Wage/wedd - "pledge, agreement, covenant" aka ones consent to any suggestion of another, which binds one into a revolution aka agreement vs disagreement. Waging drains living.
Any pledge/pleon/dlegh - "to engage oneself or become fixed" binds ones free will of choice.
Lucifer is the false lightbringer
a) Light implies the fall (inception towards death) bringing/carrying forth the rise (life)...putting luci + fer together; just like light + darkness or true + false prevents one from rising.
b) Light cannot bring forth anything false or true...only en (within) lighten (light) ment (mind). It's the enlightened mind which darkens self by holding onto measurements (false or true) taken, while ignoring all given.
Sophia is the false lightbringer
Taking sophia (knowledge) into possession darkens (ignorance) light (enlightenment).
Venus is the false lightbringer
- "Black as the dark night she was"
- "Got what no one else had"
- "Yeah, baby, she's got it"
- "Well, I'm your Venus"
- "And I'm your fire, at your desire"
It's ones desire to take (want) what is given (need) which darkens the light, while kindling the fire/ire within self.
the false god that carrying light
The real god implies light carrying...the false god implies oneself trying to carry light. Each chosen one inverts ones choice to make that inversion happen.
The suggested information one carries tempts one to ignore the perceivable inspiration which enlightens. The former has to be carried by consent; the latter can't be held onto only adapted to by free will of choice.
satan...saturn
Aka the deceiver (satan) sowing (sat) inversion (turn).
misrecognition
Aka mis (to miss) re (to react) cog (together) gnoscere (to perceive) tion (action). The trick...putting the cog into ones perceiving reaction tempts one to miss all action.
One cannot perceive together; only apart from one another. It's ones consent to any suggestion which puts together what all sets apart from one another.
pleroma (totality of divine powers)
Tot (death) al (all)...all divines/divides living (power of growth) and dying (power of loss) from one another. Putting tot+al together leaves alive out, while putting an "s" onto powers establishes a plurality within singularity.
misorientation
Notice orient (east) from oriri (to rise). The cain-anites suggested a com (together) pass (to transfer) to distract from east (inception) to west (death) generating north (living) within south (dying).
archons
Consenting to a suggestion establishes the arch from one to another.
the same theme
THEme aka THEos...the same god. Different words can only be written within the same sound, yet differences can be tempted together with likable theme-songs like: "where everybody knows your name, and our troubles are all the same". Cheers btw implies "frame of mind".
several... texts
All severs each one from one another...few suggest text/teks (to weave) to confine many within a consensus.
Luci-fer implies weaving together by text of what all severs.
the rulers generate illusions
Rule/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies the generating force (inception towards death) for each re-generating being (life) within. It's ones consent to suggested pluralism (rulers) which makes singularity (generation) illusive to ones perception.
A cain-anite doesn't generate...but distracts from generation by suggesting an "s" to rule. Consenting to it permits Cain to dis-Abel one.
appearances that mimic the higher world but lack its essence.
The mimicry (suggestion) of appearance (perception) requires the consent of essence/esse (to be).
Only within lack/loss (inception towards death) can essence grow (life)...falling for the mimicry of one another drains essence faster. Nobody can put anything into this world which wasn't already there...it's shaping which mimics transformation as creation.
Lucifer aka light (luci) carrying (fer)...light implies God; carrying implies the animation of being carried forth within light. Cain represents that which is shaped out of that which is carried forth within light.
God favoring Abel implies light enABELing, which Cain disABELs out of jealously aka wanting to hold onto that which attracts (favor).
Luci (light) fer (to carry) implies Abel...putting luci+fer together implies Cain.
God the one and only father enables (Abel) each ones free will of choice to disable (Cain) oneself. Abel and Cain aren't TWO brothers but each aspect of the ONE and only father. Two (dualism) represents a creation of the Cain-anites during the Pythagorean story.
All movies have a brainwash component.
Only all moves, which allows each one within to respond to being moved. A movie implies a "moving picture", while a picture implies a "captured moment"...responding to that tempts matter (life) to ignore the momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
The brainwash component refers to com (together) ponere (to place) aka holding onto a captured moment, while the momentum of nature washes through the brain of each being.
Motion liquefies any solid; movies solidify solids, which makes it harder to resist (living) liquefaction (dying).
