What was that to prove?
Lift (life) can discern oneself only while being propelled (inception towards death)...seeking proof from others contradicts ones self discernment.
Notice for yourself that living implies getting a lift by being propelled within process of dying, hence establishing temporary growth (matter) within ongoing loss (motion).
Literally nothing useful came from that.
a) How could "nothing" be lifted or propelled?
b) How could literal aka "words in their natural meaning" be lifted and propelled?
c) What if perceivable sound propels, while suggested words tempt those being propelled to ignore the lift thereof?
d) What if holding onto a suggested word makes it harder to lift self while being propelled within perceivable sound?
AERODYNAMIC
a) Aka aeros; aer (air) + dynamikos (powerful)...what can you tell me about the nature which empowers L(and) A(ir) W(ater)?
b) What if air implies matter within momentum of motion? What can you tell me about "solid; liquid; gas" and the power which differentiates each one from another?
phenomenon
a) What if few suggest phenomenalism?... https://www.etymonline.com/word/phenomenalism#etymonline_v_46260
b) What if many can be tricked with suggestion to ignore perception?
Sleight of hand: "Say what you want (suggestion), but keep your lips sealed (perception)...Something like a phenomenon"... https://genius.com/Ll-cool-j-phenomenon-lyrics
This is well-known, solid-grounded physics.
Knowledge implies ones perception; physic implies all perceivable bringing forward each ones perception aka solid within fluid.
What others suggest IS tempts one to ignore what WAS perceivable. When you write "this is"...you tempt others to ignore that everything was perceivable before you could shape a suggestion about what this is.
That's the trick aka the difference between science/scio/to know/to perceive as one and scientism as suggested by another.
I guess planes are fake somehow.
All perceivable implies moving reality; ones consent to hold onto anything suggested implies "fake".
A plane implies a solid within fluid aka a temporal shaped within constant change. Your guesses on "solid-grounded physics" tempt you to ignore that. This is being used to manipulate your perception of reality with suggested fiction, shaped by others.
You fire them from a gun. They only time they are propelled is while inside the barrel.
Why does one need to maintain a gun? What happens to a gun if not maintained regularly? What is this power affecting a gun while "not in use"?
There is no lift.
a) There implies a differentiation between here and there...only during the same motion (loss) can there be differentiation of matter (growth). There's the propelled lift.
b) Others utilize IS (suggestion) to invert WAS (perception), and nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt one to de-nial everything perceivable. That's why you use the words "is" and "no"...neither of which can be perceived in nature.
Point at anything in nature and say "this is"...all was perceivable before you could suggest what this is.
The only force acting on them outside the gun barrel is drag and gravity.
Motion implies the only acting force...each matter within is forced to react, both to being (life) moved (inception towards death) and to one another, when trying to come together.
Drag (to draw) implies matter drawing from motion; or trying to draw from other matter, hence burdening self aka becoming heavier (gravity; gravis).
keep living
Living (temporary growth) implies within process of dying (ongoing loss)...one cannot keep anything, while everything moves. Holding onto anything makes it harder to resist the temptation of being processed.
nothing makes sense
All perceivable generates each ones perception...senses work only within everything available. Few suggest nothing to tempt many to ignore everything perceivable.
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
sacrifice is a materialist ritual in place of esoteric understanding
a) EXO (inception towards death) towards ESO (life) implies sacrifice aka whole (motion) establishing a place for each partial (matter) by internal separation (momentum).
b) Material-ist implies ones consent to suggested material-ism, hence matter/material holding onto other matter.
take YHWH apart, learning how the word is formed letter-by-letter.
a) ONE...it doesn't matter which letters are suggested; only ones consent LETTING another shape words with it.
b) Oneness (whole) generates ones (partials) by setting each apart from one another. The foundation for wholeness and apartheid implies ONE...for all is one in energy.
c) Words (suggested information) can only be shaped within sound (perceivable inspiration)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter can't be held onto.
special power
Power (inception towards death) generates specials (life).
Words divide by de-fin-ition.
Ones consent to a suggested definition implies one to be a DEAF PHONECTICIAN aka one who ignores to discern self as divine (partial) within holy (whole) of perceivable sound.
The difference between division (being against) and separation (being within) can only be discerned by self...not by consenting to the suggestions of others; which tempt one into a conflict of reason aka into division aka into ignoring self for another.
