all the chemicals
ALL-CHEMI (alchemy) aka alkimia/khemeioa/gheu - "to pour" aka flowing solvent (inception towards death) pouring formed essence (life) aka a process of purification.
Few dissolve many by tricking each formed essence into a suggested cauldron called "melting pot"...
a) There can be only one cause (ongoing loss) for each effect (temporary growth) within.
b) Para/per - "forwards" implies cause (inception towards death) moving effects (death) forwards
c) Site/sitos/si-tu - "food; to settle" implies effects settling within a moving cause aka temporary food for ongoing hunger, hence the struggle of form (life) within flow (inception towards death) to starve of consumption by hunger.
This is why sleeping implies fasting, which one interrupts at break-fast...
d) Suggested theorism tempts one to consent to the-ory aka orated the-ism aka the word of another as authority over self and representative for perceivable sound of nature.
Perceivable theory/theōros aka thea (a view) horan (to see) implies ones perception within all perceivable aka being a horan within thea.
Suggestion tempts one to ignore perception.
e) Homo/homos/somo - "together with" contradicts sex/seco - "to divide aka apart from"
Being implies apart from one another aka SEX...consenting to the suggestion of another implies putting together that which nature sets apart, which makes one HOMO.
Few imply SEX; many imply HOMO...guess who's getting fucked?
tl; dr...ones ignorance of hunger permits other ones to feed of ones lack of resistance. Resisting hunger grows resistance to temptation.
we avoid...we use instead
Avoiding suggested pluralism (we) prevents singular (one) from being used by those who speak in the name of others.
language matters
Yet only motion generates matter...sound moves; words tempt one to hold onto definitions.
how quickly things became normalized
Suggested information by few became the norm as soon as many consented to it. Suggested changes after given consent are instantaneously, but few wield the power to decide (hence being chosen ones) how quickly these changes are allowed to penetrate the ignorance of many.
what to do?
Resist any suggested norm/norma/gnōmōn - "carpenters square" or one finds self enCOMPASSed within conflicts of reason.... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm#etymonline_v_9797
Above the left right paradigm
a) Paradigm aka para (beside) digm/deik (to show) implies being within sides and shown by another. Oneself implies para; others tempt one with digm/deik to ignore that.
b) Few suggesting left vs right paradigm to many are selected to be above by those willingly submitting to be below.
jew catholic paradigm
a) A jew suggests catholicism as a digm/deik to tempt the consent of gentiles.
b) Each consenting gentile chooses a suggested side to consent to (belief vs disbelief), which in return tempts one to ignore being para (in-between sides aka beside).
c) Catholic/cathode aka kata (down) hodos (way) implies gentiles (life) following a jewish suggestion down the way (inception towards death) instead of discerning for self to be an anode aka ana (up) hodos (way) aka of being a temporary growth within an ongoing loss, enabled as free will of choice to resist and thereby grow self.
the only way forward is to actually get right
Right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right#etymonline_v_15068
One needs to resist being (life) moved in a straight line (inception towards death). Nature implies ones right of passage...any and all suggested rights tempt one to ignore that.
A jew suggests progressivism (get) to tempt gentiles to "want to get", hence following the suggested carrot on a stick towards a promised/hoped for outcome...which in return tempts one to ignore perceivable origin, which moves one towards DEATH.
people not recognize that every thing status quo
Recognition aka re-cog (respond to perceivable) can be tricked into ignorance by a suggested status quo.
It is hard to see
Seeing implies ones sight within all perceivable...looking/locking at suggested tempts one to reduce/narrow/confine ones sight.
the act of imagery
An image implies a reaction to something moving, hence a picture implying a "captured moment" tempting one to ignore ongoing momentum. Movies were then suggested as "moving pictures" to mimic ongoing momentum of captured moments.
Action (inception towards death) generates reactions (life)...a reaction cannot act, but it can suggest actors/acting aka progressivism to distract ones reacting free will of choice into following along.