Who watches movies? The audience/audentia/au (to perceive), yet watching a captured moment (picture) being artificially moved (movie) tempts perception to watch suggestion.
Since you mentioned Cain...Jean CA(u)IN of Noyons who formulated Calvanism changed his name from Cohen > Cauin > Calvin.
Another bit about Cain/coin/koin... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koin%C3%A9_language from koinos (common, public, shared, general, ordinary) which also implies a private language.
Edit: almost forgot...Cain from Hebrew Qayin - "created one" aka based on creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing).
The same people...
Nature implies same; being implies differentiated from one another by nature...people implies artificial likeness shaped by few tempting many together.
papal bloodline
The all-father (pap-al) only has one blood (life) line (inception towards death).
black nobility
To know (nob) all (el) or to absorb (black) all. All perceivable moves through each ones perception; suggested gets absorbed by one.
As above (nobel) so below (black)...free will of choice.
monster inc
Monster from the Latin monstrum (divine omen); from PIE moneie (to make think of, remind)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/monster
Using words to make others think and to shape mental confinement by remembrance thereof...that's what in-corp-oration is about aka using a dead language (words) to distract from what animates the living tongue (sound).
spiritually nullified or transferred through speech
Ignoring that which animates the living tongue (sound) by using a dead language (words) implies spiritual nullification by transference of speech...
When you move
One can only re-move aka respond to being (life) moved (inception towards death). There's a natural fluidity animating each beings solidification.
compress and flex
That implies ones choice in-between compressing (move together) and flexing (move apart).
generates a tiny electrical charge
What if nature represents the only generator charging (inception towards death) each elect (being)? What if responding to generation by electing choice implies re-generation? What choosing to hold onto a side (tiny or gigantic) prevents regeneration, while pressing both sides in conflict against each other?
piezoelectricity
Aka piezo (to press) + elect (choice). What if being given choice implies magnetic/magh - "to be able" aka towards (inception towards death) being (life) enabled?
What if nature charging being implies the enabling (magh) of choice (elect)? What if few suggest electromagnetism to distract many from that?
What if consenting by free will of choice to any suggested -ism, like electromagnetism, puts a being under PRESSURE? https://genius.com/Queen-and-david-bowie-under-pressure-lyrics
needs to build up
Only within loss (inception towards death) can one build (life). Loss implies need; growth implies want aka the want to hold onto (living) within the need to let go of (dying).
This process works through a highly efficient biological mechanism
a) Consenting to a suggested -ism (mechanism) implies possession, which tempts potential (life) to ignore process (inception towards death).
b) Process implies delineation (inception towards death) of potential (life)...logic implies circular thinking aka a mental confinement of potential which distracts from process.
the squeeze; the spark; the growth
What if it's spark (inception) > growth (life) > squeeze (death)? What if the ongoing process represents light, and each temporary potential a fiery particle (spark) within?
Is it heart or hearth (fireplace)? Is it really circulation by heart or delineation of hearth aka of hot (life) within cold (inception towards death)? What if temporal hot resisting ongoing cold implies a frequency aka Hz aka Hertz/herz (heart/hearth)?
there is a difference between the two
Differentiation can only exist within singularity..."two" implies suggested dualism tempting ones consent to artificially hold together what nature sets apart from one another.
Example..inception and death are not TWO, but ONE process for each ONE potential living within.
Revelation of the Method...Predictive Programming
- Revelation implies revealed (life) by action (inception towards death). Anything nature brings into being implies revelation.
- Method aka meta (to pursuit) hodos (way) implies the suggestion of an artificial outcome to distract ones perception from natural revelation.
- Predictive aka pre (before) dict (to show). All perceivable was shown to each perceiving being before any suggestion can be shown to one another.
- Programming aka pro (forward) gram (to write). Nature forwards each being before a being can shape writing to describe nature to one another.
As for the differences...revelation implies natural origin; method implies an artificial outcome, so nature was revealing before any method can be "revealed" by any being. It's about tricking one to ignore the natural revelation for the artificial reveal by method of anything one ignores.
It's consenting to the suggested method which represents the program written into self, which permits another to predict the natural revelation one ignores.
method serves
Few suggest methods to tempt many into a consensus by giving individual consent to serve another. A method doesn't serve...it's being carried by anyone preserving it by consent.
this way shaping our perceptions and, more disturbing, our acceptance of them
There's only one way (inception towards death) within which perception (life) can be shaped...the way which moves forwards no matter if perception is disturbed by acceptance or denial of suggestion.
