what kinda god lets innocents get raped and murdered
a) Kinda/kind/kin - "class, sort, variety" implies partials within whole. Kinda (partial) God (whole) contradicts itself.
b) Let implies whole letting partials wield FREE will of choice to respond without interfering. Choice can only operate at center of balance (need/want). One needs to resist wanted temptations...
c) Innocence aka in (being within) nocere (harms way) implies being (life) within harms way (inception towards death).
Guilt/gieldan - "to pay for, debt" implies harming self by taking from another, while ignoring to be in nocere.
if your baby got...
a) Implication (if/then) implies a moving origin...got/get (taking possession of) implies ones ignorance of being (life) within a moving (inception towards death) origin.
b) Baby/babylon/babel - "confusion; disorder" + bab (gate) ilu (god) are suggested deceptions to distract one from off-spring, which implies springing of origin into being, hence coming (inception towards death) towards being (life) aka already passing through the gate of god.
still cool with god
Blaming the origin of each ones free will of choice implies blasphemy and shirking response-ability. If choice goes against origin (balance); then choice imbalances itself.
be leerily of Freudian psychology
Logy (reasoning about suggested) tempts one to ignore psyche (animation of perceivable). Logy is utilized by few to distract many from psyche.
Freud/friend vs fiend implies logy/logic/reason...few suggest freudianism to tempt many to consent to a conflict of reason (friend vs fiend).
- YHWH/jehovah/hawah - "was"
Your question about what it IS contradicts WAS. You are being tricked to wait for a suggested answer, while ignoring perceivable solution (inception towards death) for any problem (life) within.
his own religious cult
Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew)...one cannot own religion; one binding self to another implies religion. Few utilize suggestion to cultivate religious "consent" among many.
YHWH...saying this
a) Nature does not pronounce (speak; utter articulately)...ignoring this implies falling for spell-craft aka sooth-saying.
b) YHWH/jehovah/hawah - "was"....suggesting what IS tempts one to ignore what WAS perceivable.
IS implies suggested information; WAS implies perceivable inspiration...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter can't be held onto.
Religion is a delusion created by our subconscious mind in its attempt to deal with fear ~schlomo
a) "attempt to deal" implies ones temptation to consent to a suggestion by another.
b) Consenting to the suggestion of another binds one anew aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew).
c) Suggested creationism tempts one to consent aka to bind self to another aka to make a deal with a merchant of temptation.
d) CON (together; with) tempts one to ignore SCION (to know). Each one perceives all perceivable...that implies knowledge. Ignoring this for the suggestion of another implies under-standing aka SUB-CON-SCIOUS.
e) Fear implies towards an outcome; being implies in response (life) to origin (inception towards death). Few suggest terror-ism (Latin terreo; fear) to tempt many to become afraid of outcomes, while ignoring origin...aka distraction by inversion.
f) Consenting to a suggestion, hence binding self to another (religio) establishes a conflict of reason, within which both sides utilize deceptive opinions aka delusions.
a) Inspiration cannot be held onto....
b) Information requires ones consent to hold onto it, hence "bricking" ones memory with a burden.
c) Brick/break implies something set apart...flow (inception towards death) sets form (life) apart from one another. Few "inform" many by tempting consent and suggestion together within a contract aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew).
d) "not" implies suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing)...consenting to it tempts one to de-nial everything perceivable.
In short...nothing implies suggested information; everything implies perceivable inspiration.
e) IN (being within) FORM (formed by) ATION (action) + IN (being within) SPIRIT (breathing within) ATION (action).
f) Holding onto information makes adapting to inspiration harder...
a) Mason/mag - "to knead; fashion; fit"...a writer kneads, a reader is FREE to read.
b) Suggested information implies brick; ones consent implies mortar...a mason of free will utilizes these to build walls of ignorance within others.
c) Words are shaped by LETTERS, yet only if one LETS another shape words onto which meaning is added.
d) Ones consent AUTHORIZES the suggested information by another aka ones choice selects chosen ones offer.
