If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest
a) Employer (all perceivable) generates servants (ones perception)...slave (ones consent) permits master (suggestion by another).
b) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot be arrested...form (perception) can be tricked to ignore flow (perceivable), by holding onto (suggested), hence arresting the development of ones mind.
The fight to prevent arrest implies each ones need to resist wanted temptations by another, hence choosing want tempting one to ignore need, thereby arresting self by ignoring a moving origin.
From same (inception towards death) to difference (life)...alternation.
doesn't even know where
Where? At center of circumference as odd (life) within even (inception towards death).
As for "doesn't"...where does nothing exist?
Taking (consent) a token (suggestion) tempts one to ignore given (perception).
claim
Holding anything within ones hand implies a claim; nature forcing one to let go of whatever one holds onto refutes any claims.
video
Aka Latin videre "to see"...watching what another shows contradicts ones sight.
their was a second
If EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power" implies first, then what does second imply?
- PHARMACEU'TICAL, adjective - "to practice witchcraft; poison or medicine"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Pharmaceutic
- MED'ICINE, noun - "any substance, liquid or solid, that has the property of curing or mitigating disease"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/medicine
Aka poison (suggested information) or medicine (perceivable inspiration)...liquid (inception towards death) or solid (life).
- CURE, noun - "to prepare; remedy for disease"
Aka towards (inception towards death) preparing (life) aka remedy (ongoing loss) for dis-ease (temporary growth).
actual chemist
Chimistry implies analysis (set apart) and synthesis (put together)...nature sets apart ones perception within all perceivable, while few within nature tempt consenting many together with suggested.
A jew suggests synthesis to tempt gentiles into paralysis by ignoring analysis.
Example: UNITED STATES implies synthesis; ISRAEL implies analysis and JOE BIDEN implies paralysis....synthesis continues because paralysis prevents analysis.
I’ve been sporadically watching
Which implies as opposed to regular watching. A jew suggests watching to establish gentiles into a regular whole with sporadic partials standing out. The consenting "regular" whole can then be used to "regulate" the sporadic partials.
What' the issue with watching? It's that it tempts one to "keep watch", hence holding onto what others are showing, while ignoring that what nature offers (perceivable) ones sight (perception) cannot be held onto.
the only way to describe it is a surrealist shitshow.
a) -ist (surrealist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (surrealism), which permits another to shape the suggested by free will of choice for a consenting audience, hence the shitshow.
b) Surreal implies in addition (sur) to reality...that's fiction aka ones ignorance of all perceivable for the "addition" of another ones suggestion.
In reality...addition (inception) and subtraction (death) imply within the same motion for each different matter (life) within. An addition cannot add anything (partial) into everything (whole).
Ones consent to suggested surrealism tempts one to ignore reality for endless addition "shown" by few and "watched" by many.
Difficult to watch
Because watching doesn't differ...it tempts alike reactions. Many focusing on a screen filled by few ignores differentiation for sheep like compliance, order following; NPC behavior; collectivization etc.
Everyone there looks confused
Because by mass consent of watchers; their focus fuses together (con-fuse). Few generate con-tent (holding together) to amass the consent of many.
To look implies to lock onto, while ignoring that nature aka natural order aka process of dying implies a continuous release aka a setting free of anything living within.
polymorphic
a) MORPH; noun - "genetic variant of an animal" implies animation (inception towards death) generating variances (life).
b) Poly implies more than one...there can be only one aka one for all and all for one. Being implies partial (one) within whole (oneness).
Reality implies UNI; fiction implies POLY...one can only discern this by self; not through others.
AWOL aka absence (suggested information) without leave (perceivable inspiration) aka stuck within the allegorical cave while being free within projected reality.
As for laser...light (all perceivable) amplification (suggested by another) by stimulated emission of radiation (ones consent).
This nullifies conservatives as any real opposition going forward.
a) To nullify implies one holding onto de-nial (Latin nihilo, nothing)
b) Nature doesn't conserve (preserve from loss)...it presents growth (life) into loss (inception towards death).
c) Ones consent to suggested conservatism tempts one to hold onto denial of all perceivable.
d) Going forwards (inception toward death) generates resistance (life)...going against opposition destroys resistance.
e) Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) perceivable...ignoring this by consenting to suggested establishes a conflict of reason (real vs fake).
Nature doesn't fake/feign/fold/falsify/counterfeit...RE (reaction) within AL (action) wields the free will of choice to fake it.
