What is reality?
That which was perceivable before one can suggest to another what it is. One cannot suggest what is without tempting others to ignore what was.
Every form of dating is retarded pseudo science. only the math pens out.
a) Counting establishes accountants...others suggest one to count, as to gain permission over a registry of a debt or credit. Ones consent implies the credit/creed; what one consents to becomes ones debt to another.
b) MATH, noun - "a mowing; as in aftermath"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/math
Suggested math establishes an aftermath; based on counting others. Perceivable COUNT, verb - "to number; to tell one by one" implies addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for offspring) and division (being one apart from one another; within whole).
Nature designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one)...other ones (chosen ones) tempt one to count units.
c) Suggested date tempts one to ignore that perceivable DATE; noun "duration" implies oneself as durable (life) within action (inception towards death). Holding onto any dates reduces ones duration.
how animals and humans came to be
HU'MAN, adjective (Latin humanus; Heb. form, species) implies AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul) aka coming to be within (life) animation (inception towards death).
Holding onto the suggested words "human" and "animal" tempts one to ignore the hue (color) of men within animation aka the visible spectrum of light from ones sight within.
a) AI (artificial intelligence)...intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies the consenting viewers, while the shiny happy people shown imply the artificial suggestion by another.
AI aka viewers standing under showers.
b) Gustavo Fring is being shown as a two-faced character (fast food business + narcotics trafficking), hence him dying with only half a face. In reality...fast food implies narcotine aka opium for the masses.
c) TECHNOL'OGY, noun (Greek; art, word or discourse) implies any suggested word within perceivable sound aka anything suggested by another aka anything spoken into existence (fiat-currency).
Latin FIAT - "let it be done" implies ones consent LETTING the suggestions by another be done.
d) Whatever is shown on any any screen is irrelevant...only ones consent to focus ones sight within perceivable nature onto the suggested artifice by others is affecting matter.
SCREEN; verb - "to shield from punishment, protect from inconvenience or danger; to conceal"...being implies revealed (life) within danger (inception towards death); which one ignores when watching any screen.
J(ames)OKE(efe)...
JOKE, noun (Latin jocus) - "an illusion; something not real, or to no purpose"...In joke in jest; for the sake of raising a laugh; not in earnest.
Islamists dance around a black cube
a) -ist implies ones consent to a suggested -ism, hence Islam (submission).
b) Being implies in-between left/right + front/back + up/down aka within a cube aka CUE (to stand in line) BE (being) aka being (life) standing in line (inception towards death).
c) If being ignores self for others; then ignorance shrouds being (cube) in the absence of light (black).
d) Ignoring perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information) tempts one into conflicts of reason aka circular reasoning. One who suggests circular reasoning to others is called a kike; kikel; circle.
e) Kaaba aka cabbala aka quibbel (to receive, admit, accept) implies the one within cube being tempted to quibbel the suggestions from those outside.
f) Mecca aka mahrab aka sanctuary (Latin sanctus; holy) implies the perceivable whole/holy for each perceiving partial within.
Others suggest hegira (departure) and hajj (gathering) to de-part partials within whole by gathering many under suggestions of few.
Hidden away as a side
a) Being implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...others tempt one with suggested sides to off-center self, when consenting to hold onto a side within a conflict of reason.
b) Hidden (concealed within oneself) knowledge (all perceivable) implies oneself choosing to hide from perceivable (inspiration), while permitting others to conceal with suggested (information). Holding onto information implies hiding self from moving inspiration.
original texts
Latin textus (woven) implies uniting anything flexible together; hence reducing flexibility. Meanwhile...origin (inception towards death) generates flexibility (life).
"Because it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread"...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He1TntAK2fs
go to sources
a) Towards (to) implies a single source (motion), hence each life within being moved from inception towards death.
b) That which sets apart is the source of weaving together (text).
c) Notice that religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies binding together, and that before religion, there was mystic/mist/misceo (to mix).
Before anything can be mixed and bound together; it has to be set apart, hence being implies one apart from one another.
don't know
Knowledge implies everything perceivable by each one within...others suggest nothing (don't) as the inversion thereof. This implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting consensual de-nial of perceivable.
this murderous gang...
Jeffrey David Sachs. His family is jewish.
Sons of SIMP (Latin simplex; single; unmixed)...shown to the masses on mass media.
Slavs real root is from Słowo (the Word) or Slava (the Glory), not from "slave".
The root of word implies sound; and the root of glory (bright) implies light...consenting to suggested; while ignoring perceivable; shapes oneself into the slave and another into ones master.
Also, ROOT, noun (Latin radix; radius) implies from oneself (seed) outwards (soil)...consenting to be part of a slavic people (an aggregate suggested by another) reduces ones radius.
jewish bot
L’chaim (to life)...