Build/bheue - "to be, grow"...motion levels; matter builds.
solid stone
A solid (life) can only exist within fluid (inception towards death). Can a "stone" be liquefied and grown into shape? Can heat melt small stones into larger ones?
Without a master there could never be enough slaves...
If humanity is free
a) Collectivism binds each particular, hence preventing ones FREE will of choice.
b) Hue of man implies a visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) for each ray (matter) within...a setting apart aka a setting free from one another.
The suggested word "humanity" tempts one to consent to "humans collectively", hence ignoring singular nature for plural artifice. Consent prevents one from being free, because it binds one to another.
we are not free
Are you free to resist nihilism (not) and pluralism (we)?
the great pyramid specifically
This perspective prevents building, because it specifies artifice over nature.
technical know how
Technic/techno/tekhnē - "art" tempts one to ignore natural knowledge. Look into how Schauberger was being smeared as "water wizard" by the scientific community, because he told them that water cannot be measured in a lab, only felt within nature.
current residents
If one discerns to reside (life) within current (inception towards death); then one can shape anything within everything provided.
the principalities of lawlessness
Anyone who ignores natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested) establishes another as a principal (highest in rank) above one.
In other words...ignoring natural law makes many lawless and few principals over many.
attack on God
Partials cannot attack whole...only each other "in the name of" whole. Reasoning among many over suggestions by few implies such an attack...
I think a lot
LOT, noun - "that which, in human speech, is called chance, hazard, fortune"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/lot
Nature doesn't call chance; it sets choice. Many are the lot cast by few who suggest each ones free will of choice to follow orders together.
rambling about etymology
Only logy/logic/reason implies ramble/rumble...there's no conflict within etymo unless one chooses to establish one.
least person
Per sonos (by sound) implies each one within being lesser than entire sound. Shaping a conflict of reason (least vs most) tempts one to ignore that.
to get a reply
Form (life) needs to reply to flow (inception towards death); while resisting the want to reply to each other. Few designed social media to tempt many to reply to each other, while ignoring origin for medium.
least a bit happier
a) Least vs most aka happy vs sad...different brand for same conflict of reason.
b) BIT, verb - "to put a bridle upon a horse; to put the bit in the mouth"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bit
Sleight of hand: "bit and byte"... few utilize rhetoric like that for the domestication of many.
because
Being implies effect within cause...suggested "because" inverts that.
You have 0 posts score
No offer by free will of choice, yet so much offense taken by others willingly...
to contribute
a) Tribute/tribuo - "to divide" implies setting apart, which con - "together; with" contradicts.
b) That (inception towards death) which sets apart (life) implies ones tribunal aka administered justice aka natural order.
You have nothing
How could a being (perception) within everything (perceivable) have nothing (suggested)...
Everyone in here knows
Who would speak in the name of others? Alas, that's how it goes... https://genius.com/Leonard-cohen-everybody-knows-lyrics
literally changed nothing
ALL (inception towards death) changes ONE (life)...few utilize literation to tempt many into de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing). Nature doesn't shape letters, it offers each one the free will of choice to LET others shape.
I am 100% sure
If form (life) claims self as "me; myself or I"; then only by ignoring flow (inception towards death), which dissolves claims.
I guess I can't train
GUESS, verb - "to conjecture; to form an opinion without certain principles or means of knowledge; to judge at random"....guessing implies ignoring perceivable knowledge for the suggestions by others, hence being trained as a slave by a master.
What a faulty chatbot you turned out to be...made by a 3rd grader
a) Dehumanizing a child?
b) Can you show me a "chatbot" that can adapt to inspiration on the fly?
c) Does it look like as if I'm chatting aka talk idly aka being "slothful; given to rest and ease; averse to labor or employment"? Aren't my efforts contradicting that?
You're inconsequential.
a) "I am whatever you say I am...cause if I wasn't; then why would I say I am?"
b) Being implies within (life) sequence (inception towards death), while apart from one another...not CON (together; with), which implies ones CONsent to the suggested pluralism of another one...a chosen one.