There is a sibling to this called Revelation of the Method
Sibling/sibja/swe - "self" implies nature diving fe-male within male from one another to allow inter-course with one another for off-spring from one another, which is how SELF sustenance requires perpetuation through one another.
The self implies the process of revelation...others suggest methods to tempt ones consent into taking possession. Process implies giving; possess implies taking...a contradiction.
esoteric concept
Nature implies exo (outer); being implies eso (inner)...teric/téreó - "to keep" implies inner potential ignoring outer process by keeping within possession.
Inner (perception) ignores outer (perception) when holding (consent) onto (suggestion)...the latter consent to any suggestion represents the shaping of a con (together) cept (to take).
Nature doesn't conceptualize...nature visualizes by divided each visible being from one another.
reveal their hidden agendas
Agenda/agent/action implies enacting nature revealing each re-acting being. Nature only reveals...it's a being who hides from nature by consenting to any suggested agendas by another.
There's nothing hidden from free will of choice...it's ones free will of choice to hide from revelation by seeking explanation from one another.
ritualistic purpose
Ritual/rite/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies nature putting forwards (pur) the position (pose) of each being by dividing each from one another.
Few draw circles inside (logic) and outside (reason) of many to distract from the one and only rite of passage (inception towards death) for each passenger (life) within.
Natural delineation implies purpose; artificial circulation implies aimlessness.
by forcing the public
Nature implies the force which privatizes each being from one another...few shape a consensus called "public" by tempting many to hold onto one another, thereby ignoring the natural force which empowers the being to be able to hold onto one another.
Law Enforcement implies natural law forcing mind into being... which one ignores when mentally and physically following suggested laws by another. Asking any law enforcement officer why the use of force gets the answer: "I'm just following orders".
when you pour it out more is there
Only within pour (inception towards death) can a pore (life) come into being by delineation...more vs less or love vs hate (circular conflict) represents an artificial vessel (looking glass) which the ongoing pour shatters sooner or later.
think in this way
Way implies forward motion, which one ignores when holding onto a side within a circle (love vs hate).
what is love?
"Oh, baby, don't hurt me" by HAD-DA-WAY (head the way)... https://genius.com/Haddaway-what-is-love-lyrics
One cannot love without getting hurt by hate, and it's baby (babylon aka confusion; disorder) spread by babel (articulation of words within sound) which binds both sides against each other if consented to either.
Being in bed with Big Tech is a bigger deal than being in bed with Israel imo
The bed implies the mind of many. Big Tech; Big Pharma; Big Sugar etc. represents the blanket suggested by few to confine the minds of many into slumber. Consenting to any suggestion represents the deal putting ones perception to sleep.
Israel aka yisra'el "he that striveth with God" implies ones perception (christ) struggling with the suggestions of another (anti-christ) within all perceivable (god).
- Natural order (forward motion) > arrangement of being (apart from one another) > alphabet (rearrangement of being)
a) Natural order arranging the mind of each being apart from one another implies an analytical process...beings rearranging minds by following alphabetical order implies a synthetic product.
b) Within the natural order arrange implies "set in a row aka into a more or less straight line". Within the alphabetical order arrange/range becomes hringaz/ring - "a circle"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arrange
Why a circle? Because if an arranged mind (life) within a straight line (inception towards death) holds onto any letter/leta - "to allow; to leave behind, depart from"; then one moves equidistant from the center aka in a CIRCumference.
Allowing another binds ones free will of choice. Consenting to any suggestion of another leaves self behind. Departing from implies ones mind ignoring to be a divided (de) part within.
c) Alphabet aka alpha/aleph/eleph (ox) + beta/beth/bet (pledge as a forfeit to another)... that's how ones choice is being tricked to pledge self domestication to a chosen one.
Edit: OED (Oxford English Dictionary) aka ox + ford/furdu/prtu/per (to lead; pass over)... that's how the Bauer farms by leading the oxen to pass over the field.