Sleight of hand... https://www.lyrics.com/lyric/35958053/Falco/Naked
- Naked, I don't want to fake it
- Naked, I just can't await it
Aka I don't want to fake origin (perceivable); I just can't await outcome (suggested). Ones perception within all perceivable operates in the nude, clothing oneself with suggested tempts one to ignore that.
Naked implies need; cloth implies want. An off-spring enters naked, and no matter how much clothes an elder wears...nature is gonna take out the naked.
discernment aligns
To discern implies perceiving differences, hence being cernere/separated (life) within align/line (inception towards death)...Jake Paul implies a suggested/suggesting idol tempting one to hold onto/consent with.
One wants to hold onto; one needs to let go. The former implies ignorance; the latter discernment. Any suggestion shaped within perceivable implies a graven idol.
One cannot shape within nature; only shift what nature already shaped.
God wants
God implies needed whole for each wanting partial within. Each partial needs to resist wanted temptation, hence needing to let go of wanting to hold onto...like for example the suggested word "God".
apparent enough
Enough implies "sufficient aka needed"; while apparent implies "coming into sight aka perceivable"....others utilizing the words "apparent enough" which implies a suggestion (want) tempting one to ignore perceivable (need) when consenting.
One has to discern self as coming (inception towards death) into being (life) to be able to further discern ones sight (perception) within all (perceivable).
to win
Aka towards overcoming conflict by defeating opposition. That implies suggested progressivism tempting one to seek outcomes, while ignoring to be within perceivable origin.
Ones position as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) isn't in op-position aka opposing the position of another, but oportune aka op (in front of) portus (habor) aka a vessel (matter) within harbor (momentum) of sea (motion).
Matter (choice) within momentum (balance) implies a safe harbor for response-ability (free will of choice), hence being enabled (momentum) to react (matter) to action (motion).
good beats evil
If one discerns self as being at (be-at) aka near a conflict of reason (good vs evil); then one strikes a beat aka beats on one another.
Nature doesn't strike beats...it moves all sound through each one instrument.
Who's suggesting "beats"?
- https://genius.com/Selena-gomez-beat-lyrics
- https://genius.com/Michael-jackson-beat-it-lyrics
- https://genius.com/2-unlimited-let-the-beat-control-your-body-lyrics
- https://www.beatsbydre.com/
"It doesn't matter who's wrong or right...just beat it"
Hebrew חָבַט (chabat) - "to beat off, beat out"
- Virgina Roberts - Virgin Robber
- Eisenhower - Steel Hitter - Stalin Hitler
Notice the difference in discernment required to be able to see the layers, including phonetic and different languages simultaneously...
Why average American public in social does not make jokes and memes around it?
Average/avarie/awariya - "damage to ship; damaged merchandise" aka AV'ERAGE, noun - "in commerce, a contribution to a general loss".
A jew suggests an average to tempt each exceptional gentile to fall in line, while ignoring to sustain self.
"Crook" also means "cheater", "swindler", "renegade"
Mean/mydho - "middle"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mean#etymonline_v_12496
All meanings are suggest to one by others aka from circumference (others) towards center (one)...holding onto a suggested meaning by consenting to it implies leaning off-center aka away from middle, while permitting another to build suggested information at center aka media/medius/middle.
It's the suggested word meaning which distracts one from perceivable implication (if/then).
it is done through distortimg surnames, not playing with direct meanings.
Direction implies from/to aka linear movement...crook/hook/bend implies a distortion of linear into a curve.
surname
a) A jew suggests surnames as additions (sur) to brands (name) shaped within a moving system. One can neither brand nor add anything from within a moving system, yet one can be tricked to hold onto a suggested brand, while viewing it as an addition.
b) Name/nombre/number aka "designation of a unit" implies one (Latin unitas/unus) and nature designates each unit through addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (being partial within whole).
c) Nature doesn't give names...it nurtures natives. Natives adding surnames neglects nature. It's idolatry.
The lack of logical consistency
Logical consistency implies conflict...hence chosen few being able to operate within balance, while ignorant many imbalance each other within conflicts of reason.
Also...con (together) sistere (to place) implies one vs another instead of apart from one another.
Stockholm syndrome
Consent to suggested was given willingly, hence offering self as host/hostage for the suggested information by another. The hostage wasn't taken...it holds onto what another offered, while ignoring to let go.
As for the psychological bond...ones consent to any suggestion implies the bond, for which one ignores perceivable psyche (animating power), while establishing a conflict of reason (logic).
cognitive infiltration to suggest events
a) Cognitive implies ones perception within all perceivable...ones consent to suggested implies infiltration by another.
b) EVENT', noun (Latin evenio) - "to come" aka coming (all perceivable) towards being (ones perception). That's the only event...any event suggested by another tempts one to ignore self discernment within origin.
to cause confusion
Being implies "cause to" aka from cause (inception towards death) into effects (life) aka a setting apart...not a melting (fuse) together (con).