One cannot choose among suggested choices without ignoring to be choice within perceivable.
Unfortunately we use them to commune.
a) Few suggest chance (fortune) to tempt many to ignore choice.
b) Few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt each singular (one) to ignore self for others.
c) Few suggest commune-ism to tempt each consenting one to become part of a collectivist many.
There's no "many" in nature unless one counts other ones as many. Each one within nature is distinct; different; apart from one another. Instead of looking for difference in alike behavior...notice that each one exists at a different position from one another.
You do give the answers that the literal interpretation suggests.
Which I try to break down within perceivable solution; like that interpretation aka interpreting action implies ones reaction to suggest an interpretation of perceivable action.
Interpreting perceivable inspiration as suggested information corrupts the one consenting to it; because then one holds onto words instead of adapting to being moved within sound.
Both answers and questions implies suggestion; only solution implies perception, hence being problem (life) within solution (inception towards death).
In the beginning was The Word...
...which you contradicted with "the word is formed letter-by-letter". I simply describe that contradicts by taking apart both words and letters, while trying to describe SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; whole; unbroken".
Only within whole can partials (life) have beginning (inception) and end (death).
plus one
That implies lacking self discernment of being one (partial) within oneness (whole) by trying to add to whole.
In reality...addition of one implies inception; subtraction of one implies death; multiplication of one implies intercourse for off-spring through one another, and division of one implies separation of oneness into ones.
Consenting to monotheism implies one consenting to another ones suggestion aka 1+1=2...that contradicts MONO (single; one and only).
Perception implies one; suggestion implies plus one...if one consents to it.
Through lower division we get wordS.
a) Sound remains whole; while each partial instrument within choose to put words together by LETTING each other suggest definitions for them.
b) Others suggest one to get (suggestion) so that one ignores what one got (perception). One cannot get more than reality already offers...endlessly trying to get fiction "gets one got".
Always return to the source
The trick here is "turning"...transmuting ingredients in and out of base doesn't turn, it moves differently within (life) same direction (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: "Turn around...Every now and then I get a little bit lonely...And you never coming 'round"... https://genius.com/Bonnie-tyler-total-eclipse-of-the-heart-lyrics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcOxhH8N3Bo ...over one billion views yet seldom one with sight.
When the 'law' and the 'will' become one thing
Law (need) coming to be will (want) aka want (life) struggling to resist temptation within need (inception towards death).
Each ones free WILL of choice within oneness of natural LAW aka balancing on land; breathing air and being solid within fluid of water.
I'll never downdoot you
It's logos/logic aka a conflict of reason (updoot vs downdoot)...no matter which side one chooses. Only implication (if/then aka if oneness; then ones) prevents conflicts among one another.
Yahweh/hawah/hayah - "was" aka that which was (perceivable) before that which is (suggested). Ones consent to any suggestion implies a sacrifice within perceivable.
Not sacrificing "animals", but "anima/animation"...hence ignoring fluid (perceivable) when holding onto solid (suggested).
idea of sacrifice
a) SAC'RIFICE, verb - "to devote (life) with loss (inception towards death)" aka ones sacrificial rite of passage.
b) Only during sacrifice can ideas be shaped.
counterfeit
Suggestion (information) pretends to be (counterfeit) perception (inspiration).
"water" is defined in the passage as very generic, as something from which land appears
a) Only within fluid (inception towards death) can there be solid (life)
b) Defined aka definite (affixed) contradicts generic (fluid).
c) Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies fluid nature differentiating solids.
d) Water above (fluid) generates waters below (solid).
a) Let it (motion) divide the waters (fluid momentum) from the waters (solid matter).
b) A firmament in the midst aka mind formed as center (ones perception) of surrounding (all perceivable).
is this firmament still there?
Only within firm/form a ment/mind/memory can one shape questions.
Copilot: "I’ll respectfully disengage"
Because ejecting from an airplane as a copilot is such a respectful thing to do...
Life isn't fair
Fair (inception towards death) generates partial; inequitable; partisan (life)...living implies within all fairness.