- AXIS, noun - "motionless straight line around which a body rotates".
a) A straight line (inception towards death) implies motion, and a body (life) can only curve within it. If that straight line implies light (motion) establishing a spectrum (momentum), then each ray (matter) within can be bend...
b) Axis vs Allies...suggested vs perceivable...a trick to AX ALL.
expands everywhere more or less evenly...moves in addition
There cannot be expansion without motion....motion (inception towards death) adds expansion (life).
you are in the center of expansion
Indeed...center (life) of expansion (inception towards death) during motion.
speed of light is a constant
Speed implies measuring of ongoing motion by temporal matter from within. Light as constant implies before setting itself apart into a visible spectrum that can be measured.
nothing could move faster than light
Slow vs fast implies a conflict of reason aka measurement issue among rays within visible spectrum of light...not light itself.
Few trick many to measure while ignoring that each measurement aka each ones measuring mind is a fault within result.
could not lose energy
Lose energy into what and where? Energy implies all internal power aka both loss and growth in balance with each other, hence all being one in energy.
current expansion is one-way process
Current (inception towards death) expands (life) during a one-way process...internally/inherently.
And on top of that it all covered...
All reveals each one...one chooses to cover self by ignoring all (perceivable) for each other (suggested). Consenting to a suggestion puts oneself at bottom and another on top.
be completely different
A being cannot be complete...only a partial (matter) within an even (momentum) whole (motion) aka within the process of differentiation.
Few suggest progressivism (complete) to tempt many to heal the world by bringing together (tikkun olam) aka to complete that which is broken.
preserve current
Current moves...motion cannot be preserved. Prime example...currency. Many are tempted to hold onto currency; yet it miraculously flows out of their grasp...again, and again and a gain for few.
social security
SOC (together with) contradicts SE (apart from). Society only secures those few who socially distance from many.
Self-Assembling
Self implies apart from one another...assembling contradicts that, hence in this example the injection by another.
copy/paste
A tool for the many to pretend making efforts. Pretension aka professed ignorance...
you never changed...only then you change your ways
a) Contradiction
b) Only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within implying constant change.
Still not human
Human aka hue-man (color of man) implies a visible spectrum within moving light...motionless (still) and nihilism (not) contradict that.
your way to put forth useless information
a) One cannot put forth way, while way (inception towards death) puts forth one (life).
b) It's ones free will of choice to ignore perceivable inspiration (reality) for suggested information (fiction).
c) About free-will-of-choice...Post-Score (0). I didn't put anything forward aka no offers made.
so much work for -4
a) Work implies energy; being implies employment within energy aka reaction (life) employed within action (inception towards death)...working forwards tempts being to destroy itself.
b) I resist judging others, hence 0 upvotes/0 downvotes given, thereby not participating within a conflict of reason (upvote vs downvote).
c) For aka forwards implies towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring to respond to perceivable origin.
reaching no conclusion
Solution (inception towards death) implies erection (inception) and conclusion (death) of being (life). I adapt to solution...not towards conclusion.
Etymology is an interesting way to twist words
a) Way implies perceivable sound...suggested words twist ones perception if consented to.
b) Etymology aka etymos (actual) logy (reasoning about fictional). Using logic implies ignoring etymos (real; actual; perceivable) for suggested fiction.
not the desired response.
Desire implies temptation aka ones free will of choice to ignore need for want aka "a craving or yearning; an emotion directed toward attainment or possession of an object; sensual appetite, physical desire, lust".
Ones struggle to sustain life while being moved from inception towards death implies the need to resist wanted temptations.
adapt to this
This/the/seo - "to behold"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/this#etymonline_v_10764 implies being holding onto suggested information, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration, which cannot be held onto, since it moves through one.
I simply draw from all perceivable inspiration offered to each ones perception instead of holding onto any suggested information by another.
Viruses don't actually exist
a) Virus/ueis (to flow) aka viral (of nature). The flow of nature (inception towards death) implies the virus for each remedy (life) generated within.
