▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Being implies in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death)...others suggest in the name of alpha to tempt one towards omega, hence leading cattle towards slaughter.

your local hometown

Whatever town or home one resides within implies the circumference of ones local being, hence one needing to locally shelter from circumference.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

You built...on fundamentally....No wonder you don’t understand.

Does standing under inhibits ones growth on/within/from foundation?

fundamentally incorrect

a) Can the foundation (all perceivable) of existence (ones perception) be fundamentally incorrect?

b) What if foundation (inception towards death) corrects anything build within (life)...no matter how incorrect those within are building?

c) What if natural order (loss) corrects any erroneous chaos within (growth)?

d) Why is it called a departed mind (department) of corrections and why are the few "correcting" the departed minds of many by locking them up together?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

religion

Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies ones consent to anything suggested by another. All those who consent are being deceived to view the suggested as religion, while ignoring the mercantile contract underneath aka buy (consent) and sell (suggestion).

Why such a deception? Suggestion (information; fiction) tempts one to ignore Perception (inspiration; reality), while ones consent is permitting others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.

reason

Consenting to suggested implies both sides aka want or not want; agree or disagree; belief or disbelief; consent or denial...this is what shapes conflicts of reason (want versus not want; agree vs disagree etc.).

Those conflicts of reason not only keep many fighting each other over suggestions by few; it also permits few control over both sides of every conflict of reason and the opportunity to rebrand the sides at will into for example...true vs false; yes vs no; good vs evil; rich vs poor; left vs right; black vs white; democrat vs republican, trump vs hillary; vaxxed vs unvaxxed; russia vs ukraine; soccer vs football; sega vs nintendo; vanilla vs chocolate; big mac vs whopper; us vs them, you vs me; jews vs gentiles; have vs have not and so on.

Reason (imbalance) tempts one to ignore implication (balance)...so instead of participating in any of the versus conflicts, try utilizing if/then instead.

From a different perspective...choice can only exist within balance, hence in-between sides (need/want). Others suggest sides (want vs not want) to tempt choice off-center.

Suggested want (appetite) tempts one to hold onto; while perceivable need (hunger) can't be held onto. Being implies need to resist wanted temptations...reasoning (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore need.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Common from root KA (together) MOI (change; move)

b) E pluribus unum (out of many; one) implies communism (moving together)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_pluribus_unum

c) Great Seal aka SEAL; verb - "binding; joining together".

d) Consenting to suggested "conceals" perceivable from one...that's the greatest seal there can be.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

mind reading artificial intelligence

a) Only within natural (sound) can there be artificial (word).

b) Consenting to suggested (artifice) permits others to define; redefine and contradict it aka to craft the spelling thereof aka to write spells.

c) Mind/memory implies processing of natural (inspiration) or storage of artificial (information)...depending on ones free will of choice.

d) Intelligence aka understanding implies "standing under" another, hence consent (slave) standing under suggested (master) aka master-slave protocol. Slaves permit master to read and write.

Slave (one's choice) establishes Master (chosen one).

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

how TPTB shutting down the internet

Only oneself can shut down the internal net, by resisting the temptation to permit others to spin webs of suggested information within ones consenting mind/memory. A spider/spinner requires boundaries to weave within, and ones memory in a state of ignorance implies a dark place for setting up webs for entrapment (trapping mind).

Ones consent permits others to pull the strings of suggested information; while ones want for more suggested information implies being strung out aka physically debilitated, while mentally entrapped.

Sleight of hand: "You spin my head right round, right round...like a record (memory; call to mind) baby..."

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Consider S(alt)OIL aka salt (male; motion) to oil (female; momentum) to seed (anointed trans-form).

Poison aka poise (balance; equilibrium) aka balance (inception/death) of substance (life)...if one chooses suggested money, one permits chosen ones ownership over self, hence M-ONE-Y (my one).

Balance can only exist within motion aka current; holding onto suggested currency imbalances free will of choice at the center of balance.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

These Dutch were like a main circuit cable in Colonial America

a) Look into The House of Fugger... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family (The last name was originally spelled "Fucker"...)

b) America aka the western branch of the East India Company... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_East_India_Company#/media/File:Flag_of_the_British_East_India_Company_(1801).svg

c) Dutch United East India Company aka Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie (OVC) worked the England to Great Britain to the United Kingdom transformation (The Crown as jurisprudence over commonwealth realms) as a front.

d) Deutsch aka Dutch aka Dish...yid-dish.

