James Corbett comes close but his time is primarily allocated to zoomed-out big-picture research, so there's many important pieces that barely even make it onto his radar.
There's gotta be at least one other person out there somewhere with similar abilities but more time (eg, someone retired, financially secure and no wife & kids to deal with).
A suggested book/bind/bond/bondage tempts ones consent in-between covers, while focusing on spell-craft by others...this tricks the reader to bind self to that which was; covering self from that which is, while waiting for that which comes to be.
What happened to the Library of Alexandria is happening under the disguise of "kindle fire"...and yet the readers only ever want more books to consume.
Generation (inception towards death) establishes reaction (life)...war implies a conflict among reactions aka a conflict of reason. You chose to react by opening your comment with NO, which implies a conflict of reason (yes vs no) against other. That's war.
How would one perceive the future without another suggesting speeches about it? Does ones origin speak aka does nature shape words to tell anyone being within about whats gonna happen next?
Can life discern its own death? Can life perceive its own death?
What if generation implies origin for each generated being coming to be within? What if suggested pluralism contradicts singular generation? What if you as singular could be tricked with suggested pluralism to believe in more than generation aka more than perceivable origin is offering?
What if ones will turning/spinning towards "his story" implies turning away from nature/origin/all?
This guy really knows how to smear shit all over a comment section
What will really bake your noodle is when you block him and still see his posts. I think "he" is a bot that the mods won't allow you to block.
Have blocked. Will check noodles later, thank you