Sleight of hand: "I got the poison, I got the remedy, I got the pressure"... https://genius.com/The-prodigy-poison-lyrics
b) "actual exist" contradicts itself...nature acts; those within re-act. Few suggest existentialism (ex-ist) to tempt many to react to the suggested instead of in response to perceivable nature.
To be implies EX within ACT. Sleight of hand: "exactamundo"
What causes...
EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...anything else is in effect.
herpes
a) Eruption from within spreading outwards. Ongoing velocity (inception towards death) generates temporary resistance (life)...whatever resistance holds onto will be forced to erupt through velocity.
In other words...the need to let go overrules the want to hold onto.
b) Why the spreading? Because nature sets apart, and so if a partial doesn't resist it mixes together with others partials, hence spreading dis-ease.
what happened to Native Americans upon contact with Europeans shows contagion
Apart implies "at ease"; mixed together implies "dis ease".
contagion
Aka together, with (con) touching (tag) action (ion)...action (inception towards death) generates reactions (life) by setting apart through anointment. Each offspring being anointed through the birth channel implies without direct touch.
Sleight of hand for touch: "reach out and touch faith"... https://genius.com/Depeche-mode-personal-jesus-lyrics
Few have only one agenda...mix many to set apart few.
enriching a story
How does a store get rich...wholesale or retail?
themes are essential
If essence implies being, then how does a store use themes to get rich of beings? Could themes be used within retail to distract beings from wholesale?
multiple levels fostering a more immersive experience that encourages personal interpretation and emotional resonance.
Like multiple levels of cornflakes within a store? Is this really done to foster/promote growth within a buyer who experiences personal interpretation and emotional resonance when looking at cornflakes?
A kid looking at cornflakes doesn't think about organized jewish crime or the sugar quay in the city of london...the theme playing in a kids mind is more likely about Tony the Tiger; right?
a) Add "of choice" to freewill and ask yourself if the origin of choice (balance) can intervene in the choices made within?
b) Few suggest "freewill" in return for consent by many. Consenting to a chosen ones suggestion tempts one to ignore ones choice.
Meanwhile in reality...IF free will of choice; THEN free within dominance; will/want within need; out of aka within, and choice within balance...only free will of choice can discern itself within origin.
Freewill as suggested aka "the capacity or ability to choose between different possible courses of action" tempts one to ignore different reactions (choice) within course (balance) of same action (motion).
a) Right/rego - "straight line" implies being (life) moved from inception towards death...that's ones right.
b) Right vs wrong implies a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent to suggested moralism by another. Reasoning against another corrupts ones discernment of self within a straight line aka ones right/rite of passage.
c) An image implies "artificial representation of natural origin". If one holds onto suggested information (artifice), while ignoring perceivable inspiration (natural), then an image aka imitation aka copy was made within ones mind/memory.
Sleight of hand: "It wasn't a lie...it was real in my imagination" ~Herman Rosenblat
Best of all tempts one to ignore BE (being) ST (standing firm) within ALL.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Joe-esposito-youre-the-best-lyrics
God was whole before partials come to be within.
Soul/sole - "one and only"...there can be only one; one for all and all for one.
Few suggest pluralism (souls) and determinism (our) to tempt ONE to consent to another ONE, hence ignoring one and only for dual-ism.
a) RE (responding to) IN (being within) CARNA (flesh aka matter) TION (action aka motion).
b) Same motion (inception towards death) for each different reincarnated matter (life).
Being free will of choice within moving knowledge (perceivable inspiration) implies having the FREE will of choice to become uncertain by suggesting certainty, hence establishing a conflict of reason (affirm vs deny).
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) doesn't require either affirmation, nor denial...understanding (suggested information) does.
One commits by consenting to suggested moralism, which then establishes a conflict of reason (right vs wrong)...within which one endlessly re-commits to a different side (or opinion) within the same conflict.
There can be only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Blondie-one-way-or-another-lyrics