free will always needs to be there...
a) Always aka "way of all" implies the need for each one struggling with want within.
b) A being with free will of choice exists within the need of all way, hence choice needing balance.
c) Hiding "all way" underneath "always" implies occultism.
a chance for a choice
Choice needs to adapt to perceivable origin (balance); chance tempts choice to gamble on suggested outcomes, which imbalances choice.
if they dont provide
Nature provides implication (if/then)...few within pretend to provide reason (do vs don't). Implication implies balance; reason implies imbalance...if one chooses to hold onto a side aka if one gambles on chance within a conflict of winning vs loosing.
the intended subjects
Intend/intendere "stretching forwards" implies ones consent stretching towards the suggested information by another aka WANT to hold onto over NEED to let go of.
Ones choice is subjected to balance...the suggested choices by others tempt one to subject self by consenting to a side within imbalance.
the layers to the TPTB Tier System
A mason lays...to bind bricks (suggested information) and mortar (consent) together.
saying it out loud
Saying words out loud during the "sound of silence"...disturbs resonance among listeners with dissonant noise.
What these moments reveal is how these people are functional puppets.
Moment(um) is revealed by motion...a puppet is bound by strings, hence compelled to follow a pull.
They are NOT leaders of conspiracies but compliant to curated beliefs, to then influence.
a) A leader is defined by consent of followers. Suggesting who is vs isn't a leader tempts others to choose a side, thereby establishing a leader by accumulating groups one both sides.
To believe implies ones consent to a suggestion; reason implies following suggested leads into a conflict of opposing sides...both establish few leaders among many followers.
b) Being within a moving nature implies "in-fluence"...holding onto a suggested belief hastens the destruction of being. The chosen ones suggesting are selected by ones consent to become leaders of destruction.
we lose control
- We (suggested pluralism) implies ones (singular perception) rolled together (control).
- Ones growth (life) implies within all loss (inception towards death).
As long as one holds onto "we", so long one looses growth...because one ignores growing self when joining others.
to curate belief
Curate (to take care of) implies taking suggested information and carrying it as belief within self for others.
TO implies towards aka nature moving life from inception TOWARDS death...which one ignores when taking and carrying artificial beliefs.
Meredith L. Patterson = Len Sassaman
What does it mean?
Meaning implies a mercantile contract between a chosen one suggesting meaning and ones choice consenting to hold onto suggested meaning.
Mean/medius/medhyo - "middle" aka ones choice at the middle of a balance based system. Choosing to hold onto imbalances ones choice.
why is that?
Motion utilizes momentum (inception towards death) to distinguish matter (life)...that's why this and that are different from one another.
witch
Crafting suggestion (word) within perception (sound) makes one a soothsayer aka a wicker/wikker/witch, hence witchcraft.
2 out of the 3
a) Being implies one (partial) within oneness (whole)...ignoring ones perception of all perceivable for another ones suggestion implies DUAL-ism, hence establishing 2.
b) If one (1) consents to another ones (1) suggestion, then a conflict of reason is established, which tempts each consenting one (1) to fight each other from two (2) sides, while positioning the one (1) making the suggestion outside the conflict of reason...that's how 1 (being) within 2 (reason) establishes 3rd party control (suggestion) over self onto another.
c) Notice how "2 out of 3" took 1 out of the equation...that one implies oneself as differential (life) within equation (inception towards death).
hocus pocus
To conjure (command on oath) implies a jew utilizing suggested information to command gentiles to follow their given oath of consent.
That's also why ones consent to a suggestion implies religion/religio - "to bind anew", since ones consent by free will of choice implies an oath adjuring one to another, while permitting a chosen one to become ones judge; jury and executioner.
controlling the weather
Few casting forward weather aka "weather forecast"...consent by many permits control by few of weather.
always running others’ comments through chatGPT
Take any comment I responded to and try to get a response from any AI tool that resembles what I wrote...ain't gonna work. AI can't adapt to inspiration, only parse information.
linguistic deconstruction
How does ones lingua (tongue) shape a definition (definite; affixed) when it implies a fluid instrument?
just words in the end
Does sound have a beginning and end?
I don't really devote mind power to read his definitions. The odd time he actually writes a thought I will read it though.
