Why CHOSEN ONES Are Struggling Financially
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
To believe implies holding onto...if you are a part within a singular whole, then there has to be separation by motion.
Letting go of ones belief in pluralism (we) allows singular (one) to discern self as partial within whole.
Believing what others are suggesting binds one to others, hence permitting them to do to you.
Ripples can only be made within a level (balanced) pond and balance can only exist within motion.
What if matter are the ripples within the momentum of motion?
Being can fathom...suggested nihil-ism (nihilo,nothing) tempts one to believe that being can't.
a) Native (internal) implies within foreign (external)
b) Religion/religio - "to bind anew" implies bound together, while ignoring to be singular.
c) Ones view aka visual perception is based on motion..."my" implies holding onto, while ignoring motion. One cannot take possession over self, while being moved. Others tempt one to cast "me; myself or I" upon self to become possessed by the belief of being able to hold onto self.
a) Those spiritual attacks imply reasoning against others and circular logic within self. Nature moves through one aka in (inhale) and out (exhale) aka spirit without a conflict.
b) A point implies end of sentence...nature moves ones life sentence towards point of death. Reaching towards point (death) established a conflict of reason among sentence (life), which corrupts spirit (breathing).
To believe (anything suggested) establishes a conflict of reason (want vs not want), while ignoring that "God" generates all perceivable for each ones perception.
Consenting to a suggestion by another aka "believing" contradicts the first commandment.
One cannot see ones inception or death...nor does life require to hold onto any belief to be able to discern self in-between inception and death.
Letting go of the belief one holds onto implicates motion...hence being (life) moved (inception towards death). Holding onto ignores motion, hence corrupting discernment.
Reason (did vs didn't) tempts one to ignore implication (if/then)...the former only exists in nature if oneself uses free will of choice to hold onto a side.
It's your faith that establishes the would vs wouldn't and want vs not want conflicts of reason against others and the circular logic within your mind/memory.
You think in wouldn't and want because you already gave faith to a suggestion by another. Your mind is now running in logic circles until you let go.
Creationism was suggested by other man and implies something out of nothing aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
It's jewish... "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
Material implies odd; momentum of motion implies even. Nature evens (inception towards death) odds (life).
More vs less implies you stuck within circular logic. More vs less implies an artificial conflict tempting you to ignore that nature offers all perceivable to each ones perception at this moment.
a) Being born implies a natural expression aka a revelation...not a concealment. Choosing to ignore revelation conceals ones mind.
b) Being born implies off-spring aka a setting apart from one another...others suggest pluralism (we) to tempt singular (one) to ignore self.
Only balance limits ones FREE will of choice...choosing to limit self further by consenting to suggested systems implies ignorance and denial of nature.
The FIN in finance implies "end"...being alive implies in-between beginning (inception) and end (death), hence ones struggle to grow self during loss.
A jew suggests finance to tempt gentiles to burden self with debt, while paying towards end of life...neither of which supports growth.