Monsanto means Holy Mountain

MON (mono; one) SANTO (saint; holy; whole). Only within whole (inception towards death) can one (life) rise.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Mythology aka Myth (fable; fari; to speak; tell) + Logy (logic; reason; logos; word)

Within a system where one perceives sound, each suggested word implies a fable; a fiction; a myth. Consenting to any suggested word establishes a conflict of reason, hence true vs false; belief vs disbelief or like here black vs white.

b) Black implies "absence of light" + White implies "pure light"...being able to perceive colors implies within the spectrum of visible light, hence in-between black/white.

c) People of color implies hue (color) man aka visible form within animating flow of sound/light.

d) Others suggest colorism to tempt ones within the visible spectrum of light into a conflict of reason (black vs white), hence tempting center (color) towards surrounding sides (black or white).

black oppressed by white

a) Bright (white) oppresses (overpowers; overburdens; presses through) dark (black).

b) If motion to momentum to matter; then light generates its own obfuscation. Light goes through being; while being obfuscates light unless resisted.

Others tempt being with affinity (agreement; relation; conformity; resemblance; connection) to ignore repugnance (resistance), which implies the alchemical process of crystallization.

Crystal implies stall (to fix) cry (extol; rise), hence impeding growth potential, and stall also implies a stable for cattle.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Commercial aka commerce aka buy (consent) and sell (suggestion)...merchants tempt consumption; being implies resisting (life) consumption (inception towards death).

b) Mutt; mud (Sanskrit mutra; urine + Avestan; excrement) aka mudding (life) the waters (inception towards death), hence the living being relieving self.

ESG aka environmental, social and corporate governance

a) Suggestions by others surround (environ) ones mind (ment) hence tempting one to consent.

b) Suggested social-ism (togetherness) tempts one (singular) to ignore being apart from one another.

c) Suggested corporate-ism (corpus oration; voice of death) implies suggested (words) over perceivable (sound). One lives within sound, others tempt one to incorporate self by consenting to suggested words aka spell-craft. Words imply self imposed debt/death.

d) Consent to suggested permits control (governance) over suggested onto another, while submitting self.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

a staged humiliation ritual to bookend the george floyd humiliation ritual

"Laying Ash to American Culture and Society" (ashley babbitt) + "I can't breathe leads to death" (george floyd) followed by "put a mask over your nose and mouth" aka spiritual (Latin spiro; to breathe) warfare.

Deeper than this...GEORGE (ge/gaia/earth+ ergon/work) FLOYD (lloyd; grey/gray; in-between black and white) aka to soil visible spectrum of light in-between pure light (white) and absence of light (black).

How? E pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of mutlitude) aka equality (same) through diversity (difference) aka united states; united nations; european (you are peon/pawn) union aka multiculturalism; mass migration; miscegenation; melting pot etc.

▲ 7 ▼
free-will-of-choice 7 points ago +7 / -0

a) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babbitt_(novel) ... "a satirical novel about American culture and society that critiques the vacuity of middle class life and the social pressure toward conformity"

b) Ashley Babbbitt aka Laying Ash to American Culture and Society.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are you like this?

Resisting suggested likeness distincts self from others, hence allowing discretion aka self discernment.

Consenting to suggested likeness amalgamates consenting many under suggesting few aka e pluribus unum (ouf of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together).

Ask yourself why social media suggests like vs dislike buttons, and that only resisting to press either allows distinction of self from others...

Second person

Person aka PER (by) SONOS (sound) implies a division (Latin seco; to divide).

Suggested second person temps ONE (singular) to ignore being "seco per sonos" for counting others (plural).

pronoun

PRO (forwards) NOUN (name)...nature doesn't put names forwards, it designates units (Latin unus; one) by setting each one apart from one another.

To defend oneself from spell-craft try resisting both noun (a name; word that denotes a thing) and adjective (word used to qualify, limit, or define a noun) and only focus on verbs (denoting action).

Both nouns and adjectives tempts one to hold onto definitions, which distracts one from being (life) within motion (inception towards death).

accusative tense

Blaming others (accuse) implies shirking response-ability (choice) onto others. This tempts one to ignore being set loose (life) within tense (inception towards death)...a stretch of life.

similar

Same (inception towards death) differentiates (life)...others suggest similarities among difference aka equality through diversity to distract one from this.

example

AMPLE (inception towards death) EX-pressions (life)...suggested examples tempt one to ignore that.

ZyklonShower

LICE/LIES...spell-craft excellence. Let's go deeper...zyklon b aka ZY (zygote; to join) KLON (clone; imitating another) B (be) aka shape-shifting.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's ones free will of choice to ignore everything perceivable AND anything suggested, but ignorance distracts from acquaintance aka "personal knowledge".