Act/ag - "to drive, draw out or forth, move"...that implies natural order; not each ones struggle to sustain self within it.
is it real
Reality moves; holding onto anything implies fiction.
shroud of turin
Shroud/scrud/skreu - "to cut" + Turin/tur - "water" aka form (life) cut out of flow (inception towards death) aka water above/water below etc.
good data
Data/dare/do - "to give"...nature gives balance for choice; those within choose to ignore nature for imbalance (good vs bad) aka reasoning about suggested data.
make new
Suggested "new" tempts one to ignore perceivable "now"...shaping suggestible within perceivable implies make/magic/mason/magh etc. aka make-believe.
pickle
Food implies a response to hunger...hence one has to be in the pickle of hunger first, before one can respond by eating some pickled food.
ball
A sphere can only be (life) shaped within a direct line (inception towards death)...direction (ongoing loss) swells being (temporary growth).
Prophets of Baal defeated
Prophet/phanai/bha - "to speak"...ones consent to a spoken suggestion implies the agreement to come together aka the covenant of BA'AL...a self sacrifice aka a shirking of response-ability onto another aka a self defeat.
In short...nouns tempt one to brand something within motion; while verbs express motion. Few utilize nouns to tempt many to ignore motion, by holding onto a definition/definite - "to affix".
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot affix anything...only ignore perceivable (inspiration) for holding onto suggested (information).
When one group dominates another
One (singular) group (plural)...tricking a singular to consent to suggested pluralism establishes dominance over a consenting ones choice.
all too human
A human/hue of man cannot be all, since color (hue) implies a spectrum within all light.
let us differentiate
Suggested pluralism (us) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore difference for likeness.
body of person is different from body of nations
Person implies per sonos (by sound) aka a differentiation, while people (body of nations) implies an aggregation of differences into a likeness.
taking words out of the context
Con (together; with) text/teks (to weave)...word implies letters weaved together. How could a word ever be out of context? More importantly...who LETS another weave LETTERS into words, while attaching meaning?
I don't like reductionism
- From God to Christ...a reduction?
- From one within all to "me; myself or I"...a reduction?
- From different one within same all to "like another"...a reduction?
- From being done within everything to "doing nothing"...a reduction?
a) PICK'LE, noun - "a state of condition of difficulty or disorder"
b) Ball aka BA'AL - "lord of covenant" aka COVENANT, noun - "to come together; agreement of minds; mutual consent"
Natural order sets each mind within apart from one another...few tempt many together by mutual consent to a suggestion, which establishes a division within order aka a conflict of reason (win vs lose).
Sleight of hand:
- Take me out to the ball game
- Take me out with the crowd
History is cyclical but it ultimately is linear
Nature implies linear (inception towards death)...his artificial story tempts many to reason against each other, hence ignoring linear perception for circular logic about suggestion.
prophecies of Revelation will come to pass
Coming to be (life) within passing (inception towards death) implies a revelation aka RE (reaction) VEIL (exposed to sight) ATION (action).
Action (inception towards death) exposes reactions (life) to sight (perception)...few utilize suggestion aka prophets (one who speaks for god) to distract many from perception.
They will enslave
Nah...only ones free WILL of choice can enslave itself by consent to the suggested will of another.
Slave (ones consent) selects master (another ones suggestion), while ignoring that nature (all perceivable) sets free (each ones perception).
enslave humanity
Hue of man implies the visible spectrum of all light setting apart each one ray within. If a ray consents to another rays suggestion, then a shadow is cast (ignorance) within light (discernment).
in the end
Being implies in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death)...being cannot exist IN the beginning or IN the end, only IN-between, hence separated within whole and differentiated from one another.
their rule will be short lived
a) Many willingly consent to follow the rules willed by few...towards death. It's not the rules of few that are short lived; but the many consenting to follow along who are willingly self sacrificing themselves for few.
b) Rule/regere/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule#etymonline_v_16625
There can be (life) only one rule (inception towards death)..."rules" imply suggested pluralism by few tempting each ONE of many to ignore to sustain ONEself within the only ONE rule.
Christ will put an end to it all.
Christ/christen - "to anoint" implies coming to be into life. God implies all putting each one Christ (life) from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
Will implies want...God implies need. Each anointed one within all needs to resist wanted temptation by free will of choice.
