1 + 1
If all implies one, then how could one add to all?
1 + 1 =
Why set ones apart from one another, when addition makes equal? Who benefits from equalizing differences...those equalized or the ones remaining different?
= 0
The absence of all quantity equals what?
Ed White
EDWARD aka ead (wealth, prosperity) weard (guardian) WHITE (pure light)...guarding the wealth of light thorough obfuscation of ignorant many by enlightened few.
That's the great work/magnum opus of freemasonry aka utilizing masonry (suggestion) to corrupt free (perception).
people who aren't awake yet, cannot be convinced
Convince aka COM (together; with) VINCERE (to conquer). That's what few do...conquer many by tempting together.
NASA (Hebrew nasha; to beguile/deceive) is being suggested by few and consented to by many. Deception requires consent.
It's about mass...sacrifice
Nature offers all to each one within by setting apart...few within amass others together, which when consented to, permits few to pick apart masses.
Notice how the bolsheviks were tempted by quotas (a proportional part or share) to sacrifice masses. Happening right now under the name of DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion)...
a) MICHAEL (Hebrew Mikha-el; who is like god) + NELSON (nell; weak-spirited person) + BENDIGO (bend; bhendh; to bind)
EL breathes life into those within by setting apart...those within bind weakness (consent) together, hence suggesting BANK to bind TRUST.
b) Due implies owning to...ones internal re-view (response to visual perception) doesn't own anything to another ones views.
c) Politic implies public matter; banking implies private matter, hence ones trust by free will of choice.
d) Australian/austral/aus-tero - "towards dawn" implies ones response to perceivable...-ist (nationalist) implies ones submission to suggested (nationalism).
Watch your tongue, mate...someone tries to play you for a drongo.
Saturn
a) Latin satus - "to sow" aka towards (inception towards death) sow/scatter/seamen/season/seed (life).
b) In Akkadian, the planet was kaiamanu, literally "constant, enduring," hence Hebrew kiyyun, Arabic and Persian kaiwan "Saturn."
Aka constant (inception towards death) enduring (life) aka ones rise during all falling.
away from fear towards faith
a) Both faith (want) and fear (not want) tempt one towards outcome; while ignoring origin (need).
b) Instead of "away from" try form (life) within way of flow (inception towards death)...
Mind over matter won't do anything.
Indeed...matter (ones perception) exists within mind/memory (all perceivable).
Discipline follows motivation
Motivation (inception towards death) generates discipline (life)...others tempt one to follow instead of resisting.
will attempt to use their thoughts to change their state
Thinking implies during change. Memory implies momentum of motion for matter "thinking" within.
This will ALWAYS fail. You can't change...
Because each one (life) exists within all-way (inception towards death) as reaction within action.
One cannot change anything; one adapts to everything perceivable changing...or ignores it for holding onto suggestions by others.
action over thoughts
Thinking implies re-acting to en-acting input. Only nature acts; those within react to either nature (perceivable inspiration) or each other (suggested information)...aka artifice.
I don't do religion
"don't" aka doing nothing implies ones consent to suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing). Consenting to suggested implies religion (Latin religio; to bind anew).
All perceivable sets each ones perception free (will of choice)...misusing that to consent to anything suggested by another implies binding self.
The trick of religion is that ones consent seals the deal...not whatever is being suggested as religion by another.
What's the frequency of vibrations?
Each ones frequent use of free will of choice vacillating to and fro within balance to sustain ones vigor.
shorter waves mean faster vibrations and vice versa. So "slow vibrational frequency" will have long waves, not short.
Wave (life) during line (inception towards death)...as short/long or slow/fast as frequency of ones choice vacillates it.
Hertz unit
Ones Herz (heart)
without that Hz values there just nothing to talk about.
a) Everything (perceivable) implies value; each thing (perception) implies evaluation...nothing (suggested) tempts one to de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) that.
b) "without" implies being within (life) outside (inception towards death) aka as partial within whole...not the lack of anything.
The merchant tempts the consumer to be "without" unless buying into...
"natural causes" and problem solved?
Natural cause (inception towards death) dissolves each problematic effect (life).
they are just dragging this up
Many drag "Julian Assange" along as an ingredient within a soup of suggested information...few simply steer it to see if it's dissolved yet.
Notice the difference between "Assange" and "Hitler"...the former is burning out; while the latter gets stoked...all within the minds of the many.
must have great security
a) Secure implies "free from danger"; being implies free (life) within danger (inception towards death).
b) Notice that both those taking the shots (insecure) and those ready to shoot (security)...are willingly taking orders from those who suggest danger.
He's someone I see
Seeing implies ones sight within all; looking at/gazing/beholding implies ones focus on another one...which others tempt by showing what to watch.
Dr. Fauci
- DOCTOUR - "church father"; from PIE root dek - "to take; accept"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=doctor
- FAUX - "false"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/faux#etymonline_v_33015
Anthony
St. Anthony (4c.), Egyptian hermit, was patron saint of swineherds, to whom one of each litter was usually vowed... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Anthony#etymonline_v_13519
The same you in another dimension
Or your own DI-MEN (phonetic demon) aka divided mind aka ones mind/memory divided in-between perception and suggestion...