Weda" sounds familiar to "Wiedza". in english: KNOWLEDGE
Knowledge implies perceivable...others utilize suggested (word) to distract from perceivable (sound).
Sound sets itself apart...from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perception). Others suggest the inversion thereof as coming together aka "to familiarize" aka "we are family; brothers and my sisters and me". Those who consent to be part of a family ignore being partial within whole.
From a different perspective...sound implies same; each instrument within implies difference. Others suggest words sounding alike/familiar to distract different instruments from same origin of sound.
Only within perceivable sound can suggestible words be shaped, and ones consent to another ones suggestion implies a putting together (fiction) of what nature sets apart (reality).
Trying to reverse engineer suggested languages to their origin; tempts one to ignore the ongoing sound underneath each temporary word shaped. Try humming continuously; while shaping letters until you realize the fiction of letters. Notice that you run out of breath while humming; and that you're forced to inhale aka to let in the ongoing natural order, which you then resist by exhaling. This force implies the origin of sound; not the words shaped within to describe it.
It's called "letter"; because ones consent "lets" another one shape natural sound into articulated words.
there's a pattern here
a) Pattern implies outline; being implies within (life) line (inception towards death). Focusing one suggested outline tempts one to ignore being inline.
b) Pattern as "a part showing the figure or quality of the whole" tempts one to ignore being partial (perception) within whole (perceivable); while permitting others to show (suggestion) fictitious qualities.
ha-plo-group
Aka one folded together...being implies ones (partials) set apart from one another within whole.
tl; dr...FAMILIAR; adjective - "the slaves"...there's your slavic connection. https://www.etymonline.com/word/familiar#etymonline_v_1106
CLAIM, verb - "to call for; to ask or seek to obtain, by virtue of authority" aka a suggestion tempting ones consent. Choosing to go against that implies a "permissive counterclaim", hence giving permission to the claim.
too much knowledge
Knowledge implies perceivable inspiration...something one cannot hold onto. Others suggest information under the name of "knowledge" to tempt one to hold onto it. That's where too much becomes a self inflicted burden.
In short...excess (wanted information) corrupts access (perceivable inspiration).
see if you can...stretch intellect
IN'TELLECT, noun (Latin intelligo, to understand)...standing under implies repressing self by holding onto suggested; hence ignoring to draw out (stretch) inspiration from knowledge (perceivable).
Knowledge inspires stretching; intellect tempts repression of self and suppression by another.
What do the human philosophical elite think, believe and based on what do they act
a) Nature acts; those within can only react, hence ELITE (French élite) - "selection, choice"...
b) If many ignore to react to perceivable; then a suggesting few are permitted to react at will to mass ignorance.
How they see themselves as separate from 99% of the humanity
If many consent to what few suggest; then few remain apart from an aggregated many.
How Religions are control narratives for emotionally bound NPCs (90% of population)
RELGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...nature sets each ones free will of choice apart from one another; choosing to ignore this by consenting to the suggested choices of others BINDS ones FREE will of choice underneath a chosen ones suggestion.
How the elite have killed "god" and want to become as "god"
If "god" gave choice to each one; the selecting (elite) any chosen ones contradicts one's choice.
Few suggest the label "chosen ones" to distract each one of many from "one's choice"...consenting to that label permits few to suggest in the name of (in nomine) for example patris et filii et spiritus sancti.
Labels aren't attached to nature; unless those within nature choose to hold onto artificial labels.
And how....are their pathways
Only one way/path (inception towards death) for each wanderer (life)...ones consent to any suggested pathways narrows ones transform/exchange/walk/wander.
How the human layer is influenced...
Fluid (inception towards death) sets solids (life) apart from one another. Others tempt solids to hold onto each other; which establishes layers.
Masons of free (will of choice) utilize suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within ones mind/memory. These bricks are layered upon each other...
how all of this will result...
If will responds (re) to pass over (sult) perceivable origin for suggested outcomes; then death will pass over life....few are feasting upon the passover of many.
a) Ones trust (creed) permits others to bank (credit).
b) Trusting another implies holding onto within self. This establishes a contract between trustee and debtor; where the debtor permits the trustee to charge and discharge debts.
c) Notice that Nathaniel called out the viewers to challenge him with questions, and how even those willing to pay to ask are failing to challenge anything? Similar situation at the E. Michael Jones interview with him recently.
That's because of putting trust in others preventing one from expressing self.
remote viewing
Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies ones response (re) to a meeting (mote); which permits another remote access to view ones mind/memory.
Consenting (pay) to suggested (sell) implies pay per view, because one sells ones sight out to others.
double blind
Ones sight can only exist in-between (choice) sides (balance)...consenting to suggested dualism tempts ones centered choice to hold onto a side, which establishes imbalance at center.