- Torah/horah - "he taught"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Torah#etymonline_v_15385
- Talmud/lamadh - "he learned"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Talmud#etymonline_v_4343
To learn implies to teach "self" and vice versa. Viewing the torah and talmud as law suggested by another tempts one to ignore that.
moses
Aka mosaic/muse - "to muzzle self; to be absorbed in thought"; which happens if one ignores perceivable for suggested.
hebrew
He-brew his-story to make/magic jew/you fall for it...
juda
Judah/yehudah - "to praise; value" aka ones consent evaluating the suggested values by another.
Being implies anointed one (christ)...ignoring this by consenting to a chosen ones suggestion makes one a traitor (judas) to self.
Traitor/tradere - "transfer over" aka ones consent to the suggestion of another, which also implies religion/religio - "to bind anew"
torah vs judaism
-ism implies a suggestion by another tempting ones consent. Consenting to any suggested -ism establishes a conflict of reason aka versus/verses/wer - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verse#etymonline_v_4738
That's how few turn many against each other within conflicts of reason.
articles
a) Aka added artifice. Judaism implies "old" testament; Christianity implies "new" testament...which one was added?
b) Talmud has mishnah (origin) and gemara (addition) to establish an ongoing conflict about addition (suggested information) while protecting origin (perceivable inspiration).
c) Gentiles ignore origin for addition, hence...
not a single one
a) There can be only one.
b) "not" implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of everything perceivable, when consenting to suggested.
c) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_in_Islamic_philosophy ...compare this to logos/logic/reason as the foundation of Christianity and notice how a so called jew isn't bound to the confines of either.
ESCAPE; verb - "free oneself from confinement"
a) Only within dominance (balance) can one be free (choice).
b) All perceivable sets each ones perception free from one another, while ones consent to suggestions of one another confines ones mind to the suggested.
c) Opposite of escape implies immerse aka "to plunge into a fluid"...being implies temporary solid (life) within ongoing fluid (inception towards death).
Being implies temporary escape (living) during ongoing immersion (dying)....few suggest escapism to tempt many to ignore self discernment within origin for wanting to be somewhere else.
save us all
a) US implies an aggregation of ones within all...few suggest US (united states) to aggregate each consenting one into a many aka collectivism.
b) Save/salvare/sol - "whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/save#etymonline_v_22794
Being implies partial within whole...few suggest escapism (save) to tempt each partial back into whole.
Salvation (inception towards death) offers a risk (life)...a risky business proposition. Merchants within sell "secure offers" to tempt ones consent to buy into it.
To truly oppose the schizophrenic empire
Schizo/schism (division) phreno (reason) aka a conflict of reason (true vs false). Reasoning implies one against another one...that's schizophrenic.
Empire/imperare aka in (being within) pere (production) implies being (life) within production (inception towards death).
Many are schizophrenic aka divided against each other within conflicts of reason by consenting to the suggestions of few. Being apart from one another implies "empirical"; being tricked together makes one "moot".
Empire (inception towards death) generates kings (life)...
a) There's only one plan/plane (inception towards death)...no matter how (NGS; Kabbalah etc.) those living within describe it to each other.
b) NEON (neo; new) GENESIS (generate; produce) EVANGEL (gospel aka good spell) ION (action).
Action generates reactions internally...few suggest creationism (new) as gospel to tempt many to ignore being partial within whole.
c) Kabbalah/qabbalah - "reception" aka recipere - "to hold; contain". To receive (suggested) tempts one to ignore given (perceivable)...which cannot be held onto.
The consent of many implies the reception (kabbalah) of few. Ones consenting choice establishes a chosen ones stranglehold.
Restore God
Applying self discernment to this implies RE (ones response) STORE (to hold onto) GOD (all). All moves each one and cannot be held onto.
Few trick many to ignore god (perceivable), thereby establishing wholesale (ones ignorance of perceivable) for retail (ones consent to suggested). Meanwhile many are storing suggested information within memory, which few regulate as currency, while natural current expires whatever is stored.