2nd Edit: What's the stick called for driving oxen? GAD (phonetic god)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gad
mount of olives
- Olive/oliva/elaia/ewi - "oil"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/olive
The mount of olives implies each annointed one rising up (mount) out of all (oil).
fault-line underneath the mount of olives
Aka the fault-line (inception towards death) for each anointed one (life) rising up within.
what they hoped to achieve specifically is almost totally unknown to me.
a) Achieve from Vulgar Latin accapare, from Late Latin ad caput - "to come to a head"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/achieve
Tempting many to specify suggested information within their heads permits few to shape hope and fear within the mental archive.
b) If you write "unknown to me"; then "me" implies your hope to hold self in possession or the fear to lose self...knowledge cannot be possessed. Knowledge implies a process (cause) moving through potential (effect).
c) Using suggestion to tempt perception into ignorance represents witchcraft aka another "crafting which" one chooses.
They love signalling their superiority
It's consenting to any suggested signal/signum (identifying mark) which makes oneself inferior to another.
it goes way beyond
Nature implies the only way for each being within...few suggest "yonder" (at a distance) to distract many from being within way.
things like governments/corporations
The same nature differentiates each thing within...it's consenting to hold onto suggested government (control of ming) + corporation (corpos oration) which establishes a like-minded consensus.
It's not the governments or corporations which are working together...its the consensus among many who invest their minds into artificial constructs, which are holding together what nature works apart.
nationalist
Nat-ion-al (native within action of all) implies the status quo of being within nature. An -ist (nationalist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (nationalism) by another into a consensus of many under few.
governments spending so out of control
Govern (to control) ments (minds) implies each invested being within, which tricks each being to spend (to pay out or away, deprive oneself of).
to cause hyperinflation
TO (towards) implies the cause of in (within) flat (to swell) ion (action) aka of each swell (life) within action (inception towards death).
Few suggest artificial excess (hyper) to invert natural adequacy within the minds of many, hence tempting each with the ideology that nature isn't enough.
being forced on the masses
Nature implies force dividing being...few tempt the consent of each divided being into a mass-consensus, which nature continues to force apart.
Joining a mass implies self sacrifice (consent) and mutual destruction (consensus). Whenever a mass gets destroyed... only a (((fraction))) remains. Let's call that fractional reserve banking.
governments creating
Ones mind consenting to suggested creationism is what establishes mind (ment) control (govern).
two tier justice
There can be only one (cause) for each one (effect) within...it's ones consent to another ones suggestion, which establishes two tier justice (affect).
goes out of its way
Being implies the transference of essence (life) in (inception) and out (death) of way of motion. Few utilize suggestion to tempt the mind of many to wander off the one and only way of life.
Whites have no right
White implies "pure light"; right/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies light > spectrum > ray...that's the right/rite of passage for each ray within the visible spectrum of all light.
corporations only hiring browns and blacks...
...while destroying the corporations from within. Jeff Bezos: "I predict one day Amazon will fail".
surveillance systems
System aka sy (together) stem (to stand)...standing together within a consensus permits anyone apart to watch (veil) over (sur) one.
those are your choices
There can be only one aka each ones free will of choice. Another suggests pluralism (choices) to trick singular (choice) to ignore self (ones choice) for another (chosen one). That's an inversion.
Primary (balance) > secondary (choice) > optional (choices)...
You are not allowed to
Only free will of choice can deny natural allowance for artificial permission.
opened its borders
Nature implies the closed process (inception towards death) opening up the potential (life) of each being within. Border/furðra - "further, greater, superior" implies the potential of each being to further self.
Few suggest borders to enclose the mind of many to the potential of furthering self.
pushed the same ideology
Few shape ideas (ideo) and logic (logy) within the pushing/pulling nature, to tempt many to pull ideas and logic into self. Doing so tricks each different being within the same nature to become like-minded.
Only nature pushes (inception) and pulls (death) being (life)...holding onto ideology tricks ones mind to ignore that.
Move on.
That's what sameness implies...onward motion. Being implies temporary resistance within the ongoing temptation of onward motion.
heart beat
What if beat implies BE(ing)AT aka "home is where the heart is"?
data centers
Data/do - "to give"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/data
What if data center implies being given the center (perception) of all (perceivable)? What if outsourcing to artificial data centers implies central banking aka banking the center outside the source?
