must be coming from
Origin (perceivable) cannot be assumed; one can only take hold of outcomes (suggested).
position of faith
Faith positions one under another.
no other options
Option implies ones choice...suggested choices by others tempt one to ignore option for selection aka opting out by selecting another.
No one cares
Yet most carry the meaning of words, as suggested by few, with them...
etymology nerd
Etymos (true) logic (reason)...reasoning implies a conflict aka true vs false.
Few suggest "the deduction of words from their originals" aka "the analysis of compound words into their primitives" aka "etymology" to establish conflicts of reason among many.
when they want to suppress something
How does viewing; sharing; liking; following and subscribing to another not suppress self?
content creator
Doesn't it contradict the first commandment to label another as such?
everyone is experiencing completely different
ONE implies different from one another. Experiencing complete implies being a partial (perception) within whole (perceivable), hence within the process of differentiation.
social medias at the exact same
Social media implies mass consent to suggested information by few mediators...it's this mass consent, which tempts each different one to ignore self for the exact same suggestion by a chosen one who mediates.
The issue in the video is that she assumed everyone sees the same, while ignoring that each one perceives everything perceivable differently. She (female) and He (male) are apart from one another....so why would each one see the same as the other one?
The trick...same (all perceivable) generates differences (ones perception), while differences tempt (suggestion) each other to react alike (consent). That alike consent to a tempting suggestion implies each ones free will of choice...no one else can make that choice for one, and many are willingly giving consent to suggestions by few.
In short...watching media implies consenting to let suggestion mediate for perception.
Is this people or just one person?
Person implies per sonos (by sound) aka a setting apart...people implies suggested pluralism tempting partials together.
Notice: "I didn't know people were still taking this...they're everywhere"...that implies one suggesting in the name of many. It's on oneself to resist this suggested pluralism, which would give another one the power over many.
could be
Could implies "to be able"...considering if something suggested could be tempts one to ignore being (life) enabled (inception towards death) within perceivable.
In other words...your "could be" enables my suggestion to allow me to add "should be"...which I can use to control you.
What are they doing to people at concerts?
a) Concert/concertare aka con (together; with) certare (to contend) aka bringing together in conflict, which brings harm to one (harm-ony).
b) Few suggest con (together) cernere (apart) as a contradiction to tempt many into harming each other by coming together.
Nature doesn't assemble listeners...it (sound) takes apart (in-stru-ment) each one listener...yet most don't use ears to hear.
no theory left in conspiracy
Theory (suggestion) tempts one to ignore practice (perception)...ignorance confines expression.
the other way
Ones (life) way (inception towards death)....and what other?
one bit of string
Aka ones bit (choice) of stringing (consent) self to another ones suggestion.
connection
Con (together; with) nectere (to bind) tion (action)...if action binds together, then how could reactions react to being (life) enacted upon (inception towards death)?
What if few suggest "con-nect" to tempt consenting many to ignore "tion"? What if consent binds many together, which in return permits few to amass many through suggested temptations?
To put all pieces together you have to know
a) To know implies to perceive moving differences...putting differences together equalizes them.
b) What if all (perceivable) sets each one piece (perception) apart from one another?
c) If few are in control of many, then that implies that many were put together by few...do you think more goyim put together will change that dynamic?
d) Notice the hostility when trying to put a chosen one together as "the jews"...how is it so hard for many to put few together?
how many pieces exists in the first place
a) First implies whole (oneness)...second/seco - "to divide; separate" implies partials (ones). Whole places partials.
b) How? Motion (oneness) to momentum (separation) to matter (ones)...internal separation of whole into partials.
c) MANY, noun (men'ny) - "a retinue of servants"...hence each one of many consenting to serve in bondage to few, who suggest abrahamism (father of multitude).
Who is behind all...
HIND, noun - "a domestic; a servant; pertaining to the part which follows, in opposition to the fore part"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/hind
ALL moves one from inception towards death...many choose to ignore this by following BE-HIND the suggested progressivism by few.
Behind inverts fronted (inception towards death) to be (life).
How exactly they communicate
Perception is given, suggestion is taken. Few adapt to what is given, while giving many suggestions to take hold of. The latter is being called "communication", while the former is being ignored by many.
What many call "communication" implies a huge game of telephone/chinese whispers/stille post/russian scandal/whisper down the lane/telefon shavur etc.
Nature gives sound; few within suggest words to trick many to play telephone against each other. Whatever many are communicating to each other was shaped by few...not by nature.
How to find and exterminate
Being implies expression (matter) within term (momentum) of foundation (motion) aka EX within TERM of FIND. One can only find something if a foundation already exists...looking/locking to find tempts one to ignore being within a moving foundation.
your bosses
Consenting to suggested implies employee selecting boss aka follower selecting leader...student selecting teacher...voter selecting representative...slave selecting master...many selecting few....ones choice selecting chosen ones suggestion.
If one claims self as "me; myself or I"; then one selects all other ones as "YOU" (phonetic jew).
Boss - "overseer"...ones consent to "understand" selects another as "overseer".
they have to communicate with their puppets
Consent by puppet implies attachment to string aka ones mind attaching itself to the suggested information from another by holding onto it. As long as puppets are bound; a puppeteer is in control of a self confined golem which follows orders blindly.
Example...a jew suggests religion (Latin religio; to bind anew). Each consenting gentile keeps himself in bondage by "faith", while viewing all of reality through the lens of suggested fiction aka through a self confining lens. As soon as consent was given does "communication" happen among many about the suggestions of few...not communication with few.