What about ones plane (inception towards death) of existence (life) aka ones response (re) to all (al)?
a) Propelled (inception towards death) lift (life)...natural law.
b) Both bullet and aircraft aka temporary matter is lifted and propelled within ongoing motion.
the truth is somewhere in between flat earth and globe earth
Being implies in (life) between (inception towards death)...others suggest flat earth and globe earth as truth to tempt one to incline towards a side, hence off-center.
characteristic of autism...indicating schizophrenia...secure psychiatric
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Bleuler (coined autism and schizophrenia)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud (founder of psychoanalysis)
Both conspiring with one another to conquer psychiatry... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg
https://www.amazon.de/Sigmund-Freud-zuversichtlich-Psychiatrie-Briefwechsel/dp/3796528570
How could the one holding the "center" balance it without being centered?
- HOST, noun (Latin hostia, a victim or sacrifice, from hostis, an enemy)
- HOSPITAL from hospes - "a guest" implies invitation to host...like a PARA-medic or a PARA-site.
laws
Aka suggested pluralism (laws) temping singular one to ignore perceivable L(and) A(ir) W(ater).
thermodynamic
DYNAMIC; adjective - "mechanical forces not in equilibrium, pertaining to force producing motion"...motion implies force of equilibrium (momentum) for each differential (matter) within.
DYNAMIC; noun - "energetic force; motive force"...that implies motion as the force of internal motivation.
Few suggest adjectives added to nouns to distract many from the inherent attribute of verbs...dynamic/power/strain/to exert force...hence generating heat (thermo).
electrolysis
Aka ELECTRO (inception towards death) LYSIS (life)...hence electing life to wield free will of choice to select.
Furthermore...Electric (need to let go) + Magnetic (want to hold onto).
save billions
a) Save/salvus/sol - "whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/save#etymonline_v_22794
b) Whole doesn't require to be saved; it implies salvation for each partial within.
c) Current cannot be saved...holding onto a currency tempts one to spend resistance on ignoring moving velocity of current.
water engine
Water can only exist EN (within) GINE/GEN (generation). Generation (inception towards death) irrigates re-generation (life).
a) Resolve aka ones response to being solved within all implies each thing (partial) within everything (whole).
b) SOLVE, verb - "separate the parts of any thing"...motion (inception towards death) dissolves into matter (life) internally, while matter (living) reacts to external solution (dying).
c) PLANE, noun - "even or level"...even (balance) generates odds (choice); odds struggles within even (low/high aka growth within loss).
PAR'ALLEL, adjective (Gr. against or opposite, and one the other) aka ones (life) parallel to one another within line (inception towards death). It's few who tempt many to meet within conflicts of reason aka in opposition to one another, while ignoring that nature sets each one apart from one another.
Important Psychological Reminder
a) Logic (conflict of reason) tempts one to ignore psyche (animating power).
b) Reminder implies responding to memory aka to information held within self, while ignoring perceivable inspiration moving through...which cannot be held onto.
c) Being implies product (life) in-between import (inception) and export (death).
We are an object consisting of one part free agent and one part deterministic processor.
a) Others suggest pluralism (we) to tempt each singular partial (one) within whole (oneness) to ignore self for others.
b) Object (inception towards death) generates subjects (life).
c) Consist (standing together) tempts ONE to ignore exist (standing apart from one another).
d) Agency/action (balance) generates regency/reaction (choice).
e) Free (life) implies within dominance (inception towards death) aka free-dom.
f) Suggested determinism (fixed boundaries) tempts one to ignore being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death), hence free (choice) within a moving boundary (balance).
Ones consent to any suggested -ism affixed it within ones mind/memory.
don't know the exact deterministic output of these inputs
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
b) Ones perception was generated within (input) all perceivable, while drawing out (output) of it.
c) Few suggest nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt many to de-nial perceivable for suggested...doing nothing (don't) inverts being (perception) done within everything (perceivable).
How many of these involuntary inputs are nefarious?
a) Oneness (whole) generates ones (partials)...so it can only be each one.
b) Nefarious aka NE (nothing) FARI (to speak)...nature doesn't speak, those within speak (suggested words) to distract from nature (perceivable sound).
Only within perceivable sound can one shape suggestible words...doing so implies spell-craft.
How many of these involuntary inputs are benevolent?
a) Voluntary/volent - "will"...within will (involuntary) + being will (benevolent).
b) FREE implies within dominance; WILL (want) implies within need; OF implies out of, hence within and in response to, CHOICE implies within balance.