Ones consent to anything suggested by another implies a melting together.
muddy the waters
Being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka a setting apart of vessels from one another, which permits a "clear" passage. Coming together by consenting to each others suggestions "muddies the waters".
Talmud Quotes
NumbaZero : "shit like this"
Right wingers are already claiming
A claiming wing cannot fly.
every one of the negative thumbnails is a video that promotes Prodentim
A liability shield. Just like ingredient and side-effect lists for pharmaceuticals, but for consumers with a shorter attention span. Clicking on such a video implies ones consent to the warning, which the video itself then is used to distract from.
A more aggressive disclaimer for an ever more defenseless crowd.
the famous photo
FAME; noun (Latin fama) - "to speak" + PHOTO; noun - "light"...light doesn't speak, speech distorts light. Holding onto speech within light generates shadows.
Johnathan Willis
JO (lord) NATHAN (has given) WILLIS (will; want; desire)...one needs to resist wanted desires.
The marketing shitheads at Prodentim made sure nothing bad about their product is available online.
enoch...inside you
Enoch/enokh/hanokh - "dedicated; set apart" aka one (partial) inside all (whole).
enoch banned from the bible
Because bible binds together, hence religion (Latin religio, to bind anew).
I understand, we live in a world where we are mired down by crafted suggestions.
Understanding/standing under implies such a crafted suggestion tempting ones consent to mire under another, hence student under teacher or follower under leader or slave under master.
Being implies rise (life) during fall (inception towards death)...understanding tempts one to ignore that, hence being tempted to stand in the shadow of another.
lucky too know
Luck aka chance (effect of an unknown cause) tempts one to ignore choice (effect within known cause). All suggested gaming/gambling tempts ones choice to ignore self discernment by putting choice on the stake of chance.
In other words...choice implies within origin of balance; chance implies towards outcome, while within conflict (win vs lose) aka imbalance.
Sleight of hand: Les jeux sont faits, rien ne va plus (the game's up, nothing goes anymore).
thank God for putting this path before me
a) The suggested rhetoric "before me" tempts one to ignore being forwarded.
b) If God implies origin, then origin pushes one towards outcome, which one needs to resist to sustain self.
Sleight of hand: When push (inception towards death) comes to shove (life). That's also what yisra-el (resist all) implies.
If it all was just my free will of choice
All implies just (balance); each one within implies odd (choice).
The odds of being one...
See. If one discerns self as odd, then all implies that which just-is (justice), hence natural law.
Guardian Angel
Ones "line" of sight can be tricked by the suggestion of another to fix upon a "point" of view, which permits others to utilize triangulation and angles/angels to tempt one to guard (keep watch) aka focusing onto suggested, while narrowing sight within perceivable.
the truth
Truth (wanting suggested) and Lie (not wanting suggested) tempt one to ignore change (perceivable need).
Applying change to truth shapes it into a lie and vice versa. Whatever suggestion one chooses to hold onto becomes ones truth, and whatever contradicts ones held on truth becomes a lie.
like many
Few suggest each different one to consent alike, which in return establishes a many aka a collective/community/society.
Notice that the posters here are each struggling with being different from the many, hence seeing something which most ignore.
free of brainwashing
Nature washes through ones brain...one needs to utilize this to "launder" input...both perceivable inspiration moving through and suggested information held onto. It's ones free will of choice that needs to adapt to former, while resisting the temptation to hold onto latter.
Memory is like a lint filter...one can use it to store (suggested information), but what happens to the laundry (perceivable inspiration) if one doesn't clean out that memory? It's getting harder (ignorance) to clean (discernment).
Also...don't mix white and black when washing.
freemasons always kill their opposition, those who oppose or betray or reveal secrets.
a) Mostly within institutionalized freemasonry aka to those breaking a contract, hence the 33 ranks to grow ones spine as to be upright and not leaning towards or against others.
b) Nature reveals all (perceivable) to each one (perception)...anyone can choose to draw from revelation aka perceivable inspiration. Ignoring this for suggested information is how others utilize ones consent to shape secrets to be unveiled to initiates.
c) Free (choice) implies within separation (balance), not within opposition (imbalance)...yet one can only discern this for oneself.
I know the story
Nature (perceivable knowledge) doesn't store...those within shape stories (suggested information) to tempt one to store within mind/memory by consenting to hold onto.
