no chief
What's the message? Can't hide free will of choice behind "I'm just following orders" without someone to shirk response-ability onto.
no local
Where's choice situated? At center (choice) of circumference (balance) aka local (ones choice within perceivable balance) among foreign (suggested choices tempting imbalance).
authorities' actions
a) Does choice require another choice to authorize reaction?
b) Does balance act upon reacting choices?
c) If authorities follow directions (I'm just following orders) then that implies reaction...not action.
police action
How can police/polis/city/center act, when it's circumference (inception towards death) which establishes each reacting center (life)?
Why are few building cities to simultaneously draw in order followers, while driving out those who resist? Why are cities the center of crime, while having the most law enforcement?
I have a group which tracks things that connect to me
a) Notice few suggesting the internet of things to connect many, while using "groups" to prevent anyone to "connect" to few.
b) TRACK, noun - "a mark left by something that has passed along"...what mark does being (life) passed along (inception towards death) leave?
Why is it called a track record (Latin recorder; to call to mind)?
a) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a conflict of reason within ones mind aka an argue-ment...clearly vs obscure; obvious vs oblivious, and simple vs complex.
b) Suggested writing tempts one to ignore perceivable delineation aka being (life) moved within a line (inception towards death). Why? Because to write implies to outline; while to be implies inline.
c) Question implies pursuing (quest) action (tion)...being implies reaction (life) resisting the temptation of action (inception towards death).
In other words...questions towards outcome tempts being to ignore origin.
d) The suggested rhetoric "beggars can't be choosers" tempts one to ignore that begging implies by ones free will of choice. So begging for question nonetheless implies shirking of ones response-ability (free will of choice) onto another.
e) Notice that appropriate implies taking into possession, which is what few are exploiting when many give consent to take suggested into possession.
In nature...a solid (life) cannot take possession of fluid (inception towards death); yet can be tricked to spend resistance on holding onto other solids, hence selling self out when consenting to the suggestions of another.
torn apart
The Giselle was set apart within whole; the lion tearing apart makes the Giselle whole again.
feeds the lion's power
Whole empowers (inception) and feeds upon (death) partials (life)...a lion feeds upon a Giselle to resist being consumed.
The lord giveth, the lord taketh away
Momentum of motion gives (inception) and takes (death) matter (life).
witness such an act
One can only perceive reactions (partials) while being enacted upon (whole)...others suggest one to witness (affirm) acts (action) aka to hold onto form within flow aka to ignore reacting to being enacted upon.
a way to cope
Way (inception towards death) doesn't cope (contend on equal terms)...it puts each one (life) at odds (choice) during equal (balance).
Few suggest many to cope against one another within conflicts of reason, which equalizes odds.
malevolent creator
Malevolent aka mal (bad) volens (will) implies ones free will of choice reacting to a suggestion like creationism, while ignoring to be transformed (life) within flow (inception towards death).
we must break free
From all to one implies break; being choice within balance implies free within dom, and consenting to suggested pluralism (we) binds singular (one) to another.
In short...choose to let go of "we" to discern ones free will of choice.
free of charge
Charging (inception towards death) free (life)...ones consent to suggested permits others to utilize that charge, while one ignores to re-charge within perceivable.
without fear
Being implies within; fear tempts one to ignore that for without.
No coincidences...Danny Trejo gets in fight at LA 4th of July parade - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3l_AE7bSZE
are you
a) "I am whatever you say I am...cause if I wasn't, then why would I say I am?"
b) The foundation of you (phonetic jew) is based on one claiming self as "me; myself or I"; which in return brands everyone else as "you".
A jew tricks gentiles to define each other aka to slap labels onto each other aka to brand each other like cattle. How? By tempting them to consent to any suggested label. Are you... implies such a temptation aiming at the consent of another.
or
OR, conjunction - "a connective that marks an alternative"...alternation implies action/motion/movement; trying to connect alternation with a mark contradicts that.
Direction (inception towards death) generates alternation (life)...few within tempt many to connect marks by consenting to suggested information, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration alternates through each ones perception.
21st century
To be implies within (life) momentum (inception towards death) aka within perceivable moment aka NOW...not before or after. Few suggest "21st Century" to tempt many to ignore now aka to ignore perceivable reality for suggested fiction.
21st Century only exists as a suggested label within a consenting ones mind, and no other life form chooses to hold onto such a label.
schizoid
Coined by Eugene Bleuler who conspired with Sigismund Schlomo Freud to "conquer psychiatry". Gentiles using it to psychoanalyze each other implies being conquered by a jewish suggestion, while branding each other like cattle.
tl; dr: Does one have the free will of choice to respond differently from one another? If so...voilà ce que tu m’as demandé.
on your eyes
a) On implies motion...how could nothing move?
b) Why use plural (eyes) instead of singular (all seeing eye)?
If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest
a) Employer (all perceivable) generates servants (ones perception)...slave (ones consent) permits master (suggestion by another).
b) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot be arrested...form (perception) can be tricked to ignore flow (perceivable), by holding onto (suggested), hence arresting the development of ones mind.