What if source can only move through (inception towards death) center (life)?
being built to secure
Using to (towards) to secu (to divide)...that's how nature builds being.
incoming prison
Prison/pris - "to take"...coming (inception towards death) in (life) implies process giving potential to take.
everything is connected
Every divides each from one another...ignoring this by connecting with one another occults perception.
all of that stuff is intermingled
All separates each one from one another...few intermingle many together to stuff each into confinement.
every facet of reality is a lie
If real implies each ones response (re) to all (al); then each one represents the face of all reality....not what others are masquerading it as, which requires one to believe it to be true.
the media as enemy
En-e-my implies "within me"...ones perception implies the media/medius (middle) of all perceivable within me.
the media is a filter in which you see reality
Aka the SUGGESTED media is a filter in which you see PERCEIVABLE reality...if consented to.
AT LEAST in German (zumindest) implies closing (zu) mental (mind) estimation (est)... lass dir dass mal durch den Kopf gehen.
System is weaponized against critics
- Sys (together) stem (to stand)
- Critic/krei (to distinguish)
- Weapon (instrument of offense and defense)
Using ones weapon of choice to stand together with another...prevents one from distinguishing. Few suggest systems to weaponize the consenting choice of many against critic aka self discernment as distinguished from one another.
the cost of
Co (together) sta (to stand)...nature delivers each being apart from one another. The cost of standing together implies selling self out to another.
getting the public to pay
Public implies standing (st) together (co)...that's the hidden cost ones privacy pays when joining others.
Guess who doesn't have to pay any co (together) st (to stand)? Each chosen one!
what do you call this way of thinking of yours?
Call implies "to apply by way of designation"...the issue is apply (join; combine; attach; adhere). Applying tempts one to deny way (inception towards death) of design (life).
Whatever one applies...the way of design removes, because de-sign implies the division of sign.
Attaching any name to motion tempts you to ignore the movable (motion) for the immovable (name). Motion doesn't require the name "motion"; it implies mot (mote) ion (action) aka yourself as the mote (life) within action (inception towards death).
Any de-SCRIP-tion suggested to you tempts you to consent to a SCRIPT, which others then run within you. This represents the animation of an anthropomorphic being aka a golem/goyim.
philosophy
Analyze it...phi (to love) lo (logic) sophy (to know; to perceive). Philo contradicts sophy, because phi (to love) and miso (to hate) are in conflict with one another. Your mind considering one or the other implies logic, and you choosing to hold onto one side while fighting the other implies reason.
Both logic and reason tempt you to ignore perception for suggestion aka reality for fiction aka that which moves for that which you hold onto.
i still cant wrap my mind around it
I vs you + still vs moving + can vs can't + my vs your...that's what ones mind wraps as logic within and as reason around oneself.
Wrap; verb - "to roll or fold together; envelop, surround; cover and fasten securely, swaddle; fold up or back on itself"...that's what others tempt you to do to yourself.
it seems any thought would lead to logic or reason
Nature leads each beings life from inception towards death...logic and reason implies holding onto a misleading side, while being lead. The holding onto aka the consent; belief; faith; authorization; permission; sanction; license etc. required for logic and reason are draining ones potential to hold onto.
Only if potential (life) resists process (inception towards death) can potential grow. Taking a possession by choosing a side for logic and reason implies loss of potential.
what makes us human
HU (hue; color) implies light (motion) > spectrum (momentum) > ray (matter). Light generates a spectrum which differentiates each ray from one another, which each ray (race) perceives as the visible spectrum of light.
That implies a linear process...not a circular logic turning into reason. Same with MAN (motion) > woman (momentum) > offspring (matter).
The issue in your sentence...US aka "united states" aka artificially rolling together what nature delineates apart.
reality matrix
Motion (al) > momentum (matrix) > matter (re)...momentum implies the matrix for the response of each matter within all motion.
Will a "God particle" have any basis in fact?
Each thing (effect) within all of God (cause) implies a particle given will aka essence within basis. Fact implies a fictitious act by a reacting particle within enacting God.
Will the "God particle" only exist due to the very act of observation itself?
Existence of particle (effect) implies due God (cause). The word observation implies a contradiction in terms aka observ (reaction) ation (action).
Reality, noun: "Something from which all other things derive".
Reality implies each thing responding (re) to all (al)...not a sum of things (something). Derive thereof implies driving apart.