This communication among many keeps them within conflicts of reason aka following the process of dying without resisting, while spending their resistance against each other by coming together in endless wars until spend. Few simply set the stage for these conflicts; while contradicting both sides to keep them going at each other.
surveil public figures movements
To surveil a moving mind (move ment) implies confining self by focusing on another. A public figure implies a form held within focus of public...hence tempting the minds of many to ignore motion.
Motion frees (matter) mind (momentum)...
creation of such community
Aka creationism and communism...both suggested by few to collectivize the consent of many.
to the problem
Solution (inception towards death) towards problem (life)...few suggest many to solve problems instead.
History is all a lie
a) If there's more than history, then it can't be ALL.
b) What if ones consent to HIS suggested STORY makes it true for self? What if HE BREW HIS STORY to temp one to hold onto something from another one, while ignoring that all moves?
Look at all
If all moves and one within chooses to look/lock onto anything, then one ignores being (life) moved (inception towards death).
should leave books for the future
A suggested book/bind/bond/bondage tempts ones consent in-between covers, while focusing on spell-craft by others...this tricks the reader to bind self to that which was; covering self from that which is, while waiting for that which comes to be.
What happened to the Library of Alexandria is happening under the disguise of "kindle fire"...and yet the readers only ever want more books to consume.
this seems like a generational war
Generation (inception towards death) establishes reaction (life)...war implies a conflict among reactions aka a conflict of reason. You chose to react by opening your comment with NO, which implies a conflict of reason (yes vs no) against other. That's war.
Speaking of the future
How would one perceive the future without another suggesting speeches about it? Does ones origin speak aka does nature shape words to tell anyone being within about whats gonna happen next?
Can life discern its own death? Can life perceive its own death?
coming generations
What if generation implies origin for each generated being coming to be within? What if suggested pluralism contradicts singular generation? What if you as singular could be tricked with suggested pluralism to believe in more than generation aka more than perceivable origin is offering?
history will spin
What if ones will turning/spinning towards "his story" implies turning away from nature/origin/all?
Is there no one putting all the pieces together?
ONE implies a piece set apart from one another within ALL...one (partial) cannot put all (whole) together, while being within.
Instead of putting all together...try setting oneself apart from others.
Waiting for an outcome implies moving within origin aka being within everything sensible...drowning ones senses implies ignoring origin aka de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing).
In short...nothing implies ones ignorance of everything.
Alcohol aka all-kahala implies "staining all"...by ones ignorance thereof. Nnastrovje!
not in a crisis...no emergency
Crisis/krisis/krinein - "to separate"...being implies separation within, while emerging (matter) from generating (momentum) origin (motion).
Koonin
Steven Elliot Koonin aka cohen/kohen/kihen - "priest"
"The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man."
Nature produces existence aka each ones expressed growth outwards...few within tempt many into subsistence aka many (population) standing under each chosen one.
Nature sets apart; few within tempt many together. Democracy aka demos (people) + kratos (strength) implies the power of population wielded by few, who are selected as the producers by the willing subsistence of man(y).
It's less about exposing Einstein than about gentile impotence when reasoning over jewish suggestions. Why? Because ones choice to reason against another always carries back to a chosen ones suggestion aka "it's all relative".
Relative/relatus - "to carry back". All (inception towards death) carries each one (life) back to origin.
How could one sense nothing?
- Jesse/jess/iacere - "to throw/cast"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/jess#etymonline_v_35204
- Ventura/venture - "to risk the loss; to dare, to presume"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/venture#etymonline_v_4708
Not in a single one have I seen
That's the trick...space so big and nano so small one cannot perceive it without others suggesting it.
Sleight of hand...Mork & Mindy aka mork/myrk - "darkness" and mindy - "mind".
Nanu-Nanu..."unless you can say no (nano) there will be no pieces left for yourself"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9xPivDPrCc
talking heads...keep piling up on their own narratives
It's those who consent that are keeping the narrated (narrative) stories (talk) within mind/memory. Those who consent to suggested are claiming ownership.
it is very difficult to take
NaNO-NaNO...it's very tempting to take and very hard to resist that temptation by letting go.
The case against
If you assume the position of power (suggestion) then people will soon give it to you (consent).
important context
If you give them what they desire (suggestion); then you can deprive them of what they really need (perception).
lets see what the public does
Luring with suggestion to fish for consent.
if no revolt then we will normalize this'.
The norm implies following suggested; revolt implies turning from perceivable, while following suggested.
riot
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Quiet-riot-cum-on-feel-the-noize-lyrics
Aka feel (perception) the noize (suggestion)...one is quiet; the other loud.
The ring implies religion (that which binds anew); the conflict within implies reason, and the onlookers outside imply mass ignorance.
Those within conflicts of reason are repleting their resistance against each other; while tempting onlookers to focus on the conflict; which thereby are binding themselves too into a box.
The few suggesting what the conflict is about are operating out of bounds; remain hidden among mass ignorance; control both sides of every conflict within the ring, while getting empowered from behind to shape destruction upfront.
Shape of earring...
JAB Holding Company is owned by the Reimann family..."Reimann (Hebrew: ריימן) is a German and jewish surname, also Reiman, Reinman, Rhinemann, Riemann. It is also commonly associated with Ashkenazi jews."
throw up the biggest smokescreen possible with jewmatria
As in gematria/geometria/geometry aka measuring the earth? If all is one in energy; then how does anyone within measure all of it?
Why put a point behind a process (thought)? How about thought...