This held on information then becomes a burden ones stands under (understand). What does a teacher do when a student wants to understand? He suggests more information to burden the student with.
Knowledge aka perceivable inspiration; when drawn from, relieves burden. It's like...whenever one draws from inspiration it clicks and one goes "ahhhhh". That's relief aka mind blowing.
jews always being spys and subverters
a) Suggested information is the spy device one willingly positions within ones mind/memory, while permitting remote control to another. Gentiles are telegraphing their movement by consenting alike to a suggesting jew, hence behaving like order follower.
Take Amazon and Pornhub as parts of five eyes Intelligence alliance for example...they don't have to spy on all the willingly given user data.
This in return makes those who don't follow orders stick out from the many like a nail for hammering down. All unification efforts aim to reduce spying necessity.
b) Sub (under) vert (turn)...gentiles are submitting themself by consenting to jewish suggestions, which in return turns them against one another within conflicts of reason.
Nature directs growth...turning from direction and under another implies ones free will of choice. A jew comprehends what sub-verto implies, while tempting ignorant gentiles to subvert themselves willingly. The resulting blame for subversion is then utilized to protect a jew from persecution by gentiles.
synagogues are always oddly designed
a) Synagouge/synagein - "to bring together" aka to synchronize. That's for gentiles.
b) Odd (choice) implies within even (balance)...that's for a chosen one aka ones choice.
c) Design/sign - "signifying mark of identification". That's idolatry for gentiles to distract from identical (inception towards death) differentiation (life).
Marking (sign) self divides (de) one against one another.
Notice the narrative of "intelligent design" aka INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design
even in the shape of a triangle
a) Using odds (choice) to hold angles together implies uneven (imbalance).
b) SHAPE, verb - "to form; to mold; to cast; to regulate; to adjust; to adapt to a purpose"...flow (inception towards death) shapes form (life).
Triangulation tempts ones line of sight to affix a point of view within a moving system.
always well hidden
All way reveals each one within. Once one spots what others are hiding, all the distractions build around the hidden imply concealment aka ones concealing mind, when ignoring what was always there.
Utilize movement aka a moving mind to discern between solid and fluid aka temporal and ongoing....which of the buildings are designed temporal, and which are designed with the ongoing in mind? Once one sees the latter, one can think away the former and thereby navigate in-between all the distractions.
exclusive communities
a) Clusive/cludo - "to confine within"...being implies ex (reaction) set free with-in (action). A jew tempts gentiles to ignore this, which then permits a jew to exclude gentiles.
b) A jew suggest communism (community) to tempt consenting gentiles together, hence collectivizing them, which in return permits each jew to remain apart from one another and a partial within whole.
a) Being implies FREE within MA of SONIC aka choice within matter of sound.
b) Consenting by free will of choice to a suggestion; permits another to shape matter within sound...that's magic aka mag-son-ic.
They can't see the devil even when he's everywhere in plain sight.
a) Devil is in the detail/detaillier - "cut into pieces"
b) Sight implies within whole (perceivable)...what other partials are showing (suggested) tempts one to ignore whole.
c) Plain (inception towards death) sight (life)...what others are suggesting towards ones sight tempts one to hold onto it (information) while ignoring that ones perception within all perceivable moves (inspiration) and therefore cannot be held onto.
mental gymnastics, newspeak in their heads
Aka suggested information upheld willingly within ones mind/memory.
Nature doesn't speak...it moves sound. Those within shape spoken words to distract from moving sound.
Archaeologists uncover
a) Archaeo/archon (to begin) + logi/logic (reason)...reasoning about suggested contradicts perceivable beginning.
b) -ist (logist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (logism)
c) Nature reveals all (perceivable) to each one (perception)...reasoning (logic) about suggested beginning (archaeo) tempts one to ignore that.
d) Beginning (inception) and end (death) implies same flow for each different form (life) coming to be within.
e) Moses (law giver) implies motion giving L(and) A(ir) W(ater) for matter to balance within. Those within given law cannot give only resist (need) the temptation (want) of taking, hence wielding free will of choice during dominance of balance, while being (life) moved (inception towards death).
f) PROMISE; noun - "a solemn pledge; a vow; a declaration in reference to the future made by one person to another"...that implies ones free will of choice consenting to suggested progressivism by another, which establishes the suggested as a promissory note within the consenting ones mind/memory.
Holding onto a promised land tempts one to ignore natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka land to balance on; air to breathe and water to be solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death).
a) On implies motion...how could nothing move?
b) Why use plural (eyes) instead of singular (all seeing eye)?