Do you think in definitions? Who defined the words you use to think? If to define implies to AFFIX, then how could thinking SOLVE any problems?
Im not gonna lie
a) How is "not; nothing" a truth?
b) What about "I AM" is true? If one doesn't suggest "I AM" to another, then is one true or false?
c) “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am” ~John 8:58
What came before...WAS or IS?
feels like mindwashing
If nature moves; then those who follow are being washed out...
everyone is equals...everyone with a different point of view...got banned...
What if it's the opposite? What if each one is different from one another, hence each having a different point of view...unless ignored by following the same line of thinking?
all we do is point fingers and bitch about each other.
Does free-will-of-choice do that?
Free will of choice is probably algorithm, language model, it depends who is controlling the account
a) Can you show me an algorithm or language model that can adapt to perceivable inspiration over suggested information? What if only ones free will of choice can do that?
b) If FREE WILL OF CHOICE depends on who is in control, then...?
This is a world of deception.
a) How does all perceivable deceive (mislead by false appearance or statement) ones perception?
b) How does nature generate a false appearance or suggest a statement?
need to post
3 years and counting without a single post. What's the real issue here...me needing to post, or you wanting me to post?
more easily trust you
a) Trust contradicts free because trust tempts one to hold onto it.
b) Why is it called a "bank & trust"? If a jew banks and gentiles hold onto trust, then who is gaining and who is losing?
Thanks.
Many are going to lose their minds reasoning against each other over who won the election, which permits a select few to continue undisturbed.
does a monkey smearing poo on a piece of paper make that piece of paper a document?
Doc-u-ment implies mentally holding onto suggested...the monkey adapted to perceivable by utilizing it on the fly.
Change "piece of paper" with "money" and a monkey still adapts to perceivable, while most humans would dock their mind with the suggested values thereof.
a mind of one man perceives the perceivable.
THE implies suggested the-ism by another tempting ones perception to ignore all perceivable.
Only perception is not truth
Perception implies one thing within everything perceivable...others suggest nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to distract one from everything perceivable.
Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto a thesis (truth), which establishes an anti-thesis (lie), and a synthesis (conflict of reason) among all those consenting.
Witnesses recount the same event differently
Aka same event (inception towards death) different witnesses (life). The issue...counting and recounting to each other by means of suggested information. If one counts, then one becomes accountable by another, hence establishing an (((accountant))).
Perhaps from poor memory management.
a) Memory can only operate within a moving process...holding onto suggested information tempts one to ignore being moved within perceivable inspiration.
b) Consenting to suggested information permits another to manage the information held within ones mind.
an overloading of stimulus that scrambles the brain while it is storing memories.
a) Perceivable inspiration inspires resistance (life) to resist temptation (inception towards death)...that's natural stimulation.
b) Suggested information tempts one to hold onto it (overloading memory), hence burdening self aka subduing expression by scrambling repression.
c) Since memory can only operate within a moving process...it isn't a storage device (hard-drive), but a processing unit (ram). Yet, each unit wields the free will of choice to misuse memory as storage, while falling for the temptation of procession, which others exploit by suggesting progressivism to forward one... https://forward.com/
A home can be a box of office...
...if one consents to take shelter (home) within another ones suggested information (box), while ignoring that office/opus - "work; energy" sets each one within free from one another.
A box can be a home or office
Putting self into a box by consenting to a suggestion of another, permits another to decorate the box like a home, while calling it an office for one to work in and more importantly FOR others.
And office can be a home or a box
Being can only exist within office (energy)...being can be tricked to ignore self discernment by others tempting one to live in a box aka WILLING energy retention.
to fight my way out is
a) Fighting implies against others, which implies the bubble (reason aka circular logic) keeping one within conflict.
b) Few utilize rhetoric like "fighting my way out" to tempt many with suggested progressivism (towards outcome) to ignore being within perceivable origin.
Being (life) in (inception) and out (death) of origin...no fighting ones way out required, only ones struggle to sustain self within.
nothing to be learned from it
Suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo, nothing) tempts a consenting being to ignore (de-nial) how to teach self to learn and vice versa within "everything" perceivable.