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm just going to be honest with you.

Honest aka HONE (cast stones at) EST (that is)...

What about stone aka ST (saint; holy; whole) ONE (single unit)?

Honest implies whole casting (forming within a mold) partials, and how does whole (motion) form (matter) within a mold (momentum)? By DIS- (setting apart) HONEST aka setting itself apart. Being implies not just partial within whole, and one unit apart from other units, but also department aka separated partial mind/memory...others suggest department stores to store suggested information within ones mind/memory.

This is just a tiny glimpse of how spell-craft operates underneath each and every suggested word; number; letter etc. which is being ignored by a majority reasoning against one another aka honest vs dishonest; true vs false; truth vs lies; agree vs disagree, upvote vs downvote etc.

Your notion of writing everything

Everything implies motion (inception towards death)...each one thing within is being distracted with suggested writing (typecast) to hold onto written notions (suggested idealism) while ignoring being within perceivable momentum of motion.

Motion implies MO (more; growth) within TION (action; loss), hence action (incpetion towards death) generating more reactions (life).

blah blah

a) Many suggest "blah, blah" to devalue each others idle talk aka IDLE (empty, void; vain; worthless, useless); meanwhile few comprehend being reactive (life) within active (inception towards death), which opens up an opportunity to exploit idle behavior among many.

b) How is it that many use "blah; blah" against one another, while simultaneously worshiping (218M views) a few suggesting "bla; bla; bla" to them? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hrph2EW9VjY

Look at the vid...temporary form shaped within ongoing flow aka life on-line.

c) Value (perceivable) generates evaluation (perception)...suggestion only tempts to devalue each other.

one; two; three...

There can be only one aka one for all and all for one. If energy implies one; then whats two? Energy and what else? Can you show me two things not apart from ONE another?

is extremely annoying

Extreme implies outermost; being implies innermost. Others suggest sides within conflicts of reason (imbalance) to distract one from discerning self as center (choice) of surrounding (balance).

If choice ignores balance; then imbalance harms (anoien, annuien; to harm, hurt, injure) choice.

schizophrenic to a certain degree

Division implies degree aka stage of progress aka movement towards end. Others suggest Ol' Reliable aka CERTAIN (determined, fixed; reliable; sure; assured) to distract one from being divided (schizo) frantic/phrenetic (insane aka in sanus; within sound).

How could one hear surrounding without being divided within sound?

Branding each other "schizophrenic" represents a deception under the umbrella of psychology aka utilizing LOGY (logic; reasoning over affixed) to distract from PSYCHE (animating power).

Also; the jew coining schizoid; schizophrenia; autism etc. (Eugene Bleuler) and the jewish "father of psychoanalysis" (Sigismund Schlomo Freud) conspired with one another to conquer psychiatry (erobern die Psychatrie)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg

When I see posts like this, my brain switches off immediately

a) Your consent to suggested posts establishes those suggesting them as the media; medius; middle, which in return corrupts your position as center of perceivable surrounding. You are being tempted off-balance, and your choice willingly takes that plunge.

b) Switch implies being lashed by a switch/witch aka witchcraft aka switching one thing (perception) for another (suggestion).

c) As for brain/rain...perceivable inspiration irrigates; suggested information drenches. Memory/mind needs to let go of perceivable, while resisting wanting to hold onto suggested.

I know immediately that they are not good quality posts

Reasoning (good vs bad) about suggested nihilism (not) tempts one to ignore knowledge (perceivable).

written by someone with a mental disability or a robot

Mind/memory (mental) implies being enabled (ability) through separation (dis) of input (perceivable) into mental matter (perception).

Discerning the above implies ROBOT (robur; strength; vigor; moral resistance etc.)

This is not how normal people write

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXED2AVlbR0 ...that's NORM aka where everybody knows your name aka conditioned domestication of many to standardized behavioral patterns as suggested by few.

Norm is also an accountant aka one skilled in mercantile accounts aka one charged by others to keep accounts aka keeping the debt; credit/creed of others.

Norm (Greek gnōmōn) - "carpenter's square" keeping accounts of all those within circumference (compass) aka square & compass aka freemasonry.

