US Debt Hits A Record $34.001 Trillion
(www.zerohedge.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
a) Being implies will (free will of choice) within was (dominance of balance), since only if balance was, can choice be.
b) Others suggest nihilism (never aka nothing ever) to tempt being to grow self discernment within perceivable origin. Consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable, and ignoring perceivable implies ones free will of choice to deny (de-nihilo), hence choosing to be a nihilist.
c) Denoting by words aka naming implies Latin denotare - "marking out". Perceivable sound doesn't mark out; it sets units apart from one another within, hence as instruments within sound.
No other life-form requires anything perceivable to be denoted/named by suggestions from others. Why is the domestication of other life-forms most often based on naming them before suggesting further orders to follow? Why is the domestication/civilization of humans based on identification (affixed brands) of many by a few with endlessly changing names?
Notice further that branding draws closer, hence the emotional attachment when slaughtering "Babe" as opposed to a pig. This implies emotional manipulation...one of the main tools of population control.
Notice that chosen few established a brand "jew" which offers protection from many...a brand few among many dare not to use, as to not offend chosen few. Phonetically; jew implies you, so how funny is it to trick a ME with a YOU to ignore one's choice for chosen ones?
This trick only works because of the idolatry of nouns (names), with added adjectives (word used to qualify, limit, or define a noun) to distract from verbs.
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=verb ... "express action" + "word of God"...sound (action) expresses instruments (reactions); instruments tempt each other with suggested words to distract from perceivable sound.
d) Notice that one cannot suggest "this" without "his" being implied...just like sHE; feMALE; woMAN.
Free will of choice.
a) Only among other ones can one wander (pilgrim; Latin peragro).
b) Foundation of being implies alone aka ALL (partials) within ONE (whole).
c) Lone/Loan...ongoing (inception towards death) loans temporary (life), hence alone (all in one). To loan implies to leave, hence being alive implying ones temporary leave of absence into presence.
Others suggest syllogism (deceptive argumentation) within the confines of suggested logism (reasoning about suggested words) to distract from being RISE (life) within FALL (inception towards death). Only rise can CY A FALL...
a) He brew his story to trick jew/you to fall for it.
b) Root implies radius, aka growth of local (life) within circumference (inception towards death)...choosing to hold onto a name impedes ones growth, while permitting circumference to define (affix) one.
Well, if Saul said it...
2014 years of reasoning about a name...2024 and the conflict still goes on. Meanwhile...NAME (nombre; number) - "designation of a unit" aka UNIT (unitas; unus; one).
Being implies ment (mind/memory) moved within sound, hence instrument aka mind structured within...ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words implies self entrapment, hence holding onto a definition implies capturing it within ones mind/memory, while permitting others to shape it.
In short...instead of reasoning about names of others, why not consider ones own existence before one was branded by others with a name? Who has more control over a name...oneself or others?
It's ones free will of choice to ignore everything perceivable AND anything suggested, but ignorance distracts from acquaintance aka "personal knowledge".