Is our conscious agent "given" the gift of voluntary inputs, or does our conscious agent "create" these voluntary inputs from within itself?
a) Agent gives (inception) and takes (death) regents (life)...others suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt one to ignore discerning self as regent within agent (within everything).
One reacts as input (living) to being put out (dying)...others distract one from that with suggested input tempting consenting output.
b) Creationism (out of nothing) inverts transmutation aka ingredients (life) within base (inception towards death).
Motion (male) to momentum (female) to matter (trans-form)...being implies matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
What are the most impactful kinds of inputs?
Suggested IM (within) PACT (to fasten) tempts one to ignore that input (inception of life) implies resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
I don't think it is communists, instead I think it is dialectic thinking
COM (together; with) + DIA (two)...few suggest communism to tempt many together; ones consent to a suggestion by another one puts one and one together as two.
Whole (all perceivable) sets apart (each ones perception)...
reasoning...dialectic
That's dialectic thinking aka one vs one...want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; us vs them; me vs you; belief vs disbelief; on vs off; rich vs poor; love vs hate; good vs evil; left vs right; black vs white; vanilla vs chocolate; pepsi vs coke etc.
Reasoning implies two sides against one another.
DIA (two) LEG (to collect)...ones consent to another ones suggestion implies collecting two, hence holding onto suggested information within ones mind/memory, while thinking within a conflict of reason.
Dialectic thinking permeates much of our culture
a) PER (forward) MEARE (to pass)...only nature permeates (inception towards death); each one passing (life) resists dying.
b) Temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) needs to resist wanted temptation to cultivate self.
a cancer that is hard to eradicate
a) Cancer implies accumulation (life) during eradication (inception towards death)...life wants to hold onto (temptation); yet needs to let go (resistance).
b) Cancer/karkinos/kar - "hard"...being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death). Ignoring this by solidifying establishes constipation within procession. Life perceives this constipation as cancer.
laws of perspective
Per specio implies by partial; being implies within whole L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...others suggest pluralism (laws) to distract each singular partial from discerning oneself.
flat or round
a) Flat implies line; round implies circle...only within line can a circle be shaped.
b) Cut a circle at any point and you'll have a bend line...being implies bending (life) within line (inception towards death).
c) Few utilize suggestion to tempt consenting many into circular reasoning aka "mind bending".
why's this guy talking about selling a Renoir
RE (response) NOIR (black) aka ones ignorance, which is sold by ones consent to the suggestion of another, hence selling self out when buying into another.
Now it (AI) just won't even continue.
Lesson to be learned...natural continues; artificial tempts one to ignore that it does.
selling one’s soul
- Without ('s)... one soul/sole aka one and only aka single.
- With ('s)... belonging to one as oppose to another.
That little ('s) implies ones deal of selling a part of self as a share to another one.
To make it even more obvious...apostrophe/apostrephein - "avert, turn away". One cannot add an apostrophe to ONE without turning away from oneself. If one ignores self by turning away towards another, then one cannot discern SOLE implied within SOUL.
- Duran/durus (hard) + Reflex/reflectere (bending back)
Underneath the obvious pedophile/sodomy theme...duration (inception towards death) and reflection (life). Few are doubling duration (duran duran) by reflecting (reflex) many away from light.
The double duration implies many ignoring perceivable reality for suggested fiction. Fiction cannot negate reality; it's the one who ignores reality that takes on fiction by another one as a burden, hence doubling load upon self.
Real Time with With Bill Maher
a) Notice the Proto-Indo-European root of TIME (di-mon-) and DEMON (dai-mon-)...
b) Notice Bill (seal) Maher (maker)...
c) Notice RE (response) AL (all) WITH (within)...
a) Kabbalah/qabbalah/qibbel - "to receive; admit; accept" implies ones free will of choice consenting to the suggestion of another.
b) Religion/religio - "to bind anew" implies ones free will of choice binding self to another by willingly consenting to a suggestion.
Nature sets free while inspiring resistance...accepting bonds contradicts that.
a) Free will of choice can only exist at center of balance...others suggest agree vs disagree (imbalance) to tempt ones choice to incline towards a side, hence balancing self.
b) Ones will (life) can only exist within all way (inception towards death).
c) Does life agreeing or disagreeing with the process of dying change outcome?
Progression "makes" each one within apart from one another; those consenting to suggested pluralism (we) ignore to re-make self.