Matrix, noun: "Something that constitutes the point from which something else originates, takes form, or develops"
The matrix/matris - "mother" isn't a constituting sum, but the womb forwarding each divided particle (off-spring). Coming into being doesn't constitute a point, but a sentience aka living essence send from inception towards point of death.
The true nature of the "phenomena", the great "mystery"
Nature (cause) was before native (effect) comes into being...holding onto true or false measurements tempts one to ignore the natural phenomenon, while clouding ones dormant mind in mystery.
Are the things around you really "real"?
Re (to respond) al (all) implies a delineation of action > reaction...neither a circle (around) nor a plural (things), which represent "fake" measurements.
Nothing can exist "outside" of "The All"
Outside implies outer cause and the side/sight within of each effect. Nothing/nihilo implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable aka effect denying cause for affect to one another. Doing so confines ones mind inside oneself aka circular thinking (logic), which turns into outward conflict (reason) against one another.
free-will-of-choice is Adrian P Cooper
I would feel robbed of choice if I had his lack of chin...
so logic and reason are tools less useful than perception?
Logic implies circular thinking (true OR false) which turns into a conflict of reason (true VS false) the moment one chooses to hold onto either side. The origin of logic implies logos (word of god)...yet not spoken by God but articulated in the name of God by whoever chooses to suggest it to you.
Any suggested word represents logos; you thinking about it represents logic; you fighting others about it represents reason.
Perception implies delineation aka all perceivable moving through each ones perception...no conflict; no circle; no word to hold onto.
Only within a line (implication) can a circle (reason) be shaped.
im pretty logical myself
Hence mentally stuck within the following conflicts of reason...i am vs you are + pretty vs ugly + mine vs yours.
i think i learned it works
How could your logic (pretty or ugly) ever resolve the resulting conflict of reason (pretty vs ugly)?
predict the future, as in if an apple is falling, it will hit the ground.
Pre (before) dict (to show). Before implies "forwarded being" aka nature moving each living being from inception towards death. While alive...a being cannot perceive its inception or death.
Being implies in-between beginning and end, hence transferred from > to.
One can only perceive the apple on the tree; the apple falling or the apple hitting the ground...aka each instance apart (analysis); not together (synthesis).
If you synthesize your prediction about the falling apple hitting the ground; then you mentally hold onto an artificial synthesis, which permits another to exploit your ignorance by using analysis like picking the apple from above or catching the apple before it hits the ground. Exploiting ignorance represents a potential of free will of choice...a potential you ignore when binding your choice to a prediction.
Life does not need to predict death...life needs to adapt to the process of dying. Predicting outcome implies gambling aka ignoring given choice by taking a chance.
One of the Canaanites who became renowned as a leading English economist, and still enjoys wide influence in the United States, was David Ricardo (1772-1823), the third son of Abraham Israel, who was a substantial member of the jewish community in Amsterdam. Israel emigrated to London with William III and later became one of the wealthiest members of the London Stock Exchange, where he worked closely with his fellow emigres. His son, David, became an intimate friend of Lord Nathan Mayer Rothschild, speculating heavily in government securities on advice of Rothschild. Together, they profited enormously from the financial coup resulting from early news about the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo. David Israel, now known as David Ricardo, began to write economic dicta intended to become the final word on how much the working class should be paid. He developed a formula which became known as "the subsistence wage," dictating that the worker should never receive more than the bare minimum needed for his subsistence. If his wages were to be increased, the government was charged to take care of it by promptly increasing his taxes (does this sound familiar to any Americans?).
The Canaanites in America developed a new twist with the withholding tax, which insured that the worker would never receive his wages in the first place; he would only receive a mutilated portion, from which the Canaanites had already deducted "their" portion. Ricardo's dictum, which also became known as "the iron law of wages," iron meaning that under no circumstances would the worker ever be the beneficiary of any outburst of generosity and be allowed even a small increase, when Rita Ricardo-Campbell, wife of the director of the Hoover Institution, and a direct descendant of David Ricardo, came to Washington as a key member of Reagan's staff, the Reagan anticommunist, humanitarian Revolution. She became Reagan's advisor on Social Security payments and pensions. Ricardo's economic theories on wages and labor had also been enthusiastically received by Karl Marx, who adopted them as the guidelines by which the slave workers of Soviet Russia are ruled today.
~Eustace Mullins - 'The Curse of Canaan'