmer).
Wanna go deeper? Deutsch aka Dutch aka Dish...like Yid-Dish. Deutschland or Yid-dish/deutsch-land?
a) tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka equality (same) through diversity (differences) aka united states; united nations; european union aka uniformity; university; unicode; unicef; universal basic income; universal pictures aka miscegenation; mass migration; melting pot; collectivism; multiculturalism; pluralism; dualism aka society-ism (socialism); community-ism (communism) aka democray (demos; common people + kratos; strength) aka "there comes a time, when we need to heed a certain call...when the world must come together as one" etc.
The foundation for all of this...nature sets itself apart; from whole (perceivable) into partials (perception); while those within tempt each other back together, which allows a few to remain apart.
Erecting at center (jew) while cutting off circumference (gentiles) aka circumcision. Why does it work? Because one can be tricked to ignore being center (life) within circumference (inception towards death), hence being cut off (ongoing loss) unless erecting self (temporary growth).
Example...jew erects high-rise city centers to draw gentiles in, then cut them off from downtown through suburbs towards country, where a small town boy gets drawn back by big city lights. From a farmers (Bauer) perspective...that's crop rotation and pasture management through rotational grazing for cattle.
The grass looks always greener on the other side...
a) Each brain (life) gets washed (inception towards death)...ignoring this corrupts self, while permitting others to exploit ones ignorance.
b) Suggested jew and gentile distracts from YOU (life) within GENERATION (inception towards death)...and once one comprehends this by discerning self, others cannot be blamed anymore for ones own ignorance.
c) Suggested pluralism (they) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self...that ignorance is being ruthlessly exploited by others suggesting pluralism towards ones consent.