The fight to prevent arrest implies each ones need to resist wanted temptations by another, hence choosing want tempting one to ignore need, thereby arresting self by ignoring a moving origin.
From same (inception towards death) to difference (life)...alternation.
doesn't even know where
Where? At center of circumference as odd (life) within even (inception towards death).
As for "doesn't"...where does nothing exist?
Taking (consent) a token (suggestion) tempts one to ignore given (perception).
claim
Holding anything within ones hand implies a claim; nature forcing one to let go of whatever one holds onto refutes any claims.
video
Aka Latin videre "to see"...watching what another shows contradicts ones sight.
their was a second
If EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power" implies first, then what does second imply?
- PHARMACEU'TICAL, adjective - "to practice witchcraft; poison or medicine"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Pharmaceutic
- MED'ICINE, noun - "any substance, liquid or solid, that has the property of curing or mitigating disease"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/medicine
Aka poison (suggested information) or medicine (perceivable inspiration)...liquid (inception towards death) or solid (life).
- CURE, noun - "to prepare; remedy for disease"
Aka towards (inception towards death) preparing (life) aka remedy (ongoing loss) for dis-ease (temporary growth).
actual chemist
Chimistry implies analysis (set apart) and synthesis (put together)...nature sets apart ones perception within all perceivable, while few within nature tempt consenting many together with suggested.
A jew suggests synthesis to tempt gentiles into paralysis by ignoring analysis.
Example: UNITED STATES implies synthesis; ISRAEL implies analysis and JOE BIDEN implies paralysis....synthesis continues because paralysis prevents analysis.
I’ve been sporadically watching
Which implies as opposed to regular watching. A jew suggests watching to establish gentiles into a regular whole with sporadic partials standing out. The consenting "regular" whole can then be used to "regulate" the sporadic partials.
What' the issue with watching? It's that it tempts one to "keep watch", hence holding onto what others are showing, while ignoring that what nature offers (perceivable) ones sight (perception) cannot be held onto.
the only way to describe it is a surrealist shitshow.
a) -ist (surrealist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (surrealism), which permits another to shape the suggested by free will of choice for a consenting audience, hence the shitshow.
b) Surreal implies in addition (sur) to reality...that's fiction aka ones ignorance of all perceivable for the "addition" of another ones suggestion.
In reality...addition (inception) and subtraction (death) imply within the same motion for each different matter (life) within. An addition cannot add anything (partial) into everything (whole).
Ones consent to suggested surrealism tempts one to ignore reality for endless addition "shown" by few and "watched" by many.
Difficult to watch
Because watching doesn't differ...it tempts alike reactions. Many focusing on a screen filled by few ignores differentiation for sheep like compliance, order following; NPC behavior; collectivization etc.
Everyone there looks confused
Because by mass consent of watchers; their focus fuses together (con-fuse). Few generate con-tent (holding together) to amass the consent of many.
To look implies to lock onto, while ignoring that nature aka natural order aka process of dying implies a continuous release aka a setting free of anything living within.
polymorphic
a) MORPH; noun - "genetic variant of an animal" implies animation (inception towards death) generating variances (life).
b) Poly implies more than one...there can be only one aka one for all and all for one. Being implies partial (one) within whole (oneness).
Reality implies UNI; fiction implies POLY...one can only discern this by self; not through others.
AWOL aka absence (suggested information) without leave (perceivable inspiration) aka stuck within the allegorical cave while being free within projected reality.
As for laser...light (all perceivable) amplification (suggested by another) by stimulated emission of radiation (ones consent).
This nullifies conservatives as any real opposition going forward.
a) To nullify implies one holding onto de-nial (Latin nihilo, nothing)
b) Nature doesn't conserve (preserve from loss)...it presents growth (life) into loss (inception towards death).
c) Ones consent to suggested conservatism tempts one to hold onto denial of all perceivable.
d) Going forwards (inception toward death) generates resistance (life)...going against opposition destroys resistance.
e) Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) perceivable...ignoring this by consenting to suggested establishes a conflict of reason (real vs fake).
Nature doesn't fake/feign/fold/falsify/counterfeit...RE (reaction) within AL (action) wields the free will of choice to fake it.
Sleight of hand... https://www.lyrics.com/lyric/35958053/Falco/Naked
- Naked, I don't want to fake it
- Naked, I just can't await it
Aka I don't want to fake origin (perceivable); I just can't await outcome (suggested). Ones perception within all perceivable operates in the nude, clothing oneself with suggested tempts one to ignore that.
Naked implies need; cloth implies want. An off-spring enters naked, and no matter how much clothes an elder wears...nature is gonna take out the naked.
discernment aligns
To discern implies perceiving differences, hence being cernere/separated (life) within align/line (inception towards death)...Jake Paul implies a suggested/suggesting idol tempting one to hold onto/consent with.