Like true crime
Being implies different from one another; true implies holding onto a suggestion, crime/krei - "to sieve" implies nature law pouring out different beings.
Few suggest many to hold onto "true", while fighting their way out against "false", yet there's no way out of that conflict (reason/logic) but choosing to let go of what one chose to hold onto.
I force myself to listen
Perceivable sound forces itself through ones perception, before one can force self to listen to the suggested words of others.
Sound implies force of velocity; while listening to suggested words implies ones force of resistance being tempted by others to ignore resisting velocity.
I never even fast-forward.
You are the odd (choice) within even (balance) of motion...choosing to listen to what others are suggesting implies fast forwarding (inception towards death) your state of being (life) by ignoring to resist perceivable.
letting your mind flow freely,
Being implies free (choice) within mind (balance) of flow (motion)...consenting to listen to suggested information LETS others shape ones form.
To remain free one needs to resist the wanted temptation of letting others choose for one.
It was solved over two decades ago.
If it was solved, then why are solids remaining two decades later?
you’ll believe that conclusion
If there's an ongoing solution, then why choose to believe in conclusions (of temporary nature)?
How was I so amazingly ignorant of all this before?
a) Others suggested "amazing" information to tempt you to ignore all perceivable inspiration for. Ignorance implies ones mind within A MAZE...
b) Before implies being (life) forwarded (inception towards death), which others exploit by building mazes within ones mind to distract from.
You’ll see the very same phenomenon
Phenomenon (perceivable) and ones sight (perception) are differentiated from one another.
Who is being protected from liability? No one.
Liable/leig - "to bind". Many are liable aka religion/religio - "to bind anew" by consenting to suggestions of few, which in return protects/protegere - "forward cover".
Perceivable forwards ones perception...binding self to suggested covers ones sight.
how easily any of us can file away
Mind/memory can only file during a moving process...a process which removes anything filed within memory.
File/filum/gwhi - "a thread, string; thread of fate; cord, filament; tendon"...few tempt many to file suggested information, which permits attachment. In reality there are "no strings attached", hence each one wielding free will of choice...unless ignored.
a) Is docking ones mind (doc-u-ment) a sign of intelligence (satoshi) or does it prevent a center (nakamoto) from expressing outwards?
b) Does mind/memory operate from center (ones perception) of circumference (all perceivable)?
c) HBO aka Home Box Office aka office (motion) generating a box (momentum) for home (matter).
One Nation Under Siege
a) Nation implies "native of action" aka ones reaction within all action.
b) Few lay siege, by shaping suggestions, to tempt ones native reaction to consent.
Siege/sedere/sed - "to sit" implies a chosen one being permitted to rest (lay) sitting (siege) if ones choice consents to follow a chosen ones suggestion.
"Why are gentiles needed? "They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will SIT like an effendi and eat" ~Rabbi Ovadia Yosef
c) Consenting to a suggestion implies positioning self UNDER another, which few call intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" aka to stand under. That's why many students (slaves) stand under few teachers (masters) while believing to be intelligent.
- Evolution/evolvere - "to unroll".
Only within a line can a circle be drawn. Only form (life) within a flowing line (inception towards death) can be rolled together; unrolled or encircled.
A kike/kikel (circle) encircles others within conflicts of reason aka circular logic by rolling together (con-trol) those who consent; while natural law unrolls by separating solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) from one another.
Reason (circular logic) establishes evolution.
israel worries about attacks from Palestinian militants, while Palestinians face restrictions and military presence...
Palestinian equals "militant attackers", while israel equals "worried military presence"...aka co-pilot misguiding.
- Venetian "blinds"
- Phonetician (phonetic; sound) aka Deaf Phonetician (definition).
- Canaan aka zealot/zēlos/zeal - "to emulate; seek; desire"
Light and sound differentiate...if one tries to emulate (strive to make equal) light or sound, then one becomes blind and deaf to it.
A jew suggests words to tempt gentiles to emulate sound, which is called spell-craft, and the very screen you're looking at to blind ones sight within the visible spectrum of light, which implies alchemical projection.
