To discern implies perceiving differences, hence being cernere/separated (life) within align/line (inception towards death)...Jake Paul implies a suggested/suggesting idol tempting one to hold onto/consent with.
One wants to hold onto; one needs to let go. The former implies ignorance; the latter discernment. Any suggestion shaped within perceivable implies a graven idol.
One cannot shape within nature; only shift what nature already shaped.
God wants
God implies needed whole for each wanting partial within. Each partial needs to resist wanted temptation, hence needing to let go of wanting to hold onto...like for example the suggested word "God".
apparent enough
Enough implies "sufficient aka needed"; while apparent implies "coming into sight aka perceivable"....others utilizing the words "apparent enough" which implies a suggestion (want) tempting one to ignore perceivable (need) when consenting.
One has to discern self as coming (inception towards death) into being (life) to be able to further discern ones sight (perception) within all (perceivable).
to win
Aka towards overcoming conflict by defeating opposition. That implies suggested progressivism tempting one to seek outcomes, while ignoring to be within perceivable origin.
Ones position as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) isn't in op-position aka opposing the position of another, but oportune aka op (in front of) portus (habor) aka a vessel (matter) within harbor (momentum) of sea (motion).
Matter (choice) within momentum (balance) implies a safe harbor for response-ability (free will of choice), hence being enabled (momentum) to react (matter) to action (motion).
good beats evil
If one discerns self as being at (be-at) aka near a conflict of reason (good vs evil); then one strikes a beat aka beats on one another.
Nature doesn't strike beats...it moves all sound through each one instrument.
To discern implies perceiving differences, hence being cernere/separated (life) within align/line (inception towards death)...Jake Paul implies a suggested/suggesting idol tempting one to hold onto/consent with.
One wants to hold onto; one needs to let go. The former implies ignorance; the latter discernment. Any suggestion shaped within perceivable implies a graven idol.
One cannot shape within nature; only shift what nature already shaped.
God implies needed whole for each wanting partial within. Each partial needs to resist wanted temptation, hence needing to let go of wanting to hold onto...like for example the suggested word "God".
Enough implies "sufficient aka needed"; while apparent implies "coming into sight aka perceivable"....others utilizing the words "apparent enough" which implies a suggestion (want) tempting one to ignore perceivable (need) when consenting.
One has to discern self as coming (inception towards death) into being (life) to be able to further discern ones sight (perception) within all (perceivable).
Aka towards overcoming conflict by defeating opposition. That implies suggested progressivism tempting one to seek outcomes, while ignoring to be within perceivable origin.
Ones position as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) isn't in op-position aka opposing the position of another, but oportune aka op (in front of) portus (habor) aka a vessel (matter) within harbor (momentum) of sea (motion).
Matter (choice) within momentum (balance) implies a safe harbor for response-ability (free will of choice), hence being enabled (momentum) to react (matter) to action (motion).
If one discerns self as being at (be-at) aka near a conflict of reason (good vs evil); then one strikes a beat aka beats on one another.
Nature doesn't strike beats...it moves all sound through each one instrument.
Who's suggesting "beats"?
"It doesn't matter who's wrong or right...just beat it"
Hebrew חָבַט (chabat) - "to beat off, beat out"