One wants to hold onto; one needs to let go. The former implies ignorance; the latter discernment. Any suggestion shaped within perceivable implies a graven idol.
One cannot shape within nature; only shift what nature already shaped.
God wants
God implies needed whole for each wanting partial within. Each partial needs to resist wanted temptation, hence needing to let go of wanting to hold onto...like for example the suggested word "God".
apparent enough
Enough implies "sufficient aka needed"; while apparent implies "coming into sight aka perceivable"....others utilizing the words "apparent enough" which implies a suggestion (want) tempting one to ignore perceivable (need) when consenting.
One has to discern self as coming (inception towards death) into being (life) to be able to further discern ones sight (perception) within all (perceivable).
to win
Aka towards overcoming conflict by defeating opposition. That implies suggested progressivism tempting one to seek outcomes, while ignoring to be within perceivable origin.
Ones position as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) isn't in op-position aka opposing the position of another, but oportune aka op (in front of) portus (habor) aka a vessel (matter) within harbor (momentum) of sea (motion).
Matter (choice) within momentum (balance) implies a safe harbor for response-ability (free will of choice), hence being enabled (momentum) to react (matter) to action (motion).
good beats evil
If one discerns self as being at (be-at) aka near a conflict of reason (good vs evil); then one strikes a beat aka beats on one another.
Nature doesn't strike beats...it moves all sound through each one instrument.
Who's suggesting "beats"?
- https://genius.com/Selena-gomez-beat-lyrics
- https://genius.com/Michael-jackson-beat-it-lyrics
- https://genius.com/2-unlimited-let-the-beat-control-your-body-lyrics
- https://www.beatsbydre.com/
"It doesn't matter who's wrong or right...just beat it"
Hebrew חָבַט (chabat) - "to beat off, beat out"
- Virgina Roberts - Virgin Robber
- Eisenhower - Steel Hitter - Stalin Hitler
Notice the difference in discernment required to be able to see the layers, including phonetic and different languages simultaneously...
Why average American public in social does not make jokes and memes around it?
Average/avarie/awariya - "damage to ship; damaged merchandise" aka AV'ERAGE, noun - "in commerce, a contribution to a general loss".
A jew suggests an average to tempt each exceptional gentile to fall in line, while ignoring to sustain self.
"Crook" also means "cheater", "swindler", "renegade"
Mean/mydho - "middle"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mean#etymonline_v_12496
All meanings are suggest to one by others aka from circumference (others) towards center (one)...holding onto a suggested meaning by consenting to it implies leaning off-center aka away from middle, while permitting another to build suggested information at center aka media/medius/middle.
It's the suggested word meaning which distracts one from perceivable implication (if/then).
it is done through distortimg surnames, not playing with direct meanings.
Direction implies from/to aka linear movement...crook/hook/bend implies a distortion of linear into a curve.
surname
a) A jew suggests surnames as additions (sur) to brands (name) shaped within a moving system. One can neither brand nor add anything from within a moving system, yet one can be tricked to hold onto a suggested brand, while viewing it as an addition.
b) Name/nombre/number aka "designation of a unit" implies one (Latin unitas/unus) and nature designates each unit through addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (being partial within whole).
c) Nature doesn't give names...it nurtures natives. Natives adding surnames neglects nature. It's idolatry.
The lack of logical consistency
Logical consistency implies conflict...hence chosen few being able to operate within balance, while ignorant many imbalance each other within conflicts of reason.
Also...con (together) sistere (to place) implies one vs another instead of apart from one another.
Stockholm syndrome
Consent to suggested was given willingly, hence offering self as host/hostage for the suggested information by another. The hostage wasn't taken...it holds onto what another offered, while ignoring to let go.
As for the psychological bond...ones consent to any suggestion implies the bond, for which one ignores perceivable psyche (animating power), while establishing a conflict of reason (logic).
cognitive infiltration to suggest events
a) Cognitive implies ones perception within all perceivable...ones consent to suggested implies infiltration by another.
b) EVENT', noun (Latin evenio) - "to come" aka coming (all perceivable) towards being (ones perception). That's the only event...any event suggested by another tempts one to ignore self discernment within origin.
to cause confusion
Being implies "cause to" aka from cause (inception towards death) into effects (life) aka a setting apart...not a melting (fuse) together (con).
Ones consent to anything suggested by another implies a melting together.
muddy the waters
Being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka a setting apart of vessels from one another, which permits a "clear" passage. Coming together by consenting to each others suggestions "muddies the waters".
Talmud Quotes
NumbaZero : "shit like this"
Right wingers are already claiming
A claiming wing cannot fly.
every one of the negative thumbnails is a video that promotes Prodentim
A liability shield. Just like ingredient and side-effect lists for pharmaceuticals, but for consumers with a shorter attention span. Clicking on such a video implies ones consent to the warning, which the video itself then is used to distract from.
A more aggressive disclaimer for an ever more defenseless crowd.
Notice that gentiles seek confirmation to affix and settle something, while anything a jew suggests changes.