In other words...choosing among sides establishes tunnel-vision for ones sight at center. A deprivation (blind) of ones sight within two (double) sides.
viewing a target...
...implies focusing ones sight towards a suggested outcome; while ignoring that which origin opens (perceivable) for view (perception).
Ones sight implies from center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)...what others show (suggested) narrows ones sight to it; if consented to.
rapture
RAP'TURE, noun (Latin raptus, rapio) - "seizing by violence"
Consider possession (life) within force (inception towards death) as want within need...trying to take/seize possession will be met with force/violence.
If life resists possession (temptation); then it can draw potential (inspiration) from force (velocity); which in return grows resistance...others tempt ones life to take possession of suggested information, which tempts life to ignore resisting force.
veritas
Aka VER'ITABLE, adjective - "true; agreeable to fact" aka true vs false or agreement vs disagreement reasoning over suggested fact/facio/facism.
Only if one ignores natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested) can there be a conflict of reason, and suggested fact/facio (to make) tempts one to ignore that only nature makes (action) remakes (reactions), and that oneself is a reaction (life) within action (inception towards death).
Also; project veritas implies projection towards; instead of self reflection inwards. As a ray within light one reflects outwards, while others tempt one to focus on a projection...allegory of the cave.
to blow the whistle
Whistle implies "to whisper" and it's being suggested to prevent many from screaming/skirmish (a contest; a contention) about behavior of few.
Furthermore; SCREAM in the context of horror (fear) tempts the consenting viewer to contest themselves to remain content aka to hold their emotions inwards, instead of screaming outwards.
From the view of the domesticated public...the shiny happy people don't want to experience any outcry (scream); so the murmuring few are screaming advertisements from every direction at them so that there's no time to cry... https://genius.com/Rem-shiny-happy-people-lyrics
For those with eyes to see...random access memory (RAM/REM).
Webster the dictionary.
Notice the scroll-bar on the side? That implies being within a SCROLL aka "writing formed into a roll". Few trick many with suggested scrolling to ignore turning the page of the book they bind themselves to, hence WEB-PAGES/SIDES.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Metallica-turn-the-page-lyrics
This also ties to jews unrolling the torah from scrolls instead of turning the pages of the bible, like gentiles. Also...a suggested side tempts ones perceiving free will of choice off-center and towards a side. Notice also "side-scrolling" as one of the foundations of video-games...
Anyway...perception implies sound; suggestion implies words, hence DICTION aka "action expressed by words". This is also why consenting to suggested implies followers permitting a Führer aka dictator.
trees are picked and forests misses
a) Missing the forest (perceivable sound) for the trees (suggested words)...
b) Missing implies "to fail in aim"; which implies ones choice to ignore perceivable origin for aiming at suggested outcomes. Notice that in-between inception and death...no life misses death.
Nature cannot miss...each one within wields the free will of choice to "dismiss" natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).
- Perceivable: Rise (life) within fall (inception towards death)
- Suggested: Success vs failure
Choosing either side of latter tempts one to ignore former and into a conflict against another.
As for Webster...only the chosen one weaving a world wide web represents a webster; not the ones choosing to be ensnared within it.
Ones consent to the suggestions of another implies mimicry/mockery aka imitation of form (suggested information); while ignoring origin of flow (perceivable inspiration).
Mockery is always self inflicted by ignoring origin (perception) for imitation (suggestion).
Sleight of hand: "joke's on you".
a) CENTER OF DIS-EASE implies oneself...unless giving CONTROL over it to another, who appease (pacify) by means of suggestion.
b) REDACT', verb (Latin redactus, redigo) - "to force; to reduce to form"...it's flow (inception towards death) which reduces itself to form (life). Being implies expansion (growth) within redaction (loss).
c) If one responds (re) to a suggested LEASE, verb - "to let; to demise; to grant the temporary possession of"; then one puts self onto a leash of another.
why yes
Why implies origin/cause, and it doesn't require confirmation (yes) or denial (no) from effects within. Others tempt one to ignore perceivable cause; for reasoning (yes vs no) over suggested effects.
lovely tree; says the forest
a) Ones consent to suggest theism (the) tempts one to fall for soothsaying (lovely...says...) by others.
b) Suggested pluralism (forest) tempts one to ignore each perceivable unit within whole nature.
c) Saying implies "words uttered"; and uttering implies "situated on the outside or remote from the center"...nature implies surrounding sound centering each instrument within. Which is why each unit (partial) senses surrounding (whole).
No other life form within any "forest" holds onto the suggested word "forest"; only you do, when making suggestions in the name of "forest"...doing so implies GUMP, noun - "a foolish person; a dolt".
Thanks for pointing that one out to me.