I don't know about meditating
Mediate/medius/middle aka choice finding balance by discerning self as center (ones perception) of circumference (all perceivable)...suggestion tempts one off-center, hence others utilizing MEDIA to mediate suggested information 24/7; all around the clock, and from all sides as N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh).
things wouldn't be the same
Can you show two "things" that are the same without being at different positions from one another?
dark matter
Matter/material can only exist in-between bright and dark, otherwise it couldn't sustain a perceivable shape.
a) "jews are to isms, what Italians are to operas"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jirPUjrqQP8
b) Opera implies collaboration between a composer (suggestion) and a librettist (consent).
c) ITALY aka IT A LY (it's a lie)...
fake Latin
Try Greek dēmokratia... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=democracy
Bot
Aka bot; robot (Latin roboro; robur) - "strength"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Roboration
absolutely nothing
How could nothing be free from limitation (absolute)?
What is outside that model?
a) Can one model (form) outside energy (flow)?
b) MODEL, noun (Latin modulus, modus) - "pattern of something to be made; any thing of a particular form".
What if a partial can only exist within whole?
c) What if outside implies side (momentum) within out (motion) for those within (matter). Does one exist in-between (life) sides (inception/death)?
all is an illusion
ION implies action; ILLUDO implies reaction....ignoring perceivable for suggested makes former illusive under the curtain of latter.
idea actually crossed my mind
What happens if suggested idealism crosses the flow of perceivable inspiration through ones perceiving mind/memory?
What if ones consent to another ones suggestion implies a double-cross?
a democracy has to meet certain criteria
DEMOS (common people) KRATOS (strength)...everyone's a critic.
what do you call it then....if nothing has ever existed before by your definition
Sound exists before any definition can be worded.
if you know something but cannot share that knowledge you are imprisoned by the idea
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) or idealism (suggested information)...the latter implies shared among partials; while the former implies being a partial share within whole.
Each ones perception implies a share within all perceivable knowledge.
Share (perception within perceivable) or stash (consenting to suggested)...
notice the truth
a) NOTICE (Latin notitia) - "being known" is given; truth and lies are taken.
b) Nature gives a notice which cannot be taken...perceivable inspiration. Those within nature tempt one to take notice of...suggested information.
Those who take (suggested) ignore that which is given (perceivable).
I always give thanks for just being
a) What if it's all way (inception towards death) which gives each one being (life)?
b) What if one cannot give without ignoring that all was already given before one came to be within?
c) To thank implies to respond to what came before...what if ones being implies response-ability within all that comes before/for being?
alternative is nothingness; , non existence which is unfathomable.
a) What if all generates (inception towards death), while each one within alternates (life)?
b) What if nothing (Latin nihilo) implies ones de-nial of everything perceivable for suggested nihil-ism?
c) What if fathom; verb - ""to embrace, surround, envelop" implies each one within all? What if ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested tempts one to also ignore self discernment; hence becoming unable to fathom being one within all?
There's no doubt
Where is that "no" which can't be doubted and how could free will of choice be prevented from doubting the existence of "no; not; nothing; nothingness"?
we have individuality
What if suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) into a dualism (in-dual) by consenting to hold onto the suggestion of another one...a chosen one?
freewill
a) Who suggests "free will" without "of choice" and what happens if ones consents to suggested free will without of choice?
b) What if free implies within dominance; will/want implies within need; of implies out of, hence within and in response to; and choice implies within balance?
we are all one, but separate as well
WE (suggested pluralism) contradicts all (perceivable) separating itself into each one (perception) within.
various consciousness points
Variety implies life; point implies death...hence different life sentences towards same point of death.
Beholding the creation
Aka being holding onto suggested creationism by consent, while ignoring to be set apart within whole.
What if all of humanity is a single entity
Hu/hue/color implies a spectrum within whole and entity/einai/being implies being within aka partial within whole.
Hue-man implies a setting apart into entities aka from whole (oneness) into partials (ones).
This spirit, which is both you and i, experiences all cause and effect of humanity.
Spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies effect (expression; exhale) within cause (impression; inhale). All implies cause; each one within implies effect.
reborn
Reborn implies ones RE-sponse to being BORN, hence life implying rebirth. Few suggest "born again" to tempt many to believe in a "second coming".
sum of all
All cannot be summarized, for it is all which sets itself apart into each one within. Few are summarizing/collectivizing many aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or abrahamism (father of multitude) or united states, united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union or equality through diversity etc.
It's a trick...nature sets apart; those within tempt together.
spirit experiences both action and consequence
Consequence (life) within action (inception towards death) needs to breathe (spirit; spiro) aka adapt to being enacted upon as reaction.
The point?
Being implies sentenced to life, while being moved from inception towards point of death...few suggest points to tempt many to ignore sentence.
All suggested progressivism tempt towards outcome; while one ignores being (perception) within origin (perceivable).
a trial for
That implies one trying (trial) to move forwards (for); while ignoring to be resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death), hence already being moved.
departing from God
If God implies all, then each one implies a partial within all, hence a division (de) of partials (part) from; out of; within, and in response to whole.
into something else
EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...if all implies one within energy; then what else could sustain being?
Reasoning implies friend vs enemy...no matter which side one chooses.
Each jew stays apart from any majority... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Political-History-1789-1939/dp/0199246815