Ones consent to a suggestion implies CANAAN; the description of the suggested implies PHONETICIAN, and ones ignorance of perceivable implies VENETIAN...a JEW shapes these layers to distract YOU from discerning self.
black nobility
Nobel/nobilis/gno - "to know" + Black/bhleg - "to burn"...To burn knowledge within the visible spectrum of light implies a jew tempting a gentile to FOCUS on suggested, which establishes a point of convergence aka a hearth/hertha - "a burning place".
Largely Due To...
DUE; adjective - "owed, payable as an obligation, owing by right of circumstance or condition"
Hence debt aka 2,350,299,480,989 kr (Last Updated: October 1, 2024) due to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallenberg_family
Wallenberg motto: "Esse, non Videri" (to be, not to be seen)...
Desert Fathers and Mothers
Desert; verb - "to leave; abandon"...
Why create (out of nothing)...
...to distract from transformation (within everything).
nuclear weapon
Each ones weapon of choice implies nucleus (perception) within all (perceivable). Atom/atomos - "uncut"...making a choice within balance implies cutting it however one NEEDS or WANTS it.
to protect and serve
Pro (forwards) tegere (to cover)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/protect aka serving cover (suggestion) within forwarding (perception).
For example...uniform, which implies ones form apart from one another within flow. The suggestion served for cover...uniting together. Uniform implies different from one another, while consenting to wear a uniform shapes many differences alike, which makes it harder to be distinguished from one another.
militarization
Militant - "warfare" aka conflicting passage. Each one (life) passes from inception towards death, engaging in conflict against one another aka "reason" hastens ones demise during passage.
Cops vs robbers implies the WAR which distracts one from FARE. Within war...resistance is futile; while during fare...resistance is fertile.
Follow the law tempts one to ignore that following natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) doesn't fare well for ones life...
the tiny threads that bind history together
Aka ones consent given to HIS suggested STORY become threads interwoven with all the other ones consenting.
it took an overly lengthy brawl with Keith David, Piper could put the glasses on someone else and they would immediately and unavoidably see exactly what he saw
That's the inversion...perception is unique to each one; while consenting to suggestion equalizes differences.
They live inverts this by making the conflict about suggesting each other to wear the glasses to see. In reality...reasoning over suggested prevents one from seeing perceivable. Suggested information is the looking glass blinding ones sight from perceivable inspiration.
A CARPENTER blankets (suggested) foundation (perceivable). THEY (plural) covers LIVE (singular)...if one chooses to ignore self for another.
parker
Park/parcus - "to save". Towards saving inverts ones struggle (life) during harm (inception towards death).
Try using implication (if/then) on any single sentence, while resisting reason (true vs false; good vs bad; belief vs disbelief etc.). The more you do; the easier it becomes to resist, and the more you'll see what's implied.
Notice that while you're commenting the upvote vs downvote conflict of reason is tempting participation...it's ones free will of choice to resist that temptation.
Life is bound
Animation (inception towards death) implies the boundary for life within to be free from one another.
Few exploit this by tempting many with religion/religio - "to bind anew" into consenting to a suggestion, hence holding onto it aka confining self into a cage.
How else do you explain all
All implies PLAIN for EX-pression of each one. Else/alios/allos - "other" implies ignoring all perceivable for a suggestion by another one.
In other words...seeking explanation forwards, tempts one to ignore expressing self (life) in response to forwarding plane (inception towards death).
One does not need any explanation from another...one needs to discern self as ex within plain, while resisting the temptation to WANT explanations from another.
Asking nature to explain itself is answered by nature offering aka impressing the plain for one to express self.
Impression (motion) plain (momentum) expression (matter)...
all the life forms
That implies suggested collectivism aka counting each one life-form together, in the name of "all" + suggested the-ism to establish an authority over the ones consenting.
In perceivable reality...all implies flow; each one within implies form.
Putting together each one matter cannot establish all motion, because motion generates momentum, which continuously separates matter.
BILL implies a plea or charge aka ones consent to a suggestion by another. To plea for establishes pleading against aka litigation within conflicts of reason...these are the GATES many are being herded into.
In short...to BILL opens GATES aka to plea opens conflict.
Why do few tempt many into conflicts of reason? To protect phoebē/phoibos - "bright, pure"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/phoebe from the impurities of the plebians.