Point implies end of sentence; being implies life sentence moved towards point of death. Others suggest the rhetoric "pointing out" as the inversion of "sentence within". Focusing on suggested points tempts one to ignore perceivable sentence, hence being tricked to focus on death over life.
It's that simple for a jew to tempt a goy to give consent to self destruction.
Does a robot also think its command is its own 'will'?
a) ROBOT (Latin robur; strength) aka firmness of solid matter (life) within fluid motion (inception towards death). Others suggest Johnny Nr.5; Wall-E and Nono as robots to promote weakness.
b) Will implies "wanting from", hence wanting to possess...not owning aka having within possession. Others tempt ones consent to want to possess suggested; which only gets one posses by those suggesting it. One cannot buy from a merchant without selling oneself out to a merchant.
FREE implies within dominance; WILL (want) implies within need; OF implies out of, hence within and in response to; CHOICE implies within balance.
c) Command implies together; with (com) manual (man)...that's the suggested inversion of being manual (life) within auto (inception towards death), hence AUTO (action) MATIC (reaction).
Robots are being suggested as "automatons" to distract being from discerning self as manual growth with automation of loss.
d) To think/thing implies "revolve within mind/memory" aka respond (re) to circular motion (volve). To be implies as wave-formed matter (life) within linear (inception towards death) momentum of motion.
In other words...living within process of dying implies linear procession, hence perceivable implication (if/then). Others tempt one to ignore this for circular reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; 1 vs 0 etc.).
Sleight of hand: "You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round...like a record, baby, right 'round, 'round, 'round" by DEAD or ALIVE... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGNiXGX2nLU
e) Does implies indicative mode aka "showing; giving knowledge"...only nature does (action); those within can only redo (reaction) what nature does.
a) to e)...that's five simple contradictions within a question for which you seek a suggested answer by another, while ignoring perceivable solution (inception towards death) for each perceiving problem (life) within.
Yes, your definition
a) A DEAF-PHONETICIAN implies one who ignores perceivable sound (Latin phonics) for suggested word (def-inition). Nature doesn't define (affix); it frees (will of choice) each unit within.
b) Your implies suggesting others to possess; yet "you" originates from one claiming self as "me; myself; or I"; which in return brands everyone else as YOU (phonetic jew).
Compounding (possess) within self permits others to seize and aggregate ones possession. Consenting to suggested information implies taking possession of it within ones mind/memory; which in return permits others open access to ones mind/memory aka a golem (monster out of clay; remote controlled from outside).
to be abundant to supply the full
Being implies temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death)...nature implies whole supply; those within imply partial take out; others utilize demand as temptation to trick partials to take each other out.
Those who ignore full (perceivable) for empty (suggested) are confining themselves behind empty walls of ignorance... https://genius.com/Serj-tankian-empty-walls-lyrics
correct answer
Correct implies versus incorrect aka perpetual reasoning; draining resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death). Reasoning implies dissolution of self through conflicts with others.
Instead of seeking answers from others; try discerning the implication (if/then) of question aka QUAERO (to seek) TION (action)...if reaction (life) seeks action (inception towards death); then it dies faster.
Life isn't a quest towards outcome; but an expression (growth) within impressing (loss) origin. Others tempt one with suggested progressivism to go questing aka from zero to hero aka climb the tower; slay the dragon; rescue the princess; game over...insert coin to play again.
the issue
Ones consent to suggest theism (the) tempts one to ignore perceivable aka ISSUE, noun - "act of passing or flowing out; egress". Why? Consenting to suggested implies submission of self aka ingress.
Nature speaks without need for definition or words
Nature implies fluid need for solid wants...it doesn't speak (articulate words); it is natural SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken"...living within implies a break..."'Cause I'm Kurtis Blow and I want you to know...that these are the breaks"
stated as source
That implies suggested communism...state as source.
State aka condition implies "set together"; being within natural order implies being set apart from one another.
the image
A suggested image/picture implies a "capture moment"; being implies as free will of choice (life) within momentum (inception towards death).
Notice that iMAGE implies mage; magi; magic aka an idol; the representation of any person or thing. The second commandment forbids the worship of images.
Have you checked
CHECK, verb - "to stop; to restrain; to hinder; to curb. It signifies to put an entire stop to motion"...one cannot stop motion, while being (life) within it (inception towards death), but one can restrain self before getting destroyed, hence "check yo' self before you wreck yo' self".
Fact checking suggested information is for those within a true vs false conflict of reason...an artificial conflict; not a natural instance. What I commented upon was the perceivable implication (if/then) underneath the suggested information.
Also; neither a meme maker (UnbiasedCrime); nor a government (doj.state) implies a source...but a suggested culmination within a perceivable source.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "check yo' self before you wreck yo' self"
One can only be within (life) sides (inception/death) aka matter can only exist within momentum of motion...others suggest inside vs outside to tempt one off-center.