Sleight of hand from Rage against the Machine: "Keepin' the mic warm against the norm...'Cause what does it offer me?...I think often it's nothin' but a coffin".

to structure everything into lists

a) Taking apart that which others structure together. Why? Because natural order (inception towards death) sets apart (life).

b) Viewing something as lists (enumeration) implies ignoring self (one apart from one another), hence lacking self discernment.

answer questions with simply more questions

Suggested questions and answers tempt one to ignore being (life) within solution (inception towards death), hence struggling to grow while being dissolved within loss.

contribute very little

a) TRIBUTE; noun - "stated sum of money or other valuable consideration paid by one ruler or country to another in acknowledgment of submission or as the price of peace or protection"

All contributions by many pay into the protection racket of few, while confirming each consenting ones submission to chosen ones.

Meanwhile...About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0); Comment Score (11147). I ain't postin' any tributes to others.

b) Nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception)...the suggestions by others tempt one into self inflicted tribulations (oppression, suffering, distress).

c) VERY; adjective - "real; actual" aka perceivable reality, not suggested fiction.

Your posts are highly annoying

About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0); Comment Score (11147)...imaging being annoyed by a lack of something, while blaming others for it.

You merely reply to people's statements and questions with increasingly cryptic and vague questions and statements of your own.

a) Drawing inspiration from perceivable through others grows ones discernment of self and comprehension within all...unless ignored.

b) Suggested information conceals (cryptic) perceivable inspiration...if one consents to ignore latter for former.

c) When you call me a schizo, then that implies me taking things apart aka dividing aka specifying...that's the opposite of vague. I go into details aka putting attention into particulars, while describing whole.

If one chooses to ignore perceivable for suggested; then perceivable remains vague aka on the perimeter of ones focus.

a blanket statement

Consenting to suggested permits others to blanket ones state of mind with suggestions.

eyesore

Another spell-craft example...EYE (I) SORE (suffering, sick, ill)...a statement of self misdirected against other.

being blocked

Others suggest obstructions (to block) to distract one from being "free" will of choice, hence instructed aka an instrument within sound.

Instead of blocking others...try unlocking self.

I'm just giving you this advice freely

Advise (opinion offered as worthy to be followed) implies suggested progressivism aka tempting others to follow towards outcomes. Being "free" will of choice implies as resistance (life) within origin (inception towards death).

Why would one follow AD (advertisement) VICE (fault, failing, defect, irregularity, misdemeanor) instead of resisting the temptation thereof?

understand, that the way you write makes it EXTREMELY hard to understand

Understand implies to stand under aka ones submission (consent) to another (suggestion). One needs to resist standing under others, which only then allows growing of self discernment, while compressing (comprehension) within impressing (inspiration).

Free will of choice implies local (choice) in-between extremes (balance). Why do you think few utilize foreign extremes to destabilize many locals? Why are few erecting at center, while cutting of many from their circumference (circumcision)?

How about standing up instead of standing under (understanding)?

I hope you find

Hope implies towards suggested outcomes; find implies ignoring being within perceivable foundation.

thanks

Thanks for inspiration.

Bonus:

AllWarsAreBankerWars...currency is being suggested; consenting to it banks ones trust, while tempting one into a conflict (war) of reason (poor vs rich) against other ones.

All wars are within ones mind/memory, which permits others to stage theaters of war, while controlling both sides of every conflict.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was never and will never be his name.

a) Being implies will (free will of choice) within was (dominance of balance), since only if balance was, can choice be.

b) Others suggest nihilism (never aka nothing ever) to tempt being to grow self discernment within perceivable origin. Consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable, and ignoring perceivable implies ones free will of choice to deny (de-nihilo), hence choosing to be a nihilist.

c) Denoting by words aka naming implies Latin denotare - "marking out". Perceivable sound doesn't mark out; it sets units apart from one another within, hence as instruments within sound.

No other life-form requires anything perceivable to be denoted/named by suggestions from others. Why is the domestication of other life-forms most often based on naming them before suggesting further orders to follow? Why is the domestication/civilization of humans based on identification (affixed brands) of many by a few with endlessly changing names?

Notice further that branding draws closer, hence the emotional attachment when slaughtering "Babe" as opposed to a pig. This implies emotional manipulation...one of the main tools of population control.

Notice that chosen few established a brand "jew" which offers protection from many...a brand few among many dare not to use, as to not offend chosen few. Phonetically; jew implies you, so how funny is it to trick a ME with a YOU to ignore one's choice for chosen ones?

This trick only works because of the idolatry of nouns (names), with added adjectives (word used to qualify, limit, or define a noun) to distract from verbs.

https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=verb ... "express action" + "word of God"...sound (action) expresses instruments (reactions); instruments tempt each other with suggested words to distract from perceivable sound.

d) Notice that one cannot suggest "this" without "his" being implied...just like sHE; feMALE; woMAN.

