a) What is one already attending (perceivable) before others can draw (suggested) ones attention from it?
b) What if few utilize suggestion to tempt many to withdraw from nature drawing a line (inception towards death)?
c) If a drawing draws towards, then why are drawings tempting one to keep looking back...like museums filled with artificial drawings to draw in generations of onlookers?
the point
a) Death. Any suggested point implies end of sentence (life)...
b) Can you give me an example of a point being made without the dialogue aka dia (two) log (logic; conflict of reason) continuing?
c) Religion; -isms; suggested information; definitions; consent; temptations...what's the point?
You wipe a stinky fish across the trail so people can't follow
a) Why would FREE will of choice suggest others to follow trails? Following implies binding self to another, hence being drawn by suggested directions...
b) People implies ones singular consent to a suggested pluralism. Nature doesn't shape people...it generates each person.
Few suggest e pluribus unum (out of many, one) to collectivize many together to establish "united states"...as opposed to nature setting units apart from one another.
c) What if ones choice to hold onto suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) by writing CAN'T represents the stinking fish rotting within self, which corrupts ones senses to blame anything from outside for the smell?
Consider being a fish (life) within an ocean (inception towards death)...a state of decomposition.
It's not helpful
Help implies support/supportare - "bring forward" aka flow (inception towards death) bringing forward form (life)....not form helping each other, while burdening self within flow.
FREE will of choice implies being FREE of burden...unless chosen to put burden onto self by helping others. Meanwhile...the fruits of ones less burdened labors, within the work of nature, permit others to draw support from.
it's not....as you think
I think about nihil-ism whenever others suggest "nothing" to me, and the implied de-nial of everything perceivable for it. Why? Because that helps me to be less ignorant than before.
All perceivable is offered to each ones perception at any moment...others utilize suggestion to draw ones attention away.
The red herring isn't the issue...taking the bait by ones free will of choice is.
Ya, to draw the attention to something....the point. You wipe a stinky fish across the trail so people can't follow. It's not helpful as u think
a) What is one already attending (perceivable) before others can draw (suggested) ones attention from it?
b) What if few utilize suggestion to tempt many to withdraw from nature drawing a line (inception towards death)?
c) If a drawing draws towards, then why are drawings tempting one to keep looking back...like museums filled with artificial drawings to draw in generations of onlookers?
a) Death. Any suggested point implies end of sentence (life)...
b) Can you give me an example of a point being made without the dialogue aka dia (two) log (logic; conflict of reason) continuing?
c) Religion; -isms; suggested information; definitions; consent; temptations...what's the point?
a) Why would FREE will of choice suggest others to follow trails? Following implies binding self to another, hence being drawn by suggested directions...
b) People implies ones singular consent to a suggested pluralism. Nature doesn't shape people...it generates each person.
Few suggest e pluribus unum (out of many, one) to collectivize many together to establish "united states"...as opposed to nature setting units apart from one another.
c) What if ones choice to hold onto suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) by writing CAN'T represents the stinking fish rotting within self, which corrupts ones senses to blame anything from outside for the smell?
Consider being a fish (life) within an ocean (inception towards death)...a state of decomposition.
Help implies support/supportare - "bring forward" aka flow (inception towards death) bringing forward form (life)....not form helping each other, while burdening self within flow.
FREE will of choice implies being FREE of burden...unless chosen to put burden onto self by helping others. Meanwhile...the fruits of ones less burdened labors, within the work of nature, permit others to draw support from.
I think about nihil-ism whenever others suggest "nothing" to me, and the implied de-nial of everything perceivable for it. Why? Because that helps me to be less ignorant than before.