Fuck tikkun olam
Fuck/fuge - "joint"...that's why fuck is being added to everything to "heal the world by bringing together".
there is only one way to Heaven...I have no idea what you are talking about.
- Cathode aka KATA HODOS (down the way)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cathode#etymonline_v_5497
- Anode aka ANA HODOS (up the way)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/anode#etymonline_v_13486
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each wanderer (life)...YET...each wanderer chooses to go up (rise) or down (fall) the way.
Catholic/cathode tempts the wanderer to go down the way...that's what I'm talking about.
A pie cut into pieces is still part of one pie
A pie (motion) cut (momentum) into pieces (matter) implies a procession transforming a being. Such a being (life) has to struggle during procession (inception towards death) to remain a piece within a pie.
Few tempt many together to destroy each piece/peace...
jews promote multiculturalism because they want to blur the differences.
How does a "universal" church not also blur the differences by bringing the flock together (Gospel of John)?
the Church accepts differences
a) If difference accepts difference, then they equalize each other.
b) To accept or deny a suggestion establishes a conflict of reason (accept vs deny) among differences behaving alike.
c) Nature doesn't require acceptance (want) or denial (not want)...it forces adaptation (need) from each one within.
come together to worship the one
a) Before that can be suggested...the ONE sets each ONE apart from ONE another.
b) Together implies "towards getting"; being apart implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death). Being isn't about getting, but about adapting to what one already got.
c) How does nature communicate to one TO GET the apple of the tree? If the apple implies a wanted temptation, then what about needed resistance to hunger?
What if one needs to resist (hunger), while struggling with wanted temptation (apple)? That's what being apart within whole implies...
jewish globomulticulturalism...wants...to create a slave
a) If a gentile consents to a suggested -ism by a jew, then the gentile selects a jew as master, while submitting self as slave.
b) Consenting implies wanting OR not wanting suggested, while ignoring perceivable need.
What if a jew doesn't want; but simply tempts gentiles to want or not want jewish suggestions, which establishes a conflict of reason (want vs not want) among gentiles...controlled by a jew from outside?
why are CD's circular?
Empty center; noisy circumference; squaring the circle ( https://img.gvid.tv/i/2iCTP8nZ.jpg) while cutting corners.
a) Being implies center (perception) filled by silent circumference (perceivable), hence sound flowing silently through formed instruments.
b) Ignoring perceivable for suggested implies... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
- People talking without speaking
- People hearing without listening
- People writing songs that voices never shared
- No one dared
- Disturb the sound of silence
c) Being implies in-between left/right + front/back + up/down aka within a cube, while wielding an angular perspective within perceivable. Reasoning about suggested aka circular logic "cuts the corners", hence permitting others to utilize compass and square to manipulate circles and angles.
d) COM (together; with) PACT/PAG (to fasten) DISC/DIKEIN (to throw)...nature throws (inception towards death) apart (life); few within tempt many together with a pact (consent to suggested) to fasten the partials back to whole.
I think in fundamentals instead of optional...in this case the contradiction between religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) and race (Latin raddix; radius; ray). The former implies "together", while the latter implies "apart".
a) Why is there a universal church for a separated race of people?
b) Does nature make universal by putting together or set units apart from one another within whole?
c) Notice that a jew promotes tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states; united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union aka mass migration; miscegenation, melting pot; multiculturalism etc.
How is all of this not fundamental to the contradiction between "together" and "apart"?
d) What about cathode aka cata hodos (down the way) and anode aka ana hodos (up the way)? If catholic distracts from cathode by tempting believers to follow along, then where's the anode?
a man is not defiled by what enters his mouth, but by what comes out of it
What enters (perceivable sound)...what comes out (suggested words).
Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death
Aka anyone (matter) who curses (suggested words over perceivable sound) his father (motion) or mother (momentum) must be put to death.
If matter (life) ignores the momentum (inception towards death) of motion, then being puts itself to death.
the Pharisees were offended
Pharisee/perish/parash - "separate"...nature (motion) offers (momentum) separation (matter).
blind guides
Aka ones blind consent to guiding suggestions by another.