Read and learn

Free will of choice.

Lonely pilgrim

a) Only among other ones can one wander (pilgrim; Latin peragro).

b) Foundation of being implies alone aka ALL (partials) within ONE (whole).

c) Lone/Loan...ongoing (inception towards death) loans temporary (life), hence alone (all in one). To loan implies to leave, hence being alive implying ones temporary leave of absence into presence.

fallacy

Others suggest syllogism (deceptive argumentation) within the confines of suggested logism (reasoning about suggested words) to distract from being RISE (life) within FALL (inception towards death). Only rise can CY A FALL...

Hebrew roots

a) He brew his story to trick jew/you to fall for it.

b) Root implies radius, aka growth of local (life) within circumference (inception towards death)...choosing to hold onto a name impedes ones growth, while permitting circumference to define (affix) one.

St. Paul himself tells us, in fact...

Well, if Saul said it...

Posted on November 19, 2014

2014 years of reasoning about a name...2024 and the conflict still goes on. Meanwhile...NAME (nombre; number) - "designation of a unit" aka UNIT (unitas; unus; one).

Sounds like you've been caught by the Hebrew Roots Movement trap.

Being implies ment (mind/memory) moved within sound, hence instrument aka mind structured within...ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words implies self entrapment, hence holding onto a definition implies capturing it within ones mind/memory, while permitting others to shape it.

In short...instead of reasoning about names of others, why not consider ones own existence before one was branded by others with a name? Who has more control over a name...oneself or others?

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Understand the Basics

a) Consenting to stand under suggested the-ism tempts one to ignore perceivable base.

b) If one stands under; then what does one stand on?

c) Consent debases self by placing self under another.

d) Consenting to be based positions others onto apex, which tempts one to ignore being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death). Loss implies lowest position (base); hence any growth within implying an apex position.

e) Only within an ongoing bottom (current) can there be temporary tops (discharges).

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) If Jesus aka anointed one implies oneself (anointed through birth); then one can be both lamb of God (light brought forward) and lion of judah (ignoring light for jewish lies)...

b) What if others suggest cool names to distract from brand-awareness aka name/brand/hot?

c) Instead of adding cool names to something; why not consider origin of suggested name?

  • Hebrew Yeshua
  • Greek Iesous
  • Latin Iesus
  • Syriac Yeshua
  • Arabic Yasu

Who would sneak a J in there? Nobody nose...

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Permitting others the right to copy (suggested) tempts one to ignore origin (perceivable)...hence all the fakery/forgery.

to believe the story they sold

a) Why did you use "believe" instead of "buy into" when what you describe is being sold?

b) When is believing not buying into (ones consent) what others are selling (suggested by another)?

c) What if consenting to a suggested story stores it within ones mind/memory?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) To sign a letter implies letting another control a token aka something (suggested) intended to represent or indicate another thing (perceivable).

b) Letters tempts letting aka LET, verb (Latin elocare) - "to lease; to permit; to allow; to suffer"

c) A suggested SIGNAL; noun - "visible sign, indication; identifying mark" tempts one to ignore that nature differentiates expressions within identifying (same) mark (impression).

Inception towards death impresses living expressions aka same loss generating different growth.

d) Expert aka EX (out of) PER (by) aka ones perception out of and by all perceivable. Suggestions by others tempt one to ignore what comes out of perceivable.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

If, within a moving system, one consents to hold onto a suggestion by others, then one permits others to dilate; accelerate or bend the suggested at will.

can't even agree

How could "even" agree when "odds" are implied?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

civil war

a) Suggested civil (common) tempts one to ignore being (unique); while suggested war (imbalance) tempts one to ignore being one piece/peace (choice) within whole (balance).

b) Consenting (want or not want) to suggested tempts one into a conflict (war) of reason (want versus not want); while permitting others to redefine the sides into for example north vs south; blue vs red; union vs confederacy; us vs them etc.

Choice can only exist at the center (life) of balance (inception/death), so choosing any suggested side imbalances choice.

In short: one's choice (consent) elects chosen ones (suggestion).

really about

a) Suggested whataboutism (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality).

b) Opposite of about implies directly, hence being (life) directed (inception towards death)...

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

biometric

METRIC; noun - "science of versification", from Greek metrikē - "prosody" aka PRO (forwards) ODE (song; vocal uttering)...that implies life (bio) being enchanted (metric) with suggested (words) over perceivable (sound).

tracking

Consent given to suggested implies marking self for tracking by others. Perceivable sets perception free; suggestion ensnares perception.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›