That's what they tell us. Light can travel through a vacuum with nothing in it. And maybe so but what is the evidence?
So I looked up the best vacuum on planet Earth. It contains 2.5 million molecules of air per cubic cm. This is said to replicate conditions between stars. So how then can we say we've ever tested light waves going through "nothing". We haven't.
To test the validity of my suspicions I've asked the science guys on reddit if they have an answer for this. The first few responses have already been hostile and that usually indicates this is one of those issues they simply don't have a good answer for. I was very polite in my question btw, so no I didn't provoke anybody, this is all on them.
We'll see how it goes. I'm open to a good explanation of why this is a valid test, but this light has 2 million molecules to interact with ever cubic cm it propagates, so you didn't rule out matter.
a) Travel can only exist within light. Rays can travel distances among each other, while being separated from one another within the visible spectrum of light.
b) Without implies that WITHin expressing OUTwards.
Consenting to what IS suggested tempts one to ignore what WAS perceivable aka evident. What another suggests as evidence contradicts videns/videre - "to see"...the moment one consents to look at it. Why? Because consent tempts one to view perceivable (reality) through the lens of suggested (fiction).
Valid/valere/wal - "to be strong"...validation implies setting a value and holding onto it, which costs one strength, hence making one weaker in the process.