Jesus did not answer a word
Hence adapting to perceivable sound, while resisting to give consent to suggested words.
His disciples came and urged Him
Aka consenting followers tempting a leader to suggest progressivism aka slaves selecting a master.
Live with inspiration rather than suggestions.
Living WITHIN inspiration rather than holding suggested information WITHIN self.
Nature really can teach
Nature moves matter...matter adapting to motion implies learning to teach and teaching to learn. Matter consenting (student) to each other (teacher) corrupts that.
Schaubergers issues started when he tried to teach others what he learned to teach himself within nature.
many people live their lives distant from nature and burdened by suggestions
Hence facing inwards, while reflecting upon the suggested burden held within. The issue with describing this is that WORDS are that suggested burden ones inscribes into self. Doing so makes perceivable sound seem distant...background noise.
I feel like you would like
Motion equalizes (inception towards death) differences (life)...few tempt many to respond "alike".
Depeche Mode
Aka Dispatched (inception towards death) Extension (life).
they may be on the dark side
a) Choice can only exist in-between sides aka within balance...holding onto a side imbalances choice.
b) Light implies motion; dark implies matter casting shadows upon each other. In-between that operates momentum as the spectrum of visible light for each differentiated ray within.
Stripped...about peeling back the layers of people's suggested personality
The cover one tries to peel off is held within. A masons utilizes ones free will of choice to build a wall of ignorance within self by tempting one to consent to brick after brick of suggested information, hence cementing beliefs/opinions/definitions etc.
Those who try to peel back layers aka loosening bricks aka crumple the joints of masonry are facing both many fortifying that wall of ignorance from within and few holding their hands against the wailing wall, while filling the cracks/joints with wishes...these few also fertilize that wall by fucking it, hence German FUGE/fuck - "joint".
Here's the sleight of hand: The last name was originally spelled "Fucker"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family
That being said...both inception to life and life to death imply a "naked" transformation. The natural order implies that which STRIPS, while those struggling with the need to shelter within are being TEASED.
Sleight of hand: "It's always tease; tease; tease..." https://genius.com/The-clash-should-i-stay-or-should-i-go-lyrics
free of suggestions
Free to resist (need) suggestion (want). There's no "free of" only free (choice) within dominance (balance)...and dominance (inception towards death) makes free (life) fall aka "falling domino" rhetoric.
stifle the soul
Soul/sole aka "one and only"...all moves; each one within struggles with stifling (difficulty breathing), hence suffering through release.
So many of their songs are pertinent I think to what you talk about here
Soul/sole aka all is one in energy...each different song was composed within same sound.
The issue with discerning this is that others suggest pertinent/pertain aka per (forwards) tenere (to hold), hence tempting one to hold onto the temporary formed song, while ignoring the flow of ongoing sound.
no it doesn’t.
There's the brick within self...de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing)
Shut up!
A brick wall set within self as a line of defense against others coming in.
their bad behavior is intrinsically caused by their bad racial genetics, they must be removed....established the Catholic (meaning universal) Church
Universal/universus - "all together"...how does the religious (all together) not contradict the racial (apart from one another)? The genetic issues are based on mixing; right?
If someone chooses...what would happen to him after his death?
Suggested happenstance (to come by chance) tempts life to ignore choice and its origin within balance...only within balance can there be choice...not before or after.
Few suggest "before" to forward being aka progressivism, and "after" aka alternativism to distract being from "now" aka perceivable moment-um (balance) of motion for matter (choice) within.
In short...nature implies moving origin; happen tempts those within a moving origin to choose to wait for the chance of an outcome.
There is right and there is wrong.
Only within a conflict of reason aka within a consenting ones "imagination".
a) System aka syn-sta (formed together)...a suggested inversion of flow (inception towards death) setting apart form (life).
b) Energy works by action (inception towards death) setting reactions (life) apart from one another, hence establishing temporary growth within ongoing loss.
c) System (formed together) tempts one to ignore work (energy setting itself apart)
d) Only during destruction (inception towards death) can the be erection (life).
e) A moving system cannot be fixed...many within motion can be tricked by few to affix suggested system (formed together) within each ones consenting mind.